Administering Human Rights Legislation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR)
Advertisements

Duty of Fair Representation Duty of Fair Representation - MB Labour Relations Act s. 20 Every bargaining agent which is a party to a collective agreement,
The Ontario Human Rights Commission.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Workplace Disputes Topic 4: Human Resources Strategies in human resource management.
Human Rights Chapter 5. Human Rights Vs. Charter of Rights Human Rights protects against unfair treatment by other people or organizations. The Charter.
Human Rights Chapter 5. Human Rights Human rights include the right to receive equal treatment to be free from prohibited discrimination and harassment,
Industrial Relations in Canada Presentation at the Government-to-Government Session and Seminar for an Exchange of Information on Topics of Freedom of.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 3 Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 3 Litigation and.
The Legal Series: Employment Law I. Objectives Upon the completion of training, you will be able to: Understand the implications of Title VI Know what.
Overview of the Claims and Appeals Process February 2010.
Hampton Inn Case Study Bryan Andrews. Meeting Legal Requirements Bryan Andrews.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission.
Chapter Implementing Equal Employment Opportunity 3.
Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement June 6 - 9, 2010 Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Human Rights.
HUMAN RIGHTS Administering Human Rights Legislation.
Human Rights in Ontario. Human Rights Activity- let’s do a Human Rights Quiz… Individuals should be treated fairly as human beings regardless of the age.
Chapter 5. Key Vocabulary  Human Right  Discrimination  Human Rights Codes  Stereotyping  Prejudice  Complaint  Prima Facie  Gravamen  Respondent.
By Aidan, Lochie, Curtis. WORKPLACE DISPUTES  Negotiation: Is a method of compromising disputes within a workplace. This easygoing approach usually.
Human Rights In Canada.
Example - Human Rights Case. Case Citation Formats Criminal Law:R v. Jones prosecution v. defense Civil Law:Smith v. Jones plaintiff v. defendant Human.
Human Rights Complaints and Discrimination Prevention Canadian Human Rights Commission January 2005.
ENFORCING HUMAN RIGHTS CLN4U. Human Rights The Charter applies to governments and their agencies, while the actions of individuals are governed by various.
April 2, 2007 Ontario Human Rights Commission Introduction to the Enhanced Complaints Process (ECP) – Pilot.
Human Rights. Human rights include the right to receive equal treatment to be free from prohibited discrimination and harassment, and to have equal access.
NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 4 INVESTIGATION.
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES EXPEDITED CASE PROCESSING PURSUANT TO PUBLIC ACT
CHAPTER THREE Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
1 Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.Schwind 7th Canadian Edition. 4 F O U R Meeting Legal Requirements C H A P T.
Photo: © Tourism Toronto, 2003 EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE FOR CHUBB WEBCAST ON JUNE 8, 2010 Jeffrey E. Goodman - Partner.
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
FILING AND DECIDING A HUMAN RIGHTS CASE PART A: DEFINITIONS PART A: DEFINITIONS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL PROCESS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL.
 Human rights: the right to receive equal treatment, to be free from prohibited discrimination and harassment, and to have access to places, services.
1 GAEP Study Tour An Overview of the Ombudsman for Workplace Safety May 16, 2007.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Ontario Human Rights Commission.  The Ontario Human Rights Commission is the agency directly responsible for administering and enforcing the Human Rights.
+ Human Rights Complaints. + Filing a Complaint A lawyer is not needed to file a complaint. Complaints can be withdrawn at any point. Complainant – person.
What Is Employment? Compare employee with agent and independent contractor Differences: Control test - Degree of control exercised over an employee is.
Administering Human Rights Legislation Law 12 – Chapter 5.
EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS AWARENESS SLO: I can understand the terms and conditions associated with fair workplace practices.
The Plan… 20 Sept 2013  Finish your Charter of Rights Case Brief  Print & Hand in Be sure to hand in your self assessment…  Start Chapter 5: Human Rights.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission Complaints Process CLN4U.
AN OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) MECHANISMS BY MUENI MUTUNGA.
Many slides Copyright © 2008 by Delmar Learning
Mason County School District
Chapter 3 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Enforcing Human Rights
Certificate in Human Resource Management Employment Law
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 Civil Cases
SCSEP Grievance Policies & Procedures
Labour Law.
The Legal Framework of HRM
Ontario Human Rights Commission
Chapter 3 Alternative, Judicial, and Online Dispute Resolution
Human Rights.
Review for Unit 2 Test Created by Educational Technology Network
Enforcing Human Rights
Human Rights Complaints and Discrimination Prevention Canadian Human Rights Commission January 2005.
Who Wants to Be a Millionaire -
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Human Rights in Canada Filing a Human Rights Complaint
Human Rights.
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT
Administering Human Rights Legislation
The Halton District School Board expects that everyone associated with the Board has a right to be treated with respect and dignity and to teach, learn.
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT
Presentation transcript:

