1. THE AUDIT BOARD OF INDONESIA

2. THE RESEARCH 1. Respondents 157 persons from 16 agencies : 8 government agencies, National Police Department, Attorney General Office, Commission for Corruption Eradication, Financial Intelligent Unit, 1 state-owned bank, 3 state owned companies 1. Time 3 weeks (March to April 2013) : distribution, collection, process

3. Results – Findings Corruption 1. Level of corruption a. Respondents thought Corruption was intolerable, very serious, pervasive, and increasingly occurred in recent years; b. Global Integrity Index and Corruption Perception Index fairly reflected the reality of Corruption in Indonesia ; c. Corruptions were mostly predictable and It was most likely to happen within public entities.

4. Results – Findings Corruption 2. Types of Corruption a. The most types of corruption based on prevalence were Grand corruption, petty corruption, and corruption at enterprise level.; b. The most common types of corruption were Abuse of power and Bribery. c. The highest probability were Petty Corruption and Grand Corruption while the parties most likely involved were employees, supervisors, and high-level management;

5. Results – Findings Corruption 3. Sectors vulnerable to Corruption a. Law enforcement agencies and tax collections were considered the most vulnerable sectors; b. At government level, areas possessing greatest possibility to occur were procurement contracts and revenue (tax) collection.

6. Results – Findings Corruption 4. The use of corruption’s money The monies gained from corruption were mostly used to purchase assets.

7. Results – Findings Corruption 5. Causes of Corruption a. The causes of Corruptions were the weak and lack of anti- corruption legal system; b. The main cause of Grand Corruption was Patronage-Client System,.

8. Results – Findings Corruption 5. Causes of Corruption (cont’d) c. Weak accounting practices, including lack of timely financial management; d. Corruption during budget formulation is primarily grand or political corruption and is influenced by the distribution of budgetary powers between the executive and the legislature.

9. Results – Findings Corruption 5. Causes of Corruption (contd) e. Unchecked and excessive executive discretion in the budget process; f. Public Financial Management System weakness during budget formulation.

10. Results – Findings Corruption 6. Anti corruption efforts a. Steps taken by the government were considered weak; b. The role of whistle blower was important in reporting corruption; c. It was effective to lodge complaints of corruption.

11. Results – Findings Corruption 7. Consequences of Corruption Corruption was considered to give serious impact to government’s budget as well as society.

12. Results – Findings Money Laundering 1. The degree of seriousness of money laundering in Indonesia a. Currently money laundering is in its serious condition. b. The prevalence rate of money laundering tends to increase and getting more sophisticated over the years.

13. Results – Findings Money Laundering 2. The main pattern of money laundering in Indonesia a. Money laundering occurs both in public and private sectors. b. The most vulnerable sector for money laundering is real estate.

14. Results – Findings Money Laundering 2. The main pattern of money laundering in Indonesia (contd) c. The wealth obtained from corruption is the main source for money laundering, with approximate amount of more than USD 50M. d.The most common method used for money laundering is by using real estate, business and cash transactions.

15. Results – Findings Money Laundering 3. Causes of money laundering The main factors causing money laundering in Indonesia are Insufficient supervision/control system and the insufficient legal system for anti money laundering.

16. Results – Findings Money Laundering 4. Negative consequences of money laundering a. Increase the number of crime and corruption b. Reduce the amount of government’s tax revenue and weaken the government’s control over the economy. c. Very seriously impact economic and social condition, national security, Indonesia’s international reputation, and economic reform.

17. Thank You..