: 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Structure of Sentences Asian 401
Advertisements

BBN-ANG-253 Advanced Syntax Lecture Course Autumn, 2014/15
Null complementizers Sept. 21, 2012 – Day 11 Introduction to Syntax ANTH 3590/7590 Harry Howard Tulane University.
Finite and Non-Finite Subordinate Clauses Sási Erzsébet 11 th April, 2014.
Lecture 4: The Complementiser System
Specifiers! The notion of subject. Specifier = Subject u By creating DP, we got rid of our only example of a specifier. u So do we need the notion specifier?
Unit 5 Finite Verbs or Verb Phrases. What is a verb phrase? A verb phrase is a phrase whose nucleus is a verb which can be a finite V/VP or a non-finite.
Elliptical, gapping, null spellout, silent AUX
Syntax Lecture 10: Auxiliaries. Types of auxiliary verb Modal auxiliaries belong to the category of inflection – They are in complementary distribution.
Dr. Abdullah S. Al-Dobaian1 Ch. 2: Phrase Structure Syntactic Structure (basic concepts) Syntactic Structure (basic concepts)  A tree diagram marks constituents.
Syntax Lecture 13: Revision. Lecture 1: X-bar Theory X-bar rules for introducing: – Complement (X 1  X 0 Y 2 ) – Specifier (X 2  Y 2 X 1 ) – Adjunct.
Week 12b. Relative clauses CAS LX 522 Syntax I. Relative clauses Another place where we see wh- movement, besides in explicit questions (either in the.
Installment 9a. CP and PRO CAS LX 522 Syntax I.
Lecture 6: Verbs with Clausal Arguments
Installment 12a. Commentary, and the beginning of wh-movement ( ) CAS LX 522 Syntax I.
Episode 7b. Subjects, agreement, and case CAS LX 522 Syntax I.
CAS LX 522 Syntax I Week 11a. Wh-movement.
Clauses and Moods by Prashanth Kamle
Embedded Clauses in TAG
LEL 1 Syntax 8: Wh-movement. Outline Questioned constituents in English undergo movement to first position of the sentence. This movement can lead to.
Extending X-bar Theory DPs, TPs, and CPs. The Puzzle of Determiners  Specifier RuleXP  (YP) X’ – requires the specifier to be phrasal – *That the book.
Syntax Lecture 8: Verb Types 1. Introduction We have seen: – The subject starts off close to the verb, but moves to specifier of IP – The verb starts.
Lecture 9: The Gerund.  The English gerund is an intriguing structure which causes a particular problem for X-bar theory  [His constantly complaining.
Ex 3.2 Oct. 1, 2012 – Day 14 Introduction to Syntax ANTH 3590/7590 Harry Howard Tulane University.
IV. SYNTAX. 1.1 What is syntax? Syntax is the study of how sentences are structured, or in other words, it tries to state what words can be combined with.
Syntax Lecture 5: More On Wh-movement. Review Wh-movement: – Moves interrogative ‘wh’-phrase – from various positions inside the IP – to the specifier.
Lecture 7: Tense and Negation.  The clause is made up of distinct structural areas with different semantic purposes  The VP  One or more verbal head.
Subordination & Content clauses
Syntax III November 19, Sentences The basic phrase types include: NP, VP, AP, PP A basic sentence is an “inflectional phrase” (IP). The head of.
Revision.  Movements leave behind a phonologically null trace in all their extraction sites.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 5 Filters. The Structure of the Grammar 1960s (Standard Theory) LexiconPhrase Structure Rules Deep Structure Transformations.
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 16, March 6, 2007.
 Chapter 8 (Part 2) Transformations Transformational Grammar Engl 424 Hayfa Alhomaid.
Syntax Lecture 6: Missing Subjects of Non-finite Clauses.
Lecture 1: Trace Theory.  We have seen that things move :  Arguments move out of the VP into subject position  Wh-phrases move out of IP into CP 
8 Split Projections 8.1 Overview CP: Force Phrase, Topic Phrase, Focus Phrase TP: Tense Phrase, Aspect Phrase, Mood Phrase VP: headed by a lexical verb.
X-Bar Theory. The part of the grammar regulating the structure of phrases has come to be known as X'-theory (X’-bar theory'). X-bar theory brings out.
Week 3. Clauses and Trees English Syntax. Trees and constituency A sentence has a hierarchical structure Constituents can have constituents of their own.
THE SUBJUNCTIVE ETSI de Telecomunicaciones English.
Week 12. NP movement Text 9.2 & 9.3 English Syntax.
Installment 9b. CP and PRO (v1.1)
Lecture 6: More On Wh-movement
Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation
English Tenses The Past.
Week 10 X-bar syntax: More on Clauses
Lecture 4: The Complementiser System
Structure, Constituency & Movement
Week 11. Verb movement: Aspectual Auxiliaries
English Syntax Week 12. NP movement Text 9.2 & 9.3.
Lecture 3: Functional Phrases
Lecture 3 Krisztina Szécsényi
Syntax Lecture 9: Verb Types 1.
Lecture 7: Missing Subjects of Non-finite Clauses
Lecture 12: Summary and Exam
Lecture 10 Krisztina Szécsényi
Lecture 9 Krisztina Szécsényi
Part I: Basics and Constituency
Lecture 8: Verb Positions
: 2018.
: 2018.
Introduction to Linguistics
Syntax Lecture 11: More on the DP.
The Basics of Sentence Structure
:.
Noun clauses.
:.
:.
:.
Principles and Parameters (I)
Presentation transcript:

