June 7-10, 2016 Emergency Operations and Coordination Centers (EOC/ECCs) at all levels of government and the private sector will activate to conduct a.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DAPPOLONIA S.p.A Tsunami Early Warning System Info Day UNESCO/IOC, Paris 31 January 2006.
Advertisements

SEISMIC HAZARD Presentation is based on: Allen, R., Earthquake hazard mitigation: New direction and opportunities, in "Treatise on Geophysics”, Bilham,
The Day After The Shakeout Place your Counties Logo Here MT DES Exercises.
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Monitoring and Reporting through the Advanced National Seismic System Briefing for.
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
National Focus, Local Touch COLLABORATION IS THE KEY Ellis M. Stanley, Sr., CEM General Manager, Emergency Preparedness Department City of Los Angeles.
Importance of OEF to the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Michael L. Blanpied USGS Earthquake Hazards Program For Powell Center March.
Earthquake Hazard Assessment in the Pacific Northwest: Site Response Thomas L. Pratt U. S. Geological Survey School of Oceanography University of Washington.
Abstract Detection of active faults and seismic hazards in the Seattle area is problematic, owing to thick surficial deposits and abundant vegetative cover.
Abstract Earthquakes are one of the most powerful natural disasters that occur in the world. Ground motion and shaking during an earthquake can be detected.
Earthquake Damage Can Be Reduced
Operations VDEM works with local government, state and federal agencies, voluntary organizations and private partners to provide resources and expertise.
1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake Investigating Earthquakes--San Francisco.
Earthquakes. Given information on Earthquakes, you will be able to describe, in writing: a) what an earthquake is; b) what the elastic rebound theory.
Use of ShakeMap in Emergency Management Loren Turner Caltrans, Division of Research & Innovation.
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Earthquake Hazard Session 1 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis
Real World Applications of USGS EQ Science: Stacy Bartoletti Degenkolb Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Washington Cascadia Region Earthquake.
PHS Geography Department Physical Geography/Natural Disasters.
The 2004 Sumatra Tsunami and U.S. Tsunami Preparedness Harold Mofjeld NOAA/PMEL and NOAA Tsunami Research Program Seattle, Washington Harold Mofjeld NOAA/PMEL.
Missouri Geological Survey Joe Gillman The Central U.S. is Earthquake Country: The Science Behind Earthquakes Hazard Preparedness Response.
Earthquake Information Timeline min 10-20min 1hr 2hrs 4hrs epicenter & magnitude (USGS ENS) ShakeMap (point source) Earthquake Occurs PAGER (pending.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Natural Hazards Science – Reducing the World’s.
Natural Hazards and Our Dynamic Planet LAB 7 What natural hazards do dynamic events cause? Our planet is dynamic because it is powerful, active Our planet.
You Need the Following: Papers on the Table SCIENCE BOOK! Sheet of Paper Turn in your Test Self-Assessment Turn in any test corrections.
SEISMIC HAZARD. Seismic risk versus seismic hazard Seismic Hazard is the probability of occurrence of a specified level of ground shaking in a specified.
Liquefaction Liquefaction occurs where ground water is near the surface in soils composed of sands and silts. The soil temporarily loses strength and behaves.
Loss-Estimation Modeling of Earthquake Scenarios for Each County in Nevada Using HAZUS-MH Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 06-1 University.
M6.3 EARTHQUAKE STRIKES KAKI, IRAN TUESDAY, APRIL 9, DEAD 850 INJURED Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Location and map of region Tectonic activities Mechanism of earthquake Damage Risks.
 To understand how the impacts of tectonic hazards differ in MEDCs and LEDCs.
EARTHQUAKE DISASTER RESILIENCE PART 2: Informing Community Stakeholders About Global Earthquake Disaster Situations Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster.
Hazards, Vulnerability, and Mitigation Sub-Committee.
M7.2 EARTHQUAKE STRIKES CENTRAL CHILE NEAR THE LOCATION OF THE M8.8 FEBRUARY 2010 QUAKE March 25, 2012 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction,
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation’s Transforming Undergraduate Education in STEM program within the Directorate for Education and.
How Earthquakes work Investigating Earthquakes--San Francisco.
Dr. Walter Hays US Geological Survey (Retired) Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction.
Damage from earthquakes The specification states that you need to know about: Social and economic impacts: Types of ground movement, damage to structures,
CISN Performance in Recent Earthquakes CISN Business Meeting Oct 10, 2014.
Andrew Phelps Director Oregon Office of Emergency Management
Emergency Preparedness - Earthquakes -
Destruction Due To Earth Quakes
Geologic Hazards Geologic Hazards are those Earth processes that are harmful to humans and/or their property. Includes: Earthquakes Volcanic eruptions.
Post-Earthquake Response
“Protecting the Public through Hazard Mitigation Planning”
Magnitude 7.2 Metro Manila
Earthquake Magnitude and Intensity
Emergency Preparedness - Earthquakes -
California Earthquake Early Warning System (CEEWS)
Plate movement Earthquake = sudden release of energy in the Earth’s crust that creates seismic waves. They are measured by the Richter Scale,
More lectures at Disasters Supercourse - 
Hazards Planning and Risk Management Risk Analysis and Assessment
Earthquakes.
Good Friday Alaskan Earthquake
Earth Quakes.
TOPIC 1:TECTONIC PROCESSES AND HAZARDS
EARTHQUAKE DISASTER RESILIENCE PART 3: Helping Community First Responders Prepare for Expected And Unexpected Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster.
IDEOC and IDAVOAD Interaction
VII. Earthquake Mitigation
DO NOW Pick up the notes and Review #19. Turn in review #18.
Factors Affecting Earthquake Damage
Engineering Geology and Seismology
8.3 Destruction from Earthquakes
Earthquake and Tsunami Program Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
Andrew Phelps Director Oregon Office of Emergency Management
Risk Modelling & Impact Forecasting Tools
Forms of seismic hazard
Web Pages.
Presentation transcript:

June 7-10, 2016 Emergency Operations and Coordination Centers (EOC/ECCs) at all levels of government and the private sector will activate to conduct a simulated field response operation within their jurisdictions and with neighboring communities, state EOCs, FEMA, and major military commands. See https://www.fema.gov/cascadia-rising-2016

Exercise scenario built on info gathered & compiled by the PNSN. “The narrative for this Cascadia Rising exercise relies upon the 90th percentile damage – the damage state with only a 10 percent estimated chance of being exceeded. By using a worst case scenario model, … The number of deaths could exceed 10,000, and more than 30,000 people could be injured. The economic impacts could also be significant. For Washington and Oregon, the direct economic losses have been estimated at upward of $81 billion.”

Opportunity for E&O: Webinars & Seminars, featuring PNSN Realtime Earthquake Products ShakeCast ShakeMap DYFI? EEW (Earthquake Early Warning) Web 0.0 Sec 10 Minutes TED PSHA (Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessments) Earthquake Notification Service 3 Minutes Years->hours before During After PAGER (Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response) http://earthquake.usgs.gov Earthquake Information System. (EIS) Holistic view of earthquake information systems. What’s Next? Should be comprised of a combination of Aftershock probabilities &NEIC Tectonic summaries. GNS New Zealand his done this well (Gerstenberger’s lead). For any event, not all products are either guaranteed, nor are they of equal importance or robustness. Some events (outside of CA will not have EEW; ShakeMap is less robust where fewer stations are available; OEF will be there for all aftershocks, but may not be useful for all mainshock (e.g., no foreshocks occurred before Napa event) Expectations are that the system works no matter what the event, but not all products are required for a successful response.

Situational awareness products provided

for the mainshock & 7 aftershocks. Special types of water-saturated sediments lose their strength when shaken, in a process called liquefaction. During shaking pressures may build within buried liquefied sediments causing them to erupt onto the surface, creating features called ‘sand blows’ like those shown in this photo after the 2001 Nisqually Washington earthquake. When sediments liquefy beneath buildings and other structures, severe settling may occur. Photo from the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Aftershock shaking may be more intense locally than that from the mainshock (e.g. as in Portland for this example). 5

PNSN Tweets….