Laurie Leffler, Division Administrator FHWA Ohio Update Laurie Leffler, Division Administrator

Highlights Safety Performance Measures Asset Management e-Construction Infrastructure Proposal

Safety Drive Through the Work Zone Ingress/Egress Sign Spacing/Message Barrier Wall Glare Screens Pavement Markings Blunt Ends, Barrier Wall Drums Damaged or Improperly installed Hardware Pavement Condition

What is Transportation Performance Management (TPM)? A strategic approach that uses system information to make investment and policy decisions to achieve transportation system performance goals Investment and Policy Decisions System Information System Owner The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) defines transportation performance management as a strategic approach that uses system information (i.e., quality performance measures of the transportation system) to make investment and policy decisions to achieve national performance goals. Transportation performance management is systematically applied, so it is a regular, ongoing process that provides key information to assist decision-makers in understanding the consequences of investment decisions across multiple performance areas. This improves communications between decision-makers, stakeholders and the traveling public and ensures targets and measures are developed in cooperative partnerships and based on data and objective information. It is applicable to all aspects of transportation, and ties closely to the planning and programming process and asset management.

MAP-21 and the FAST Act defined seven National Goal Areas Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Executive Summary MAP-21 and the FAST Act defined seven National Goal Areas Safety Infrastructure condition Congestion reduction System reliability Freight movement and economic vitality Environmental sustainability Reduced project delivery delays MAP-21 defined seven national goals in accordance with 23 USC 150(b). [23 USC 150(b)] These goals are the first element of TPM, and include: 1. For safety, to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. 2. For infrastructure condition, to maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair. 3. For congestion reduction, to achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System. 4. For system reliability, to improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system. 5. For freight movement and economic vitality, to improve the national freight network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets and support regional economic development. 6. For environmental sustainability, to enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment. 7. For reduced project delivery delays, to reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies’ work practices. National goals should be primarily achieved through the performance-based planning and programming processes.  SHA will set Targets for the different national goal areas FHWA will assess each of the State targets separately for each measure to determine the significant progress made toward the achievement of each target. Significant progress is made for a target when either: The actual condition/performance level is better than the baseline condition/performance; or The actual condition/performance level is equal to or better than the established target. So, if a target is a declining target (meaning the target is equal or worse than the baseline condition/performance), the target must be achieved to make significant progress. If a target is set to be an improvement over the baseline condition/performance, then significant progress is made if the condition/performance is better than the baseline, even if the target is not met. References: 23 CFR 490.109

Asset Management Achieve system performance effectiveness and targets for assets Manage risk Minimize cost Preserve/extend the life-cycle of assets Moving away from silos and worst-first approach A State DOT must establish a set of processes for developing an asset management plan that comply with the requirements in the rule. FHWA will do its first certification review for the processes based on the initial asset management plan. The bridge and pavement management systems must be used to develop the plan and the minimum standards are included in the asset management plan rule. The plan must contain: Summary listing and conditions of assets on the NHS Objectives, targets and measures Performance gap analysis Life-cycle planning Risk management analysis Financial plan (10-yr projection) Investment strategies Background Information: From Asset Management Plan Rule: Section 515.7 Interactivity: None Notes: None

Deadlines TPM Safety (PM1) Was set February 27, 2018 Pavement (PM2) SHA Set Target May 20, 2018 Reliability, Freight, and CMAQ (PM3) SHA Set Targets by May 20, 2018 Asset Management Initial TAMP is due April 30, 2018 Final TAMP is due June 30, 2019 As I mentioned before, FHWA established measures through final rules. You can see on the screen that there are three final rules, typically referred to as PM1, PM2, and PM3. PM1 contains the measures for safety. PM2 contains the measures for pavement and bridge condition. PM3 contains measures for system reliability, freight movement, and the congestion mitigation and air quality (CMAQ) program. State DOTs have to establish targets for each measure one year after the effective date of each final rule for PM2 and PM3. MPOs have to establish targets 180 days after State DOTs establish targets for each measure. State DOTs and MPOs have to incorporate information on TPM in their S/TIPs and long-range plans two years after the effective date of each rule for PM2 and PM3. Safety came first and the time periods do not match up the same as PM2 and PM3.

e-Contruction EDC Funding for devices and software Pilot for ER Reporting Software – MSAR (Moblie Solutions for Assessment and Reporting) Risk Based Inspection (GoFormz) Change Order approval process SWPP tracker software

Infrastructure Proposal