Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparing for the CD-2 Review Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting October 12-14, 2006.
Advertisements

Measurement of the  n(p)  K +   (p) at Jefferson Lab Sergio Anefalos Pereira Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Zhihong Ye Hampton University Feb. 16 th 2010, APS Meeting, Washington DC Data Analysis Strategy to Obtain High Precision Missing Mass Spectra For E
CLAS12 CalCom Activity CLAS Collaboration Meeting, March 6 th 2014.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Report of the NTPC Test Experiment in 2007Sep and Others Yohei Nakatsugawa.
Status of W analysis in PHENIX Central Arm Kensuke Okada (RBRC) For the PHENIX collaboration RHIC Spin Collaboration meeting November 21, /21/20091K.Okada.
The GlueX Detector 5/29/091CIPANP The GlueX Detector -- David Lawrence (JLab) David Lawrence (JLab) Electron beam accelerator continuous-wave (1497MHz,
Jiawen Zhang, IHEP, 2008, April 10, frascati Status of BEPCII/BESIII and Physics preparation Jiawen Zhang 2008/4/7—10 , PHIPSI08, Frascati.
Possibility for Double DVCS measurement in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne SBS Meeting June 4 th 2013.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
108 Mar 2007L. Musa TPC Commissioning ALICE Technical Forum, CERN, 8 th March 2007 L. Musa Outline Pre-commissioning above ground (2006) Preparing for.
22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas From Detector to Ntuples: Muons Steven Doulas Northeastern University Boston, MA D0 Muon Upgrade Group.
The Path to Running CLAS12 BONuS12 Latifa Elouadrhiri August 21, 2015.
HPS T EST R UN C ONTINGENCY P LAN S. Stepanyan JLAB.
22 September 2005 Haw05 1  (1405) photoproduction at SPring-8/LEPS H. Fujimura, Kyoto University Kyoto University, Japan K. Imai, M. Niiyama Research.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Workshop on General Purpose High Resolution.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
Test of the GEM Front Tracker for the SBS Spectrometer at Jefferson Lab F. Mammoliti, V. Bellini, M. Capogni, E. Cisbani, E. Jensen, P. Musico, F. Noto,
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
The GlueX Detector in Hall-D at Jefferson Lab February 16, 2010 David Lawrence, Jefferson Lab (for Curtis A. Meyer, Carnegie Mellon University) July 7,
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
CLAS12 CalCom Activity: a progress report V. Burkert, D. Carman, R. De Vita, D. Weygand CLAS12 meeting, June 14 th 2012.
JEFFERSON LAB CLOSE-OUT 6 GeV  Finish analysis on CLAS eg1-DVCS (SSAs + DSAs in   production with longitudinally polarized H and D targets) and.
Analysis of    production ► Data taking ► Reaction identification ► Results for double polarization observable F ► Summary Based on data taken in the.
Quarkonia production with the HERA-B experiment J. Spengler, MPI Heidelberg.
Minerva Test Beam 2 Status Geoff Savage for the Test Beam 2 Team March 23, /23/2015AEM - Minerva Test Beam 2 Status1.
Tracker Neutron Detector: INFN plans CLAS12 Central Detector Meeting - Saclay 2-3 December 2009 Patrizia Rossi for the INFN groups: Genova, Laboratori.
CLAS12 Particle Identification S. Stepanyan (JLAB) Probing Strangeness in Hard Processes INFN Frascati, October 18 – 21, 2010.
Hall B and GEANT4 Mark Ito Jefferson Lab GEANT4 Tutorial May 22, 2006.
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
K+e+γ using OKA detector
Status of BESIII and upgrade of BESIII
CLAS12 Forward Tracking: Status and Challenges
Richard J. Tesarek Fermilab For the CDF Collaboration
Renuka Rajput Ghoshal John Hogan Ruben J. Fair Probir K. Ghoshal
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab
Forward Tagger Simulations
Commissioning and Calibration Strategies for Micromegas Vertex Tracker
CLAS12 Beamline Configurations
CLAS12 DAQ, Trigger and Online Computing Requirements
CLAS12 First Experiment Workshop Summary
CLAS12 Commissioning with Cosmincs
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Preparation for CERN test beam
CLAS12 Calibration and Commissioning (CALCOM)
CLAS12 Analysis and First Experiment Organization
CLAS12 Ready for Science Answers to the Homework Questions & Summary/Path Forward Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab CLAS12 Ready for Science Review.
Region I: stringing 1/3 done on 1st chamber!
Overview of CLAS12 Calibration
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
Detector Concepts Target/Luminosity Additions: Recoil detector
CLAS12 First Experiment Workshop Report
Micromegas Central Tracker
Hall C KPP Demonstration March 10, 2017.
Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set
for meson spectroscopy
CLAS12 Timing Calibration
Ion-Side Small Angle Detection Forward, Far-Forward, & Ultra-Forward
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
T. Bowcock University of Liverpool For the LHCb Collaboration
E19 result Ryuta Kiuchi (SNU)
CLAS Collaboration Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab CLAS Collaboration – CLAS12 Workshop Jefferson Lab March 28-31, 2017

Outline CLAS12 Technical Design KPP Run Engineering/Physics Run Preparation Summary

CLAS12 Technical Scope Optimized for exclusive and semi-inclusive reactions Large coverage in J and f angles Small angle capabilities Capable of operating at luminosity of 1035 cm-2s-1 Particle ID up to high momentum for e-/π-, π/K/p, γ/πo separation Good momentum & angle resolution for use of missing mass techniques Operate Polarized Target

CLAS12 – Baseline Equipment Forward Detector (FD) TORUS Magnet HT Cherenkov Counter Drift Chamber System LT Cherenkov Counter Forward TOF System Pre-shower Calorimeter E.M. Calorimeter Central Detector (CD) SOLENOID Magnet Silicon Vertex Tracker Central TOF System

CLAS12 - Upgrade Equipment Forward Detector (FD) TORUS Magnet HT Cherenkov Counter Drift Chamber System LT Cherenkov Counter Forward TOF System Pre-shower Calorimeter E.M. Calorimeter Central Detector (CD) SOLENOID Magnet Silicon Vertex Tracker Central TOF System - Central Neutron Detector MicroMegas Forward Tagger RICH detector Polarized target Upgrade Detectors Forward Tagger (FT) Ring-Imaging Cherenkov Counter (RICH) Micro-Megas Detector (MM) Central Neutron Detector (CND) 11/29/2018

CLAS12 Technical Specifications Forward Detector Central Detector Angular Range Tracks 5o  35o 35o  125o Photons 3o  35o Resolution dp/p 1% @ 5 GeV < 5% dq 1 mrad 10 – 20 mrad df 3 mrad 5 mrad Photon Detection Energy > 150 MeV n.a. 4 mrad @ 1 GeV Neutron Detection Neff < 70% (EC+PCAL) 10% Particle ID e/p Full range p/p < 6 GeV < 1.5 GeV p/K < 3 GeV < 0.7 GeV K/p < 5 GeV < 1.0 GeV p0, h  gg CLAS12: CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer 12 GeV

CLAS12 KPP Configuration Do not wait for the solenoid arrival, fully assembled forward detector, SVT and CTOF installed upstream of the target (CTOF on a temporary support) and run with ~100 times lower luminosity (e.g. 5 nA beam on a 0.5 mm thick 12C target) Detector operational: events recorded with a > 2 nA electron beam at > 6 GeV beam energy (3 passes) KPP Demonstration: Detector running for 8 hours recording data from all subsystems. Screenshots of beam status and/or accelerator e-log. Plots showing relative timing of calorimetry, time-of-flight, and Cherenkov detectors. Event displays showing correlated particle hits in the Forward Detectors. Plots of reconstructed particle trajectories showing target position. Particle identification plots using signals from calorimetry and Cherenkov detector.

KPP Run Success!! KPP – Run Period Feb. 3 – Feb. 6, 2017. Data taking with the full detector readout: -Beam current: 5 nA electron beam - Target: 0.5 mm carbon wire - Torus: 50% B-field -Trigger: Hit-based trigger, ORed from 6 sectors FADC-based trigger, ECAL INNER cluster finding with different thresholds Production runs & calibration runs Reverse polarity Torus Field = 0 DC (HV and Threshold scans) Random trigger2 Different trigger threshold 2 type of trigger 2 target positions Low luminosity run

CLAS12 Engineering/First Experiment Run Engineering/First Experiment configuration: The entire CLAS12 is operational Engineering October/November 2017, followed by Physics data taking Run at 2.2 GeV (1 pass) and 11 GeV (5 passes) with LH2 target  Commission at low luminosity using loose trigger configuration Study detector performance as a function of luminosity, define luminosity limits – the goal is L=1035 cm-2 sec-1 (75 nA beam on 5 cm long LH2 target) Record data for physics analysis Perform special runs (e.g. alignment ...)

Timeline TASK 2016 2017 Coordinated Calibration Challenge Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept SIMULATION RECONSTRUCTION CALIBRATION EXP. SCHEDULE New release with full central detector (MM) New release with full central detector Ready for KPP Ready for Physics KPP Run Engineering Run Coordinated Calibration Challenge Full Chain Test

Extend KPP Strategy to the engineering Run Full Chain Complete from simulation to cosmic data taking to documentation Commissioning plan revised CLAS12 first experiment final configuration simulation complete SC Torus and Solenoid ready and field maps produced All detectors and corresponding electronics ready DAQ/Trigger firmware and hardware ready Beam polarization Experiment normalization Online monitoring for shift taker and for experts Online reconstruction, fully tested ready Data base complete with detector calibration Detector alignment Offline data processing and offline shift training Offline data calibration ready and exercised on calibration challenge Event selection framework completed and tested on KPP and simulations Final data processing to general DST Skimming to produce DST for the first specific experiments Analysis note based on KPP data Ready

THANK YOU for Successful KPP run Looking forward to successful engineering run and the start of physics data taking!