Travel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE POWER OF INTERNATIONAL TV. PROJECT ENGAGEMENT.
Advertisements

Newspaper ads that demonstrate the strategic role of (Re)Appraisal.
10+ reasons to use… TUBE advertising
Business Decision Makers & Magazine Engagement Presented by John Baker Tangible Media With support from Nielsen Media Services.
The importance of environment for online advertising 1.
How Media Works: Advertising and the Purchase Funnel for Department/Discount Store Advertising A Yankelovich Study for the Television Bureau of Advertising.
1 Newsbrands and finance. Newsbrands have a wealthy audience…
May 2009 CONTENT.  Credit crunch  Failing banks  Rising unemployment  Reduced ad spends.
Newspaper ads that demonstrate the strategic role of Extension.
How Media Works: Advertising and the Purchase Funnel for Travel/Travel Website Advertising A Yankelovich Study for the Television Bureau of Advertising.
How Media Works: Advertising and the Purchase Funnel for Entertainment Advertising A Yankelovich Study for the Television Bureau of Advertising.
Newspaper ads that demonstrate the strategic role of Call to Action.
Newspaper ads that demonstrate the strategic role of Conveying Information.
How Media Works: Advertising and the Purchase Funnel For the Financial Services Category 1 A Yankelovich Study for the Television Bureau of Advertising.
How Media Works: Advertising and the Purchase Funnel For Auto and Life Insurance 1 A Yankelovich Study for the Television Bureau of Advertising.
SOCIAL MEDIA LAB Building Brand, Generating Sales and Growing Your Business.
Newspapers prompt action 1 Summary of effectiveness test findings.
KETTLE ® Chips: Effectiveness 1 How newspaper advertising stimulated a 20% increase in sales of KETTLE ® Chips.
Connected Consumers 2 Exploring the impact that various magazine media channels have on the purchase journey. In Connected Consumers 2 Time Inc. UK takes.
A Snapshot Review of Long Copy Ads 27 th April 2011 (Revised July 13 th 2011)
[ 1 ] MAGAZINES DELIVER CURATED CONTENT THAT INSPIRES AND INFLUENCES MAGAZINE BRANDS ARE NO LONGER JUST PRINT MAGAZINES ARE THE MOST TRUSTED SOURCE OF.
Computer A deep dive. NEWS Table of contents Demographics 3 Key readership facts 4 Reach9 Total 10 Demographics11 Who are they?13 How online newsbrands.
Introduction to newsbrands. Table of contents The newsbrands3 What makes newsbrands different? 8 Key readership facts12 Time spent/time of day20 Engagement,
Test 1 Dynamic & Animated Static Digital & Paper Liverpool Street
Computer A deep dive.
Computer A deep dive.
Presentation of results
3. Advertising Influence and Reaction:
Left vs right – who wins?.
Industry Snapshot 2016.
Top facts you need to know about newsbrands
Image-based ads outperform price-based ads on almost every measure
Print vs Digital – who wins?
Funeral Services Industry Today
Table of contents Demographics 3 Key readership facts 4 Time spent 8
What’s the best part of the week to advertise?
Which work best – text or images?
Supermarkets.
Motors.
Advertising vs content marketing – which works best?
Why digital newsbrands deserve their premium
Methodology: RAMetrics
Print newsbrand ads are increasing in effectiveness
Mobile.
Top facts you need to know about newsbrands
The multi-platform study
What’s the best part of the week to advertise?
Why listen to me? Sr. Digital Marketing Specialist for Fastline Media Group Social media is my world Fastline has seen a… 1,044% growth in Facebook audience.
Top facts you need to know about newsbrands
Top facts you need to know about newsbrands
RAMetrics funnel: All ads
Does size matter?.
Telecoms.
Top facts you need to know about newsbrands
Top facts you need to know about newsbrands
Which work best – text or images?
Top facts you need to know about newsbrands
Updated April 2018 Left vs right – who wins?.
Mobile.
Image-based ads outperform price-based ads on almost all measure
Print vs Digital – who wins?
Top facts you need to know about newsbrands
Travel.
Retail.
Key findings: Which work best – Advertising or content marketing?
Mobile.
Top facts you need to know about newsbrands
Top facts you need to know about newsbrands
Finance.
Top facts you need to know about newsbrands
Presentation transcript:

Travel

Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. Key Findings: Travel ads Print ads for travel brands are less impactful (61% recall) than ads across all categories (70% recall) and as a result score below average across almost all brand measures. When noticed, they score particularly well for likeability, are more appealing and more interesting - recognisers are also more likely to think that the brand has taken a fresh approach. Lumen eye-tracking shows that readers’ viewing is biased towards right hand pages of a spread – RAMetrics corroborates these findings for travel advertisers, with some exception, such as ad recall where both sides come out equally strong. Ads on the right hand side score better for attention, recognition and tend to be more engaging. Image based ads have higher impact but price based ads are much more common (61% vs 54%). Image based ads demand more attention and score higher for familiarity, readers also find them more interesting and are more likely to recommend the brand/product advertised. Readers earning above £30,000 per annum and readers earning below £30,000 per annum, are both equally likely to notice travel print ads (62%), despite this high earners score significantly better across all brand and action measures – they are more likely to pay attention and to be familiar with the product/brand being advertised. 18-34 year olds score significantly higher than adults aged over 35 across all brand measures for travel print ads, especially when it comes to having an emotional response (81% vs 41% for 35+). Comparing against the all category averages, travel print ads have lower impact (76% recall) than ads across all categories (83% recall) for 18-34s, however they score significantly higher across all brand metrics and are stronger than other categories when it comes to delivering on action. Digital ads for travel are just as noticeable as digital ads for all categories, however they are less engaging. Their strength lies in driving hard metrics which are more action orientated Our ancestors travelled by foot, their successors took to the seas, then came the railroad and eventually we took to the skies. Whether we’re going on holiday, migrating in search of new homes or embarking on gap years, it is clear humans have an innate curiosity. We have a desire to explore that has kept us moving throughout history, crossing frontiers and discovering new environments. Taking time off is what most of us look forward to the most, with Google searches for flights and holidays peaking in the first week of January according to Google Trends. However the travel sector has faced its share of challenges in recent times, with Brexit negotiations dominating the headlines and airlines filing for bankruptcy, more Britons are leaning towards holidays closer to home. In fact, almost half of Britons (23.9 million) took a staycation in the last 12 months. Travel editorial is a key part of newsbrands across all platforms and readers still rely on newsbrands for inspiration and ideas. According to the latest TGI Clickstream survey, a quarter of 18-34s say that newspapers and magazine articles on holiday and travel influence their choice of holiday. We know that newspapers are highly effective in the media mix: Benchmarketing’s analysis of econometric models shows that adding print newsbrands to a travel campaign increases effectiveness by three times. Analysis of RAMetrics data shows that, from a creative perspective, travel ads could be involving readers a whole lot more, they are less impactful (61% ad recall) than ads across all categories (70% ad recall) and as a result they score below average across all brand measures. However, understandably, not everyone is in the market for a holiday at all times, so how about those are? When noticed, print ads for travel score particularly well for likeability (46% vs 39% for all ad across all categories), they are more appealing (48% vs 38% for all ad across all categories) and more interesting (50% vs 40% for all ad across all categories) – recognisers are also more likely to think that the brand has taken a fresh approach (51% vs 43% for all ad across all categories). Lumen eye-tracking shows that readers’ viewing is biased towards right-hand pages of a spread and adverts on the right are seen more: 94% see full-page ads on right-hand pages, 89% view when on left-hand page. RAMetrics confirms these findings for travel advertisers, with some exceptions, such as ad recall where both sides come out equally strong (59%). Taking a closer look at some brand metrics, ads on the right-hand side are more likely to be recognised by readers (familiarity: 33% vs 37% for right-hand side ads) and tend to be more engaging (fresh approach: 29% vs 32% for right-hand side ads). Image-based advertising tends to have more of an emotional impact, whereas price-based advertising is more effective at prompting action. For the travel sector, price-based ads are more common than image-based ads, despite image-based ads being more impactful (61% vs 54% for price-based ads). Image based ads demand more attention (25% vs 17% for price-based ads) and score higher for familiarity (38% vs 26% for price-based ads). Readers also find them more interesting (33% vs 23% for price-based ads), easier to understand (41% vs 36% for price-based ads) and are more likely to recommend the brand/product advertised (27% vs 17% for price-based ads). So what about different income groups? How do readers earning below £30,000 per annum (low-earners) and readers earning above £30,000 per annum (high-earners), respond to travel ads in newspapers? It turns out that both groups are equally likely to notice the ads (ad recall: 62%), however, high-earners score significantly better across brand and action measures, they are more likely to pay attention (46% vs 32% for low-earners) and more likely to be familiar with the brand or product being advertised (64% vs 51% for low-earners). When it comes to age, young people (18-34s) score significantly higher than the over 35s across all brand measures, especially when it comes to having an emotional response (81% vs 21% for 35+). They’re more likely to recognise the branding (51% vs 46% for 35+), and they like the ads more too (68% vs 42% for 35+). Next let’s take a look at how young peoples’ responses to travel advertising in print stack up against their responses to print ads in other categories. When compared against all the category averages, travel print ads have lower impact (76% recall) than ads across all categories (83% recall) for 18-34s. However they score significantly higher across all brand metrics. They provide the reader with new information (76% vs 61% for all ad across all categories) and evoke emotions (81% vs 41% for all ad across all categories). They even deliver on action; in fact 18-34s are more likely to recommend (60% vs 46% for all ad across all categories) and discuss the products and brands seen in the print travel ads (36% vs 24% for all ad across all categories). Looking specifically at digital, it’s interesting to note that ads for the travel sector are just as noticeable as digital ads for other categories on newspaper sites. However they are less engaging and readers find them less appealing (11% vs 13% for all ad across all categories). Their strength lies in driving hard metrics which are more action orientated, such as encouraging visits to the advertiser (13% vs 7% for all ad across all categories) and encouraging consumers to look for more information (11% vs 8% for all ad across all categories).   Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland.

