1. Fiscal Year 2004 April 10, 2003

2. FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004 EnactedBudgetBudget COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN: Army Corps of Engineers98.00113.5125.1 Bureau of Land Management 10.8 10.8 10.8 Bureau of Reclamation 11.0 15.0 19.0 United States Fish and Wildlife Service 10.0 11.7 10.3 Natural Resources Conservation Service 27.9 27.9 27.9 Bureau of Indian Affairs 0.4 0.4 0.4 United States Geological Survey 0.4 0.5 0.5 N.O.A.A. Fisheries 26.036.6 41.1 United States Forest Service 56.5 50.6 48.9 Environmental Protection Agency 18.3 18.3 18.3 TOTAL (Discretionary Appropriations) 259.3 285.3 302.3 Bonneville Power Admin. Direct Fish Costs 253.3 289.7 286.6 TOTAL (Discretionary & Indefinite) 512.6 575.0 588.9 OTHER PACIFIC COASTAL SALMON: Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund 110.0 90.0 90.0 NOAA Pacific Salmon Treaty 45.0 40.0 0 TOTAL (Other Pacific Coastal Activities) 155.0 130.0 90 GRAND TOTAL (Columbia & Other Pacific Salmon) 667.6 705.0 678.9 FEDERAL AGENCY FISCAL YEAR 2002-2004 FUNDING COLUMBIA RIVER BASINWIDE SALMON ($ in millions)

3. FY2002 FY2003 FY 2004 Actual Enacted Budget Construction, General Columbia R. Fish Mitigation Proj. 73.80 85.00 95.00 Chief Joseph Dam Gas Abatement 0.00 0.50 0.90 Lower Col. R. Ecosystem Restor. 0.00 2.00 2.00 Lower Snake R. F&WL Comp. Plan 0.00 4.00 2.00 Willamette Temperature Control11.86 8.00 10.00 General Investigations Willamette Floodplain Restoration 0.75 0.15 0.21 Lower Col. R. Ecosystem Restor. 0.13 0.30 0.25 Walla Walla Watershed 0.18 0.65 0.44 Operation and Maintenance39.51 45.33 47.60 Bonneville direct share (28.23) (32.41) (33.30) Congressional Funding 98.00 113.52 125.10 Total Program 126.23 145.93 158.40 US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FISCAL YEAR 2002-2004 FUNDING COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN SALMON ($ in millions)

4. FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 Enacted Enacted Budget Columbia /Snake Salmon Recovery Hydropower 5.5 6.5 6.4 Tributary Habitat 3.5 6.6 10.5 R, M and E 0.9 General 2.0 1.9 1.2 TOTAL11.0 15.0 19.0 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION FISCAL YEAR 2002-2004 FUNDING ($ in millions)

5. FY 2002FY 2003 FY 2004 EnactedEnactedBudget Hydropower Monitor & Evaluate Bull Trout Proj.0.000.1190.119 Habitat Instream Flow0.3750.9490.949 Avian Predation0.3000.2980.298 ESA Consultation0.7971.7001.700 Col. R. Estuary Restoration0.000.1790.179 Fish Passage0.0500.0500.050 Subbasin Planning1.0601.0531.053 Bull Trout Passage0.4951.1431.143 Habitat Restoration0.4000.3970.397 Total Habitat 3.4775.7695.769 Hatcheries Hatchery Operations and Maintenance1.8092.3943.017 Hatchery Monitor and Evaluation0.5801.0541.054 Fish Health0.000.1190.119 Total Hatcheries 2.3893.5674.190 Harvest Limit Harvest Impacts0.1600.2280.228 Construction Fish Screens4.002.000.00 TOTAL10.02611.68310.306 US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE FISCAL YEAR 2002-2004 COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN INITIATIVE RESOURCE ($ in millions)

6. FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 Enacted Enacted Budget Columbia River Hatcheries Operations and Maintenance 11.5 11.5 11.5 Screens (Construction) 3.4 3.4 3.4 Hatchery Reform 1.7 1.7 1.7 ESA Recovery Plan 7.2 7.2 7.2 Resource Information Base 2.2 2.2 2.2 Columbia River BiOp Research, Monitoring and Eval. -- 0.0 11.6 Subbasin & Hatchery planning and Implementation -- 0.0 3.5 Mass Marking Trailers -- 1.6 -- Subtotal 26.0 27.6 41.1 Other Pacific Coastal Salmon Activities Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund 110.0 90.0 90.0 Pacific Salmon Treaty 45.0 40.0 0.0 Subtotal 155.0130.0 90.0 NOAA FISHERIES COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON FUNDING FISCAL YEAR 2002-2004 FUNDING ($ in millions)

7. FY 2002FY 2003 EnactedEnacted Expenses O&M – Lower Snake Comp.15.4 16.2 O&M – Corps and Bureau35.9 37.0 NWPPC 4.3 4.3 Treasury Repayment 84.1 90.1 Direct Program 150.0139.0 Total Expenses 289.7286.6 BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION FISH AND WILDLIFE FUNDING FISCAL YEAR 2002-2004 ($ in millions)

8. Future Council considerations for federal appropriations for fish and wildlife implementation April 10, 2003

9. Anticipate subbasin plans Subbasin plans will form an improved documentation of regional needs. Local constituencies will use them to seek funding from a variety of sources. The Council can help organize a coherent regional implementation strategy based on subbasin plans.

10. What we should be working on today? Help define the implementation “tool box” for subbasin plans. Specifically, the subbasin plans will include strategies that define project needs. Early identification of funding sources is key to implementing subbasin. plans.

11. “Tools” in the “toolbox” If a subbasin plan calls for : –Reducing sedimentation – CREP. –Screening irrigation diversions – FWS screening, BOR, Mitchell Act sources. –Improving water quantity in tributaries – NFWF water brokerage. –Hatchery upgrades – Corps, Mitchell Act funding sources.

12. How we make progress Define the various funding sources. Determine flexibility for priorities – Forest Service may have less than Reclamation or Corps. Determine needed improvements in authorities or decision processes. Facilitate a regional process.