UNIVERSITY OF THE ARMED FORCES - ESPE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

Global Learning Outcomes at Pensacola State College (GLOs)
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
IMPLEMENTATION OF DYNAMIC IN THECLASSROOM AND ITS INCIDENCE ON CHILDRENS PERFORMANCE AND MOTIVATION OF FIFTH GRADEOF BASIC EDUCATION AT ANDRES SEVILLA.
Teacher Evaluation Model
UNIVERSITY OF THE ARMED FORCES-ESPE DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGES APPLIED LINGUISTICS CAREER Research project “THE INFLUENCE OF DIGITAL CLASSES AS DIDACTIC MATERIAL.
AUTHOR: Verónica Gabriela Poveda Reto ADVISORS: DIRECTOR: Lic. Miguel Ponce, M,Sc. CODIRECTOR: Dr. Ma. Teresa Llumiquinga.
DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGES APPLIED LINGUISTICS CAREER THESIS DEFENSE WELCOME EVERYBODY.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
Understanding Validity for Teachers
RESEARCH DISSERTATION THEME: “INCIDENCE OF APPLYING TASK- BASED LEARNING GROUP WORK ON SPEAKING PRODUCTION FOR STUDENTS OF SEVENTH YEAR OF BASIC OF.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Interdisciplinary role of English in the field of medicine: integrating content and context Nataša Milosavljević, Zorica Antić University of Niš, Faculty.
Pre-service teachers’ interest in ELT research Haedong Kim Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (Korea)
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Dissertation Theme “The incidence of using WebQuests on the teaching-learning process of English Foreign Language (EFL) for students attending the seventh.
Understanding MYP Criteria
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Evaluating a Research Report
WELNS 670: Wellness Research Design Chapter 5: Planning Your Research Design.
AUTHORS: María Eugenia Guerrero Andrade Martha Catalina Puga Cevallos ADVISORS: Director: MS. Miguel Ponce Medina Co-Director: MG. Néstor Bonilla Bonilla.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
THE EFFECTS OF COLLABORATIVE LEARNING ON FL STUDENTS: A STUDY ON WRITING IN GROUPS.
Minds are like parachutes they only function when open. - Thomas Dewar.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Intelligent Consumer Chapter 14 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Career Academic Technical Institute (CATI) Division of Career-Technical Education TN State Department of Education 25th NACTEI New Orleans, 2005.
1 Advisor : Ashley Chen ( 陳祥頤 ) Presenter : Karen Peng ( 彭千芸 ) Shirley Pan ( 潘娟娟 ) Department of Applied English Ming Chuan University.
THEME: By Susana A. Andrade P. ADVISORS: DIRECTOR: MSc. María Eugenia Arcos CODIRECTOR: Msc. Olga Cárdenas ARMY POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGES.
Authors: Evelyn Almeida García Patricia Contreras Castro
Marketing Research.
Angela Kleanthous University of Cyprus May 20th, 2017
Inquiry-Based Instruction
WELCOME TO OUR PROJECT DISSERTATION DEFENSE
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN AND SOCIAL CIENCES APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH CAREER    “THE INFLUENCE OF TEACHER’S ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS INTO TECHNOLOGY-RELATED.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGES APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH PROGRAM
Avon Grove School District October 2009
ARMY POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL
Part Two.
AUTHOR: PRISCILA JARAMILLO CANTOS DIRECTOR: MASTER CARLOS ESPIN
THE INCIDENCE OF FLIPPED LEARNING IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE WRITING SKILL OF SENIOR ENGLISH LEARNING GROUPS AT JOHANNES KEPLER HIGH SCHOOL, YEAR.
DEPARTAMENTO DE CIENCIAS HUMANAS Y SOCIALES
Impact-Oriented Project Planning
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS FUERZAS ARMADAS “ESPE”
RESEARCH PROJECT   INFLUENCE OF THE INPUT AND INTERACTION ON VOCABULARY ACQUISITION IN THE TENTH YEAR AT “CIUDAD DE CUENCA” HIGH SCHOOL DURING THE SECOND.
The research process András István Kun.
Understanding Results
Georgia’s Pre-K Summer Transition Program
CHAPTER 4 Creative Marketing Project Event
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Presented by Nguyen Kieu Oanh (M.A)
The Role of Teachers and Technology in Assessing the CCSS Speaking and
Learning and Teaching Principles
The research process András István Kun.
Critical Analysis of Ochoa
COMPETENCIES & STANDARDS
The MR process.
The WIDA ELP Standards and Formative Assessment
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PRACTICE IN WEST AFRICA
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
CHAPTER 4 Creative Marketing Project Event
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 19
The Effects of Task-Based Teaching on English Speaking of Undergraduate Students Name: Wen-Hsin Chang ID:
Peer and Self Assessment: Help others help you!!
Interviewing Skill: Criteria Sheet
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
A COMPARISON OF USING DIGLOT WEAVE TECHNIQUE AND STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION ON STUDENT’S VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT Indonesian Education and Culture.
Presentation transcript:

UNIVERSITY OF THE ARMED FORCES - ESPE DISTANCE LEARNING EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN AND SOCIAL SCIENCES APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH PROGRAM RESEARCH PROJECT PROPOSAL

RESEARCH PROJECT “THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING ON THE SPEAKING SKILL DEVELOPMENT FOR STUDENTS OF THE FIRST YEAR OF BACHILLERATO AT JOSE MARIA VELAZ HIGH SCHOOL, IN HUAQUILLAS, DURING 2015- 2016 SCHOOL YEAR” NELLY MARIBEL JARAMILLO JARA ELSSY ELENA PORRAS MALDONADO

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION LOW SPEAKING SKILL DEVELOPMENT Cause N°1 Low professional profile Cause N°2 Students are not in an English Speaking environment Cause N°3 Lack of incentive in the oral communication Cause N°4 Absence of cooperative climate in the class Cause N°1.1 Techniques of cooperative learning are not being applied properly Cause N°2.1 Uninterest of student in the language Cause N°3.1 Inadequate application of components of communication Cause N°4.1 Decrease in the learning process on the speaking skill Effect Nº 1.1 Low learning level Effect Nº 2.1 Indiscipline problems Effect Nº 3.1 Diminution ability to develop the Speaking skill. Effect Nº 4.1 Academic goals non- satisfactory Effect N° 1 Low performance in the classroom Effect N°2 Inappropriate execution to practice English language. Effect N°3 Unproductive Communication Effect N°4 Non- compliance of workgroup activities

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION VARIABLES MATRIX INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: COOPERATIVE LEARNING DEFINITION DIMENSIONS SUBDIMENSIONS DEPENDENT VARIABLE: SPEAKING SKILL

GENERAL OBJECTIVE TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING ON THE SPEAKING SKILL DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE FOR STUDENTS OF THE FIRST YEAR BACHILLERATO AT JOSE MARIA VELAZ HIGH SCHOOL IN HUAQUILLAS, DURING 2015- 2016 SCHOOL YEAR.

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES To enhance classroom activities organization with the aid of cooperative learning to achieve a successful learning. To identify the problems on the speaking skill that do not allow the development the components and the oral communication. To achieve an effective production of the communication through the combination of the different didactical activities that offer the cooperative learning .

Involves teams work. Exchanges the experiences, ideas and criteria among them. COOPERATIVE LEARNING Face-to-face interaction. Develops the social skill in the student.

COOPERATIVE LEARNING

COOPERATIVE LEARNING

SPEAKING SKILL Interactive process Productive and effective communication SPEAKING SKILL Includes the components of communication Emits clear and precise the message to the receiver

SPEAKING SKILL INVOLVES FLUENCY ACCURACY GRAMMAR VOCABULARY PRONUNCIATION STRESS

SPEAKING SKILL HAYRIYE KAYI DAVID NUNAN Speaking is a set to the process for constructing and receiving information. It is neccesary linguistics habits because the communication should be real and productive.

SPEAKING SKILL HARMER JEREMY There are three basic reasons to provide Speaking task to the students: Rehearsal: Free discussion Feedback: Remember   Engagement: Maintain activities effectiveness.

COOPERATIVE LEARNING AND SPEAKING SKILL RELATION Group work for teaching how to speak Working together and developing components of communication Classroom activities organization and oral communication

OTHER CAUSES OF CORE PROBLEM Students are not in an English Speaking environment Uninterest of students in the language Lack of incentive in the oral communication Inadequate application of the components of communication Absence of cooperative climate in class Decrease in the learning process on the Speaking skill

HYPOTHESIS FORMULATION WORKING HYPOTHESIS The cooperative Learning affects the Speaking skill development for students of the first year bachillerato at Jose Maria Velaz high school in Huaquillas, during 2015-2016 school year. NULL HYPOTHESIS The cooperative Learning does not have any effect on the Speaking skill development for students of the first year bachillerato at Jose Maria Velaz high school in Huaquillas, during 2015-2016 school year.  

PART III METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN RESEARCH TYPE AND DESIGN It was applied of the field. The research was quantitative, quasi experimental and transversal. POPULATION SIZE AND SAMPLE ( 30 Students) FIELD WORK ( In situ) INSTRUMENTS FOR DATA COLLECTION : ( Pre-test Control Group) (Post-test Experimental Group) DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS. They were analyzed by statistical descriptive and inferential procedures.

