Conclusion & Discussion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
If You Build It Will They Come? Associations Between Birds and Vegetation Structure During Ten Years After Thinning Sveta Yegorova, Drs. Matt Betts, Joan.
Advertisements

Assessing Constructed Forested Wetland Development Using Successional (Performance) Trajectories Susan M. Carstenn Hawaii Pacific University Kaneohe, Hawaii.
Structure and Composition of Edges in Boreal Forest Qinglin Li.
Mark Wilson,Tom Gittings, Josephine Pithon, John O’Halloran, Tom C. Kelly, Paul Giller Bird Assemblages of Irish Plantation Forestry: Effects of Growth.
State Wildlife Grants (SWG) were created with the intent of protecting and managing wildlife species in greatest conservation need. With 80 percent of.
Gembloux Agricultural University Ministry of Walloon Region.
Diets of two human-subsidized predators, common raven and glaucous gull, on Alaska’s Coastal Plain Abby N. Powell, U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Cooperative.
Predictive Model of Mountain Goat Summer Habitat Suitability in Glacier National Park, Montana, USA Don White, Jr. 1 and Steve Gniadek 2 1 University of.
Thesis  Erin Harrington  Advisors  Bobbi Low  Phil Myers.
. 4. Result:  78 woody species were recorded in the fragments.  The most frequent species were Croton macrostachyus Hochst. ex Delile and Syzygium guineense.
Questions How do different methods of calculating LAI compare? Does varying Leaf mass per area (LMA) with height affect LAI estimates? LAI can be calculated.
Aedes albopictus in Bermuda: seasonality, spatial correlates and density dependence David Kendell 1, Camilo Khatchikian 2, Laran Kaplan 2 and Todd Livdahl.
Evaluating survey methods for the Yellow Rail: comparison of human surveys and autonomous recording units Kiel Drake and Danica Hogan.
Geographic Information Systems Applications in Natural Resource Management Chapter 12 Synthesis of Techniques Applied to Advanced Topics Michael G. Wing.
Tom Gittings 1, George Smith 2, Mark Wilson 1, Laura French 2, Anne Oxbrough 1, Saoirse O’Donoghue 2, Josephine Pithon 1, Vicki O’Donnell 3, Anne-Marie.
Ecological determinants of nest-site selection by a keystone engineer: the red-naped sapsucker Chris Floyd, Jessica Lowney, and Evan Weiher Department.
Precipitation Effects on Tree Ring Width for Ulmus americana L
Effect of a Tropical Storm in a Urban Secondary Forest in Humacao, Puerto Rico Cintrón Sol Taína 1,, Carmen Zayas 1, Natalia Piñeiro 1, Joel Soto 2 y Denny.
Oyster Reefs as a Restoration Tool: Do Reef Structure, Physicochemical Conditions, and Wave Energy Environment Affect Reef Sustainability? Sandra M. Casas.
MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS OF WILDLIFE BIOLOGY DATA Bret A. Collier 1 and T. Wayne Schwertner 2 1 Institute of Renewable Natural Resources, Texas A&M University,
Moose(Alces alces gigas) browse and habitat resources and resource use in response to post-fire succession on Kanuti National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska ____________________________________________________.
Tree distribution patterns in the southwest Jemez Mountains Kamal Humagain 1, Robert Cox 1, and James Cain 2 1 Texas Tech University 2 New Mexico State.
Project 2: Geospatial and Statistical Basis for Mine Soil Sampling for C Sequestration Accounting. Objectives: To determine the horizontal and vertical.
Delaney Forestry Services Matt Delaney Albany, Oregon
Current Conditions of Camp Sacajawea Group 2 Matthew Dicks Daniel Kaminski Clarissa Spicer Antoinette Spitz.
Composition of the Songbird Community at the DePauw Nature Park and Arboretum Libby Allard, V. Artman, K. Reed, K. Koehler, Department of Biology, DePauw.
Elmwood School Forest Property Recommendations Presented By Forestry and Wildlife Class
Patterns of Event Causality Suggest More Effective Corrective Actions Abstract: The Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) has used a consistent.
Regeneration of Natural Pasture in Enclosures for Parthenium Weed Management in the Rangeland of Jigjiga, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia B Y Lisanework.
The Effect of Four Early-Successional Pennsylvania Tree Species on Soil Bacterial Communities SMITH, G. and K. KLEINER, Dept. of Biological Sciences, York.
Birds on the Edge Forest edge effects on bird assemblage size and composition in the Chuckanut Mountains Drew Schwitters Department of Environmental Sciences,
Potential Biodiversity and Environmental Impacts of Commercial Willow SRC Production in the UK. Rebecca L. Rowe 1, Nathaniel R. Street 1, Michael E. Hanley.
What Does it Mean When >80 Equals Spotted Owl Habitat?
Forest Floor Invasion Results BIO 205F, 2003 Objectives: 1.To determine whether plant species from the natural forest floor will reestablish if the invading.
1 Action Items for Management Board Challenges for Implementation of Recommendations.
U.S. Department of the Interior - U.S. Geological SurveyUpper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center Abstract : Declining amphibian populations and the.
Using Lidar to Identify and Measure Forest Gaps on the William B. Bankhead National Forest, Alabama Jeffrey Stephens 1, Dr. Luben Dimov 1, Dr. Wubishet.
Impact of Native Tree Species Foliage on Aquatic Invertebrate Communities Branden Birth Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania.
Impacts of Forest Types on Formicadae Biodiversity: Native vs Alien Species A Comparison of Secondary Forest versus Eucalyptus Forest in Southern Brazil.
Species richness The number of species is an important biological variable that scientists try to quantify.
Fleshy Fruit Production in Mature and Recently Harvested Upland & Cove Hardwood Forest of the Southern Appalachians.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
References. Methods Results We conducted avian point counts at pre-established points (created by USFWS within the Whittlsey Creek Watershed in the
Effects of Prairie Management on Soil Characteristics and Bees METHODS RESULTS  Soil Characteristics Analysis of variance (ANOVA) suggests that there.
Temporal and Spatial Influences of Juglands nigra and Gleditsia triacanthos on Soil Indicators in a Southern Appalachian Silvopasture Study Area By Scott.
Does fertilization influence herbivory during tropical forest restoration? Emma Rosenfield (‘16), Arianna Porter (‘15), Julia Rogers (‘16), Omari Matthew.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Matthew Casali and Robert Fahey
Science 1 biodiversity.
CARBON LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF BIOENERGY CROPS PLANTED IN THE MARGINAL SITES IN LOWER MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL VALLEY K.C. Dipesh1, Michael.
Evolution, Biodiversity, & Population Ecology
Comparison of Two Artificial Cover Object Grid Densities for Sampling Terrestrial Salamanders JohnRyan A. Polascik and Brian P. Mangan King’s College,
Foresters for the Birds
Deer Management, Forest Management & Cooperatives
Birds provide insight for stewardship of urban riparian areas
College of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.
Biodiversity Variety of life
Biodiversity Variety of life
Charlotte Levy1 & Eloise Brown2
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Golden-cheeked Warbler Population Viability and Habitat Suitability
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests is shown for the southwestern United States. Red dots indicate location of.
List of Treatments in 2015 Injection Study
Estimating Population Size
Species Diversity Comparison North and South Slopes
Zeima Kassahun and Heidi Renninger Results and Discussion
A Comparison of Forest Biodiversity Metrics Using Field Measurements and Aircraft Remote Sensing Kaitlyn Baillargeon Scott Ollinger,
Rodrigo Santos, Sarah Santos and Fernando Ascensão
Evaluating the Ability to Derive Estimates of Biodiversity from Remote Sensing Kaitlyn Baillargeon Scott Ollinger, Andrew Ouimette,
Presentation transcript:

Conclusion & Discussion Avian Use of a Bottomland Hardwood Afforestation Site in the Red River Alluvial Valley Colby W. Sharp1 and Heidi L. Adams2 1School of Biological Sciences, Louisiana Tech University; 2School of Agricultural Sciences and Forestry, Louisiana Tech University Abstract Bottomland hardwood forests cover about 2.8 hectares of the original 10 million hectares that once existed in the southeastern United States. These losses have led to an emphasis on afforestation of retired agricultural land. It is important evaluate changes in wildlife communities as these afforested stands mature. For instance, topographic variation within them can lead to certain tree species becoming better established in certain areas compared to others, leading to an afforested stand with forest types of differing species. Previous research at an 809-ha afforested bottomland hardwood stand near Coushatta, Louisiana identified seven forest types. We conducted point count surveys at 28 point locations evenly distributed among the forest types at the afforested stand six times during the avian breeding (i.e., June-August, twice/month), recording detected species and its distance from point. We used DISTANCE 7.0 to estimate detection function and avian density within each forest types. Avian diversity was calculated for each forest type using Shannon's Diversity Index. Preliminary results for bird density in each forest types ranged from 1.698 bird/ha in willow oak (Quercus phellos) to 26.181 birds/ha in sweet pecan (Carya illinoinensis). Shannon’s Diversity Indices for 2016 diversity analysis ranged from 2.354 (H max = 2.565) in sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) to 2.591 (H max = 2.833) in sweet pecan, with diversity analysis in 2017 showing changes with sweet pecan increasing by 0.149 and sugarberry persimmon at 2.399. Results of study will aid in developing forest management recommendations to promote breeding bird use of the afforested stand Study Site and Methods The study site is an 809-ha afforested bottomland hardwood stand near Coushatta, LA that is owned by NRG Energy, Inc (Fig. 1). It was planted with bottomland hardwoods during the winters of 1994-95 and 95-96 by US Fish and Wildlife Service. We conducted point count surveys at 28 randomly selected point that were evenly distributed among the study site’s 7 forest types,previously identified by Strozier (2015), 6 times during the avian breeding (i.e., June-August 2016 and 2017, twice/month). We recorded species and distance from the observer for all individual birds detected. We used DISTANCE 7.0 to estimate avian density within each of the forest types and compared them using the 