Kari Kleine (kleine@mci.sdu.dk) Educating for Technology Entrepreneurship Through Scientist-Student Collaboration Kari Kleine (kleine@mci.sdu.dk) SDU Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SERVICE-LEARNING: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES BY FRANCIS YEE AND FRANCIS ADU-FEBIRI.
Advertisements

UKPSEC and UKPSF Dual professionalism of engineering educators
Introduction to CCC Coaching Programs. PURPOSE OF COACHING Preparing for a stretch assignment or role Transitioning into a new executive team or organization.
Research and Doing a Phd
Deanne Gannaway Facilitating Change in Higher Education Practices.
School of Marketing Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science Sales management issues relating to cross-functional selling teams John Wilkinson.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Leading to excellence Comprehensive Equity at Ohio State: What have we learned? Joan M. Herbers Principal Investigator ceos.osu.edu 1.
History, Theory, and Philosophy of Science (In SMAC + RT) 7th smester -Fall 2005 Institute of Media Technology and Engineering Science Aalborg University.
Mike Sharples. Beyond mobile learning Learning-enhanced environments DREAM proposal DREAM is a new centre for groundbreaking research into Digital Reality.
Home Institutional context for embedding innovation from national projects.
Expanding the Evidence Base for Consumer Policies A project in partnership with: The European Commission DG Environment BIO Intelligence.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Ed.S/Ed.D in Special Education Course Update and Revision *Change in Program Submitted by: Leena Her, Program Coordinator of Ed.S/Ed.D in SPED Revision.
Johns Hopkins University School of Education. Overview Program Objective Program Requirements Program Format Admissions Process Note: This program is.
Enterprise & Entrepreneurship Education the new curriculum guidelines in Ireland and the UK ISBE 2012, Dublin 6 November Professor David Rae
Action Research Project Measuring the impact of student led teaching techniques in academic subjects.
Constructivism and Instructional Design Are they compatible? Summary and Presentation by Anna Ignatjeva.
Is there a Doctor in the house? Then take me to your leader. Engaging medical and clinical staff in Post Graduate accredited workbased leadership development.
Evidence based research in education Cathy Gunn University of Auckland.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Using formative feedback, asynchronous discussion boards and recognition to develop the creative, confident and inspired learner 2. Teaching and Assessment.
Towards an activity-oriented and context-aware collaborative working environments Presented by: Ince T Wangsa Supervised by:
Case Study #9 Jackie Adams: Evaluating a Federally Funded Faculty Training Program Melody Murphy AIL 606 The University of Alabama.
A Model to Facilitate Effective Blended E-learning within Universities in Developing Countries B. Aguti, R. J. Walters, G. B. Wills Electronics and Computer.
Management of assessments and decision making: execution, facilitation, evaluation Mikko V. Pohjola, Nordem Oy (THL)
Can VeSeL provide a model for collaborative participation in the design and delivery of e-learning? Pauline Ngimwa PhD student The Open University, UK.
Developing the Fine Particulate Matter Response. Developing the Response – Air Physical System.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
1 Agenda Kauffman’s strategy for entrepreneurship Judges’ recommendations for final proposals Group Q & A Lunch.
Reflection and Learning Workshop April 2015 Imperial Botanical Garden Hotel, Entebbe.
Training and Development Prof R K Singh AIMA CME.
ASSESSING TEACHER KNOWLEDGE OF EFFECTIVE PRIMARY GRADE READING AND WRITING INSTRUCTION Measurement Issues and Concerns Panel Presentation by D. Ray Reutzel.
Legitimate assemblies: is collaborative research the ‘pathway to impact’? Susan Molyneux-Hodgson Sociological Studies University of Sheffield.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Understanding Policy Contexts CEP:ELM, 2011 Mombasa.
DARM 2013: Assessment and decision making Mikko V. Pohjola, Nordem Oy, (THL)
C R E S S T / U C L A Validity Issues for Accountability Systems Eva L. Baker AERA April 2002 UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.
March  Third annual 2141 Club meeting  Recognizing new members  Introductions  Developing a support network.
Status Reports: Measuring against Mission National Institute of Standards and Technology U.S. Department of Commerce 1 Technology Program Evaluation: Methodologies.
