Watershed Restoration on the Lolo NF Benefits for the Clark Fork Watershed Taylor Greenup, Hydrologist, Lolo National Forest Jennifer Mickelson,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
Advertisements

Restore and Protect Red River Watershed BPA Project #
Restore Lawyer Creek Habitat: Targeting Steelhead and Chinook Salmon.
Rehabilitate Newsome Creek Watershed BPA Project #
Lolo Creek Watershed Project #
Implement Actions to Reduce Water Temperatures in the Teanaway Basin BPA FY 2002 Columbia Plateau Province Proposal Project ID #
Restore and Protect Red River Watershed Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries Watershed Program.
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during.
Little Canyon Creek Subwatershed Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project Sponsored by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Moffatt Thomas Lower Boise River Wetlands Restoration Project Sponsor:Pioneer Irrigation District Presenter: Scott L. Campbell Legal Counsel for Pioneer.
Restore McComas Meadows /Meadow Creek Watershed Project # Restore McComas Meadows/ Meadow Creek Watershed Project # Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries.
Planning for Our Future:
Restoring Life History Diversity to Bonneville Cutthroat Trout and Bluehead Sucker in the Weber River Paul Burnett – Trout Unlimited Ben Nadolski – Utah.
Project Collaboration In 1999, as a result of several years of monitoring of neotropical migratory birds such as the willow flycatcher, Jim Steele from.
Cary Denison Gunnison Basin Project Coordinator & Brian Hodge Yampa & White Basin Project Coordinator Trout Unlimited in The Colorado Basin.
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds North American Journal.
Protect & Restore Northeast Oregon/Southeast Washington Project Number ISRP – Geographic Review May 1, 2013.
1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Indian River Lagoon North Restoration Feasibility Study Public Meeting September.
Clackamas River Basin Council Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan Implementer’s Perspective August 19, 2013.
Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resource Management Nez Perce Tribal Executive Committee Natural Resource Sub-Committee July 1, 2008 Watershed.
Natural Resource Information Systems Aquatic Organism Passage Managing your Data in INFRA and NRIS Water Brian Sanborn USFS – NRIS Water/Air Region 9 –
Chumstick Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land development, road construction, and other human activities have affected channel migration and sediment.
Lower South ForkClearwater River Lower South Fork Clearwater River Nez Perce Tribe DFRM Watershed Division Mark Johnson-Project Leader
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.
Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resource Management Nez Perce Tribe / Nez Perce National Forest Partnership Overview February 3, 2011 Watershed.
Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resource Management WATERSHED DIVISION FCRPS Biological Opinion Expert Panel “Gap Filling by Habitat Actions”
Fiscal Year 2004 April 10, FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004 EnactedBudgetBudget COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN: Army Corps of Engineers Bureau of Land.
Mission, Brender, and Yaksum Creeks Habitat Conditions Low flows and associated high temperatures affect distribution and abundance of native species.
The Upper Lochsa and Progress Toward Restoration Rebecca A. Lloyd, NPT Watershed Division.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Technical Meeting May 16, 2007, 1-4 pm Red Lion Redding, CA.
Implementing Post-Construction Stormwater Controls Greg Davis, EPA Region 8.
Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary.
The Use Of Barriers to Protect Westslope Cutthroat Trout Populations from Genetic Introgression and Competition by Nonnative Salmonids David Moser Montana.
Coos Watershed Association Watershed Restoration Projects.
Coal Creek Culvert Replacement Pacific Coast Salmon Coalition.
Flathead River to Lake Initiative Conservation and restoration through a diverse collaborative effort Part I – How it began Part II – Conservation Successes.
Dungeness Watershed Action Plan Olympic National Forest.
Agency Questionnaire Results Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Conservation Strategy Work Group Information gathered September/October 2005.
Watershed Restoration Overview for the Klamath Basin.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Reconnecting Fluvial Westslope in Skalkaho Creek Is this working and how do we tell?
Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview MARY ANDREWS NOAA JULIE DEVERS USFWS ERIK MARTIN THE NATURE CONSERVANCY CHESAPEAKE BAY FISH PASSAGE.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Alameda Creek Watershed San Francisco Public Utilities Commission October 27, 2009.
Restoration Under a Future Climate Understanding and managing climate change effects on federal lands Dr. Cynthia West, Director Office of Sustainability.
STORM WATER SOLUTIONS FOR EXISTING URBAN AREAS: IDENTIFYING SITES TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS Jared Bartley, Cuyahoga SWCD September 8, 2011.
Regional Peer Learning Workshop: Accelerated Landscape Restoration Siuslaw Stewardship Model and Collaborative Engagement.
WNTI Projects. Overview Historically, our funding has limited us to smaller projects. All of these “low hanging fruit” type projects have now been accomplished.
Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26, 2016 James Capurso, PhD Regional Fisheries Biologist Pacific Northwest Region USDA Forest Service.
Bull Trout Recovery & Watershed Restoration in the Clark Fork River Basin.
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
Aquatic and Riparian Conservation Strategy
Souhegan River Watershed [Watershed Community Group]
Fish and Watershed Restoration Efforts in the Ninemile Drainage: Potential, Progress, and Opportunity Clark Fork R.
Critical Linkages: Identifying Culvert Replacement Priorities to Maintain Connectivity of Cold Water Streams in the Face of Climate Change Scott Jackson,
An Overview of the Flathead Subbasin Planning Process
A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds North American Journal.
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Fish Passage Barriers & Salmon Recovery
A Community-Based Approach to
Stream Connectivity in the Clark Fork Watershed
Jason Throneberry Aquatic Ecologist.
WESTCAS Fall Conference Tuesday, October 23, 2018 Dick Fleishman
Leveraging Funding from Other Sources: a Programmatic Approach
Columbia Basin Water Transactions Program: Annual Economic Report, 2010 WestWater Research June 17, 2010.
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Presentation transcript:

