H IGHER O RDER T HINKING Q UESTIONS Lesson Plan Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revised Blooms Taxonomy (RBT) and North Carolina Essential Standards March 5, 2010.
Advertisements

U.S. Classroom Observation Checklist
LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Course Design for Online Library Tutorials Carol ONeil Centre for Learning and Teaching Dalhousie University.
Writing Student Learning Outcomes
SIOP Lesson Planning for Science
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy A Tool for Rigor and Alignment
Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
SCIS Oration We are pleased to sponsor Joy McGregor for the SCIS Oration.
What Are The Characteristics of Quality Questions?
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
Introduction to Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Idea Purpose ◦ Organize and classify educational goals ◦ Provide a systematized approach to course design Guided.
Section VI: Comprehension Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Aligning Theory with Practice How to Use Bloom’s Taxonomy Table EDTEC 572.
At the end of my physics course, a biology student should be able to…. Michelle Smith University of Maine School of Biology and Ecology Maine Center for.
March 21, 2011 Bassett High School Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised and Revisited.
What Do the Data Say? Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Tool for Rigor and Curriculum Alignment.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
Taxonomies of Learning Foundational Knowledge: Understanding and remembering information and ideas. Application: Skills Critical, creative, and practical.
Depth of Knowledge A HEAP of Complexity. BLOOM’S TAXONOMYBLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY KNOWLEDGE “The recall of specifics and universals, involving little.
Bloom's Taxonomy: The Sequel (What the Revised Version Means for You!)
 Bloom's Taxonomy is a classification of learning objectives within education.
Half-Day Professional Development November 9, 2012.
The New Bloom’s Taxonomy quiz
The Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (RBT): Improving Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in an Accountability-Driven, Standards-Based World Developed and.
Ferris Bueller: Voodoo Economics Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4.
Paul Parkison: Teacher Education 1 Articulating and Assessing Learning Outcomes Stating Objectives Developing Rubrics Utilizing Formative Assessment.
Standards-Based Planning Essential Question: What is good teaching? Rigor, Consistency and Cohesiveness in Unit Planning.
Phase II Essential Standards. Phase I Phase II Lesson Plan Template.
Dillon School District Two Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy.
1 Mesa Public Schools Writing an Effective Learning Objective: The instructional road to focus learning Ensuring learning occurs in every lesson.
August 2, 2010 TE 818. Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (1943)  Studied exemplary people  Physiological Needs (warmth, shelter, food)  Security.
Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) and Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised (2001) Thomas F. Hawk Management Department Frostburg State University.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge.
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
Shake it up, baby! Differentiation in middle and high school classrooms. Tanya B. O’Berry.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Benjamin Samuel Bloom He was one of the greatest minds to influence the field of education. He was born on February 21, 1913 in Lansford,
Original Terms New Terms
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Designing Aligned Instruction.
Welcome to Watauga County Schools Professional Development High School Healthful Living and Physical Education March 15 th and 16th.
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy Creating Higher Level Discussions.
WHAT IS EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION? E xplicit D irect I nstruction.
PLANNING FOR THE PRACTICUM. Reflective Practitioner Model PLAN ACT Knowledge Diversity Professionalism Pedagogy REFLECT FSEHD Conceptual Framework.
Part:1 EFFECTIVE LESSON PLANNING AND DESIGN
Drafts of the North Carolina Essential Standards STEM Design Team Webinar Middle Grades Summer PD June 15-17, 2010 Asheboro City Schools.
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
Bengkel pembinaan item soalan unit biologi 2014
Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity
The New Bloom’s Taxonomy
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Questions and Questioning Strategies
BLOOM’S Assessment & Evaluation in Language Testing
Chapter 10: Bloom’s Taxonomy
Bloom's Hierarchy “Although it received little attention when first published, Bloom's Taxonomy has since been translated into 22 languages and is one.
The New Bloom’s Taxonomy
Writing Effective Objectives
Bloom's Revised Taxonomy.
IN THE NAME OF “ALLAH” THE MOST BENIFICENT AND THE MOST MERCIFUL
The New Bloom’s Taxonomy
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان إعداد
Taxonomies Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive Domain (Bloom & Krathwohl, 1956) A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision.
Writing Learning Outcomes
The New Bloom’s Taxonomy
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
Section VI: Comprehension
Writing Learning Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

H IGHER O RDER T HINKING Q UESTIONS Lesson Plan Review

P URPOSE OF THE R EVIEW To determine professional development needs for teachers in the area of lesson planning. To provide feedback, consistent across the District, on the lesson plans. To focus on higher order thinking skills questions.

