Perkins IV Secondary Accountability

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Advertisements

Perkins IV Secondary Accountability Data Dan Smith Marlys Bucher “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Career and Technical Education in Minnesota Presentation to the Governor’s Workforce Development Council March 13, 2008 Minnesota Perkins State Career.
CTE Accountability and Planning Perkins Planning Meeting March 2013 MSDE/DCCR Accountability Team Pat Mikos, Program Manager George Comegys, CTE Specialist.
Perkins Accountability I: Secondary and Postsecondary Overview September 23, 2014.
Massachusetts Department of Education EDUCATOR DATABASE Informational Sessions Overview: September 2005 Web:
PERKINS NEW COORDINATOR TRAINING SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 PERKINS 101.
11/15/07 1 Career-Technical Education Accountability Ohio Department of Education Sharon Enright Dave Ozvat Erica Cheyney Ohio School Improvement Institute.
Career and Technical Education End-of-Year CTE Data Collection Data Accountability Video Training Session.
Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
CTE Special Populations Coordinators
Kathy WilkinsLes Janis Montana University SystemGeorgia State University NACTEI Conference May 12, 2011 The proposed cut of 13 percent from Perkins Title.
Career and Technical Education Carl D Perkins Act of 2006.
CARL D. PERKINS SPRING INFORMATIONAL SESSION for NEW PERKINS COORDINATORS TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2003 OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM NEW PERKINS COORDINATORS.
Perkins Data Collection Help Link - MDE Marlys J. Bucher, Ph.D. Coordinator Secondary Perkins CTE Assessment and Evaluation Specialist
SD Secondary Career & Technical Education (CTE) Perkins Updates – July 2013.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education Division of Academic and Technical Education Progress of the State Perkins Accountability.
Click to edit Master title style 1 What Data? California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Dr. W. Charles Wiseley, “Chuck” Career Technical Education.
Perkins IV Secondary Accountability Data September 8, 2015 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
111 TECH PREP ACCOUNTABILITY IN PERKINS IV National Association of Tech Prep Leadership September 30, 2009 NCPN October 2, 2009.
Perkins Technical Assistance Webinar January 15, 2014 Oregon Department of Education | Department of Community Colleges and Workforce Development.
Data in Perspective: A view of national, state, and local data collection, compilations and systems Presented by : Beth Hartness Program Specialist, National.
Perkins Accountability I: Secondary and Postsecondary Overview September 20, 2012.
The Career and Technical Education (CTE) Master Schedule Collection, Student Record Collections, CTE Annual Performance Report and Data Analysis Report.
Perkins Accountability I: Secondary and Postsecondary Overview September 2, 2015.
Perkins Accountability II – Postsecondary Webinar September 9, 2015.
Dale Gruis Ag Ed Consultant Iowa Dept. of Education
Marlys Bucher Dan Smith. Secondary Consortium Data Reports 1S1 Academic Attainment in Reading/Language Arts 1S2 Academic Attainment in Mathematics 2S1.
Perkins IV – What ’ s In Store? Mimi Lufkin NAPE/Women Work National Conference April 6, 2008 National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity.
Perkins IV Secondary Accountability Data Michelle Kamenov Kari-Ann Ediger “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Key Considerations in Collecting Student Follow-up Data NACTEI May 15, 2012 Portland, OR Promoting Rigorous Career and Technical Education Programs of.
Using Perkins Data To Improve CTE Sharon Enright, Ph.D. Ohio Department of Education Office of Career-Technical Education 1 NCLA Conference October 1,
Perkins 101 Dale Gruis, Consultant Iowa Dept. of Education
Convention Center B213 2:15-3:15 Perkins Implementation Update Changes That Will Impact Your Program.
CTE by the Numbers CTE data entry, verification and reporting Counselor & Administrator Conference Dover, Delaware January 26, 2016.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Core Indicator Cohort Selection Carl D Perkins (Perkins IV) Career and Technical Education Act Dr. W. Charles Wiseley.
Career and Technical Education End-of-Year CTE Data Collection Data Accountability Video Training Session.
Federal - Perkins IV Programs of Study (Pathways) Secondary/Postsecondary Links Improving Student Performance –Academic and Technical Skills –Graduation/Completion.
Kathy WilkinsLes Janis MontanaGeorgia NACTEI Conference May 12-14, 2009 High demand/wage/skill occupations (High-DWS) are mentioned 23 times in the Perkins.
Section 31a and Accountability
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Accountability Overview Measures and Results
Perkins IV Data and Accountability
Perkins 101 Review Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 Purpose and Expectations Act aims to increase the quality of.
Perkins Accountability ~ Secondary 2016 CTE Fall Webinar Series
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Postsecondary Accountability CTE Fall Webinar Series September 7, 2017
Negotiating Your Local Targets and Understanding Perkins Core Indicator Annual and Trend Reports November 9, 2017.
MINNESOTA PERKINS CTE Fall Webinar Series August 30, 2018
Teacher Student Data Link (TSDL)
Teacher Student Data Link (TSDL)
Secondary Perkins Data
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
using test & assessment data to support teaching and learning
REPORTS CTE 103.
Perkins IV Postsecondary Accountability
CTE Data and Accountability Overview
CTE Data and Accountability Overview
Session two: Grant Guidelines Webinar/meeting
TRANSITIONS January 2019.
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
A Quick Carl D. Perkins Act Update
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Perkins IV Secondary Accountability September 20, 2018 Perkins IV Secondary Accountability

