IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UW River Falls, May 15-16, 2003 Searching for Dark Matter Through South Pole Ice Kurt Woschnagg University of California - Berkeley.
Advertisements

AMANDA Lessons Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array.
The IceCube Neutrino Telescope Kyler Kuehn Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics The Ohio State University Novel Searches for Dark Matter CCAPP.
Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment 03UM1106 Kazuhiro Fujimoto A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree.
IceCube.
SUSY06, June 14th, The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube.
Search for Extremely-high Energy Cosmic Neutrino with IceCube Chiba Univ. Mio Ono.
IceCube 1400 m 2400 m AMANDA South Pole IceTop Skiway 80 Strings 4800 PMT Instrumented volume: 1 km3 (1 Gt) IceCube is designed to detect neutrinos of.
Optical Sensor and DAQ in IceCube Albrecht Karle University of Wisconsin-Madison Chiba July, 2003.
The IceCube High Energy Telesope The detector elements Expected Sensitivity Project Status Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics CHIBA Univ. ICRC 2003.
Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole David Boersma UW Madison “New Views of the Universe” Chicago, 10 December 2005.
IceCube a kilometer-scale deep-ice observatory in Antarctica Olga Botner Uppsala university, Sweden Neutrino 2004, June 14-19, icecube.wisc.edu.
1 IceCube: A Neutrino Telescope at The South Pole Chihwa Song UW-Madison photographed by Mark Krasberg 4 th Korean Astrophysics Workshop May 17-19, 2006.
Per Olof Hulth Stockholm university1 NSF Review March 25-27, 2003 Introductory remarks Per Olof Hulth Stockholm university.
A km 3 Neutrino Telescope: IceCube at the South Pole Howard Matis - LBNL for the IceCube Collaboration.
Apostolos Tsirigotis Simulation Studies of km3 Architectures KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting April 2007, Pylos, Greece The project is co-funded by the.
IceCube S Robbins University of Wuppertal Moriond - “Contents and Structures of the Universe” La Thuile, Italy, March 2006 Outlook for Neutrino Detection.
Piera Sapienza – VLVNT Workshop, 5-8 october 2003, Amsterdam Introduction and framework Simulation of atmospheric  (HEMAS and MUSIC) Response of a km.
Frontiers in Contemporary Physics: May 23, 2005 Recent Results From AMANDA and IceCube Jessica Hodges University of Wisconsin – Madison for the IceCube.
First Results from IceCube Physics Motivation Hardware Overview Deployment First Results Conclusions & Future Plans Spencer Klein, LBNL for the IceCube.
Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole David Boersma UW Madison Lake Louise Winter Institute Chicago, 23 February 2006.
AMANDA and IceCube neutrino telescopes at the South Pole Per Olof Hulth Stockholm University.
Computing in IceCube Georges Kohnen, Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium for the IceCube Collaboration The IceCube neutrino telescope.
CIPANP 2006K. Filimonov, UC Berkeley From AMANDA to IceCube: Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole Kirill Filimonov University of California, Berkeley.
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
The Status of IceCube Mark Krasberg University of Wisconsin-Madison RICH 2004 Conference, Playa del Carmen, Mexico Dec 3, 2004.
News from the South Pole: Recent Results from the IceCube and AMANDA Neutrino Telescopes Alexander Kappes UW-Madison PANIC ‘08 November 2008, Eilat (Israel)
COSMO/CosPA 2010 Searches for the Highest Energy Neutrino with IceCube Searches for the Highest Energy Neutrino with IceCube Aya Ishihara ( Fellow) (JSPS.
B.Baret Vrije Univertsiteit Brusse l Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium The AMANDA – IceCube telescopes & Dark Matter searches B. Baret on behalf of the.
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
IceCube and AMANDA: Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole Brennan Hughey February 22nd, 2007.
Calibrating the first four IceCube strings Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 Detector Characterization IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Bartol, March 2004.
Data collected during the year 2006 by the first 9 strings of IceCube can be used to measure the energy spectrum of the atmospheric muon neutrino flux.
KEK, Feb 27, 2006Tom Gaisser1 Cosmic-ray physics with IceCube IceTop the surface component of IceCube.
Science Advisory Committee March 30, 2006 Jim Yeck IceCube Project Director IceCube Construction Progress.
IC59 Cascade Filter Comparison between the recos for (HLC+SLC) and (HLC only) pulses Part I Mariola Lesiak-Bzdak LBNL 1 Cascade Phone Call, Nov. 8, 2010.
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
IceCube project Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics, Chiba University.
Icecube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole Kirill Filimonov, University of California, Berkeley, for the IceCube Collaboration.
I Taboada, GA Tech High-energy neutrino astronomy with IceCube Ignacio Taboada Georgia Institute of Technology for the IceCube collaboration Madison, NDM.
1 Particles and Nuclei International Conference (PANIC05) Santa Fe, NM (U.S.A.) October 24 th, from Quark n.36, 02/01/04 Neutrino.
1 slide Brennan Hughey University of Wisconsin – Madison for the AMANDA Collaboration Recent Results From the AMANDA Experiment Rencontres du Vietnam August.
IceTop Design: 1 David Seckel – 3/11/2002 Berkeley, CA IceTop Overview David Seckel IceTop Group University of Delaware.
IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole Brendan Fox Pennsylvania State University for the IceCube Collaboration VLVNT08 - Very.
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Search for Ultra-High Energy Tau Neutrinos in IceCube Dawn Williams University of Alabama For the IceCube Collaboration The 12 th International Workshop.
Albrecht Karle University of Wisconsin - Madison for the IceCube Collaboration IceCube Current status, recent results and future prospects.
Dark Matter Searches with AMANDA and IceCube Catherine De Clercq for the IceCube Collaboration Vrije Universiteit Brussel Interuniversity Institute for.
1 IceCube Christian Spiering for the IceCube Collaboration EPSC, Cracow July 2009.
KM3NeT P.Kooijman Universities of Amsterdam & Utrecht for the consortium.
Neutrino Physics with IceCube
Measuring the total neutrino cross section using the IceCube detector
Future high energy extensions of IceCube with new technologies: Radio and/or acoustical detectors Karle.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
SAC/PAP Review UW-Madison March 1-2, 2007
Imaging the Neutrino Universe with AMANDA and IceCube
Status of the Baikal-GVD experiment
Julia Becker for the IceCube collaboration
Imaging the High-Energy Neutrino Universe from the South Pole
Recent Results of Point Source Searches with the IceCube Neutrino Telescope Lake Louise Winter Institute 2009 Erik Strahler University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Simulation in IceCube Science Advisory Committee Meeting Paolo Desiati
Performance of the AMANDA-II Detector
IC40 Physics Run Preparations
Christian Spiering, ESC DESY, Sept.2003
Status and prospects of the IceCube Neutrino Telescope
The IceCube Neutrino Telescope
Karen Andeena, Katherine Rawlinsb, Chihwa Song*a
Unfolding performance Data - Monte Carlo comparison
IceCube Construction and Analysis Report
Presentation transcript:

IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole Brendan Fox Pennsylvania State University for the IceCube Collaboration VLVNT08 - Very Large Volume Neutrino Telescopes 2008 - Toulon, France

The IceCube Collaboration Bartol Research Institute, Delaware, USA Pennsylvania State University, USA UC Berkeley, USA UC Irvine, USA Clark-Atlanta University, USA University of Alaska, Anchorage, USA Univ. of Maryland, USA 29 institutions ~250 people University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA University of Wisconsin-River Falls, USA LBNL, Berkeley, USA Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, USA USA (11) Japan Europe (15) Chiba University, Japan University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ New Zealand Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium Universiteit Gent, Belgium Humboldt Universität, Germany Universität Mainz, Germany DESY Zeuthen, Germany Universität Dortmund, Germany ANTARCTICA Universität Wuppertal, Germany MPI Heidelberg, Germany RWTH Aachen Uppsala University, Sweden Stockholm University, Sweden Oxford University, UK Utrecht University, Netherlands Amundsen-Scott Station

Detecting Neutrinos In Ice Phototubes  Muon neutrino Electron neutrino Tau neutrino Track: + increased detection volume Cascade: - must be in detector Hybrid: - must be in detector +  points along , i.e. to source -  background (brems’ng) - need E>o(1000 TeV) - cosmic ray  background - limited pointing capability + nil background - energy measurement “okay” + good energy measurement + pointing capability + best energy measurement (also includes NC ,)

Digital Optical Module (DOM) IceCube-AMANDA AMANDA Eiffel Tower Svenska Dagbladet Digital Optical Module (DOM) currently instrumented IceTop - ICECUBE : 4800 DOMs on 80 strings ICETOP : 160 Ice-Cherenkov tank surface array (IceTop) - AMANDA: 677 OMs surrounded by IceCube

IceCube Digital Optical Module Low intrinsic noise ~ 500 Hz Fast digitization 30 ms/channel Waveform: 4 channels/128 sample Low power consumption 5 W per DOM Up to 12 ms combined waveform length Variable sampling speed: 250 - 800 MHz Up to 200-300 p.e./10 ns charge resolution

IceCube Digital Optical Module

DOM Final Acceptance Testing freezer ~60 DOMs at time 3 identical setups at UW-Madison (USA) 1 setup at DESY-Zeuthen (Germany) 1 setup at Uppsala University (Sweden)

DOMCal Summary for FAT22 Budweiser-TP4Y0031 1260 Volts 1340 Volts Gain vs. HV Fit 1e7 DOMCal Summary for FAT22 Budweiser-TP4Y0031 1.6pC Charge (pC) HV Most PMTs achieve 1e7 at 1100-1600 Volts • Require 5e7 at <2kV

