Does Corruption in Procurement have a Cure?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procurement Mainstreaming Process in Indonesia. Figures about Significance of Public Procurement Public procurement in Indonesia is around 8 % of GDP.
Advertisements

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
1 Sample fraud awareness presentation Combating Corruption and Fraud Nigel Savage, JD, CFE International Fraud Expert and Man of Action SavageFraud.com.
OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention Unit
Towards a Unified Methodology for Measuring Corruption Global Forum V on Fighting Corruption and Safeguarding Integrity 2 – 5 April 2007 Johannesburg,
Reporting Corruption G. Jasper Cummeh, III Director, Center for Transparency & Accountability in Liberia “leading the fight against corruption in Liberia”
Preconditions for Effective Implementation of anti-corruption measures.
Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention Unit Zagreb –
Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention Unit Naples
AGENCY FOR PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AND COORDINATION OF FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION mr.sci. Vladica Babić - Assisstent.
Integrity and responsible governance in a private sector - case Finland Pentti Mäkinen Conference of the Corruption-free society Prague 12 September 2014.
Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention, Reporting and Analysis Unit Riga –
International Corruption laws & Culture HCA 457i Michelle Wheeler, Miyeon Kim.
Using the UN Convention against Corruption as a Basis for Good Governance.
International Anti-Corruption Standards and Role of Governments in Promoting Business Integrity Olga Savran Senior Anti-Corruption Advisor MENA-OECD Investment.
Der Kampf gegen die Korruption. What is corruption? Grand corruption acts committed at a high level of government at the expense of the public good Petty.
Values and Ethics as a Public Sector Fraud Control Financial Management Institute June Allen Tait, CA, CFI Senior Investigations Manager Ontario.
Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement Irina Stefuriuc Office for Fight Against Fraud (OLAF) Unit D.2 –
Medical Device Compliance Congress: Emerging Compliance Issues in Asia Anne Trimmer.
GLOBAL FORUM V ON FIGHTING CORRUPTION AND SAFEGUARDING INTEGRITY INTER-RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE VARIOUS FRAMEWORKS.
ANTI-CORRUPTION INSTITUTIONS AND MEDIA IN ALBANIA.
THE AUDIT BOARD OF INDONESIA. THE RESEARCH 1. Respondents 157 persons from 16 agencies : 8 government agencies, National Police Department, Attorney General.
The State Procurement Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan Welcomes the participants of the 9 th Public Procurement Exchange Platform “Efficient Implementation.
Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention Unit Bratislava –
GOVERNANCE AND ETHICS FOR THE BUILT AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Ethical Challenges in the Built and Natural Environment Sector and the Role of Professionals.
World Bank – GOPAC – APNAC – Forum, 20 September 2006, Arusha (Tanzania) International Framework to Fight Corruption: International Treaties and Standards;
Provincial SCM Summit 03 February 2011 Bolivia Lodge Consolidated Policy inputs and Recommendations.
Problems and challenges in the implementation of anti-corruption activities Drago KOS President of the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption, Slovenia.
Sub-theme 5: Workshop 1 The significance of preventive measures Hans G. Nilsson Sub-theme 5: Preventive measures: a national integrity system Workshop.
Latest fraud trends taking place in the public sector [Presenter: Zanele Mxunyelwa, CIA, CFE| Head : Specialised Audit Services, National Treasury]
C N A O AUDIT TO DETECT FRAUD AND CORRUPTION: EVALUATION OF THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION AND MONEY LAUNDERING National Audit Office of the People’s Republic.
Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention, Reporting and Analysis Unit Budapest.
Private Sector Development Competition and Anti Monopoly The World Bank Mission February-March, 2004.
Copyright All rights reserved. Copyright All rights reserved. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) – value added for business or competitive.
Chapter 2 Organizations: Their Political, Structural and Economic Environment By: Arnica Trazo.
Internal market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Integrity Matters in the New Public Procurement Directives and other ongoing public procurement workstrands.
Kingdom of Cambodia 1 Anti-Corruption Mechanism In Cambodia Presenter: Mr. Try Sothearith Dean of Business Faculty of Business and Economics, Western University,
FIGHTING CORRUPTION IN SIERRA LEONE- IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION (UNCAC)
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT A tool for Development...
BY: NASUMBA KIZITO KWATUKHA
Center for Good Governance Studies
Trade Capacity Vietnam
Know that Name Measuring Up Cycling Businesses Political Systems Know
Red flags OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention, Reporting and Analysis Unit
Global Corruption Robert Barrington managing the risks
Is Your Ethics Program in Order?
Integrity Matters in the New Public Procurement Directives and other ongoing public procurement workstrands François Arbault 'Public Procurement Strategy'
Know that Name Good Behavior B&B: Business Ethics Know that Term
Corruption and Bid-rigging
Corruption and Bid-rigging
OBJECTIVE To identify the core elements required in creating a control driven strategy to manage fraud and corruption in the Supply Chain Management.
Business in Partnership Against Corruption
Integrity Filters in eProcurement Systems
International business ethics
ICN Cartel Working Group SG 1 Call Series Linda Plumpton
Infrastructure Governance at the OECD
Partners: EUI, Hertie, SAR, Basel Institute, and BCE
Corruption Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement.
MACRO ENVIRONMENT.
The European Anti-Corruption Report
Sample fraud awareness presentation Combating Corruption and Fraud
Bribery Act 2010.
CORRUPTION AND DEVELOPMENT SIMAD UNIVERSITY LECTURER: MOHAMED SHEIKH AHMED.
4/8/2019.
Rural Partnerships between Small Farmers and Private Sector
Corruption Risk Management (CRM)
CCP 420: FRAUD DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT
The Economics of Corruption and Bribery
UNCAC Chapter II Overview Prevention of Corruption under the United Nations Convention against Corruption 8-10 April 2019 Addis Ababa.
CRISTINA BREDEN – Director ROMANIAN COURT OF ACCOUNTS
Presentation transcript:

