Assessment Leadership Day Continuous Program Improvement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Understanding Middle States Expectations for Assessment
Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
Faculty Senate Overview of Faculty Excellence Pilot Study May 6, 2014.
Medical Education Grand Rounds Self-Study Overview Middle States Commission on Higher Education January 13, 2010.
SEM Planning Model.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
What is Middle States, Anyway? Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated by Joe Marchetti, Gene.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
STUDENT-CENTERED VALUE RESEARCH Assessment activities of the UNT Libraries Sian Brannon, Ph.D. Kathleen Murray, Ph.D. UNT Libraries May 2, 2013.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Ann Campion Riley University of Missouri
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
DEEP DIVING INTO THE REVISED MSCHE STANDARDS FOR RE-ACCREDITATION ​ Brigitte Valesey, Ph.D. Widener University ​ Drexel Assessment Conference ​ September.
College Success Program John Cowles, Ph.D. Dean of Student Success and Retention Grand Rapids Community College Grand Rapids, Michigan.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Planning in the Context of Budget Reduction
Chapter 9: Key Performance Indicators, Plan Evaluation, & Modification
Academic Program Review
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Development of Key Performance Indicators: Lebanese Case Study
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
The Role of Students in Program and Course Evaluation
Ellie A. Fogarty, Ed.D. Vice President
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Master Academic Planning
Campaign Fundamentals
Master Academic Planning
Center For Faculty Excellence: Leadership and Faculty Development
Program Planning Or…Why does the university want to torture me and make me do more work? Brandon White Associate Professor, Biological.
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Tennessee Board of Regents Strategic Plan
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Assessment Committee Meeting Continuous Program Improvement
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Sam Houston State University
Board of Trustees Update
Middle States Commission on Higher Education
Reaccreditation and Planning: NEASC
The City University of New York Performance Management Process (PMP)
Cañada College Full-Time Equity Director Position
The Heart of Student Success
What to do with your data?
AQIP Accreditation Systems Appraisal 2010
February 21-22, 2018.
Academic Program Review Comprehensive Report
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
Sam Houston State University
Florida State University PhD Completion Project Phases I & II
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Fort Valley State University
Presented by Planning & Research
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
A Workshop for New Academic Administrators
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Leadership Day Continuous Program Improvement Planning, Analytics, and Decision Support (PADS) Planning and Assessment 1-17-2018

Agenda Role of Academic Quality in Vision for NYIT Middle States Expectation for Institutional Improvement Continuous Program Improvement (CPI) Framework Draft Academic CPI Template Draft Administrative CPI Template Proposed Process and Timeline

Role of Academic Quality Draft vision statement (Sep 2017): NYIT will become an engaged and supportive academic community devoted to ethical, highly impactful teaching and learning that is technology-rich, intellectually rigorous, and future-focused. Academic quality is critical to this vision.

Role of Academic Quality Strategy for achieving our vision presented by Hank Foley (Dec 2017): Be the 3rd best private institution of higher education in metropolitan New York by 2027

Role of Academic Quality Wall Street Journal and Times Higher Education Rankings: Rankings focused on student success and learning – based on a survey of 200,000 current students Sufficient resources? Students engaged and challenged? Good academic reputation? Student outcomes post-graduation? NYIT strengths: Diversity; Student Interaction/ Engagement NYIT’s most notable challenge: Reputation

Role of Academic Quality How do you change reputation in higher education? ACADEMIC QUALITY Is this the work of just the academic program? No… INSTITUTIONAL EFFORT

MSCHE Expectations – Institutional Improvement: Show institutional health and improvement Student achievement Financial standing Linkage between the two Report on major initiatives What’s the intended improvement? What can data tell you about impact on improvement? How is this linked to your resources? All of this done in the context of institutional mission.

Annual Institutional Updates The 8 Year New Process Annual Institutional Updates •Financial and Student Achievement data elements •Responses to recommendations (if needed) Opportunities/Input for Institutional Improvement Midpoint Review •Cumulative Peer Review of AIU data •Feedback from the Commission Self-Study Evaluation •Campus engagement in self-study process that culminates with an onsite team visit by peer evaluators

Rethinking assessment: “Student Achievement-” Academic Progress Mandatory Retention Rates IPEDS Graduation Rates Mean Time to Graduation Assessment of Learning Report – can exclude from review % Credits Completed/Attempted % Pell % Minority % Developmental % 1st Generation % Non-Traditional % Part-Time Self-Identified

Rethinking assessment: “Student Achievement-” Post-Institutional Mandatory Loan Default Rate Loan Repayment Rate Review – can exclude from review 1st time Pass Rates on Licensure Exams Graduate Survey Satisfaction Results Career Placement Rates “First Destination” Survey Placement Rates Transfer Rates Self-Identified

Rethinking assessment: Financial Health Indicators- Documents All Most Recent Audited Financials IPEDS Finance Data Title IV Compliance Audits Catalog/URL Most Recent USDE Composite Score If Applicable Bond Rating for New Debt issued Financial Audit from Parent Corporation

Continuous Program Improvement (CIP) Process: At the heart of NYIT’s new framework – using data of all kinds to: Demonstrate the health of the school/department Student achievement (e.g., persistence, student learning) Financial metrics (e.g., expenditures and revenues, enrollment) Achievement of mission and goals – aspirational, strategic goals Inform improvement initiatives Inform resource allocation decisions

Dean’s data set (internal) Student credit hours FTE faculty FTE staff Total revenue and expense, total margin Three year enrollment trend. DFW (drop-failure-withdrawal)rates Three-year trend data: retention rate, graduation rate, and mean time to graduation. School/college level graduation students survey (GSS) and NSSE Others (requested by deans)

Dean’s data set (outside-environment) Market data Benchmarking to peer programs Student/alumni/employer/client satisfaction data Others?

Academic CPI Template: Department Overview – history, points of pride, mission, etc. Department/Program Profile and Trend Analysis – Dean’s data set Department/Program Goal Achievement – evidence of meeting goals, curriculum review, scholarly productivity, faculty service Evidence of Student Learning and Achievement Evaluation of Student Satisfaction with Academic Programs

Academic CPI Template: Evaluation of Student Service Areas Impacting Student Life Cycle Improvement Initiatives Update on Past Improvement Initiatives Self-Reported Resource Allocation Analysis Department/Program Strengths and Concerns Future Department/Program Goals and Recommendations

Administrative CPI Template: Similar to Academic CIP with some additions: Staffing Structure Organizational Chart Key Performance Indicators

New Framework (CPI) Implementation Discussion: Timeline: a 4-year cycle with annual update to track its implementation? Responsibilities & collaborations: School/department/division own it, and PADS facilitates the multi-year planning and assessment with data, and data analysis. Tech platform to facilitate? Presentation to a review team (who should be) Initiate process Academic Year 2018-2019

School/department/division CPI presentations Students’ learning improvement with evidence. Students’ achievement improvement with evidence Teaching effectiveness improvement Scholarship productivity improvements Curriculum improvement with evidence of updated syllabi Alumni and current student recommendations of NYIT Other evidence of improvement (e.g., rankings)…