Watershed Restoration on the Lolo NF Benefits for the Clark Fork Watershed Taylor Greenup, Hydrologist, Lolo National Forest Jennifer Mickelson, Fisheries Biologist, Lolo National Forest Swartz Creek Missoula RD

Upper Lolo Creek Road Reclamation Overview Lolo NF within the Clark Fork watershed Forest Restoration Objectives and Priorities Project Planning, Implementation, and Tracking Highlight Project: Upper Lolo Creek Road Reclamation

Lolo NF Watershed Facts 2 million acres 4 million acre-feet/yr est. mean annual contribution to water supply (Brown and Froemke, 2009) Headwaters Blackfoot River Bitterroot River Middle Clark Fork St. Regis River Thompson River

Forest Watershed Impacts

Watershed Restoration Returning an undesirable existing condition to a desired future condition at a defined scale. i.e. Sediment levels, road density, stream crossing, instream channel parameters (width, depth, bank stability), fish populations, etc. Mitigation – to lessen in force or intensity; make less severe (Webster 1995)

Restoration on the Forest Multiple sources for direction: Lolo National Forest Plan and INFISH Northern Region Restoration and Protection Strategy “Restoration and maintenance of high value watersheds in a properly functioning condition.” Montana State Water Quality Plans Threatened and Endangered Species Conservation

Restoration Prioritization

Restoration Prioritization

Forest Project Planning and Implementation NEPA: 5 Year Planning Process Typically integrated, large-scale projects Reviewed annually Small projects Tend to be resource specific Often involve partners for watershed restoration Funding Contracting

Road Maintenance Cost Range: Blading - $300/mi Rolling - $100 - 180/mi Brushing - $335 to 780/mi Rip Rap - $500 to 1,000/struct.

Aquatic Passage Cost range from $25,000 – 125,000

Stream Restoration Cost range from $264,000 - $528,000/mi

Lolo National Forest Watershed Improvement Tracking Forest Activities Tracked: Stored, Decommissioned and Re-located Roads and Trails Stored and Decommissioned Road-Stream Crossings Upgraded Road-Stream Crossings for AOP & Q100 Stream Restoration Sites Abandoned Mine Reclamation Sites Fish Screen Locations Other: land/stream acquisition, etc. Costs and Funding Source

Highlight Project: Upper Lolo Watershed Restoration Coordinated assessments for the Upper Lolo TMDL (2003)

Upper Lolo Watershed Restoration Goal: “to improve water quality and aquatic habitat by reducing the amount of non-natural sediment delivered to streams by forest roads” NEPA completed and Decision Notice signed in 2005. Commitment: Remove or replace 22 culverts Decommission 58 miles of roads BMP upgrades to 35 miles of major roads

Upper Lolo Watershed Restoration Partnerships: Montana Trout Conservancy Westslope Chapter of Trout Unlimited Work to Date: 2007: Level 3 Decommissioning: 5.78 miles Level 3N Decommissioning: 11.08 miles Level 4 Decommissioning: 0.45 miles Level 5 Decommissioning: 0.79 miles Total Number of Culverts Removed - 13 Miles of Upstream Habitat Made Accessible - 2.18 Miles Total Cost - $171,000 (11,000 NFWF and 161,000 NFVW)

Upper Lolo Watershed Restoration Work to Date, continued: 2008: Level 3 Decommissioning: 36.64 miles Level 3N Decommissioning: 18.39 miles Level 4 Decommissioning: 5.79 miles Level 5 Decommissioning: 4.07 miles Total Number of Culverts Removed - 37 Miles of Upstream Habitat Made Accessible - 10.24 Total Cost - $168,993 all NFVW

Upper Lolo Watershed Restoration Road Decommissioning

Upper Lolo Watershed Restoration Culvert Upgrades Aquatic Organism Passage Q100 flows Unnamed Tributary to Lost Park Creek

Upper Lolo Watershed Restoration What remains: Complete remaining culvert removals/upgrades 11 culverts to open ~12 miles of fish habitat Implement remaining road BMP upgrades Future Needs in the Upper Lolo: Assessment and probable restoration of former Plum Creek lands

Questions? Taylor Greenup, Hydrologist Lolo National Forest 406-329-3949 tgreenup@fs.fed.us Jennifer Mickelson, Fisheries Biologist Lolo National Forest 406-826-4350 jmickelson@fs.fed.us