Revised Commissioning Strategy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tessa Charles Australian Synchrotron / Monash University 1 Bunch Compression Schemes for X-band FELs.
Advertisements

1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Hal Tompkins FEE/FEL June 16, FEE/FEL Commissioning Overview By Hal Tompkins Photon Beam Systems Deputy.
James Welch October 30, FEL Commissioning Plans J. Welch, et. al. FEL Commissioning Plans J. Welch, et. al. Accelerator.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
Paul Emma LCLS Commissioning Status Nov. 11, 2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 LCLS Commissioning Status P. Emma for The.
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
ESS DTL beam commissioning
Injector Accelerator Readiness Review, 10/31/06 Henrik Loos 1 Beam Losses During LCLS Injector Phase-1 Operation Scope of phase 1 operation Operating modes.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
TTF-II Status & Prospectives Nick Walker DESY 5 th ITRP Meeting – CALTECH.
TTF2 Start-to-End Simulations Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg TESLA COLLABORATION MEETING DESY Zeuthen, 22 Jan 2004.
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
Synchronisation Activities for 4GLS Supported by EUROFEL DS3 G J Hirst CCLRC Central Laser Facility.
LCLS Accelerator SLAC linac tunnel research yard Linac-0 L =6 m Linac-1 L  9 m  rf   25° Linac-2 L  330 m  rf   41° Linac-3 L  550 m  rf  0°
Luminosity expectations for the first years of CLIC operation CTC MJ.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
K.Honkavaara, LCLS ICW06 LCLS Injector Commissioning Workshop, SLAC, October 9-11, 2006 Linac Experience at FLASH Katja Honkavaara University of Hamburg.
Beam Stay-Clear (BSC) Apertures in LCLS-II June 24, 2015 P. Emma Take up work Jim Welch started (LCLSII-TN-14-15, Jan. 23, 2015) Goal is to define stay-clear.
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
X-band Based FEL proposal
Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen PSI, March 2013 Paul Scherrer Institut PSI / DESY / KIT Mini-Workshop on Longitudinal Diagnostics for FELs.
WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Steps towards beam commissioning: RF system group Paolo Craievich :: RF Section :: Paul Scherrer Institut SwissFEL.
MAX IV linac overview and scope of automation Sara Thorin.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Dielectric Wakefield R&D programme at Daresbury Lab.
Eduard Prat / Sven Reiche :: Paul Scherrer Institute
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Studies at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Status of the MAX IV Short Pulse Facility
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
LLRF'15 Workshop, Shanghai, Nov. 4, 2015
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Status and Interest of the X-ray FEL SINAP
Short pulse, low charge LCLS operation
Timing and synchronization at SPARC
Illustration of electronic in tunnel
Paul Scherrer Institut
Beam-Based Feedback in LCLS-II
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
LCLS Linac Update Brief Overview L1 & BC1 Progress LTU & E-Dump Status Continuing Resolution Impact.
Injector –Linac Status & Schedule E. Bong LCLS FAC October 12, 2006
LCLS Gun Commissioning Status & Plans David H
Diagnostics overview and FB for the XFEL bunch compressors
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
LCLS Injector Commissioning Dates ( )
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
Brief Introduction to (VUV/)Soft X-ray FELs
FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
LCLS Linac Overview E. Bong Lehman Review August 10, 2004
Linac (WBS 1.2.2) Vinod Bharadwaj April 23, 2002
LCLS Commissioning P. Emma, et al
VELA – CLARA AP (Draft) Goals Software Goals
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Diagnostics RF and Feedback
LCLS Injector Commissioning P
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
European XFEL Status Winni Decking, DESY
P. Emma, for the LCLS Commissioning Team LCLS DOE Review May 14, 2009
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
Status of DESY-PSI-CERN collaboration on development of X-band TDS with variable polarisation: PolariX-TDS Alexej Grudiev on behalf of Polarix-TDS collaboration.
Presentation transcript:

Revised Commissioning Strategy Sven Reiche :: SFBD :: Paul Scherrer Institut Revised Commissioning Strategy Commissioning Workshop 2016

Introduction Strategy driven by beam dynamics and FEL objectives Requisite for hardware given by objectives Hard requisites: e.g. X-band operational for Compression Commissioning should stop and allow for installation and repair if no further commissioning objectives can be achieved Soft requisites: e.g. Amplitude laser not available, but Jaguar is. Commissioning can continue but requires to return and repeat this commissioning step once the requisite is fulfilled. Missing soft requisites must be evaluated if it makes sense to continue Example 1: Setting up TDS and measurement procedures with jaguar is useful Example 2: Slice emittance optimization with jaguar is a waste of commissioning time Commissioning should not happen for the sake of filling the commissioning time slot if no further objectives can be fulfilled

Injector I - Gun Goal (Minimal Goal): Demonstrate generation of electron beam Set-up gun phase procedure Hard requisite: Gun RF commissioned, Laser available, Gun spectrometer functional Both screens, a BPM and one charge measurement (WC or ICT) ready in SINEG01 Soft requisite: Stability in jitter and drift: 5 times the SwissFEL tolerance values Diagnostic resolution: 5 times the SwissFEL design values 200 pC charge

Injector II – Transport, Optics & Proj. Emittance Goal (Minimal Goal): Transport beam to injector spectrometer Achieve 150 MeV beam energy Establish stable beam optics for transport Measure projected emittance of uncompressed beam Hard requisite: SINSB01 and SINSB02 RF commissioned All BPMs, Screens in SINLH01, SINBC01, SINDI01, S10DI01 and S10BD01 All magnets except Bunch Compressor and Laser Heater Soft Requisite: Stability in jitter and drift: 5 times the SwissFEL tolerance values Diagnostic resolution: 5 times the SwissFEL design values 200 pC charge

Injector III – Slice Emittance, Optimization Goal: Set-up TDS measurement Measure slice emittance and longitudinal phase space Optimize slice emittance and mismatch for uncompressed bunch Hard Requisite: TDS RF commissioned Soft Requisite: Amplitude Laser available Stability in jitter and drift: 5 times the SwissFEL tolerance values Diagnostic resolution: 5 times the SwissFEL design values except camera S10DI01 and S10BD01 with nominal resolution 200 pC charge

Injector IV – Bunch Compression Goal: Set-up nominal bunch compression Demonstration and optimization of slice emittance values Hard Requisite: BC1 movable and operational All RF stations operational Soft Requisite: Amplitude Laser available Stability in jitter and drift: 5 times the SwissFEL tolerance values Diagnostic resolution: 5 times the SwissFEL design values except cameras in S10DI01 and S10BD01 200 pC charge

Injector V – Laser Heater Goal: Demonstrate induced energy modulation with laser heater Hard Requisite: LH chicane and undulator operational LH laser pulse available LH diagnostics operational Soft Requisite: Stability in jitter and drift: 5 times the SwissFEL tolerance values Diagnostic resolution: 5 times the SwissFEL design values 200 pC charge

Injector VI – Stability & Reproducibility Goal: Demonstrate reproducible and stable operation of the injector Commissioning of the beam-based feedback system Hard Requisite: All feedback-related diagnostics available Soft Requisite: Jitter and drift are fulfilling SwissFEL tolerances Diagnostics has nominal resolution 100 Hz operation BS data aquisition

Linac I - Transmission Goal (Minimal Goal): Transport of the beam to the Aramis beam dump Acceleration with C-Band to 500 MeV Hard Requisite: S10CB01 operational BPMs and screens available All magnets operational except BC2 and septum magnet / Resonant kicker Soft Requisite: 200 pC Stability in jitter and drift: 5 times the SwissFEL tolerance values Diagnostic resolution: 5 times the SwissFEL design values

Linac II – Optics (e.g. Collimator, Switchyard) Goal: Establish nominal beam transport Commissioning energy collimator Hard Requisite Energy collimator operational Soft Requisite BAM in SARBD01 Stability in jitter and drift: 5 times the SwissFEL tolerance values Diagnostic resolution: 5 times the SwissFEL design values

