Figure 1 Concept of the therapeutic index

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1 The heterogenous landscape of triple-negative breast cancer
Advertisements

Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 3 Response after appearance of a new lesion
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 5 Mutational heterogeneity in oesophageal and gastric cancer
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Multiscale modelling in oncology
Figure 5 Schematic illustration of different clinical trial designs
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Three-step approach to the assessment and management
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Copy-number variations in multiple myeloma
Figure 6 Double opposed-field irradiation of an idealized geometry
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 4 Possible combination therapies CDK4/6 inhibitors
Figure 2 Therapeutic targeting of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway
Figure 1 Proposed treatment algorithm for advanced gastroesophageal cancer based on publish recommendations Figure 1 | Proposed treatment algorithm for.
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 1 CAR-T-cell design
Figure 2 Examples of histopathological validation
Figure 4 Effects of delaying cardioprotective medications after anthracycline administration Figure 4 | Effects of delaying cardioprotective medications.
Figure 2 The association between CD8+ T‑cell density of the tumour
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 5 The biological effects of charged particles
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 1 Therapeutic targeting of the B-cell receptor (BCR)
Figure 3 Drug cycling with collateral sensitivity
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Differences between MC and AC
Figure 3 Possible modalities for reconciliation of patient's and physician's report of symptomatic treatment-associated toxicities Figure 3 | Possible.
Figure 1 Balance between proteasomal load and capacity
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 1 NIR fluorescence is more suitable for
Figure 1 The dynamic nature of resistance mechanisms can be
Figure 2 Nonmalignant tissue can be spared from radiation
Figure 2 Components of each transplantation platform
Figure 3 Clinical trial design in charged-particle therapy (CPT)
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 3 The yin and yang of tumour-associated
Figure 2 Median monthly launch price of a new anticancer drug,
Figure 2 The patterns of epithelial-to-mesenchymal
Figure 1 Translocations involved in multiple myeloma
Figure 1 Simplified representation of the physiological
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Host immune responses, not the radiosensitivity
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Approaches to improve CAR-T-cell therapy
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Frequency and overlap of alterations
Figure 2 Variations between planned and delivered doses of radiation
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 3 Tumours secrete factors that cause systemic immunosuppression
Figure 5 Schematic overview of a clinical decision-support
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 4 Radiogenomics analysis can reveal relationships
Figure 1 Overview of the imaging biomarker roadmap
Figure 3 Determination of the primary site
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 1 Gene-expression quantification methods
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1 Concept of the therapeutic index Figure 1 | Concept of the therapeutic index. A variety of strategies have shown promise in ameliorating ionizing radiation damage to normal tissues, including protection with radical scavengers, stimulating recovery with cytokines, modifying the p53 response, reducing the negative effects of inflammatory cascades and oxidative stress, and the use of stem-cell therapy. Of note, the slopes of clinical dose–response curves (the relationship between the probability of tumour control and the ionizing radiation dose) indicate that increasing the effective ionizing radiation dose by just 10% (a dose enhancement factor of 1.1) will increase tumour control rates by 5–30%, depending on the tumour site and whether control rates are already low or high121,122. Sharma, R. A. et. al. (2016) Clinical development of new drug–radiotherapy combinations Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.79