TIME CRITICAL REMOVAL ACTION IN RESPONSE TO CONTAMINATED SOILS ALONG THE EASTSIDE DITCH NEAR DEER LODGE, MONTANA G.S. Vandeberg1, D.J. Dollhopf1, D.R.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phosphate-Based Treatment of Contaminated Land in Jasper County, Missouri Missouri Department of Natural Resources –David E. Mosby, RG
Advertisements

Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
June 6, 2013 SURFACE RECLAMATION OF THE CAPTAIN JACK MILL SUPERFUND SITE Nick Anton, CDM Smith Todd Bragdon, CDM Smith Mary Boardman, CDPHE Joy Jenkins,
June 5, 2013 Ten Years After: The Operation of the Luttrell Biochemical Reactor David J. Reisman Angela Frandsen, P.E. David T. Shanight, P.E. ASMR.
Northwest Region Cleanup Program Zidell Waterfront Property Cleanup 2012 Portland Scott Manzano | Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Lovers Lane Lead Site Jeffrey A. Lippert, OSC.
INTRODUCTION TO THE USE OF CERCLA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS USDA FOREST SERVICE Grants and Agreements Workshop February 28, 2002 Great Falls,
AHMET UCANOK JOHN E. ELVIS Pump and Treat of Contaminated Groundwater at the United Chrome Superfund Site Corvallis, Oregon.
 Cold Spring is a town in New York State, situated on the Hudson River  To the south of Cold Spring is:  Foundry Cove – a small river inlet  Constitution.
Summitville Gold Mine Disaster
Neponset River Capen Street Investigation Milton, MA Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EOEEA) Department of Environmental Protection.
REMEDIATION OF INCE CENTRAL ESTATE IN WIGAN A Part 2A Site Tony Brown, SiLC – Director of Ground Engineering John Crowther, SiLC - Technical Director 22.
Remediation Plan for Arkansas River Flood Plain OU11 of the California Gulch National Priority Site.
Ministry of Agriculture
1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14.
Biogeochemistry at the confluence of an ARD stream with a pristine mountain stream By: Austin Kaliher and Brian Gross.
PIT MANAGEMENT Why? Technical Standards Branch CEA PRESENTATION Revised Feb14 Bruce Blue.
GFOA PS3260 Contaminated Sites Workshop Thursday, November 14, 2013 Whitehorse, YT.
Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining & Safety Idarado Natural Resource Damage Remediation Project CDRMS Office Locations Denver Grand.
Challenges of Performing Contaminated Sediment Remediation and Restoration in China and Taiwan Brian J. Mastin, Ph.D. Dave Renfrew Jerry Chen Samuel Wu.
Lead Contamination in the Belledune Area: Past and Present Prepared by Inka Milewski Conservation Council of New Brunswick October 2003.
Centennial of the Clark Fork’s Great Flood June 1908 – June 2008.
  16 th Annual OSC Readiness Training Program Community Involvement Case Study – Standard Mine Gina Cristiano R8 Emergency Planning.
Former Point Cook Fire Training Area Contamination Remediation Works Project Community Information Session 26 September 2013.
Waste Management Strategy Outline - Geography - Future Needs – 5 and 25-Year Time Frames - Capacity - Near-Term Needs - Long Term Needs.
Watershed interactions and water quality assessment of previously mined mineralized areas Willow Creek Demonstration Watershed, Madison Co., MT,
The Superfund ERA Process. What is Superfund? Superfund was created on December 11, 1980 when Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
