Can we use total field magnetics to find buried pit houses beneath layers of volcanic ash? Visible pit houses at Bridge River, B.C. (Prentiss et al., 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seismic Resolution Lecture 8 * Layer Thickness top 20 ms base
Advertisements

Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021
Travelers Rest State Park - processing demo A Native American gathering area for centuries Lewis and Clarks party camped here in 1805 and 1806 Recent archaeological.
Problem 1 The corrections can be larger than the anomaly Stat.Time T Dist. (m) Elev. (m) Reading (dial units) Base reading at time T Drift corr’d anom.
Imaging Furniture, Graves, and Stone Rings at Depth: Recent Magnetic and Radar Results from the Northern Rockies Steve Sheriff Professor of Geophysics,
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Magnetic Methods (IV) Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I
Edge Detection and Depth Estimates – Application to Pseudogravity and Reduced to Pole Results: Part I Edge detection on an oversampled synthetic anomaly.
Storm-time total electron content and its response to penetration electric fields over South America P. M. de Siqueira, E. R. de Paula, M. T. A. H. Muella,
AKS Geoscience. Located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, AKS Geoscience Inc. is a progressive independent firm comprised of professional.
Computer Vision Detecting the existence, pose and position of known objects within an image Michael Horne, Philip Sterne (Supervisor)
Mapping Basement Structure in East-Central New York Pearson, deRidder and Johnson, Inc.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Improved Soil Moisture Variability in CLM 3.5 Sean Swenson NCAR Advanced Study Program in collaboration with Keith Oleson and David Lawrence.
Total field magnetic intensity, contour interval is 10 nanotesla. Tightly packed near circular contours illustrate effect of debris on or near the ground.
Processing and interpreting total field magnetic data, Kevin Rim, Montana Collected three adjacent grids Grid #1 used for organization- fill in details.
More Raster and Surface Analysis in Spatial Analyst
Separating regional and local magnetic signals What can you tell me about this magnetic map? Where is it? What kind of sources? Is there a range of depths?
INVERSIONS AND CONSTRAINTS
Reflection Field Methods
Magnetic Methods and Results Daniel Boesner Wendy Key Geol 692 May 2009.
Lecture 4: Edge Based Vision Dr Carole Twining Thursday 18th March 2:00pm – 2:50pm.
Anatomy of Anomalies Total Field Magnetics and Ground Penetrating Radar at a Potential Archaeological Site.
Werner deconvolution, like Euler deconvolution, is more properly thought of as an inverse method: we analyze the observed magnetic field and solve for.
Summary Of the Structure of the Milky Way The following graphical data is meant to help you understand WHY astronomers believe they know the structure.
Outline  Derivatives and transforms of potential fields  First and second vertical derivatives  Convolutional operators  Fourier approach  Reduction.
Outline  Uses of Gravity and Magnetic exploration  Concept of Potential Field  Conservative  Curl-free (irrotational)  Key equations and theorems.
…….CT Physics - Continued V.G.WimalasenaPrincipal School of radiography.
Spatial data models (types)
Spatial-based Enhancements Lecture 3 prepared by R. Lathrop 10/99 updated 10/03 ERDAS Field Guide 6th Ed. Ch 5: ;
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
“Frequency domain” EM“Time domain” EM. Measurement of signal decay – sample the decaying amplitudes in a number of time windows, or “channels” As the.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Detection of nerves in Ultrasound Images using edge detection techniques NIRANJAN TALLAPALLY.
Aldo Dell'Oro INAF- Observatory of Turin Detailed analysis of the signal from asteroids by GAIA and their size estimation Besançon November 6-7, 2003.
GP33A-06 / Fall AGU Meeting, San Francisco, December 2004 Magnetic signals generated by the ocean circulation and their variability. Manoj,
Magnetic Anomaly Map Including outline of island Magnetic Anomalies of Macquarie Island.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Discrete Fourier Transform in 2D – Chapter 14. Discrete Fourier Transform – 1D Forward Inverse M is the length (number of discrete samples)
Imaging Multiple Horizons with Spectral Techniques in the Sirt Basin, Libya Authors: Sam Yates, Irena Kivior, Shiferaw Damte, Stephen Markham, Francis.
GG 450 Feb 27, 2008 Resistivity 2. Resistivity: Quantitative Interpretation - Flat interface Recall the angles that the current will take as it hits an.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Assignment: Use these raw TMI data from near Yellowstone Lakeraw TMI data clean them up separate sources make professional final images Write a report.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Matched Filtering as a Separation Tool – review example In any map of total magnetic intensity, various sources contribute components spread across the.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Recall that the proton precession magnetometer makes measurements of the total field, not the vector components of the field. Recall also that the total.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Edge Detection and Depth Estimates – Application to Pseudogravity and Reduced to Pole Results: Part I Edge detection on an oversampled synthetic anomaly.
1 Information Content Tristan L’Ecuyer. 2 Degrees of Freedom Using the expression for the state vector that minimizes the cost function it is relatively.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Detection of nerves in Ultrasound Images using edge detection techniques NIRANJAN TALLAPALLY.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Outline  Gravity above a thin sheet  Equivalent stratum for buried sources (Green’s equivalent layer)  For gravity  For magnetic field  The uniqueness.
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021
Collected three adjacent grids
Magnetic Methods (V) Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I
Magnetic Methods- continued
Final review sessions - II
GG 450 February 19, 2008 Magnetic Anomalies.
Deep Equivalent Layer Total Field Anomaly Shallow Equivalent Layer
The Relationship between Uncertainty and Quality in Seismic Data
Outline Derivatives and transforms of potential fields
Wavelet transform application – edge detection
Presentation transcript:

Can we use total field magnetics to find buried pit houses beneath layers of volcanic ash? Visible pit houses at Bridge River, B.C. (Prentiss et al., 2009)

Can we use total field magnetics to find buried pit houses beneath layers of volcanic ash? Approach, constraints and thoughts: The site, Anangula in the Aleutian Islands, has up to two meters of volcanic ash burying some of the pit houses

Bridge River Study: vertical magnetic gradient The vertical magnetic gradient observations from Prentiss et al. (2009) provide an analog to model similar features in the Aleutians. The result helps confirm the likely success of magnetic exploration to map the layout of the site. Note that the observed values of vertical magnetic gradient are very high with a range of about 200 nt/m. A portion of the amplitude of the circular highs (red rings) is probably due to the excavated soil.

Vertical gradient magnetometer observations from the Bridge River, British Columbia site provide an analog for modeling

Use forward magnetic models of truncated vertical cylinders To test a worst case situation produce a signal much less than that of the Bridge River results

Use forward magnetic models of truncated vertical cylinders Signal range is about 25% of that for the Bridge River vertical gradient observations

Total Field Intensity (TMI) and Vertical Gradient of the Total Field: these anomalies are calculated over simulated pit houses Pit houses modeled as vertical cylinders 2m tall, with radius = 6m, and tops at the surface. Amplitudes of anomalies are scaled so that the range of the vertical gradient is about 25% of the anomalies from Bridge River. This tests a weaker case. Some measure the vertical gradient in the field but it can be calculated from total field observations as one type of edge detector (aka image enhancement).

Recalculated TMI and Vertical Gradient Anomalies: simulated pit houses are now 2 meters below the surface The range of the vertical gradient is now reduced to about 10 nt, or 5% of the values measured at Bridge River. This is due to lowering the top of the modeled pit houses to 2m below the surface. The anomalies are still very strong.

Contaminate the weak forward signal with substantial noise: determine if we can still recover signal Simulated Fractal Noise: Amplitude ~Equal to the TMI Signal signal/noise ~ 1 !

Random (1/f 2 ) magnetization (A/m) simulating very variable soil properties Magnetic field (TMI) calculated from the 1/f 2 distribution of magnetization Adding this magnetic field to that for the two meter deep pit houses will simulate a bad field situation. The noise (+/-20 nt) is a bit greater than the TMIs range (+/-15nt).

Add the Fractal Noise to the Signal From 2m Deep Pit Houses: a field situation with an extremely low signal to noise ratio The general location of the deep pit houses, even though greatly obscured by the noise, is still apparent in the total field anomaly even without any processing. The location of the pit houses is very difficult to distinguish in the vertical gradient anomaly. This is because the vertical gradient is a high pass frequency operator and biases against the signal from the deep pit houses.

Post-processing Enhances the TMI Anomalies Even in this low signal/noise situation the pit houses standout. Deep equivalent magnetic layer after separating shallow source components with matched filtering Maxima of the horizontal gradient of the pseudogravity transform of the TMI; highs estimate edges of sources.

Summary Pit house model parameters for a pretty bad (if not worse) case field scenario: House diameter = 6 meters; depth to top = 2 meters Surface magnetic anomalies scaled to 25% of Bridge River vertical gradients After burial to two meters signal amplitude is about 5% of Bridge River values Two meter layer of fractal noise added to signal to simulate volcanic soils Model signal to noise ratio ~ 1 1 meter spacing of observations; they would be at 0.1 meter along lines in the field. The modeled situation is quite pessimistic relative to known results at Bridge River. Regardless, the pit houses are still very apparent. If the Bridge River results are at all characteristic, the situation at Anangula in the Aleutian Islands could easily be much better than this model.