Agenda We will review: Timelines Data sources Performance Indicator definitions Summary reports that are produced and available to you Target setting 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Timelines

Timelines State/Local Negotiation Process for FY2019 Target Target Time Frame Accountability Webinars September 2018 All P-file data submitted to MDE Mid-September 2018 Performance Indicator data available December 2018 Distribute proposed targets to consortium Consortium Response due January 2019 Initial State Response Local Negotiations completed January/February 2019 Evaluation of 2018 Performance January 2019 (Trend & Status reports) Consortium Leaders prepare CP grants January-March Plan Review Cycle April-May 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Data Sources

Everything Begins With… Table C: Program, Course Codes, Teacher Licensure information https://education.mn.gov/MDE/dse/cte/progApp/ And, the Program Approval Database which lists all the 6-digit Program Codes and 2-digit Course Codes for all your districts’ Approved Programs https://education.mn.gov/MDE/dse/cte/progApp/ 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Carl D. Perkins Record Layout 2018 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

P-file Data submitted to MDE Data Sources Data Submission: 327 secondary districts, who implement approved programs taught by licensed CTE instructors, annually submit their P-file (Perkins) data to Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) via a secure web-based system. P-file Data submitted to MDE MARSS Migrant Flag SLEDS MCA/ MTAS Data are Aggregated and Verified: Final P-File data are aggregated into the Carl Perkins Database and are verified using the Minnesota Automated Reporting Student System (MARSS) (e.g., using MARSS-ID#, Name, Birthdate, Gender). Perkins data are linked with additional sources: MARSS: student demographics and completion MCA/MTAS: 1S1 & 1S2 Achievement outcomes SLEDS: 5S1 placement/postsecondary enrollment outcomes Migrant Flag 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Performance Indicators

Perkins IV Definitions Participant Any student who successfully completes 100 hours or more in approved CTE courses, within one career field Concentrator Any student who successfully completes 240 hours or more in approved CTE courses, within one career field NOTE: It is the “successful completion” piece that makes it so critical to closely examine the “Count Proficient” within the Carl Perkins Submission Status Report. 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

CTE Career Wheel 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Target Setting

State and Local Target Negotiations Federal/State Negotiations State/Local Consortia Negotiations Evaluation of State Performance Improvement Plans Evaluation of Local Performance Improvement Plans With the transition to Perkins V, unless we receive other information, the expectation for 2019 targets is that we will leave them at your 2018 level/that you continue to meet the targets currently in place. There will be no 2019 local target negotiation process unless you want to request a target higher than your 2018 target level for any accountability indicator.