Linac III – Undulator Alignment Goal: Beam based alignment of QFF magnets Beam based alignment of undulator modules Evaluation of settings for entrance and exit correctors and earth magnetic coil Hard Requisite: All undulator modules operational Soft Requisite: 1.7 GeV beam energy 200 pC Stability in jitter and drift: 5 times the SwissFEL tolerance values Diagnostic resolution: 5 times the SwissFEL design values

Linac IV – Bunch Compression Goal: Bunch compression with BC2 Emittance optimization with two-stage compression Compression set-up Hard Requisite: BC2 operation C-Band TDS operational Soft Requisite: Amplitude laser 200 pC Full Linac 1 energy Stability in jitter and drift: 2 times the SwissFEL tolerance values Diagnostic resolution: 2 times the SwissFEL design values

Linac V – Stability and Reproducibility Goal: Demonstrate reproducible and stable operation of the linac and undulator line Commissioning of the beam-based feedback system Hard Requisite: All feedback-related diagnostics available Soft Requisite: Jitter and drift are fulfilling SwissFEL tolerances Diagnostic has nominal resolution 100 Hz operation BS data aquisition

FEL I – FEL Gain Observation Goal (Minimal Goal): Demonstration of FEL signal on Screen Hard Requirement: Same as Linac III Soft Requisite: Linac IV concluded

FEL II – FEL Characterization Goal: Commissioning of photon diagnostics and optics in front-end and optical hutch Photon beam alignment with spontaneous radiation Measurement of FEL gain curve, photon energy, spectrum and pulse energy Hard Requisite: Front-end and optical hutch hardware operational Beam energy 2.1 GeV Soft Requisite: Beam energy 3 GeV Nominal two-stage bunch compression achieved Amplitude laser 200 pC Stability in jitter and drift: 2 times the SwissFEL tolerance values Diagnostic resolution: 2 times the SwissFEL design values

FEL III – FEL Saturation and Optimization Goal: Achieving photonics milestone at 3 GeV (saturation, pulse energy, stability) Hard Requisite: Full instrumentation of front end and optical hutch Beam energy 3 GeV Soft Requisite: Amplitude laser 200 pC Nominal two-stage bunch compression achieved Stability in jitter and drift: 2 times the SwissFEL tolerance values Diagnostic resolution: 2 times the SwissFEL design values

FEL IV – Operation at 1 A, Stability, Rep Rate Goal: Demonstrate photonics milestone at 1 Angstrom Commissioning of experimental stations End of Commissioning for Aramis at 200 pC Hard Requisite: Full Instrumentation of SwissFEL Machine jitter and drift within SwissFEL tolerances Diagnostics resolution within specification.

Causal Dependence of Commissioning Steps 150 MeV 350 MeV Injector I (Gun) Injector II (Transport) Injector III (Emittance) Injector IV (BC1) Injector V (LH) Injector VI (Stability) 500 MeV 1.7 GeV 2.1 GeV Linac I (Transport) Linac II (Optics) Linac III (Alignment) Linac IV (BC2) Linac V (Stability) 2.1 GeV FEL I (Demonstr.) Minimal Goal Milestones Twice relaxed nominal stability 3.0 GeV 5.8 GeV FEL II (Charact.) FEL III (Optimiz.) FEL IV (Stability) Nominal stability

Time Line (Ideal, Soft Requisites Fulfilled) PIC plan slot for injector PIC plan slot for injector, linac, undulator and front end PIC plan slot for full machine, including end stations Relaxed Stability (x2) Much Relaxed Stability (x5) Nominal Stability 2.1 GeV @ BC2 4.7 GeV 150 MeV 350 MeV 540 MeV 2.7 GeV 5.8 GeV 2016 2017 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Inj I-III Inj IV Lin I+II Inj V Lin III Fel I Lin IV Fel II+III Inj VI Lin V Missing: Fel IV: 28 weeks (15 weeks for 1st user station) 10 pC Mode Large Bandwidth Mode Switchyard and Athos Two Bunch Operation During User Operation ~1 week per month