Time Resolution Test Laser pulses @15kHz occupancy ~0.04 laser trigger times recorded in dedicated “Sync DOM” PMT signal recorded in DOM 100,000 synchronized hits sampling time 3.5nsec pulse height ~5mV @1e7 digitizer 0.1mV/count Time computed from leading edge (50% of pulse maximum) Resolution 2-3nsec includes DAQ time slewing relative to Sync DOM

Dark rate monitoring ~120 hours checking for: Average Rate 2-3kHz Temp (°C) –35°C –10°C 5e7 Dark rate monitoring ~120 hours checking for: Average Rate 2-3kHz includes non-PMT contributions will be 650Hz in ice (or 300Hz without double- counting time-correlated noise) No instabilities

Construction Plan Overview 08-09 09-10 IC-40 DEPLOYED AMANDA … drilling/deployment plans for the 10-11 season being discussed

Schematic of Hot Water Drilling

String Deployment

2007-08 Season … 18 strings deployed!

String 39 two-week freeze-in movie Commissioning String 39 two-week freeze-in movie

Commissioning 76 528 820 1136

DOM Survivability 76 DOMs 589 DOMs 1390 DOMs 2515 DOMs 66-33 “New_York” and 66-34 “Dou_Mu” go high current 39-61 “Hydrogen” PMT breaks 54-47 “Garbanzo_bean” stops communicating 39-22 “Liljeholmen” stops communicating properly 39-21 “Aspudden” slows down 30-60 “Rowan” stops communicating

DOM-to-DOM Synchronization RAPCAL: Sync each DOM to GPS time

Initial Timing Verification dom 10 17m dom 11 string 76

Initial Timing Verification Means Sigmas … timing of all DOMs within spec (<3 ns)

Timing Verification With Muons Cherenkov Photons  track Emission on the Cherenkov Cone string 49

Long-Term Stability of Timing track position of leading edge on monthly basis … … timing stable over IC-22 data-taking period

Initial String Geometry

String Geometry - z check

String Geometry - z check For string 64, the stage 1 depth was a bit of guess since the pressure sensor broken.

String Geometry - (x,y) check Select well reconstructed muon tracks Vary (x,y) of DOM … look at the log-likelihood -vs- (x,y) Minimium will be where the DOM is situated MC studies still underway … technique looks promising

Readout Scheme

Detector Monitoring Snapshot

Neutrinos in IC-9 (2006) RESULT Online filtering at Pole to isolate sample of “good” up-going candidates Transfer this sample by satellite to North More refined analysis … … Log-likelihood reconstruction, etc. … apply additional quality cuts, etc. to gain more down-going muon rejection Ratio of data to simulation: At selected cut strength of 10: 234 up-going  in 137.4 live-days of data (purity of neutrino sample > 95%) Mis-reconstructed atmospheric muons RESULT J. Pretz, Ph.D. thesis (Maryland) [DRUM 1903-4163]

Neutrinos in IC-9 (2006) ZENITH AZIMUTH t ~ 90-110° … muon background peaks in  artifact of the IC-9 string configuration

Prospects for IC-22 … IC-40 … (Integrated Exposure) “Actual” Graph shows cumulative km3·yr of exposure × volume 1 km3·yr reached 2 years before detector is completed Close to 4 km3·yr at the beginning of 1st year of full array operation. NOTE: not adjusted for actual

Upcoming Season Plans 1996-2001: AMANDA 2004-05: 1 string 2005-06: 8 2006-07: 13 12 planned 2007-08: 18 14 planned 2008-09: 16+ 2009-10: 16+ 2010-11: 7+ 09-10 08-09

String Layout Options DEEP CORE UHE STRINGS Preliminary design Olaf Schulz Preliminary design UHE STRINGS

Conclusions Drilling/deployment of IceCube strings is going well Deployment of IceTop stations also on target (40 stations deployed) IceCube components (DOMs/daq/triggers/filter/etc.) up and going IceCube is working as expected … first physics results from IC-22 (318 days @ 95% uptime) … IC-40 data-taking started April 1, 2008 IceTop-40 is working too … tank/station performance as per specs … first physics physics from IC-22 being prepared now AMANDA integrated into IceCube … low energy results improved by using IceCube as veto In the future, - Low energy core planned … first string to be deployed 08-09 - UHE arrangement of final strings underway … Elisa Resconi discussed the physics expected from IceCube + these extensions.

BACKUP SLIDES

} LC IceCube Triggering InIce: 4 3 5 2 1 InIce: - Local coincidence between neighboring modules (variable time window: presently = 1 us) On the surface: - require NDOMs  8 within 5 us window Form event from all “hits” within ±8 us of trigger } LC

Ice Properties Bubbles at higher depth dust layers Scattering Absorption Bubbles at higher depth dust layers Average optical parameters: abs ~ 110 m @ 400 nm sca ~ 20 m @ 400 nm