RESEARCH VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY To establish the content of validity of the oral test including the scoring rubrics, the students were validated and tested by piloting.

T- STUDENT: RESULTS 1. Student's t-Test: Results   Student's t-Test: Results The results of an unpaired t-test performed at 09:01 on 1-MAR-2016 t= -8.47  sdev= 0.927  degrees of freedom = 28 The probability of this result, assuming the null hypothesis, is less than .0001 Group A: Number of items= 15 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.50 9.00 Mean = 6.17  95% confidence interval for Mean: 5.676 thru 6.657  Standard Deviation = 1.10  Hi = 9.00 Low = 5.00  Median = 6.00  Average Absolute Deviation from Median = 0.700

T STUDENT: RESULT Group B: Number of items= 15 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Mean = 9.03  95% confidence interval for Mean: 8.543 thru 9.524  Standard Deviation = 0.719  Hi = 10.0 Low = 8.00  Median = 9.00  Average Absolute Deviation from Median = 0.500   Data Reference: 666E

CONCLUSIONS NULL HYPOTHESIS 1   1 Cooperative Learning affects the speaking skill development for students Cooperative Learning Tecniques were not apply correctly 2 3 There is not an adequate environmet to learn English Inadequate application of communication in classroom Absence of cooperative climate in class. 5 4

RECOMMENDATIONS Teachers learn about cooperative learning techniques 1 Teachers use the cooperative learning techniques To foment English Speaking environment 3 2 To develop the cooperative learning climate Teachers include components of oral communication 4 5

HIGH SPEAKING SKILL DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE TREE HIGH SPEAKING SKILL DEVELOPMENT Cause N°1 High professional profile   Cause N°2 Students are in an English Speaking environment. Cause N°3 More incentive in the oral communication. Cause N°4 Presence of cooperative climate in the class. Cause N°1.1 Techniques of cooperative learning are being applied properly. Cause N°2.1 Interest of student in the language. Cause N°3.1 Adequate application of components of communication. Cause N°4.1 Increase in the learning process in the speaking skill. Effect Nº 1.1 High learning level. Effect Nº 2.1 There are not indiscipline problems. Effect Nº 3.1 Growth ability to develop the Speaking skill. Effect Nº 4.1 Academic goals are satisfactory. Effect N° 1 Adequate performance in the classroom. Effect N°2 Appropriate execution to practice English language. Effect N°3 Productive Communication. Effect N°4 Good compliance of Group work.

STRATEGIES MATRIX PROBLEM CAUSE OBJECTIVE STRATEGY SPEAKING SKILL DEVELOPMENT DECREASE. The teachers do not apply the oral communication in class. To practice constantly the oral communication to a conversation effective. Attend seminars or workshops. Maintaining the practice using the components of communication. -Use the cooperative learning techniques in classroom always. Inappropriate climate to teach the English language.   To Provide the necessary conditions to facilitate the English learning process. -Create an environment funny to apply the didactic resources. -Combine different activities of teams work. Non-application of cooperative learning techniques in class. To apply different activities to develop the learning in the second language. -Promote the techniques that involve the cooperative learning in classroom.

ANALYTIC STRUCTURE OF PROPOSAL To achieve an acceptable development level of the speaking skill with the application of Cooperative Learning to an adequate performance in classroom SPEAKING SKILL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENT COMPONENTS To generate a cozy and cooperative environment. To promote in class the oral communication . To apply of properly form the cooperative learning techniques . To employ correctly the components of communication . ACTIVITIES GOAL PURPOSE

LOGICAL FRAMEWORK MATRIX NARRATIVE SUMMARY INDICATORS VERIFICATION MEDIA SUPPOSES GOALS To achieve an acceptable development level of the speaking skill development with the application of Cooperative Learning. 90% of teachers apply the cooperative learning techniques. -Rubrics -Oral test -Interviews -Teachers enhance the practice of the oral communication. PURPOSE SPEAKING SKILL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENT -95% of the teachers use adequately the components of the communication . -Teachers attend seminaries. COMPONENTS 1.- To create a comfortable and cooperative climate 2.- to motivate in classroom the oral communication -80% of students are prepared to work in group. -85% of students are using the components of communication. -Students wish to learn in an enjoyable and trustworthy environment. -Teachers apply different activities that involve the oral communication effective. ACTIVITIES Workshops Seminaries Participate in the activities. RESOURCES Coordinator Teachers Folders Sheet with information about Cooperative Leaning refreshments Teachers book Information about Cooperative Leaning BUDGET $1000 $700

EVALUATION The evaluation was focused on the activities done by students and their indicators. It was evaluated by means of oral test using the rubric`s criteria.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION AND PATIENCE SINCERELY NELLY MARIBEL JARAMILLO JARA ELSSY ELENA PORRAS MALDONADO