W HY D OES IT M ATTER ? CAHSEE and CST questions are written primarily at the Apply, Analyze and Evaluate levels of Blooms Taxonomy. Students must be able to think critically to be college and career ready in the 21 st century. The National Common Core Standards require students to think and perform at higher levels than ever before.

W HAT S N EW Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Costas

D IFFERENCES ? S IMILARITIES ?

Q UALITIES OF A G OOD Q UESTION Makes you think Can have more than one answer Makes you reread, rethink, or check to make sure Can be asked in different ways Cant be answered just in the book Makes you want to know more Makes you smarter Is not simple or quick Requires more than a one-word answer Provokes other questions Promotes discussion and explanation Is tied to the learning objective

T HE T AXONOMY T ABLE

T HE C OGNITIVE P ROCESS D IMENSION The six categories comprising the cognitive process dimension are comparable to the original six cognitive levels. The updated categories in order of increasing complexity are: Remember (Knowledge) Understand (Comprehension) Apply (Application) Analyze (Analysis) Evaluate (Evaluation) Create (Synthesis)

S IX C OGNITIVE D IMENSIONS … N INETEEN C OGNITIVE P ROCESSES Cognitive DimensionsCognitive Processes RememberRecognizing, Recalling UnderstandInterpreting, Exemplifying, Classifying, Summarizing, Inferring, Comparing, Explaining ApplyExecuting, Implementing AnalyzeDifferentiating, Organizing, Attributing EvaluateChecking, Critiquing CreateGenerating, Planning, Producing

T HE K NOWLEDGE D IMENSION 1. Factual Knowledge – knowledge of discrete, isolated content elements, bits of information. It includes knowledge of terminology and knowledge of specific details and elements. 2. Conceptual Knowledge – knowledge of more complex, organized knowledge forms. It includes knowledge of classifications and categories, principles and generalizations, theories, models and structures

T HE K NOWLEDGE D IMENSION 3. Procedural Knowledge – knowledge of how to do something. It includes knowledge of skills and algorithms, techniques and methods, as well as knowledge of the criteria used to determine and/or justify when to do what within specific domains and disciplines. 4. Metacognitive Knowledge – knowledge about cognition in general as well as awareness of and knowledge about ones own cognition. It encompasses strategic knowledge; knowledge about cognitive tasks, including contextual and conditional knowledge; and self-knowledge.

H OW DO YOU USE THE TOOLS TO CLASSIFY A QUESTION ? Locate the verb within the question Locate the noun within the question Classify the verb by reference to the cognitive process dimension Classify the noun by reference to the knowledge dimension The question is placed at the intersection of the two dimensions

Questioning Behaviors Questions for Reflection Identify instructional purpose.What is the purpose of the question? -Is it to reinforce knowledge, or to engage students in discussion that causes them to think at higher levels? -In what ways do the questions build group cohesiveness or involve, interest, and motivate students? Determine content focus.For which facts, concepts and skills are learners accountable? -Are these facts, concepts and skills important? -Do the questions, taken together, lead to essential learnings and enduring understandings? -Is the content aligned with district and state standards/assessments? Select cognitive level.At what cognitive level are students responding? -Are students remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating or creating? -Are student responses at the level of the questions? -Do the questions include a variety of cognitive levels during the course of the lesson? -Do students have the prerequisite knowledge to respond correctly? Consider wording and syntax.Do students understand the question? Do they understand what is being asked of them? -Is the meaning clear? -Is the question specific? Is it limited to a single topic? -Is the question tightly worded? -Is the question phrased so that it can be spoken with ease? Reflect on related beliefs.To what extent do the students share the following beliefs? -Good questions help students learn. -Divergent thinking is important.

Q UALITY Q UESTIONS ARE S ELDOM A SKED BY C HANCE ! Quality questions are the muscles of classroom instruction. As we build these muscles, we increase the power to lift our students learning and thinking to new heights. However, like powerful muscles, quality questions are seldom created by chance. Rather, we must craft them according to instructional purpose, content focus, desired cognitive level, learner needs and interests. Source: Quality Questioning Research-Based Practice to Engage Every Learner – Jackie Walsh and Beth Sattes