Travel vs all ads - print ad recall Ad recall: Do you recall seeing the ad? % saying yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. All ads – 30 ads from 10/05/2017 to 25/07/2017, Travel – 33 ads from 21/05/2015 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the newspaper.

Print - Travel vs all ads among all readers brand measures attention + recognition engagement action Travel All Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad makes me feel positive towards the advertiser. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad? % Yes Interesting: The ad is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Fresh approach: The ad has an original design. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional : Did you react to the advertisement emotionally? % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad? % Yes Visit a website: Have you visited or will you visit the website as a result of the ad? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have you visited or will you visit this advertiser as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Recommend: Have you recommended or will you recommend the company / product due to the advertising? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale (Added in April 2016) Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising? % Yes (Added in April 2016) Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. All ads – 30 ads from 10/05/2017 to 25/07/2017, Travel – 33 ads from 21/05/2015 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the newspaper.

Print – Travel 5 year funnel Ad recall 61% Brand recognition 30% Engagement 28% Action 13% 49% 93% 46% Ad recall: Do you recall seeing the ad? % saying yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. 70 ads from 01/01/2013 – 31/12/2017, Score base: read the newspaper.

Print – Travel ads when noticed, are more engaging than all ads brand measures attention + recognition engagement action Travel All Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad makes me feel positive towards the advertiser. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad? % Yes Interesting: The ad is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Fresh approach: The ad has an original design. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional : Did you react to the advertisement emotionally? % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad? % Yes Visit a website: Have you visited or will you visit the website as a result of the ad? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have you visited or will you visit this advertiser as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Recommend: Have you recommended or will you recommend the company / product due to the advertising? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale (Added in April 2016) Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising? % Yes (Added in April 2016) Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. All ads – 30 ads from 10/05/2017 to 25/07/2017, Travel – 33 ads from 21/05/2015 to 25/07/2017. Score base: noticed ad

Travel print – LHS vs RHS ad recall Ad recall: Do you recall seeing the ad? % saying yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. Left – 28 ads from 01/01/2013 to 25/07/2017, Right– 30 ads from 01/03/2013 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the newspaper.

Travel print – LHS vs RHS brand measures attention + recognition engagement action Right Left Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad makes me feel positive towards the advertiser. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad? % Yes Interesting: The ad is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Fresh approach: The ad has an original design. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional : Did you react to the advertisement emotionally? % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad? % Yes Visit a website: Have you visited or will you visit the website as a result of the ad? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have you visited or will you visit this advertiser as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Recommend: Have you recommended or will you recommend the company / product due to the advertising? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale (Added in April 2016) Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising? % Yes (Added in April 2016) Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. Left – 28 ads from 01/01/2013 to 25/07/2017, Right– 30 ads from 01/03/2013 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the newspaper.