Identification of the Skill Needs of Enterprises and the labour market and contribution to skill development made by education, including formal, non-formal.
Smart Tourism Destination as a sustainable tool of promotion By: Shpresim DOMI, PhD Cand. Agricultural University of Tirana (AUT) Economy and Agribusiness.
Adapting the Biggs 3P model (1993) for Learning in Pharmacy Practice Boys,R; Kendrew,P; Miller, E. Reflection Advanced and Consultant Level Framework Appraisals.
21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics
Amleset Kelati - MSc.EE, Research Engineer, PHD Candidate – KTH
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Program Evaluation ED 740 Study Team Project Program Evaluation
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
STRATEGIC ACADEMIC UNIT “PEOPLE & TECHNOLOGIES”
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Keywords: Capstone design course, business plan, interdisciplinary collaboration Integration of Real-life Engineering Design Problems into Engineering.
Factors facilitating academic success: a student perspective
Commitment 9: Set out EIT strategic agenda
DARM 2013: Assessment and decision making
ICT PSP 2011, 5th call, Pilot Type B, Objective: 2.4 eLearning
Introduction to Comprehensive Evaluation
Module Content Research Principles and Approaches Types of Research
SUNY Applied Learning Resolution.
Impact assessment and decision making
Lourdes Guàrdia, Elena Barberà Teresa Guasch and Enrique Rubio
AP computer science PRINCIPLES
Scaling-up Active Collaborative Learning for Student Success
eSTEeM Induction event, 1st November 2018
CO-OPERATION BETWEEN HEI’S AND LABOUR MARKET , Baku
ICCE WORKSHOPS.
M.V. de la Fuente; D. Ros; M.A. Ferrrer; J. Suardíaz;
THE EXPERIENCE OF ENGINEERS LEADING PROJECT TEAMS: A GENERIC QUALITATIVE INQUIRY Halle Horvath.
Table 1. Conceptual Framework Learning Outcomes
Yelena Shevchenko Director of Strategic Planning and
Getting Knowledge into Action for Healthcare Quality
Presentation transcript:

Kari Kleine (kleine@mci.sdu.dk) Educating for Technology Entrepreneurship Through Scientist-Student Collaboration Kari Kleine (kleine@mci.sdu.dk) SDU Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Mads Clausen Institute, Sønderborg This research is part of a PhD dissertation regarding technology entrepreneurship education. Amongst others, the focus is on learning processes, technology transfer, and practical implementation of innovative teaching approaches. What is our problem? Can students build the bridge towards commercialization? Barr et al. (2009), AMLE What is our reference framework? Commercialization of research outcomes, combination of academic and student entrepreneurship Collaboration between scientists and engineering students – Learning theories Scientists as origin of technical prototypes Scientists act as mentors/technical experts Students drive the commercialization and product development process Research question How do the collaboration dynamics between scientist and students contribute to achieve intended learning outcomes (regarding technology commercialization)? Method Embedded multiple-case study in line with Eisenhardt & Graebner (2007) Micro-level perspective Cases are independent experiments and therefore allow comparison Case data 4 teams (students and scientist) – longitudinal data (6 months) Rich data: reports, evaluations, focus groups and interviews Mid-term interviews with experts Mid-term focus groups with students Concluding focus groups with scientist and students Initial project proposals by the scientists Student assessments of the ideas/prototypes (initial and final) Written group assignments & reports Preliminary findings Scientist involvement facilitates a real context for the students, which is used to validate assumptions The technically advanced status of the scientists´ prototypes enable students to drive the commercialization process and facilitate real feedback loops from potential customers/markets Scientist-student collaboration contributes knowledge that exceeds regular lecture content in term of applicability Student motivation depends on the degree of ownership they develop during the project, which impacts the collaborational dynamics Implications for practice and research Scientist-student collaboration is a form of ‘learning through’ entrepreneurial practice and is highly useful to achieve intended learning outcomes in technology entrepreneurship Singular nature of technology entrepreneurship: focus on both the development and commercialization of new advances in science and engineering Contribution to teaching models that address specific challenges of technology entrepreneurship education Scientist-student collaboration can be an active driver for technology transfer