Administering Human Rights Legislation

Who settles concerns? Human rights commission is a group of people appointed by the federal or provincial government to administer and enforce various human rights codes and make decisions about complaints Most complaints settled by commissions Few go to adjudicator, board of inquiry, or human rights tribunal Some provinces go directly to board or tribunal

To Avoid a HR Complaint, an employer must prove: 1. The job requirement is a ‘bona-fide occupational requirement’- It is necessary for the safety, efficiency or economy of the company 2. The person from a protected group cannot be accommodated without undue hardship to the employer

Filing a Human Rights Complaint: Inquiries are completely confidential Inquiries must follow procedures outlined in HR Code of each province (package) It is up to the accuser to prove your case In Ontario, a complaint must be filed w/in 6 months of the last incident involving the alleged discrimination

Complainant: Respondent: Person making an allegation of discrimination Must complete a package of info to complete (describe incident) Respondent: Person or organization that the complainant alleges to have discriminated against him or her

For Employment Discrimination Complainant Must Establish.... a) Prima Facie Case - legally convincing unless disproved by contrary evidence During hiring as an example, The Complainant Must Prove: 1. You were qualified for the particular employment 2. You were not hired 3. Someone no better qualified than you was subsequently hired – someone who lacked the distinguishing feature that represents the gravamen b) Gravamen (main grievance) - the grievance, or main cause of an accusation

Remember! An employer is allowed to justify their choices by: - Identifying a Bona Fide Occupational Requirement - Providing accommodation until Undue Hardship

Human Rights Commission Complaint Process 1. Complaint  you submit your complaint and it is reviewed by the commission 2. Response  if accepted, a copy of your complaint is sent to the respondent for reply 3. Reply  a copy of the respondent’s reply to your complaint is sent to you

4. Mediation  an attempt is made to work with you and the respondent to settle the complaint 5. Investigation  where mediation is not successful, an investigation into your complaint may take place. 6. Report  a report of the investigation is sent to you and the respondent

7. Conciliation  if evidence supports your complaint, conciliation is attempted 8. No settlement  if the complaint is not settled, it is reported to the chief commissioner 9. Hearing your complaint may be heard by an adjudicator, human rights tribunal, or board of inquiry

Role Of HR Commission HR Commission’s have a duty to offer a response to all complaints that are properly filed. Complainants are informed by the commission if their complain is intra vires to the provincial code. The commission then serves the respondent with the complaint, and formally responds to the allegations of discrimination.

Dismissing a complaint Human rights commission may dismiss complaint Some reasons include: Interest of individual will not be served No merit No significant issues Dealt with already Improper motives (bad faith) Time limit varies from province to province – 1 year is common

Methods of Resolving HR Complaints a) Mediation Intervention btwn conflicting parties that promotes compromise or settlement of the dispute b) Investigation services If no settlement is reached in mediation – formal investigation by human rights officer (gather information, inspecting documents, records, interviewing witnesses Or

It is more forceful, as they try to force a decision C) Conciliation Bring conflicting parties to a resolution through an arbitrator to resolve their differences It is more forceful, as they try to force a decision

Hearing a case If no resolution is reached, case can go to adjudicator, board of inquiry, or human rights tribunal

Dismissing a HR Complaint: Main Reasons for Commission’s Dismissal: Complaint is trivial, frivolous or made in bad faith Complaint is not w/in the jurisdiction of the commission Complaint is filed more than 6 months from incident A complainant has 15 days to appeal decision to formally request a new trial; a commission can turn down the appeal.

Available Remedies: Order the respondent to stop the discriminatory practice. Compel the respondent to issue a letter of apology Order the respondent to pay the complainant for mental anguish and/or for any losses suffered in pay or benefits Compel the employer to give the complainant back his or her job or grant the denied promotion Require the organization to provide human rights & anti- discriminatory training for all employees + change policies to become less discriminatory.