How do we judge efficacy of a screening test?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Validity and Reliability of Analytical Tests. Analytical Tests include both: Screening Tests Diagnostic Tests.

Advertisements

Comparison of the HIV LIA vs WB on HIV-Negative Samples CDC-HIV Diagnostics Meeting “New Diagnostic Technologies” Dec 5-7, 2007 Dr. John Kim National Laboratory.

Sensitivity, Specificity and ROC Curve Analysis.

What Happens to the Performance of a Diagnostic Test when the Disease Prevalence and the Cut-Point Change? Pathological scores Healthy scores Healthy population.

© 2014 SynteractHCR. All rights reserved. SHARED WORK. SHARED VISION. Pitfalls in Companion Diagnostics Don't underestimate the power of conditional probabilities.

TUTORIAL SCREENING Dr. Salwa Tayel, Dr. A. Almazam, Dr Afzal Mahmood

Azita Kheiltash Social Medicine Specialist Tehran University of Medical Sciences Diagnostic Tests Evaluation.

(Medical) Diagnostic Testing. The situation Patient presents with symptoms, and is suspected of having some disease. Patient either has the disease or.

What is Screening? Basic Public Health Concepts Sheila West, Ph.D. El Maghraby Professor of Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Johns Hopkins University.

Homework 12 Welcome to the HIV cost calculator A tool to assist in answering the question "Why not test everyone?"

Interpreting numbers – more tricky bits ScotPHO training course March 2011 Dr Gerry McCartney Head of Public Health Observatory Division NHS Health Scotland.

Reliability of Screening Tests RELIABILITY: The extent to which the screening test will produce the same or very similar results each time it is administered.

When to Confirm a Positive NAAT An additional test should be considered after a positive screening test if a false-positive screening test would result.

BIOE 301 Lecture Thirteen. Review of Lecture 12 The burden of cancer Contrasts between developed/developing world How does cancer develop? Cell transformation.

Likelihood 2005/5/22. Likelihood  probability I am likelihood I am probability.

Diagnostic Tests Afshin Ostovar Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Bushehr, /7/20151.

Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value

Practical application. Population A ELISA test is applied to a million people where 1% are infected with HIV. Of the million people, 10,000 would be infected.

1 Wrap up SCREENING TESTS. 2 Screening test The basic tool of a screening program easy to use, rapid and inexpensive. 1.2.

Predictive values prevalence CK and acute myocardial infarction –sensitivity 70% –specificity 80% –prevalence - 40% –prevalence - 20% –PPV and NPV.

Screening.  “...the identification of unrecognized disease or defect by the application of tests, examinations or other procedures...”  “...sort out.

Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.

Return to Home! Go To Next Slide! Return to Home! Go To Next Slide!

Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 5 Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test.

Question 1 A new test to diagnose urinary tract infections (UTIs) is being evaluated. The sensitivity of the test is 70% and the specificity is 90%. In.

دکتر حمیدرضا صابری

Looking at Bayes’ Theorem with a Tree Diagram An alternate way of “reversing the conditioning” on conditional probabilities.

Screening for Disease: Part One

10. General rules of probability

DR.FATIMA ALKHALEDY M.B.Ch.B;F.I.C.M.S/C.M

Looking at Bayes’ Theorem with a Tree Diagram

TUPEB018 Field evaluation of rapid HIV serologic tests for screening HIV-1/2 infection using serum samples from Rakai Cohort, Uganda. S.C. Kagulire, P.D.

Two Way Tables & Data Collection.

Principles of Epidemiology E

Interpreting numbers – more tricky bits

continued on next slide

Dr. Tauseef Ismail Assistant Professor Dept of C Med. KGMC

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Clinical Epidemiology

What is Screening? Basic Public Health Concepts Sheila West, Ph.D.

How do we delay disease progress once it has started?

Diagnosis II Dr. Brent E. Faught, Ph.D. Assistant Professor

continued on next slide

continued on next slide

Entering Test Results for QC Requirements Contractor Mode

Platelet Antibody Testing in Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

What is Screening? Basic Public Health Concepts Sheila West, Ph.D.

تحليل الحساسية Sensitive Analysis.

Is a Positive Developmental-Behavioral Screening Score Sufficient to Justify Referral? A Review of Evidence and Theory R. Christopher Sheldrick, PhD,

Millie D. Long, Bruce E. Sands

Refining Probability Test Informations Vahid Ashoorion MD. ,MSc,

House Sales What proportion of the houses that sold for over $600,000 were on the market for less than 30 days? Days on the market Less than 30 days 30.

Volume 75, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)

Large-scale testing of women in Copenhagen has not reduced the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections H. Westh, H.J. Kolmos Clinical Microbiology.

Baye’s Rule and Medical Screening Tests

Figure 1. Table for calculating the accuracy of a diagnostic test.

Patricia Butterfield & Naomi Chaytor October 18th, 2017

Epidemiology The science of associations.

Positive predictive value of screening tests

Review – Key Chapters Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 5 Chapter 6

Warm Up # 3 Complete POST – Assessment INDIVIDUALLY!!!!

Algebra 1 Section 12.2.

Estimated number of people living with HIV and adult HIV prevalence

continued on next slide

The two-step Fagan's nomogram.

Chapter 2, Unit E Screening Tests.

continued on next slide

Presentation transcript:

How do we judge efficacy of a screening test? Homework 7 How do we judge efficacy of a screening test?

Solve the following problems 1. To evaluate the performance of a new diagnostic test, the developer checks it out on 100 known cases of the disease for which the test was designed, and on 200 controls known to be free of the disease. Ninety of the known cases yield positive tests, as do 30 of the controls. Based on these data, what is the sensitivity and specificity of the test? 2. A diagnostic test is 95% sensitive and 80% specific. The test group is comprised of 500 people known to have the disease and 500 people known to be free of the disease. How many of the known positives would actually test positive? How many of the known negatives would actually test negative? 3. A test with 99.9% sensitivity and 99% specificity is used to screen a population of 100000 people for a disease with 1% prevalence. What would be the positive predictive value of this test? 4. A test with 97% sensitivity and 98% specificity is used to screen a population of people for a disease with a 3% prevalence rate. What is the positive predictive value of this test?

Sensitivity and Specificity PPV and HIV status World Prevalence Rates

Return to main slide

Return to main slide

Return to main slide