Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From 1997-2002 (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FIRE AND BIOFUEL CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANNUAL MEAN AEROSOL MASS CONCENTRATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES ROKJIN J. PARK, DANIEL J. JACOB, JENNIFER A. LOGAN AGU FALL.
Advertisements

1 Dust Impacts on the 20% Worst Visibility Days Vic Etyemezian, David Dubois, Mark Green, and Jin Xu.
Regional Air Quality Modeling Patrick Barickman, Air Quality Modeler Tyler Cruickshank, Meteorologist/Modeler Utah Department of Environmental Quality.
1 The Asian Aerosol Contribution to North American PM Pollution: Recognizing Asian Transport Composition and Concentration Modeling Regional Aerosol Burdens.
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
Worst 20% Hazes Across the Country Based on IMPROVE Speciation Data by Marc Pitchford August 2001.
1 Estimates of worst 20% natural condition deciview: application of the new IMPROVE algorithm and a revised statistical approach Rodger Ames, CIRA
Radiative Effects of Atmospheric Aerosols and Regional Haze Jin Xu DAS Science Talk February 17, 2004.
IMPROVE Report 2006 L. Debell, K. Gebhart, B. Schichtel and W. Malm.
Update on Natural Levels II Technical Review Committee By Marc Pitchford for the June 12 th RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis Conference Call.
BACKGROUND AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin Park Motivated by EPA Regional Haze Rule Quantifying uncontrollable.
Tribal Causes of Haze Representativeness Assessment Phase I Mark Green, Alissa Smiley, and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Go After the Causes What are the principal causes of haze in each area? WRAP emissions WRAP modeling WRAP monitoring (causes of haze) Other studies How.
Reason for Doing Cluster Analysis Identify similar and dissimilar aerosol monitoring sites so that we can test the ability of the Causes of Haze Assessment.
Colorado Plateau Sulfate Episode Worst 20% at 5 sites: INGA, BRCA, MEVE, WEMI & SAPE Best 20% at GICL, SACR, CHIR, SIAN, GUMO, TONT, and most California.
Sources and Processes Affecting the Chemical and Physical Properties of Denver Aerosol during DISCOVER-AQ FRAPPÉ/DISCOVER-AQ Science Team Meeting 4 May.
Causes of Haze Assessment Mark Green, Dave DuBois, Jin Xiu, and Dan Freeman Desert Research Institute Marc Pitchford, NOAA and WRAP Monitoring Forum Chair.
Characterization of Aerosol Physical, Optical and Chemical Properties During the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational Study (BRAVO) Jenny.
Aerosol Extinction Assessment and Impact on Regional Haze Rule Implementation Douglas Lowenthal Desert Research Institute Pat Ryan Sonoma Technology, Inc.
Evolving Understanding of Pollutant Transport from Asia to North America Richard (Tony) VanCuren Research Division, California Air Resources Board Department.
TSS Data Preparation Update WRAP TSS Project Team Meeting Ft. Collins, CO March 28-31, 2006.
WRAP COHA Update Seattle, WA May 25, 2006 Jin Xu.
Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
1 Options for Estimating Natural Background Visibility in the VISTAS Region Ivar Tombach with benefit of material prepared by Jim Boylan and Daniel Jacob.
Causes of Haze Assessment Update for Fire Emissions Joint Forum -12/9/04 Meeting Marc Pitchford.
Influence of the Asian Dust to the Air Quality in US During the spring season, the desert regions in Mongolia and China, especially Gobi desert in Northwest.
Draft, 2 June NATURAL HAZE LEVELS SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 1. Project Overview Ivar Tombach Regional Haze Data Analysis Workshop 8 June 2005.
AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Regional Air Quality Modeling Results for Elemental and Organic Carbon John Vimont, National Park Service WRAP Fire, Carbon, and Dust Workshop Sacramento,
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study:  Understand the long-range, trans-boundary transport of visibility-reducing.
New Mexico Pilot Study: Salt Creek and White Mountain Wilderness areas Prepared by: Ilias Kavouras, Vic Etyemezian, Jin Xu, Dave DuBois, Marc Pitchford.
IMPROVE Algorithm for Estimating Light Extinction Draft Recommendations to the IMPROVE Steering Committee.
Sea Salt comes from the Sea Shore, as She Should. But how can Soil Dust come from the South?
Global and Local Dust over North America Initial Assessment by a Virtual Community on Dust Coordinated by R.
Update on Assessment of the Major Causes of Dust-Resultant Haze in the WRAP Vic Etyemezian, Jin Xu, Dave Dubois, and Mark Green.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
Causes of Haze Assessment Update for the Haze Attribution Forum Meeting By Marc Pitchford 9/24/04.
Causes of Dust. Data Analysis Ilias Kavouras, Vic Etyemezian, Dave DuBois, Mark Green, Marc Pitchford, Jin Xu Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert.
Ambient Monitoring Data Summary: Dust WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Properties of Particulate Matter
CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report IWG Meeting Portland, Oregon August 29-31, 2006.
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Reasonable Progress Demonstrations
Asian Dust Episode (4/26/2001)
Review upcoming Teach-Ins and participation in WRAP Regional Haze Planning Work Group - Jay Baker and Tina Suarez-Murias.
The average PM2.5 mass concentration based on IMPROVE data available from September 2000 to December 2002 is 3.3 mg/m3 The highest occurrence of the 20%
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Reasonable Progress: Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area
Asian Dust Episode (4/16/2001)
Proposed PM NAAQS and Regional Haze
Evaluating Revised Tracking Metric for Regional Haze Planning
Case Study for Forest Fire Episode
Tom Moore (WESTAR and WRAP) and Pat Brewer (NPS ARD)
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Regional Haze Rule: Natural Conditions Concepts & Approaches
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC)
New CoHA Product Access Page & Representativeness Analysis
Paved and Unpaved Road Dust
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Sulfate Contributions to Regional Haze in the WRAP Region
Attribution of Haze Project Update
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From 1997-2002 (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean percentage contribution of dust (fine soil + coarse mass) to light extinction for all sampling days Percentage of sampling days when aerosol light extinction was dominated by dust (meaning its contribution was larger than any of the other four major catogories - SO4, NO3, EC, OC) Fraction of the 20% worst days when dust dominated aerosol light extinction for each month Contribution of CM to dust light extinction during the 20% worst days when dust dominated aerosol light extinction for each month

In most of the western United States, the mean contribution of dust to light extinction is in the range of ~ 10 – 30%

The percentage of sampling days when dust dominated aerosol light extinction is as high as ~ 50 – 70% in some of the sites. “Dominated” means that it caused more light extinction than any of the other major categories -- SO4, NOx, EC, and OC.

Fraction of the 20% Worst Days When Dust Dominated Aerosol Light Extinction for Each Month

Lots of dusty days in the western US during the spring and summer

Contribution of CM to Dust Light Extinction During the 20% Worst Days When Dust Dominated Aerosol Light Extinction for Each Month

Coarse mass usually contributes more than about 80-90% to the dust light extinction. But during the month of April and May, especially along the west coast in April, the contribution of CM is relatively lower, suggesting possible influence of long-range transported dust