: 2018

Syntax: A First Encounter Marcel den Dikken Department of English Linguistics ELTE

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases → SAFEty First • on top of the v–VP core of the structure of the clause, syntax introduces a projection of the functional head I, which is responsible for checking agreement with and assigning nominative Case to the subject in SpecIP • nominative Case is assigned by agreeing I under Spec- Head agreement, while accusative Case is assigned by the [–N] categories (incl. ‘little v’) under government • in finite clauses, the agreeing subject in SpecIP always receives nominative Case; in non-finite clauses, it is not possible for the subject to show agreement with the verb in English (unlike in Portuguese), so the subject of a non- finite clause never receives nominative Case • the subject of certain English non-finite clauses can, however, surface with accusative Case – how?

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases • English cannot produce Portuguese-like inflected infinitives with a nominative subject of the infinitive • but English can mimic them in a way, with the help of the element for, which assigns the subject of the infinitive accusative Case será difícil [eles aprovarem a proposta] it’ll be hard [for them to approve the proposal] it’ll be hard [they to approve the proposal] it’ll be hard [to approve the proposal] * what is this for, and how does it assign accusative Case?

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases for assigns accusative Case under government • we see this Case-assigning for also under Vs like prefer • for+him is not a constituent here • the adjacency condition on accusative Case assignment is in effect here it’ll be hard [for them to approve the proposal it’ll be hard [them to approve the proposal] it’ll be hard [to approve the proposal] * I prefer for him to tell me the truth * for him, I prefer to tell me the truth I prefer (sincerely) for (*sincerely) him to tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases for assigns accusative Case under government V' CP V ?? a complementiser prefer ?? IP for DPi I' him I vP to ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases for is the English complementiser for infinitival clauses (with the infinitival marker to under I) V' V CP prefer C IP for DPi I' him I vP to ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases that is the English complementiser for finite clauses (with finite tense under I) V' V CP think C IP that DPi I' he I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases in both finite and infinitival clauses, the complementiser itself is usually just optionally present: C can be occupied by a silent morpheme V' V CP think C IP that DPi I' he I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases in both finite and infinitival clauses, the complementiser itself is usually just optionally present: C can be occupied by a silent morpheme V' V CP think C IP Ø DPi I' he I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases in both finite and infinitival clauses, the complementiser itself is usually just optionally present: C can be occupied by a silent morpheme V' V CP prefer C IP Ø DPi I' him I vP to ti tell me the truth

regarding silent morphemes, recall the discussion of v SAFE 9 ‘Little v’ flashback regarding silent morphemes, recall the discussion of v vP DP they v′ v Ø VP V′ V laugh (PP) at me

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases back to CP and overt instances of the complementiser — what other examples can we think of? V' V CP think C IP that DPi I' he I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases back to CP and overt instances of the complementiser — what other examples can we think of? V' V CP wonder ✓ C IP if DPi I' he I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases back to CP and overt instances of the complementiser — what other examples can we think of? V' V CP wonder * C IP whether DPi I' he I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases I wonder [whether or not] he told me the truth I wonder [if or not] he told me the truth I think [that or not] he told me the truth * * V' whether is clearly phrasal in ways that that and if are not V CP wonder * C IP whether DPi I' he I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases I wonder [whether or not] he told me the truth I wonder [if or not] he told me the truth I think [that or not] he told me the truth * * V' for true complementisers such as that and if, it makes sense that they cannot be coordinated with not, which itself projects a phrase (cf. certainly not) V CP wonder * C IP whether DPi I' he the Law of Coordination of Likes I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases I wonder [whether or not] he told me the truth I wonder [if or not] he told me the truth I think [that or not] he told me the truth * * V' now the fact that whether can be coordinated with not strongly suggests that whether is, like not, a phrase — if so, it cannot occupy the C-position V CP wonder * C IP whether DPi I' he the Law of Coordination of Likes I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases I wonder [whether or not] he told me the truth I wonder [if or not] he told me the truth I think [that or not] he told me the truth * * V' now the fact that whether can be coordinated with not strongly suggests that whether is, like not, a phrase — if so, it cannot occupy the C-position V CP wonder * C IP whether DPi I' he Q: where can we put whether, then? I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases I wonder [whether or not] he told me the truth I wonder [if or not] he told me the truth I think [that or not] he told me the truth * * V' note that we had left the C-projection rather incomplete up to this point: we projected C straight up to CP, for simplicity; but there is, of course, also a C′ V CP wonder * C IP whether DPi I' he Q: where can we put whether, then? I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases I wonder [whether or not] he told me the truth I wonder [if or not] he told me the truth I think [that or not] he told me the truth * * CP note that we had left the C-projection rather incomplete up to this point: we projected C straight up to CP, for simplicity; but there is, of course, also a C′ Spec C' * C IP whether DPi I' he Q: where can we put whether, then? I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases I wonder [whether or not] he told me the truth I wonder [if or not] he told me the truth I think [that or not] he told me the truth * * CP SpecCP is the perfect place to put phrasal whether Spec C' * C IP whether DPi I' he Q: where can we put whether, then? I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

Complementiser Phrases SAFE 9 Complementiser Phrases I wonder [whether or not] he told me the truth I wonder [if or not] he told me the truth I think [that or not] he told me the truth * * CP SpecCP is the perfect place to put phrasal whether ✓ whether C' now the C-position remains empty again: a null morpheme is sitting in C C IP Ø DPi I' he I vP -ed ti tell me the truth

SAFE Deposits → at this time, let us revisit our SAFE Deposit Box • we had previously built the structure of the clause up to the IP, projected by the functional head I (for ‘inflection’) • for many clauses in English, projecting the structure up to IP is sufficient • but subordinate clauses in English are often introduced by a functional element – a so-called complementiser • English has an infinitival complementiser, for, as well as two finite complementisers, that (for declarative clauses) and if (for interrogative clauses) • the complementiser for is able to assign accusative Case to the subject of the clause in its complement • the complementisers for and that have very little meaning so they can often be omitted; CP then has a silent head • the SpecCP position is useful for phrasal whether

Syntax: A First Encounter Marcel den Dikken Department of English Linguistics ELTE

: 2018