Timelines State/Local Negotiation Process for FY2019 Target Target Time Frame Accountability Webinars September 2018 All P-file data submitted to MDE Mid-September 2018 Performance Indicator data available December 2018 Distribute proposed targets to consortium Consortium Response due January 2019 Initial State Response Local Negotiations completed January/February 2019 Evaluation of 2018 Performance January 2019 (Trend & Status reports) Consortium Leaders prepare CP grants January-March Plan Review Cycle April-May 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Evaluation of Annual Local Performance No action At or above target Negotiated Level Report Required Between 90% and 99% 90% of Negotiated Level Improvement Plan Below 90% of target 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Improvement Plans and Reports (Local Plan) A consortium whose actual performance does not meet the negotiated target (90-99%) for any indicator is required to write an Improvement Report. If a consortium’s actual performance falls below 90 percent of the negotiated target, the consortium must write both an Improvement Report and an Improvement Plan. 90 to 99% of Negotiated Target Below 90% of Negotiated Target Write Improvement Report Improvement Report Components: The number and name of the indicator that was not met The actual performance percentage General strategies planned to improve performance Comments or context for actual performance Write Improvement Report and Improvement Plan Improvement Plan Components: Identification of any special populations where gaps in performance exist Contextual factors contributing to existing performance gaps Resources needed Timeline Person(s) responsible Description of how progress will be documented 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Perkins IV Accountability Indicators: How do I know if our consortium met the target? Where can I find that information? System Office staff distribute reports to Consortia Leaders early in the calendar year (for the most recent reporting year): Annual Core Indicator Report Three-Year Trend Performance Report

Annual Core Indicator Report and Three-Year Trend Performance Report

Summary reports that are produced and available to you!

Secondary Performance Indicator Reports 1S1 Academic Attainment in Reading/Language Arts 1S2 Academic Attainment in Mathematics 2S1 Technical Skill Attainment (TSA) 3S1 School Completion 4S1 Student Graduation Rates (NCLB 4-year Graduation Rate) 5S1 Placement (SLEDS Match) 6S1 Nontraditional Participation 6S2 Nontraditional Completion 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Secondary Reports Summary Reports Reports available by: state, consortium, district, school Career Cluster Report by the 16 career clusters CTE Concentrators only Program Report Report includes the 6 digit program codes CTE Participants only (duplicate students across programs) Course Report 6 + 2 digit course codes CTE Participants only (duplicate students across courses) Duplicated and Unduplicated counts are specified in each report 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Access: MDE Secure Reports http://w20.education.state.mn.us/MDEAnalytics/DataSecure.jsp All Authorized Users (people who submit the P-file to MDE) have access to the P-file Submission Status. It’s automatic. All Consortium Leaders can request/receive access to the Performance Indicator Reports. It’s So COOL! There is even an “all” button where you can download Performance Indicators for all your districts -at once. …working on a way to give access to H.S. Principals & Perkins Coordinators.  12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Snapshot Report Principals can request access for their district Data are displayed by District only All Performance Indicators are displayed on one page Three year trend data are displayed Consortium and State rate are both shown in comparison to the district’s performance 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Waterline Report Consortium Leaders have access to their consortium only The performance outcomes for each district in the consortium is displayed within one chart, by indicator Districts above the “Waterline” are performing at or above the Consortium’s outcome Districts below the “Waterline” are performing below the Consortium’s outcome Those consistently below the “Waterline” may need additional support 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Perkins V Accountability Opportunities Summary reports that are produced and available to you Perkins V Accountability Opportunities

Perkins V: Accountability Opportunities With the transition from Perkins IV to Perkins V, there will be the need for consortia leadership and stakeholder input on a variety of topics, including core accountability measure development. The timeline for this work is emerging as federal guidance and additional details continue to be released and shared forward with states. 12/2/2018 Leading for educational excellence and equity, every day for every one. | education.state.mn.us

Thank you! Kari-Ann Ediger Kari-Ann.Ediger@state.mn.us 651-582-8269 12/2/2018