Thoughts on (Efficient) Drilled Shaft Design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lightweight Forming System and Roofs for Concrete Floors.
Advertisements

BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR Practice Questions Next.
JP Singh and Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., P.E. Gary Norris, Ph.D., P.E. March 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM S-SHAFT FOR LATERALLY LOADED.
Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo.
8. Axial Capacity of Single Piles
Chp12- Footings.
ACI “Standard Specifications for Tolerances for Concrete Construction and Materials” gives (2) tolerances for suspended slabs on metal deck: Thickness.
Reinforced Concrete Design-8
Bridge Engineering (6) Superstructure – Concrete Bridges
1 Application and Analysis of Helical Piers in Frozen Ground He Liu, Ph.D., P.E. Daniel Schubert, P.E. Hannele Zubeck, Ph.D., P.E. Sean Baginski.
Design of Mat Foundations
Foundations and basements
ADSC/CALTRANS CIDH Pile Workshop Spring Overview of Structural Design and Detailing of Large Diameter Drilled Shafts (Caltrans Practice) Amir M.
Modeling for Analysis CE Design of Multi-Story Structures
Large Diameter Open-End Pipe Piles for Transportation Structures Dan Brown, PhD., P.E., D.GE.
Designing Piles for Drag Force
Beams and Frames.
AASHTO LRFD Section and 10
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation
LRFD-Steel Design Dr. Ali Tayeh Second Semester
Department of Civil Engineering NED University Engineering & Technology Building Prof Sarosh Lodi.
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly 2 May 2008 Sacramento, CA Alan Macnab
Shear - Tensile - Compression Stresses Slip Ted 126 Spring 2007.
10 Pure Bending.
REINFORCED EARTH STRUCTURES CONCEPT BASICS OF DESIGN CASE STUDIES.
Footings.
Composite Beams and Columns
Soil-Pile Interaction in FB-MultiPier
Analysis of Laterally Loaded Drilled Shafts and Piles Using LPILE
METAL FOUNDATIONS The strongest, most durable, most reliable and most cost-effective alternative to concrete foundations. You can add personalized information.
University of Palestine
Slop Stabilization Pertemuan
Static Pushover Analysis
Compression Component Design
Chapter 4 - Flexure. Lecture Goals Structures Basic Concepts Rectangular Beams.
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG 1 COMPOSITE FLOORS - II.
DIAGRAM Basic Foundation Design Basic Foundation Design Central Pipe Column.
Alternate Technical Concepts AASHTO Subcommittee on Design July 28, 2010 Columbia, S.C. KATHY HARVEY State Design Engineer Missouri Department of Transportation.
A Better Foundation Alternative DESIGNING METAL FOUNDATIONS Shaner Industries |
1 Foundations and retaining walls.
Mechanics of Materials(ME-294) Mechanics is the branch of physics that is concerned with the analysis of the action of forces on matter or material systems.
By: Antoine N. Gergess, PhD, PE, F.ASCE
Foundation Loads Dead Load Live Load Wind Load
Using Reflective Crack Interlayer-
Beam Design Beams are designed to safely support the design loads.
Lecture 2 Structural System Overview CVEN Structural Concrete Design January 15, 2003.
5 December 2011 Task 2 Cavern Study Ground model and 3D cavern layout Matt Sykes Eden Almog Alison Barmas Yung Loo Agnieszka Mazurkiewicz Franky Waldron.
Leads Institute of Technology & Engineering Subject Code : Name Of Subject :Building Construction Name of Unit : Soil Foundation Topic : Bearing.
GLE/CEE 330: Soil Mechanics Introduction to Foundation Engineering
Soil mechanics and foundation engineering-III (CE-434)
DIAPHRAGM WALLS.
Section Engineers Meeting March 6, 2014 Lexington, KY.
Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Basic Structural Considerations INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORTATION.
AN OVERVIEW OF SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATION SYSTEMS
REINFORCED EARTH STRUCTURES
Deep Foundation Institute Bay Area Rapid Force Pulse Seminar
Introduction Bridge members must be able to carry the loads applied to them. This presentation considers: how loads are applied to members how bridge.
UNIT-IV SHEAR,TORSION AND BOND.
Fabrication and Placement of Drilled Shaft Reinforcing Cages
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
Buckling & Stability Critical Load
Fundamentals for the Up-and-Coming Bridge Engineer
Tapered Beams: Engineers often taper beams so that the beam strength is larger where the bending moment is larger.
Buckling & Stability Critical Load
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Earthquake resistant buildings
Mechanics of Materials Engr 350 – Lecture 38 Columns
Graduation Project Bracing system for deep excavation.
Presentation transcript:

Thoughts on (Efficient) Drilled Shaft Design Robert Thompson, P.E., D.GE Dan Brown and Associates, PC ALDOT Pre-Construction Conference May 7, 2015

Thoughts on Efficient Drilled Shaft Design Side vs Base Resistance Point of Fixity – Lateral Analysis Slurry Effect / Construction Methods Over Conservative Design? Flexibility / VE Design

Side vs. Base Resistance Common to neglect one due to belief that they are incompatible – to mobilize base we have to “fail” side resistance Mobilization of side and base is at different displacements. Can design for both based on common displacement. Possible to never mobilize base resistance in rock sockets

Base Resistance Only Common to neglect side resistance because: Concerns over sidewall quality (construction techniques) in soil, so just easier to neglect. Inspection requires certain criteria for base resistance in rock (e.g. no seams), so we chase good rock and create a socket that was not included in the design. Just the way we have always done it.

Properties for modeling soil and rock in LPILE and FBPier Lateral Loading Properties for modeling soil and rock in LPILE and FBPier Failure to adjust p-y models to match reality Inexperienced users Shaft or Socket length for “Point of Moment Fixity” Not well defined in AASHTO Depth for transverse steel – maybe to shaft tip NOT for determining minimum shaft length

• Geotechnical Strength Limit State Overturning failure Lateral Loading • Geotechnical Strength Limit State Overturning failure • Structural Strength Limit State Yield in flexure • Service Limit State Lateral Deformations

• Geotechnical Strength Limit State Lateral Loading • Geotechnical Strength Limit State • Model shaft as linear elastic beam • Perform analyses to find minimum length for stable solution with (1/φ) x factored loads • Use φ = 0.67 for Strength I-V Load Cases • Use φ = 0.8 for Extreme Event Load Cases

• Structural Strength Limit State Lateral Loading • Structural Strength Limit State • Compute maximum bending moment using factored loads • Service Limit State • Compute deflections using service loads, nonlinear EI for shaft

Properties for modeling rock in LPILE and FBPier Lateral Loading Properties for modeling rock in LPILE and FBPier Failure to adjust p-y models Inexperienced users Socket length for “Point of Moment Fixity” Not well defined in AASHTO Depth for transverse steel – may be to shaft tip NOT for determining minimum shaft length

Construction Methods/Constructability As designer, why do we need to consider potential construction methods to be used? Can it be built? Reinforcement congestion = problems with concrete placement Are we introducing potential sources of problems? Side wall roughness, especially in soft rocks (e.g. shale) Slurry “filter cake” - reduces side resistance? Polymer slurry – increase side resistance? Can the contractor achieve a clean bottom Inspection requirements delaying concrete placement

Slurry Effect / Construction Methods Wet Method - Starter Casing (“Can”)

Slurry Effect / Construction Methods Casing in Starter Hole

Slurry Effect / Construction Methods Wet + Casing

What Can Go Wrong? Voids Around Casing

Thoughts on Efficient Drilled Shaft Design

Over designed or Under designed? Not OVER designed but UNDER designed Not spending enough time on the design Maybe more conservative (much larger than needed), not OVER designed

Maybe NOT Conservative at all Over Conservative? Maybe NOT Conservative at all From a design perspective, yes, but…. Increase risk exposure during construction Requires larger tools/equipment More excavation, more chances for error Inexperienced contractor Wrong means/methods Etc.

Flexibility / VE Design Difficult to be flexible with traditional Design-Bid-Build Value Engineered (VE) Designs Offers potential for flexibility, potential for cost savings Owner/designer need to be open to suggestions Review needs to be thorough but streamlined Sort out “selling” versus “ a better solution” Consider pre-bid Alternate Technical Concept (ATC) Contractor submits confidential pre-bid ATC for review If approved, can bid ATC or base bid Adopt Design-Build project delivery

What Else?