95% confidence intervals. Avian diversity was calculated for each forest types using Shannon's Diversity Index (H’) and Equitability (J’). Figure 4. A yellow-breasted chat fledgling detected during point counts at the afforested bottomland hardwood study site. Conclusion & Discussion Based on preliminary results, our data indicates that density of breeding birds at our study site vary with forest type, but it is evident that a year effect could be present due to the 2017 avian densities being more similar than 2016 avian densities. For instance in 2016 sweet pecan and sweetgum (similarity group a) have a higher density than willow oak (group c). From these results we could infer that bird species are less attracted to the willow oak forest type. These difference seem to be less prevalent in 2017 avian density, shown by the lack of distinct groupings (due to overlapping error bars).Weather patterns could allow for better breeding conditions in some forest types, thus showing this change. Diversity and equitability appear to be similar across forest types for both the 2016 and 2017 breeding season. However, with respect to both density and diversity estimates further data collection is require in order to account for variation among these variable from year to year. We plan to conduct 1 more data collection during 2018 breeding seasons. In future data collection seasons we will conduct vegetative sampling to determine vegetation density and diversity within each of the forest types. This is important because understory vegetation can add additional cover and food sources for woodland birds. After the 2018 breeding season, we will compare our bird diversity to avian species characteristic of mature bottomland hardwood stands in the southeastern United States. This species list will be based on a review from published literature. Species in mature bottomland hardwood stand and 25 year old bottomland hardwood stand should be 75 to 85% similar if the 25 year old stand is going to be optimal habitat for woodland birds (Nuttle and Burger 2005). Results form this study will aid in the creation of assessment techniques for afforested bottomland hardwood to be used in the future, and determining if forest management recommendations are necessary. Results We detected 297 bird observations representing 34 different species during point counts during the 2016 breeding season. Species that we most frequently detected included indigo buntings, northern cardinals, tufted titmice, and yellow-breasted chats (Fig. 4). Preliminary results for woodland bird density for the 2016 breeding season in each forest types, ranged from 1.698 birds/ha in willow oak to 26.181 in sweet pecan (Fig. 2). During the 2017 breeding season 503 bird observations representing 36 different species during point count on the research site. Results from the 2017 density analysis ranged from 4.879 birds/ha in sweetgum to 20.405 birds/ha in sugar-persimmon (Fig. 3). In regards to diversity, Shannon’s Diversity Indices for the 2016 breeding season ranged from 2.320 in sweetgum to 2.636 in sweet pecan (Table 1). Diversity indices for the 2017 breeding season ranged from 2.399 in sugarberry-persimmon to 2.740 in sweet pecan (Table 2), making this forest type the highest in diversity over the two year data collection. 2016 Season 2017 Season Introduction Bottomland hardwood forests cover about 2.8 ha of the original 10 million ha that once existed in the southeastern United States. This loss led to an emphasis on afforestation of retired agricultural land. As these afforested stands mature, topographic variation can cause certain tree species to become more established in certain areas compared to others. This can lead to an afforested stand with forest types with areas of differing tree species. Our objective is to evaluate how these differing forest types influence the density and diversity of breeding woodland birds in a Louisiana afforested bottomland hardwood forest. Acknowledgments Special thanks to Mr. Gerald Nichols and NRG Energy Inc. for access to their property for data collection, and the Louisiana Tech School of Agricultural Sciences and Forestry for use of equipment and facilities. This research is being financially supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, McIntire-Stennis project LAZ00081(accession number 1006968). Figure 2. 2016 avian density (birds/ha) analysis in each of the 7 different forest types at the afforested bottomland hardwood study site. Figure 3. 2017 avian density (birds/ha) analysis in each of the 7 different forest types at the afforested bottomland hardwood study site. Table 1. 2016 avian diversity and equitability data analysis in each of the 7 different forest types at the afforested bottomland hardwood study site. Table 2. 2017 avian diversity and equitability analysis in each of the 7 different forest types at the afforested bottomland hardwood study site. References Nuttle, T. and L. W. Burger. 2005. Birds of bottomland hardwood reforestation sites: patterns of occurrence and response to vegetation structure. Pages 353–371 in L. H. Fredrickson, S. L. King, and R. M. Kaminski, editors. Ecology and management of bottomland hardwood systems: the state of our understanding. University of Missouri-Columbia, Gaylord Memorial Laboratory Special Publication Number 10, Puxico, Missouri, USA. Strozier, S. T. 2015. Evaluation of planting techniques, stand structure, and composition of a bottomland hardwood afforestation in the Red River Alluvial Valley. M.S. Thesis. Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, USA. 2016 Season 2017 Season Figure 1. The location of the 809-ha afforested bottomland hardwood forest owned by NRG Electric, Inc. in Desoto Parish, Louisiana. Also included are point locations where avian point count surveys will be conducted June-August, 2016-2018.