Does Corruption in Procurement have a Cure? University of Sharjah 1 February, 2018 Lisa Campbell, FCIPS - Chartered Procurement and Supply Professional

Presentation Content Slide 3: Definition of Corruption Slide 4: One View of Corruption Slide 5: Forms of Corruption in Procurement Slide 6: Effects of Corruption in Procurement Slide 7: Cost of Corruption in Procurement Slide 8: Proven Corruption Slide 9: The United Nations Convention against Corruption Slide 10: Possible Indicators of Corruption – Specification and Bid Related Slide 11: Possible Indicators of Corruption – Collusion Slide 12: Possible Indicators of Corruption – Conflict of Interest Slide 13: Mechanisms to Prevent Corruption in Procurement Slide 14: Fighting Corruption Slide 15: Acknowledgements, References and Further Reading

Definition of Corruption “Corruption is the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. It can be classified as grand, petty and political, depending on the amounts of money lost and the sector where it occurs.” Transparency International

One View of Corruption AfricLaw

Forms of Corruption in Procurement Bribes and Kick-backs Bid Rigging Conflict of Interest Deliberate Ignorance / Front Companies / Brokers / Fraud

Effects of Corruption in Procurement What does corruption do? Depletes national wealth Perpetuates inequality and poverty Interferes with the development of fair market structures Distorts competition and deters investment Lack of enforcement of regulations can affect precious natural resources Undermines trust in political systems, their institutions and leadership Public Procurement as a % of GDP: GCC: 15-20% (World Bank) OECD: 12% EU: 20% A hurdle to challenging corruption can be the very populations that become distrusting and apathetic

Cost of Corruption in Procurement

Proven Corruption May 2013 US Department of Justice Investigation into Total Between 1995 and 2004, Total SA paid $60 Million in bribes to an Iranian official with oil sector influence to win contracts Total SA agreed to pay US government $398.2 Million Criminal case to be dropped if comply with independent monitor Case settled in US but faced additional charges in France May 2017 US Navy Investigation into Glenn Defense Marine Asia Between 2006 and 2014, tens of millions of dollars in bribes included luxury travel, hotel stays, elaborate dinners, cash and parties Submitted low ball bids to win Created false invoices for services not provided Overcharged invoices 13 pleaded guilty, 14 cases pending Admiral Robert Gilbeau 18 months in prison, 3 years of probation, 300 hours of community service and $150,00 restitution Alex Wisidagama, GDMA exe, 5 years in prison and $34.8 M in restitution Captain Daniel Dusek, 46 months in prison

The United Nations Convention against Corruption The only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument Preventative measures Criminalization and law enforcement International co-operation Asset Recovery Technical assistance and information exchange

Specification & Bid Related Possible Indicators of Corruption Use of brand names over generics and the winning bidder’s goods are uniquely similar to specification Unjustifiably unusual or unreasonable specifications Significant changes to specification from previous market approaches Low number of bidders or interested parties Bid manipulation – changes after submission, voided for errors, unreasonable disqualification Bidders complaining Specification & Bid Related

Collusion Possible Indicators of Corruption Prices drop with new entrants Abnormal bids – just under budget, at budget, etc. All bidders consistently submit high prices Winning bid too high compared to cost estimates/published pricing Losing bidders subsequently hired as sub-contractors Collusion

Conflict of Interest Possible Indicators of Corruption Employee not completing company Conflict of Interest documentation Employee turns down promotion Employee’s unexplained wealth Acceptance of high prices and low quality Increasing value of Contract through undocumented or frequent changes Unexplained favoritism for a specific contractor Conflict of Interest

Directors of Procurement Mechanisms to Prevent Corruption in Procurement Directors of Procurement Whistleblower protections Transparent Procurement processes Adequate systems Adequate and independent audit Vetting of Contractors and Sub-contractors Anti-corrupt organizational culture Specific training to tackle corruption Procurement Staff Follow Procurement processes Procurement qualifications Remain up to date with ethics certification Anti-corrupt personal behavior Guard and protect your integrity Speak up

Remain Non-confrontational Fighting Corruption Build Partnerships Step by Step Remain Non-confrontational

Acknowledgements, References and Further Reading https://www.transparency.org/ http://www.oecd.org/ http://ec.europa.eu/anti-fraud/home_en http://www.worldbank.org/?cid=ECR_GA_HPlaunch_searchad_EN_EXTP&gclid=COfy8YbyhtQCFQgW0wodSokKcg https://africlaw.com/2015/04/13/call-for-a-corruption-free-africa-a-rights-based-approach/ Burguet, R. and Che, Y-K. “Competitive procurement with corruption” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 35 (2004), pp.50-68 Burguet, R. and Che, Y-K. “Corruption and competition in procurement auctions” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 36 (2005), pp.1-15 Laffont, J-J. and Tirole, J. “A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, London, 1993, Lecture Notes Text 14 Celentani, M. “Corruption and competition in procurement” European Economic Review, Vol. 46, n. 7, (2002) pp.1273-1303