Regulation of transcription: from lambda to eukaryotes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Control of Expression In Bacteria –Part 1
Advertisements

CTCF: the protein, the binding partners, the binding sites and their chromatin loops by Sjoerd Johannes Bastiaan Holwerda, and Wouter de Laat Philosophical.
Binocular rivalry Colin W.G. Clifford Current Biology Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages R1022-R1023 (December 2009) DOI: /j.cub Copyright ©
The magic of the sugar code Hans-Joachim Gabius Trends in Biochemical Sciences Volume 40, Issue 7, (July 2015) DOI: /j.tibs Copyright.
Advances in shaking technologies Wolf Klöckner, Jochen Büchs Trends in Biotechnology Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012) DOI: /j.tibtech
How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Luiz Pessoa Trends in Cognitive Sciences Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009) DOI: /j.tics
Control of Gene Expression Year 13 Biology. Exceptions to the usual Protein Synthesis Some viruses contain RNA and no DNA. RNA is therefore replicated.
Nucleocapsid Phosphorylation and RNA Helicase DDX1 Recruitment Enables Coronavirus Transition from Discontinuous to Continuous Transcription Chia-Hsin.
Two views of brain function Marcus E. Raichle Trends in Cognitive Sciences Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010) DOI: /j.tics
Healthy clocks, healthy body, healthy mind Akhilesh B. Reddy, John S. O’Neill Trends in Cell Biology Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010) DOI:
KRAS: feeding pancreatic cancer proliferation Kirsten L. Bryant, Joseph D. Mancias, Alec C. Kimmelman, Channing J. Der Trends in Biochemical Sciences Volume.
Recognizing Protein-Ligand Binding Sites by Global Structural Alignment and Local Geometry Refinement Ambrish Roy, Yang Zhang Structure Volume 20, Issue.

Mastering the Chemical Language of Bacteria
Genome Organization: Cohesin on the Move
RNA-Directed DNA Methylation: Getting a Grip on Mechanism
Transcriptional Memory: Staying in the Loop
Warren S. Pear, M. Celeste Simon  Cancer Cell 
Tolloid gets Sizzled Competing with Chordin
CoSMoS Unravels Mysteries of Transcription Initiation
Grounded: Transcriptional Pausing in Naive mESCs
Mutant p53 gain of function: The NF-Y connection
Approaching TERRA Firma: Genomic Functions of Telomeric Noncoding RNA
ZNF217/ZFP217 Meets Chromatin and RNA
Erratum: NAD+ metabolism in health and disease
A Big Step for SIRT7, One Giant Leap for Sirtuins… in Cancer
Loading Rho to Terminate Transcription
Scientific rigor through videogames
Volume 98, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Adding Specificity to Artificial Transcription Activators
Finding the Missing Code of RNA Recognition by PUF Proteins
Multiple Motifs Compete for EB-Dependent Microtubule Plus End Binding
Dale Dorsett, Lena Ström  Current Biology 
Coordinate Transcriptional Regulation by ERG and Androgen Receptor in Fusion- Positive Prostate Cancers  Yu Chen, Charles L. Sawyers  Cancer Cell  Volume.
Alexander Rich: In Memoriam
Codon Clarity or Conundrum?
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages 1-4 (July 1999)
Establishment of Italian national DNA database and the central laboratory: Some aspects  R. Biondo, F. De Stefano  Forensic Science International: Genetics.
Multiple Motifs Compete for EB-Dependent Microtubule Plus End Binding
Evolution of Transcription Networks — Lessons from Yeasts
Joseph Bondy-Denomy, Alan R. Davidson  Trends in Microbiology 
Beyond Energy Homeostasis: the Expanding Role of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase in Regulating Metabolism  David Carling, Benoit Viollet  Cell Metabolism 
Sensing temperature Current Biology
Gene Regulation: Stable Noise
Small Molecules, Big Effects: A Role for Chromatin-Localized Metabolite Biosynthesis in Gene Regulation  Bryan A. Gibson, W. Lee Kraus  Molecular Cell 
Lambda's Switch: Lessons from a Module Swap
Need for Speed: Mechanical Regulation of a Replicative Helicase
Proteins Kinases: Chromatin-Associated Enzymes?
Easy Stress Relief by EZH2
Destabilizing Heterochromatin: Does Swi6/HP1 Make the Choice?
A Movie of RNA Polymerase II Transcription
FOXO transcription factors
Prokaryotic (Bacterial) Gene Regulation
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Long Noncoding RNAs in Cell-Fate Programming and Reprogramming
Genome Organization: Cohesin on the Move
The ribosome revealed Trends in Biochemical Sciences
Poised RNA Polymerase II Gives Pause for Thought
Stéphan Hardivillé, Gerald W. Hart  Cell Metabolism 
Allen R. Buskirk, David R. Liu  Chemistry & Biology 
Proteinase K challenged by a novel protease
Theory in Biology: Figure 1 or Figure 7?
The 3D Genome in Transcriptional Regulation and Pluripotency
A New Cohesive Team to Mediate DNA Looping
Imposing specificity by localization: mechanism and evolvability
Fiona H. Marshall  Trends in Biochemical Sciences 
A Golden Age for Working with Public Proteomics Data
Making a Division Apparatus on Mitochondria
Marking Emerging β- and γδ-Selected T Cells
The Tail That Wags the Dog: How the Disordered C-Terminal Domain Controls the Transcriptional Activities of the p53 Tumor-Suppressor Protein  Oleg Laptenko,
Presentation transcript:

Regulation of transcription: from lambda to eukaryotes Mark Ptashne  Trends in Biochemical Sciences  Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 275-279 (June 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.04.003 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Cooperative binding of proteins to DNA. Simple binding reactions such as those shown here underlie many aspects of gene regulation and regulation of other biologically important processes. (a) The binding sites for proteins 1 and 2 are adjacent on DNA. When protein 1 or 2 is present alone, a series of snapshots would show the corresponding DNA site to be occupied only rarely – say 1% of the time. But when both proteins are present, the DNA sites are occupied more often – say 99% of the time. The effect only requires that the proteins touch one another, and weakly at that. A ‘helping’ (cooperative) effect of even tenfold, which requires only a one or two kcal of interaction energy, can be biologically crucial. Cooperativity (recruitment) requires that the interacting proteins be present below a specified level: an increase in the concentration of protein 1 or 2 would enable that protein to bind substantially without help from its partner. If protein 2 was RNA polymerase, protein 1 would be called an ‘activator’ of transcription. There are many variations and elaborations of the reaction depicted in (a). Sometimes many proteins interact and bind cooperatively, and sometimes the sites to which they bind are widely separated as in (b). In this case, the DNA must loop to accommodate the binding reaction. (c) DNA looping caused by cooperative binding of proteins 1 and 2 brings together sites 3 and 4, and this enables the more weakly binding proteins 3 and 4 to bind cooperatively. Examples of each of these reactions are found in lambda. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 2005 30, 275-279DOI: (10.1016/j.tibs.2005.04.003) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions