The More-On Principle: Why farmer use inputs like they do

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Agricultural and Natural Resources Introduction to Production and Resource Use FREC 150 Dr. Steven E. Hastings.
Advertisements

Climate Change and Farm Level Adaptation Strategies in the Midwestern U.S. Rebecca A. Pfeifer Ag Consultant, New Palestine, IN Otto Doering Department.
PRODUCTION ECONOMICS TOOLS FOR FARM MANAGEMENT AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
Impacts of Climate Change on Corn and Soybean Yields in China Jintao Xu With Xiaoguang Chen and Shuai Chen June 2014.
Corn Seeding Densities and Transgenic Traits: Economics and Farmer Behavior Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Wisconsin Crop Management.
Increasing No-Till Soybean Productivity with Cover Crops and/or Gypsum Randall Reeder Ext. Agricultural Engineer (retired) Food, Agr. and Biological Engineering.
2014 Illinois Farm Economics Summit The Profitability of Illinois Agriculture: Back to the Future? 2015 Crop and Income Outlook: Conserve Cash Now Gary.
SEED QUALITY OF ORGANIC-CERTIFIED CORN HYBRIDS Allen Geyer 1, Peter Thomison 1 *, Deborah Stinner 2, Joseph G. Lauer 4, Leslie Freehill 3, Lori Abendroth.
Lecture #9. Review Homework Set #7 Continue Production Economic Theory: product-product case.
Estimating your Cost of Production for Growing Irrigated Corn Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics UW-Madison and UW-Extension Hancock ARS.
Organic Agriculture …… Comparison to the Conventional Agriculture: Still Viable? Craig Chase, Field Specialist Farm & Ag Business Management.
The “New” Economics of Crop Production in 2008 Paul D. Mitchell Assistant Professor Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison.
How Do We Continue to Grow Quality Potatoes With Skyrocketing Input Costs? UW Extension & WPVGA Grower Conference February 7, 2007 Paul D. Mitchell
Farming a Flat Function AAE 320. Overview of Talk “Farming a Flat Function” What is it? (Give Examples) What does it mean? (Implications) In my opinion,
New Decision-Making Tool to Estimate the Net Benefit of Bt Corn in Wisconsin Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Chapter Sixteen: Markets Without Power. Perfect Competition.
MAKING PRECISION AGRICULTURE PAY ! Frannie Rogers BIOEN/SOIL 4213.
G RAIN M ARKETS AND C OST OF P RODUCTION Paul D. Mitchell Associate Professor of Agricultural & Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison
Revised Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn Carrie Laboski, Larry Bundy, Todd Andraski UW-Madison, Soil Science.
Nutrient content of dairy slurry Slurry nutrient variability and nutrient prices Slurry data from UW soils lab (Marshfield, WI) First year available 715.
2014 Illinois Farm Economics Summit The Profitability of Illinois Agriculture: Back to the Future? Outlook For Corn and Soybeans Darrel Good
1 Economic Analysis of Control Options for the Western Corn Rootworm Soybean Variant in Southern Wisconsin Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics.
Areawide Suppression of European Corn Borer with Bt Corn Reaps Benefits for Non- Bt Growers Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Central.
Economics of Crop Production. The Three Components of Profit Crop Yield Production Cost Selling Price Received.
The impacts of information and biotechnologies on corn nutrient management Jae-hoon Sung and John A. Miranowski Department of Economics Iowa State University.
Paul D. Mitchell AAE 320: Farming Systems Management
Grain Markets and Cost of Production
Risk Environment for Agriculture
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
INTENSIFYING THE CORN-SOYBEAN ROTATION WITH THE USE OF WINTER RYE FOR
Overview of Wisconsin Agriculture AAE 320: Farming Systems Management
Socio-economic Benefits of Biotechnology
Von Thunen's Regional Land Use Model (1826)
Economic Impact of Irrigation Along the McClusky Canal
SOYBEAN YIELDS: A STRATEGIC ISSUE?
Organic Agriculture ……
Economics of Crop Production
and No-Tillage under Various Crop Rotations.
Precision Nutrient Management: Grid-Sampling Basis
2018 Wisconsin Agriculture Outlook Forum
2015 Illinois Farm Economics Summit
2018 Wisconsin Agricultural Outlook Forum
Farming a Flat Function
Precision Agriculture an Overview
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
WELCOME 2016 Illinois Farm Economics Summit
Insuring Iowa’s Agriculture Michael Duffy Ames, IA November 3, 2009
السيولة والربحية أدوات الرقابة المالية الوظيفة المالية
HOW TO RESEARCH YOUR CROPS
Outlook for Land 2008 ABA National Agricultural Bankers Conference
Inelasticity of Agricultural Supply
Who benefits from Biotechnology?
Precision Agriculture in Pest Management
The Wisconsin Soil Test Recommendation Program
Precision Agriculture
Livestock & Crop Outlook
Nitrogen Response Following Corn
Corn Economics Corn Production School February 7, 2006 Mike Duffy
Crop Situation and Outlook
2019 Wisconsin Agricultural Outlook Forum
Economics of Crop Production
2012 Crop Market Outlook Iowa Farm Bureau’s 2012 Economic Summit
Crop Outlook Beginning Farmer Network Meeting Ames, Iowa Oct. 4, 2010
Crop Price Outlook Lynnville Ag Marketing Club Meeting Grinnell, Iowa
PRODUCTION PRINCIPLES
Economics of Crop Production
Perfectly Competitive Markets
Economics of Crop Production
Grain Markets and Cost of Production
Economics of Crop Production
Presentation transcript:

The More-On Principle: Why farmer use inputs like they do AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics, UW-Madison

Main Point: Environmental Impacts of Agriculture 1) Inelastic (flat) production at or near optimal levels for many inputs, so small profit change over wide input range A wide range of input levels will seem consistent with maximizing profit 2) Impact of inputs on profit is hard to clearly identify with all the variability from other factors Even science has a hard time identifying what’s economically optimal 3) Underuse of key inputs is obvious, but overuse is invisible, and inputs are relatively low cost A common human response in situations like these is to put a little more on, especially when inputs are low cost, hence the name: The More-On Principle

Farming a Flat Function For many crop production processes, yield becomes relatively unresponsive to inputs when they are used at near optimal levels Yield Input

Profit becomes Inelastic to Input Levels As a result, profit also has a “flat” response to the input Profit Input

One Site-Year from Iowa (Mitchell 2004)

Average Corn Yield by N Rate (Mitchell 2004)

Current WI N Recommendations Source: C. Laboski, UW Soil Science

Corn Returns for Seeding Density (Lauer and Stanger 2006) Source: http://corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/AA/pdfs/A044.pdf

Soybean Returns for Seeding Density and Seed Treatments (Gaspar et al http://www.coolbean.info/library/documents/SoybeanTreatmentRisk_2014_FINAL.pdf

Capture (bifenthrin) on Processing Sweet Corn (mean with 95% error bars)

Capture (bifenthrin) on Fresh Market Sweet Corn (mean with 95% error bars) How many sprays would you use?

Summary: Why farmer use inputs like they do 1) Inelastic production at or near optimal levels for many key inputs, so small profit change over wide input range A wide range of input levels will seem consistent with maximizing profit 2) Impact of inputs on profit is hard to clearly identify with all the variability from other factors Even science has a hard time identifying what’s economically optimal 3) Underuse of key inputs is obvious, but overuse is invisible, and inputs are relatively low cost A common human response in situations like these is to put a little more on, especially when inputs are low cost, hence the name: the More-On Principle