Travel print – Image vs price ad recall Ad recall: Do you recall seeing the ad? % saying yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. Image – 30 ads from 01/11/2010 to 25/07/2017, Price – 31 ads from 01/12/2012 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the newspaper.

Travel print – Image vs price brand measures attention + recognition engagement action Price Image Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad makes me feel positive towards the advertiser. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad? % Yes Interesting: The ad is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Fresh approach: The ad has an original design. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional : Did you react to the advertisement emotionally? % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad? % Yes Visit a website: Have you visited or will you visit the website as a result of the ad? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have you visited or will you visit this advertiser as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Recommend: Have you recommended or will you recommend the company / product due to the advertising? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale (Added in April 2016) Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising? % Yes (Added in April 2016) Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. Image – 30 ads from 01/11/2010 to 25/07/2017, Price – 31 ads from 01/12/2012 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the newspaper.

Travel print – High income earners vs low income earners ad recall Ad recall: Do you recall seeing the ad? % saying yes High income earners: Personal income of £30,000+ Low income earners: Personal income below £30,000 Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. Travel – 33 ads from 21/05/2015 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the newspaper.

Travel print – High income earners vs low income earners recall brand measures attention + recognition engagement action Low income High income Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad makes me feel positive towards the advertiser. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad? % Yes Interesting: The ad is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Fresh approach: The ad has an original design. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional : Did you react to the advertisement emotionally? % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad? % Yes Visit a website: Have you visited or will you visit the website as a result of the ad? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have you visited or will you visit this advertiser as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Recommend: Have you recommended or will you recommend the company / product due to the advertising? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale (Added in April 2016) Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising? % Yes (Added in April 2016) Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. Travel – 33 ads from 21/05/2015 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the newspaper.

Travel print – 18-34s vs 35+ ad recall Ad recall: Do you recall seeing the ad? % saying yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. Travel – 33 ads from 21/05/2015 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the newspaper.

Travel print - 18-34s vs 35+ brand measures attention + recognition engagement action 35+ 18-34s Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad makes me feel positive towards the advertiser. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad? % Yes Interesting: The ad is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Fresh approach: The ad has an original design. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional : Did you react to the advertisement emotionally? % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad? % Yes Visit a website: Have you visited or will you visit the website as a result of the ad? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have you visited or will you visit this advertiser as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Recommend: Have you recommended or will you recommend the company / product due to the advertising? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale (Added in April 2016) Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising? % Yes (Added in April 2016) Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. Travel – 33 ads from 21/05/2015 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the newspaper.

Travel vs all ads – 18-34s ad recall Ad recall: Do you recall seeing the ad? % saying yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. All ads – 30 ads from to 08/05/2017 to 25/07/2, Travel – 33 ads from 21/05/2015 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the newspaper

Travel print vs all ads – 18-34s brand measures attention + recognition engagement action Travel ads All ads Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad makes me feel positive towards the advertiser. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad? % Yes Interesting: The ad is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Fresh approach: The ad has an original design. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional : Did you react to the advertisement emotionally? % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad? % Yes Visit a website: Have you visited or will you visit the website as a result of the ad? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have you visited or will you visit this advertiser as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Recommend: Have you recommended or will you recommend the company / product due to the advertising? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale (Added in April 2016) Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising? % Yes (Added in April 2016) Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. All ads – 30 ads from to 08/05/2017 to 25/07/2, Travel – 33 ads from 21/05/2015 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the newspaper

Travel vs all ads - digital ad recall NB: Low base for travel category Ad recall: Do you recall seeing the ad? % saying yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. All ads – 30 ads from 01/02/2016 to 25/07/2017, Travel – 16 ads from 01/01/2009 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the digital newspaper.

Digital - Travel vs all ads brand measures attention + recognition engagement action Travel ads All ads NB: Low base for travel category Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad makes me feel positive towards the advertiser. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad? % Yes Interesting: The ad is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Fresh approach: The ad has an original design. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional : Did you react to the advertisement emotionally? % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad? % Yes Visit a website: Have you visited or will you visit the website as a result of the ad? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have you visited or will you visit this advertiser as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad? % Yes Recommend: Have you recommended or will you recommend the company / product due to the advertising? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale (Added in April 2016) Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising? % Yes (Added in April 2016) Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland. All ads – 30 ads from 01/02/2016 to 25/07/2017, Travel – 16 ads from 01/01/2009 to 25/07/2017. Score base: read the digital newspaper.