State and Tribal Government Working Group November 12, 2008 FERNALD NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES SETTLEMENT.
Pmunday copyright “ Clark Fork Revival: Remedy & Restoration at America’s largest Superfund site ” Pat Munday, PhD
Developing a Cumulative Effects Monitoring Program for the Saint John Harbour – Contaminants Karen Kidd and Angella Mercer Canadian Rivers Institute, UNB.
Monitoring and Evaluating Reclamation Outcomes: A Case Study of the Roy Pray Mine By: Ashley Bembenek Environmental Consultant Image retrieved from Google.
By Leor & Gabriel Davoodpour Definition: Removing a mineral deposit from the Earth after removing the layer of earth above it. Techniques: Area Mining.
K. Zamzow*, A. Maest, C.A. Woody, and D. Bogan *Center for Science in Public Participation Geologic Society of America, November 2, 2010 Denver, CO 1.
4 TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRICULTURE AND HORTICULTURE JULY 13-15, 2015 BEIJING, CHINA The Impact of Phosphorus Fertilizers on Heavy Metals Content.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site February 19, 2013.
Metal Sorption Properties The binding behavior of Zn, Cu, and Pb relates to the surface complexation constant, K int. Dzombak and Morel, 1990 Assessment.
R Science storytelling: Soil lead, community, place, and the power of transdisciplinary collaboration Emily C. Keener, Beth Knox, Kevin Schultz, Sydney.
BIOSOLIDS USE AND REGULATION IN PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Intervention – 2004 Nanisivik Reclamation and Closure Plan Arctic Bay June 3-4, 2004 Nunavut Water Board Public Hearing.
Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design and Cleanup Plans September 2014.
Dominic Brose, PhD Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago MWAA 2016 Winter Expo January 29, 2016.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
November 14, Still Afraid of CERCLA? Tools and Techniques for Managing Environmental Liability Concerns Susan Bromm, Director Office of Site Remediation.
Alondra Villanueva ESS 315
EPA Region 7 Lead Remediation Byrnes Mill Dam and Park
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Re-imagining Mining Sites: Kennecott North and South Zones
By Reid Brown and Rio Diniakos
HEAVY METAL SOLUBILITY AND MOBILITY IN HUMUS LAYERS IMPACTED BY COPPER INDUSTRY IN SOUTH - WEST POLAND Agnieszka Medyńska-Juraszek, Cezary Kabała Institute.
Metal Loading to the Animas River
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Mining.
Welcome.
GROUNDWATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE PINEY POINT AQUIFER
Water Quality in the Animas Watershed 1/24/18
Soil processes and trace metals
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL SITE PUBLIC MEETING December 6, 2016
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 1986, 1990 (Superfund) Operated by the EPA The CERCLA provides a Federal.
Mining.
Authors: Dr. Paul L. Hansen Dennis R. Neuman
Forum on the strategies for the management and development of contaminated sites in Taiwan Shian-chee Wu October 25, 2007.
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
CLARK FORK RIVER DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
Presentation transcript:

TIME CRITICAL REMOVAL ACTION IN RESPONSE TO CONTAMINATED SOILS ALONG THE EASTSIDE DITCH NEAR DEER LODGE, MONTANA G.S. Vandeberg1, D.J. Dollhopf1, D.R. Neuman1, P.D. Smith2, W. Bluck3 and S. Brown4 1Reclamation Research Unit, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT. 2CH2MHill, Boise, ID. 3W.B.E. Inc., Helena, MT. 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Helena, MT.

INTRODUCTION The U.S. EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order to ARCO in May, 1999 for the Deer Lodge Valley Irrigated Lands Time Critical Removal Action. This order concerned lands adjacent to the Eastside irrigation ditch near Deer Lodge, Montana (Figure 1). These lands are within the Clark Fork River Operable Unit of the Milltown Reservoir Sediments NPL site, and have been impacted by historic irrigation which deposited elevated levels of arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead and zinc from the Clark Fork River. Many of these lands exhibit bare areas and poor vegetation coverage due to both elevated metal concentrations and depressed pH. The contamination originated from mining, milling and smelting activities in Butte and Anaconda. The Eastside ditch was partially abandoned in the 1970's. Adjacent lands are currently used for residential and agricultural use.

INTRODUCTION CONT. The preferred action for the residential properties listed in the order is the excavation and replacement of soils (up to 18 inch depth) whose arsenic values exceed the trigger value of 120 mg/kg (95% lower confidence interval of the human health risk-based concentration of 150 mg/kg for residents). Lands extending beyond the residential areas (agricultural lands) have been or will be limed and tilled to ameliorate elevated arsenic, copper, and zinc levels, and low soil pH (U.S. EPA 1999). Trigger values for the agricultural areas include an arsenic value of 620 mg/kg (human health risk-based concentration for ranchers and farmers) and the potentially phytotoxic values presented in Table 1. The Reclamation Research Unit, Montana State University, in conjunction with WBE, Inc. and CH2MHill performed oversight for sampling and remedial actions along the Eastside ditch for the U.S. EPA. Soil samples were collected from 17 residences and adjacent pastures, and 2 pastures in 1998 and 1999. Remedial actions were performed by ARCO during the summer and fall of 1999.

METHODS • Residential yards were divided up into discrete sampling units and composite soil samples were collected from 0-2 inch depths. A single test pit was sampled from 0-2 inches, 2-6 inches, 6-12 inches and 12-18 inches in each unit. Samples were analyzed for arsenic (As), copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) by x-ray fluorescence (XRF), and for pH from a saturated paste. • Agricultural lands were sampled at 0-6 inch and 6-12 inch depths. The sample locations were biased towards impacted areas. The samples were analyzed for As, Cu and Zn by XRF, and pH from a saturated paste. • Based on the analytical results, response action work plans were developed for each residential yard and pasture area. Residential yards which exceeded 120 mg/kg arsenic were excavated and replaced. The replaced areas were either sodded or re-seeded. Excavated soils were placed in adjacent pastures (agricultural areas). Driveways were limed and tilled if they exceeded the residential trigger value. • Confirmation samples were collected following excavation to determine remaining As, Cu and Zn levels. Agricultural areas were limed (< 0.25 mm crushed limestone and prilled calcium oxide), and tilled to depths up to 12 inches using a Rome disc, or up to 24 inches using a Baker plow.

RESULTS • Soil samples were collected from 17 residences and 2 agricultural lands in 1998 and 1999 (Figure 2). • Soils were excavated and replaced in 8 residential yards as of November 1999 (Figures 3 and 4). Driveway areas were limed and tilled (Figure 5). • Remaining soil As levels in the excavated areas were typically below 70 mg/kg (Figure 6). Ten adjacent pasture areas were tilled and limed as of November 1999 (Figure 7).

Figure 2. Sample of average As, Cu and Zn values (0-2 inches) from residential yards before excavation or treatment.

Figure 3. Excavation of contaminated soils.

Figure 4. Backfilled and sodded residential yard.

Figure 5. Liming and tilling driveway.

Figure 6. Average arsenic values before and after excavation in some residential yards.

Figure 7. Liming and tilling pasture area.

CONCLUSIONS • Excavation and replacement of soils in 8 residential yards has lowered the arsenic typically below 70 mg/kg. • Tilling and liming of agricultural areas has lowered surface (0-2 inches) arsenic concentrations below the trigger values, and provided for increased soil pH levels above 7.0 standard units. Copper and zinc concentrations have been reduced to levels below the phytotoxic thresholds presented in Table 1.

REFERENCES AERL 2000. Draft final phase I post construction report for the Unilateral Administrative Order for the Deer Lodge Valley Irrigated Lands Time Critical Removal Action. ARCO Environmental Remediation. Anaconda, MT. AREL 1999. Response action construction work plant for select historically irrigated areas, Clark Fork River Operable Unit. ARCO Environmental Remediation, Anaconda, MT. CDM Federal Programs 1998. Area Regional Water, Waste and Soils Operable Unit final baseline ecological risk assessment, October. CDM Federal, Helena, MT. NRDP 1995. Terrestrial resources injury assessment report upper Clark Fork River NPL Site. RCG/Hagler Bailly. January 1995. U.S. EPA 1999. Unilateral Administrative Order for the Deer Lodge Valley Irrigated lands Time Critical Removal Action, EPA Docket No. CERCLA-8-99-11