UITF MPS system requirements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

Overview of SMTF RF Systems Brian Chase. Overview Scope of RF Systems RF & LLRF Collaboration LLRF Specifications for SMTF Progress So Far Status of progress.
RF Safety Discussion Derun Li/Bob Rimmer Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SRF Institute, JLab.
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan RF System The AREAL RF system will consist of 3 RF stations: Each RF station has a 1 klystron, and HV modulator,
HPS MPS OVERVIEW Dan Sexton & the Safety Systems Group JLAB 1.
Simultaneous Four-Hall Operation for 12 GeV CEBAF Reza Kazimi November 2012.
SNS Integrated Control System SNS Machine Protection System EPICS Workshop April 27, 2005 Coles Sibley.
Scientific Goals: V. Litvinenko’s RHIC retreat talk Commissioning Goals: I. Pinayev presentation last week Run 14 Goals: Complete assembly of 112 MHz SCRF.
ION CHAMBER INTRODUCTION TRANSITION - HANDOFF FROM EESIC SESSION 1 21 SLIDES TOTAL OCT
Bubble Chamber Planning Meeting 04 September
Electronic Cross-talk & Ground Loop Elimination in Injector Riad Suleiman Center for Injectors and Sources.
Discussion on Studies at Test Stands Roger Ruber Uppsala University.
MICE CM February 08Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Hardware Status o Introduction o Preliminary list o Plan for action o Summary Jean-Sebastien.
Tuning an Accelerator for 1 MW C. Peters WAO 12 August 8 th, 2012.
Injector Setup/Mini-phase  Description of injector setup  sources of drift  Mini-phase procedure for injector  Checking the rest of the machine. Stephen.
High Current Run I 2015 Feb 3 22:45 to Feb. 4 23:00 High Current Run II 2015 Feb 5 12:15 to Feb. 6 13:00 Current ~ 20 mA Approx. 40 trips, i.e. fast shutter.
Stephen Schuh Vacuum Controls SCR and 16 November 2005 Vacuum Controls System Concept Review and Preliminary Design Review.
G2p/GEp Beamline Tim Michalski Project Lead. Beamline Overview Slow Raster Tungsten Calorimeter Upside Down Girder (correctors, BCM, superharp) FZ1 Magnet.
SNS Integrated Control System Timing Clients at SNS DH Thompson Epics Spring 2003.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS BLM System Overview Detectors, Measurements, Simulations Alexander Zhukov Saeed Assadi SNS/ORNL.
MP Questions for LE eCooling. Why talk about this now? Is there additional equipment needed, not yet considered? (nor costed) Interfaces to systems that.
Machine Protection at the 1MW CEBAF Electron Accelerator and Free Electron Laser Facility Kelly Mahoney Presented at the Workshop for.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SCL Vacuum Control System Upgrade Derrick Williams
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Kirk Davis.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 UITF Progress meeting Re-scoping UITF Matt Poelker November 14, 2015.
Current NML Layout.  Overall length of building is 72M 3 cryomodules with feed and end cans ~40M Not enough room for both photoinjector and downstream.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 Alex Bogacz UITF Beam-line Modeling (2) UITF Mtg. JLAB,
Estimates of required MPS reaction time In the merger (at the centers of respective 20deg dipoles and in between 2 lenses) rms R=250 um In the
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 UITF Progress meeting UITF Project Status Meeting Matt Poelker April 12, 2016.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 UITF Progress meeting UITF Internal Personnel Safety Review UITF Overview and Introduction Matt Poelker.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Low Level RF Status and Development Activities at the Spallation Neutron Source Mark Crofford.
Frequency Control through Pulse Width Modulation for NRF Cavities. As example at FLASH RF GUN Sven Pfeiffer for the LLRF team LLRF Workshop 2015 Shanghai,
UITF Laser and Gun High Voltage John Hansknecht UITF Operational Review March 18, 2016.
NMLTA Protection System Update -Loss Monitors- Arden Warner September 2 nd, 2009.
Failure Analysis Tools at DESY. M. Bieler, T. Lensch, M. Werner, DESY ARW 2013, Melbourne,
Polarized Injector & Upgrade Schedule QWeak Collaboration Meeting November 06, 2009 P. Adderley, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 UITF Progress meeting UITF Project Status Meeting Matt Poelker July 12, 2016.
ESS LLRF and Beam Interaction
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan
Operations Machine Simulator.
RF Systems and Controls for the LERF CM Tests
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
UITF MPS system requirements
RF interlocks for higher intensities (LMC 15 June)
Beam Loss Monitors and Ion Chambers for protecting Hall Equipment Tommy Michaelides (SSG) Stay Treat 2016.
XFEL Vacuum System Commissioning
Operational Experience - Field Emission
Notes on Machine Protection for long bunch trains
Jefferson Lab Low Level RF Controls
CSNS Accelerator Control and Beam Instrumentation JIN Dapeng, XU Taoguang … June 9, 2015
UITF Project Status Meeting
CEBAF Injector Overview
UITF beamline installation
UITF Operational Review
LLRF and Beam-based Longitudinal Feedback Readiness
Upgraded Injector Test Facility
Hall C Hot Check Out Process
04-05/08/2010 End of physics at ~11:00 after 18.5 hours ~120 nb-1.
Upgraded Injector Test Facility
Fault Recovery Time for C100 Modules Spring ‘16
RF Local Protection System
Uses of UITF 10 MeV spin-polarized electron accelerator, beam current up to 100 uA M. Poelker December 12, 2018.
Installation and Beam Test Schedule
John Hansknecht Electron Gun Group
Upgraded Injector Test Facility
UITF Conduct of Operations Review
UITF beamline installation
RF introduction Anders Sunesson RF group leader
UITF Conduct of Operations Review
LCLS Machine Protection System
Presentation transcript:

UITF MPS system requirements MPS = a combination of hardware configuration and CEBAF-style FSD protection FSD trips will mostly turn OFF the laser, vacuum excursions will shutter laser and close valves GUN HV will not trip often

UITF MPS – what will it protect? Protect the ¼ CM Protect against beam loss and burn-through, maintain UHV Protect viewers (this is a software interlock – Not FSD) Protect magnets, ensure proper field for beam transport: comparator interlock, water flow or klixon interlocks Protect RF beamline components: vacuum and water flow interlocks Protect cups, apertures and dumps: water flow interlocks Protect HDIce (mostly, this means putting the beam where it is supposed to go, protect against mis-steered beam)

Hardware configuration Valves OPEN only when vacuum good Current limiting resistors in series with magnets Water flow interlocks at cups, dumps and apertures Window comparators on dipoles and gun HV Viewers inserted only when laser in pulsed-mode Water flow interlocks at buncher and chopper cavities, RF can be applied to chopper and buncher only when vacuum reads “good” Helium liquid level interlocked to klystron high power RF

FSD Input Signals FSD trips will shutter laser and sometimes close all valves BLMs will shutter laser: CEBAF-style BLM modules (x2) LLRF control boards with CEBAF-style FSD signals Vacuum FSD signals from ¼ CM. Helium liquid level interlocked to klystron control panel All beamline ion pumps ganged together, close laser shutter and close all pneumatic valves when pressure exceeds a setpoint Window comparators using 16 bit ADC cards designed by EES HDice “off target” detector (qty 1, suspect it will look like a BLM)

Similar to CEBAF SSG BLM chassis, x2 units New LLRF control boards Cryo and SRF signals from ¼ CM Window comparators using 16 bit ADC cards designed by EES FSD signals summed using VME boards with 12 input channels each FSD signals transmitted via fiber at 5 MHz SCAM to create low duty factor modes CEBAF style pockel cell tune mode generator: RTP cell with <250ns response time, backed by shutter that closes 5-10ms later

MPS timing requirements All inputs should be processed to create an output within 10 micro-seconds (that’s are goal, what we would work towards)

MPS system communications All inputs are visible to EPICS All outputs are shown on EPICS First fault detection is desirable and the first fault should be visible on EPICS EPICS should have the ability to mask or clear any input