Credibility Accuracy Reasonableness Support

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Publish or Pear-ish Moving through research in the 21 st century Michael DavisMillard West Photo from:

Advertisements

Evaluating Internet Research Sources Dennis LeForce ENG2A Kingman High School (Source: Robert Harris June 15, 2007)

Reading Comprehension Standard 2.8 Evaluate the credibility of an author’s argument or defense of a claim by critiquing the relationship between generalizations.

Writing Circle Map: “Persuasion”

Environmental Issues Presentation. Task After researching scientific and technical resources, write and present an argumentation speech that identifies.

Characteristics Generate as many characteristics of critical thinking and a critical thinker as possible.

Instructor: Bess A. Rose What examples of logic models have you found since the last class? Where did you find them?

Cars Checklist Is your source credible? Credibility Accuracy Reasonableness Support.

Components of Rhetoric – Aristotle’s Triangle Speaker MessageAudience.

CARS Checklist Credibility – trustworthy Accuracy – up-to-date, factual, exact Reasonableness – fair, balanced, objective, reasoned Support – valid.

Evaluating Websites. Why is it so important to evaluate websites ? Think about these differences… Print Books or Magazine Articles  Checked for accuracy.

Internet Research Skills Prof. Dwyer IS112 Fall 2004.

IS112 – Class 01 Computer Organization and Programming Professor Catherine Dwyer.

IS112 Internet Research Skills Evaluating Internet Research Internet has quickly become primary medium for.

EVALUATING INTERNET RESEARCH SOURCES GIVE CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE! HARRIS, ROBERT. "EVALUATING INTERNET RESEARCH SOURCES." EVALUATING INTERNET RESEARCH.

Evaluating Online Sources Clayton Hunter Michael Mitchell Adam Sheppard Nicole White.

Website Evaluation Using the internet for research.

LIBRARIES, DATABASES AND THE INTERNET. Why do we need Libraries? Credible Organized Selected In Depth Info.

Finding Reliable Sources. Credible in providing the information necessary for your topic Fair Objective Lacks biases/motives Quality control Identify.

Website Evaluation Using the internet for research.

Elisad Webpages Marianne van der Heijden november 2000.

CIL Training for the Trainers: Plan your search and search strategy - SABINET Marieta Buys 10 July 2007.

Plan your search and search strategy - CSA Marieta Buys 24 Jan 2008.

ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.

Finding Credible Sources

Funded by the Library of Congress.

Evaluating Internet Resources Why Evaluate? Identifying the Information Need Search Engines & Web Pages Evaluating Sources CARS Checklist Worksheet.

Website Evaluation for AP/Concurrent Weber State University Stewart Library.

Three Pillars of Persuasion Establishing Rhetorical Techniques.

Web Sources How to evaluat ? Nowadays, web technologies grant fast access to a tremendous variety of sources, but they cannot help you decide by themselves.

C.A.R.S. AND THE INTERNET. Why is it important to evaluate websites? No rules about what can be posted on the Internet No quality standards for websites.

Evaluating Sources Using the CARS Checklist

EVALUATING ONLINE SOURCES. GOAL Identify criteria to evaluate websites. Evaluate websites to determine their usefulness for research & your own personal.

Document Based Questioning. Learning Goal By the end of this lesson I will be able to provide a detailed, organized response to the analytical question.

Rhetoric In the study of rhetoric, the focus should be how a writer uses elements of language – diction, detail, image, tone, syntax, logical ordering,

English Composition ENG115 Reading Critically. Topics Reasons to read critically Integrating sources into your writing Using prereading strategies Reading.

Internet Sources: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Evaluating Websites.

An Introduction to Persuasion and Argument Moving people to a belief, position, or course of action Adapted from Mike McGuire’s Com 101 class notes, MV.

History Fair Help. Evaluating Websites Is it Credible?

Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.

Evaluating Web Sources By Kathy West English II Research.

Using the Internet Welcome to the Library!. Research skills Week 7 Internet Just because you found it on the Internet, doesn’t mean it’s true.

Determining Reliable Websites For Research 4 Factors to Consider CARS:  Credibility: Can we believe the site?  Accuracy: Can we consider the information.

The CRAAP Way to Evaluate Credibility AP Capstone Research Mr. Linton.

Happy Wednesday! Please take a highlighter from the table. Please get out your bias test from yesterday. You will need a clean sheet of paper. You should.

A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5 TH EDITION Chapter 4 Ethical Public Speaking.

Identifying Reliable Websites

Information Literacy Program Critically Evaluating

Evaluating Internet Research Sources

Breaking News or is it?.

Determining Reliable Websites For Research

Title: ___________________________________________________

Locating Valid & Reliable Information: On the Web Other Sources

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Website Evaluation

A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 4TH EDITION Chapter 4

Plagiarism Your worst enemy in school.

Chapter 3: The Research Process

Rhetoric Rhetoric: Using language to persuade..

WEBSITE EVALUATION Using C.A.R.S

A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 4

Integration of Knowledge and Ideas

Web Evaluation The C. R. A. A. P. Test.

Evaluating Information

Breaking News or is it?.

How trustworthy is the internet?you be the judge!

Course Organizer Standards Based Grading The This Course: ELA- Grade 7

Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric

Evaluating Internet Resources

Presentation transcript:

Credibility Accuracy Reasonableness Support C.A.R.S. Credibility Accuracy Reasonableness Support

Credibility: Trustworthy The quality of evidence and argument is evident. The author's credentials are available. Quality control is evident. It is a known or respected authority.

Credibility Credibility is relative Consider the author’s relation to her subject. rehttp://research.amnh.org/~orsola/Einstein.htm.

Accuracy: Up-to-date Factual Detailed and exact Comprehensive Its purpose reflects intentions of completeness and accuracy.

Reasonableness Fair Balanced Objective and reasoned There is no conflict of interest. There is an absence of fallacies or slanted tone.

Support Listed sources Contact information Its claims will be supported. Documentation will be supplied.

Think Critically! Velcro Save The Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus

Look, Read, and Evaluate Amy Winehouse Rolling Stone

Evaluate: Toddlers & Tiaras Ebsco version

Be responsible Follow the same concepts of CARS in your own work. Be as complete and accurate as possible. Address the opposition. Be reasonable with language and tone. Cite all information that is not common knowledge. Use the BEST sources possible.