TV White Space Coexistence Scenario based on Channel Availability

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0054r0 Submission May 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Discussion on mode of management service Notice: This document has been.
Advertisements

CX_DME_SAP Primitives
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
March 2013 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2013
Channel Classification for Logical Entities
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Call for Contribution to IG CUB
Call for Contribution to SG CUB
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
SG CUB Tentative Timeline
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
TV White Space Coexistence Plan
Channel Set Transition for Logical Entities
Channel Classification for Logical Entities
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Reference Model Date: Authors: September 2010
November Opening Report
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
[place presentation subject title text here]
Decision Topology Definitions
Liaison Report to Date: Authors: March 2012
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
Contribution on Location Privacy
IEEE P Project Status Date: Authors: July 2013
Decision on SG Formation
November Opening Report
TVWS Coexistence Study Group Extension Request
September Opening Report
July Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2009
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
July 2014 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2014
July 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2012
Reference Use Cases Date: Authors: September 2010
July 2015 SG CUB Opening Report
Negotiation between neighbor CMs
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
Discussion on SG Formation
Decision on SG Formation
September Opening Report
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
March 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2012
Addressing White Spaces Across all of IEEE 802
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
Logical Entities Date: Authors: September 2010
November Opening Report
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
Procedures Date: Authors: November 2010
Negotiation between neighbor CMs
November 2012 Opening Report
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
September 2012 Opening Report
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
Motion for Study Group on TV White Space Coexistence
July 2015 SG CUB Opening Report
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
IEEE White Space Radio First Call for Contributions
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
July 2013 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2013
May 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2012
Presentation transcript:

TV White Space Coexistence Scenario based on Channel Availability September 2009 TV White Space Coexistence Scenario based on Channel Availability Date: 2009-09-24 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.19. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.19. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the TAG of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <shellhammer@ieee.org> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.19 TAG. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRI

Channel Availability (1/2) September 2009 Channel Availability (1/2) FCC report and order designates possible TV bands for fixed or portable/personal TVBDs and networks Channel availability shows how many TV bands are available for coexisting TVBDs and networks 4 5 2 3 20 21 22 36 37 38 51 Disallowed Allowed Allowed but more stringent emission mask is needed Possible channels for fixed TVBDs Possible channels for portable/personal TVBDs Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRI

Channel Availability (2/2) September 2009 Channel Availability (2/2) Channel availability might be locally different based on; Incumbent activity Type of TVBDs Fixed TVBDs: No adjacent channel use Portable/Personal TVBDs: Adjacent channel use is possible with limited transmit power Number of activating TVBDs (or networks) Usable channel for TVBDs (or networks) includes Free channel No incumbent activity No TVBDs activity Occupied channel by other TVBDs (or networks) Figure’s copied from [1] Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRI

Scenarios M available channel out of N ( ) networks September 2009 Scenarios M available channel out of N ( ) networks : scenario 1 (Sufficient channel availability) : scenario 2 (Deficient channel availability) : scenario 3 (Single channel availability) Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRI

Scenario 1: Sufficient Channel Availability September 2009 Scenario 1: Sufficient Channel Availability M available channel out of N networks ( ) Each network operates on its own TV channel at the same time No self or inter-system coexistence problem on each channel Coexistence problems Fairness among N networks One channel per network, NO problem! Possible coexistence mechanisms for channel allocation FDM (entire one channel use) might be perfect enough! 802.22 802.16 802.15 TV channels 802.11 Slide 5 Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRI

Scenario 2: Deficient Channel Availability September 2009 Scenario 2: Deficient Channel Availability M available channel out of N networks ( ) All networks can NOT operate on their own TV channels at the same time Self or inter-system coexistence problem Coexistence problems Fairness among N networks Channel utilization goal = M/N Possible coexistence mechanisms for channel allocation and co-channel sharing FDM (sub-channel, i.e., partial channel, use) Combination of TDM (or CDM) and FDM Can select which network coexists with which one 802.22 802.16 802.15 TV channels 802.11 Slide 6 Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRI

Scenario 3: Single Channel Availability September 2009 Scenario 3: Single Channel Availability Single available channel out of N networks N networks operate on single co-channel at the same time Self or inter-system coexistence problem A subset of scenario 2 Coexistence problems Fairness among N networks Channel utilization goal = 1/N Possible coexistence mechanisms for co-channel sharing TDM (entire channel use) FDM (sub-channel, i.e., partial channel, use) CDM (entire channel use) 802.22 802.16 802.15 TV channels 802.11 Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRI

Coexistence Mechanisms for TVWS September 2009 Coexistence Mechanisms for TVWS Channel allocation To allocate a channel to a new network Two cases Allocate free channel Allocate pre-occupied channel by other networks Co-channel sharing To share an operating channel with other existing networks The channel has the same or similar TVWS networks Self-coexistence mechanism might be needed The channel has dissimilar TVWS networks Inter-system coexistence mechanism might be needed Slide 8 Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRI

Channel Allocation based on Scenario 2 September 2009 Channel Allocation based on Scenario 2 Two stage channel allocation for a new TVBD network Step 1: allocate the channel being used by the same or similar class of networks Full or partial coexistence without cooperation is possible Mechanism for self-coexistence could be applicable Step 2: allocate the channel being used by dissimilar class of networks Coexistence require cooperation Mechanism for inter-system coexistence might be required 802.22 802.16 802.15 802.11 TV channels Slide 9 Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRI

September 2009 Reference [1] Richard Paine et al, Whitespace Coexistence Use Cases, IEEE 802.19-09/026r4, July 2009 Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRI