Intercity Bus Study 5311/Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Advertisements

Oregon Freight Plan July 28, Linking Freight Improvements to Economic Growth Travel Time Freight Transportation Improvements Productivity Competitiveness.
March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
Updating the Washington Transportation Plan February 4,
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
PSRC’s Project Selection Process February 6,
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Public Transit Division Discretionary Grant Programs.
Station Development Update Melissa DuMond, Director of Planning and Integration April 29, 2015.
1 18 th National Conference on Rural Public & Intercity Bus Transportation Conference Kimberly Gayle Office of Federal Transit Grants Programs Division.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan CTC Meeting December 10, 2014 Bill Figge, Acting Deputy Director Planning and Modal Programs.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)] DECEMBER 2014.
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
Statewide Transit Strategic Plan CalACT 2011 Spring Conference Presented by: Jila Priebe California Department of Transportation Division of Mass Transportation.
April 29,  Investment in new and improved services, with a strong focus on customer experience  Investment focused on improving efficiency  Shorter.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
HSTP PLAN DEVELOPMENT Skagit-Island Human Services Transportation Plan July 10, 2014.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
Introductions Introduction to TCAG Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Responsible for long-term planning for all modes of surface transportation.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
“Modoc (Rural) Mobility Management Center” Pam Couch, Executive Director Modoc Transportation – Alturas, CA
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN THE HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA NATIONAL FORUM ON PERFORMANCE- BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING.
2008 National Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Conference Nebraska Statewide Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Oregon Transportation Options Plan Statewide TO Meeting September 27, 2013.
Presentation to Membership. A Recap of Our Process February 2009: Decision to renew strategic plan March 2009: Engagement of Berlin, Eaton.
Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant Programs: Partnership Planning & 5304 (formerly 5305) Transit Planning Presented by Priscilla Martinez-Velez California.
Title Evaluating the potential for Bus Rapid Transit and MnPASS Express Lanes in the southwest metro Investigating options for improved bus service between.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
Transit Technology Hampton Roads Transit. Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) provides public transportation for six cities in the South Hampton Roads region:
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
What is Planning for Progress?
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #1
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
Flagler County Fixed Route Transit Operation Plan
2017 SCORT Conference Washington, DC
The Future of Intercity Bus Services in California
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Votran Transit Development Plan (TDP)
NCARPO Quarterly Meeting July 27, 2018
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Oregon Freight Plan Amendment
Transportation Regional Incentive Program
VicRoads – Movement & Place
California’s Rural Intercity Bus System: 2018 Update
Focus40 Overview A long-range plan for how the MBTA can meet the needs of the region in 2040: A 20-year plan as required by MBTA enabling legislation A.
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
Transit Integration and Efficiency Study Transit Advisory Committee
History Task Force Successes Federal Level State Level
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)]
Re-Thinking Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities
NYMTC Coordinated Plan Workshop
NYMTC Coordinated Plan Workshop
What follows after approval of Active Transportation
Global Platform for Sustainable Cities - Resource Team (RT) -
Travel Washington 18th Biennial State Programs Meeting and
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

Intercity Bus Study 5311/Update Dr. Thomas Pogue Associate Director Center for Business and Policy Research University of the Pacific CalACT 2017 Fall Conference, November 3, 2017

California Statewide Rural Intercity Bus Study (CIBS) 2017 Update Background Contextual Analysis October 2016 – March 2017 Needs Assessment April – July 2017 Stakeholder and public outreach August – November 2017 Planning Integration & Action Plan April – December 2017 Updated Statewide CIBS January 2017 – March 2018

Stakeholder and public outreach Steering Committee MPO/RTPA Survey Transit Agency Survey Follow-up discussions on surveys Structured interviews validating Needs Report Outreach Workshops

What matters? Priorities in intercity bus service? Capital Operating Planning/Marketing Coordination Intermodalism and essential transportation services Strategic corridors and/or unmet needs

Initial findings Should inter-city transit funding focus on developing and sustaining movement along the interregional corridors identified in the 2015 ITSP?

Initial findings If the 2015 ITSP Corridors are targeted should certain other interregional needs, be given interregional funding resources even if they are not part of an ITSP Corridor?? – but its complicated

Initial findings Rank of Intercity Bus Goals (4= Most Important): Providing a seamless inter-regional service 3.3 Enhancing and expanding regional bus service 3.0 Inter-agency coordination 2.5 Marketing and informational network development 1.3

Initial findings Importance of these objectives? (5=Most Important): Ensuring intercity bus service connects to key primary destinations (i.e. medical facilities, educational institutions, etc.) 4.4 Ensuring intercity stations/terminals are part of or connect to larger regional/national systems of intercity travel 4.2 Ensuring intercity bus service connects to other modes of transportation 4.1 Ensuring intercity stations/terminals are a primary destination 3.8 Ensuring coordination, ridership, mobility, quality and efficiency of service are enhanced through informational outreach and marketing 3.6

Initial findings Importance of 5311(f) eligibility? (5=Most Important): Operating Assistance 4.8 Vehicle (Bus) Purchase 4.3 Intercity Bus Transit Infrastructure 4.0 Bus Related Equipment 3.8 Planning and Marketing Studies 3.1

Initial findings Importance of 5311(f) objectives? (5=Most Important): Supporting services to meet the intercity travel needs of residents in non-urbanized areas 4.68 Supporting connection between non-urbanized areas and the larger regional/national system of intercity bus service 4.65 Supporting the intercity bus network's growth to address service gaps 4.56 Supporting the intercity bus network's infrastructure through capital investment in facilities 3.96 Supporting the intercity bus network's infrastructure through planning and marketing assistance 3.20

Initial findings Support or oppose the following (5=Highest Support): Allow 5311(f) funding to favor intercity bus routes that are part of the corridors identified in the 2015 ITSP, but also allocate a fixed share or value of funding to intercity bus routes in rural areas outside of those corridors. 3.9 Prioritizing 5311(f) funding to intercity bus services based on measures related to the program's objectives, such as inter-modal connectivity, resident needs, and key locations served by the intercity service. 3.6 Allow 5311(f) funding to prioritize existing intercity bus services, but also allocate a fixed share or value of funding to expanding or developing new intercity bus services 3.1 Focus 5311(f) funding on intercity bus services that are part of the corridors identified in the 2015 ITSP - whether they are existing, expanding or new - before any funding goes to intercity bus services in other areas. 3.0 Making 5311(f) funding available only to existing intercity bus services, with only funds left over afterwards being available to expand or develop new intercity bus services 3.0

Initial findings Provider type emphasis? (5=Greatest Emphasis): Public transit providers 4.3 Public-private partnerships 3.7 Private transit providers 3.4

Thank You!