The new Libris National Library of Sweden Olle Johansson

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bibliographic Framework Initiative Approach for MARC Data as Linked Data Sally McCallum Library of Congress.
Advertisements

Subject Analysis: An Introduction Based on BASIC SUBJECT CATALOGING USING LCSH edited by Lori Robare.
FRBR QUIZ Start quiz Take quiz by pointing to the answer and clicking on it.
Application of Subdivisions June 22, 2003 ALA Annual Conference, Toronto.
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
Developing catalogues for customers (not cataloguers) Gordon Dunsire Presented at Branch/Group Day, CILIP in Scotland 5 th Annual Conference, 13 th June.
Introduction to Databases Transparencies
Catalog: Batch delete old Patron Records How to conduct global/batch updates to records – patron Adding Faculty and Patron/Student Records Manually Standardizing.
RDA, FRBR & MARC RDA Cataloguing Seminars September 2012.
Introduction to MARC Cataloguing Part 2 Presenters: Irma Sauvola: Part 1 Dan Smith: Part 2.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
Genre Headings and Authorities in the University of Washington Libraries Catalog Adam L. Schiff Principal Cataloger University of Washington Libraries.
Sage Library Consortium Cataloging-in-Publication MARC record conversion.
Forcing a change into the Global Change Queue A strategy for handling heading changes when there is no matching authority record.
8/28/97Organization of Information in Collections Introduction to Description: Dublin Core and History University of California, Berkeley School of Information.
Improving Access to Audio- Visual Materials by Using Genre/Form Terms OLAC Conference 1-3 October 2004 Montreal, Quebec.
Moving Cataloguing into the 21 st Century Presentation given at the CLA pre-conference Shaping Tomorrow’s Metadata with RDA June 2, 2010 by Tom Delsey.
Lecture Four: Steps 3 and 4 INST 250/4.  Does one look for facts, or opinions, or both when conducting a literature search?  What is the difference.
7/14/09. Robert L. Maxwell RDA Lecture Series National Library of South Africa 22 July /14/09 Cataloging: Still a Professional Asset to Become Excited.
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
The Library Cataloging Tradition Marty Kurth CS 431 February 9, 2005 [slides stolen from Diane Hillmann]
Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program New Developments in Cataloging.
RDA Toolkit With thanks to Lori Robare (University of Oregon) and Robert Maxwell (Brigham Young University) for most of these slides.
Entity Relationships for the Bibliographic Universe Jacquie Samples September 7,2010 FRBR.
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: FRBR and Millennium
RDA Toolkit is an integrated, browser-based, online product that allow user to interact with a collection of cataloging-related documents and resources.
Jennifer Bowen, University of Rochester ALA Annual Conference, 2009, Chicago, Illinois 1 Defining Linked Data for the eXtensible Catalog (XC): Metadata.
Evolving MARC 21 for the future Rebecca Guenther CCS Forum, ALA Annual July 10, 2009.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee for the Development.
How to express MARC in XML ELAG Workshop 10 Report.
Cataloguing standards are evolving … still Renate Beilharz ALIA National Library and Information Technician’s Symposium 2015.
Evidence from Metadata INST 734 Doug Oard Module 8.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
Building blocks for RDA Theory behind RDA ALLUNY Annual Meeting September 28-30, 2012.
Introduction to the Semantic Web and Linked Data Module 1 - Unit 2 The Semantic Web and Linked Data Concepts 1-1 Library of Congress BIBFRAME Pilot Training.
FRBR: Cataloging’s New Frontier Emily Dust Nimsakont Nebraska Library Commission NCompass Live December 15, 2010 Photo credit:
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
THE BIBFRAME EDITOR AND THE LC PILOT Module 3 – Unit 1 The Semantic Web and Linked Data : a Recap of the Key Concepts Library of Congress BIBFRAME Pilot.
Ex Libris, LOD and BIBFRAME
Sally McCallum Library of Congress
Differences and distinctions: metadata types and their uses Stephen Winch Information Architecture Officer, SLIC.
23 rd Annual Innovative Users Group Conference April 13 th – 16 th 2015.
The British Library Guide to RDA Name Authority Records © The British Library Board 2014.
Current initiatives in developing library linked data Gordon Dunsire Presented at the Cataloguing and Indexing Group Scotland seminar “Linked data and.
BIBFRAME and Linked Data at the University of Washington Joseph Kiegel.
CASEY A. MULLIN WITH: LALA HAJIBAYOVA SCOTT MCCAULAY DECEMBER 8, 2008 FRBR in RDF: a proof-of-concept model 1 ©2008 Casey A. Mullin.
Some basic concepts Week 1 Lecture notes INF 384C: Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Information organization Week 2 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information Spring 2015 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
1 RDA in Aleph 500 Version 21 Yoel Kortick. Aleph support manager Nov
Subjects in the FR family
What is it that cataloguers and librarians fear the most?
Subject Analysis: An Introduction
BIBFRAME and Schema.org New Models for Resource Description and Access
Defining and using an external search profile with multiple targets for copy cataloging Yoel Kortick Senior Librarian Alma Product Management.
From the old to the new… Towards better resource discoverability
Roles for Alma Catalogers
By Dr Hester Marais
Publishing to OCLC Yoel Kortick Senior Librarian.
Metadata Editor Introduction
BIBFRAME at the Library of Congress
Cataloging Tips and Tricks
FRAD: Functional Requirements for Authority Data
MARC: Beyond the Basics 11/24/2018 (C) 2006, Tom Kaun.
Metadata - Catalogues and Digitised works
Database Design Hacettepe University
Designing and Using Normalization Rules
RDA Community and linked data
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Metadata modelling and metadata creation tool
Introduction to BIBFRAME
Presentation transcript:

The new Libris National Library of Sweden Olle Johansson Katarina Synnermark RDA Editorial Group National Library of Sweden OLLE: Libris is a union catalogue for Swedish libraries: university, special and public libraries. This presentation is about leaving the old Libris and MARC21 and moving into a new system based on BIBFRAME, and about the conversion of metadata that comes with it. EURIG May 25 2018 1

The new Libris The format in the new Libris is built on BIBFRAME 2.0, with addititonal elements from other models, e.g Schema.org. The purpose is to maximise the possibility of re-use and to guarantee that we don’t lose data in the conversion https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2- model.html https://librisbloggen.kb.se/2017/04/11/bibframe-in- libris-xl/ KATARINA: The new Libris The format in the new Libris is built on BIBFRAME 2.0, with addititonal elements from other models, e.g Schema.org. The purpose is to maximise the possibility of re-use and to guarantee that we don’t lose data in the conversion BIBFRAME https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2-model.html BIBFRAME in the new Libris https://librisbloggen.kb.se/2017/04/11/bibframe-in-libris-xl/ 2

3 OLLE: The BIBFRAME model in the new Libris. Presently, only the entitites in the square are linkable. Gradually, more entitites will be possible to link and when the system is complete, it will be possible to link all entitites. BIBFRAME (Bibliographic Framework) is an initiative to evolve bibliographic description standards to a linked data model, in order to make bibliographic information more useful both within and outside the library community. When a resource is cataloged  -- a book, for example -- the resulting description includes information elements such as the author, what the book is about, various published forms, and  information about copies of the book. BIBFRAME 2.0 organizes this information into three core levels of abstraction: Work, Instance, and Item. Work.  The highest level of abstraction, a Work, in the BIBFRAME context, reflects the conceptual essence of the cataloged resource:  authors, languages, and what it is about (subjects). The Expression level, which is present in FRBR and RDA, is included in the BIBFRAME Work. This means that a new Expression, e.g. a translation, is regarded as a new Work in BIBFRAME. Instance.  A Work may have one or more individual, material embodiments, for example, a particular published form. These are Instances of the Work.  An Instance reflects information such as its publisher, place and date of publication, and format. Item.   An item is an actual copy (physical or electronic) of an Instance. It reflects information such as its location (physical or virtual), shelf mark, and barcode. BIBFRAME 2.0 further defines additional key concepts that have relationships to the core classes: Agents:  Agents are people, organizations, jurisdictions, etc., associated with a Work or Instance through roles such as author, editor, artist, photographer, composer, illustrator, etc. Subjects:  A Work might be “about” one or more concepts. Such a concept is said to be a “subject” of the Work. Concepts that may be subjects include topics, places, temporal expressions, events, works, instances, items, agents, etc. Events:  Occurrences, e.g. a festival, a concert, the recording of which may be the content of a Work. 3

The new Libris The new cataloguing tool is available here: https://libris-stg.kb.se/katalogisering/ Here you also find Information about the tool Introduction to linked data, format, vocabulary etc. A support forum Short educational films KATARINA: The new Libris The new cataloguing tool is available here: https://libris-stg.kb.se/katalogisering/ Here you also find - Information about the tool - Introduction to linked data, format, vocabulary etc. - A support forum - Short educational films 4

id.kb.se id.kb.se is a service under development which will make available the foundation stones used by the Swedish National Library to publish structured, linked data. Here we will have mutual definitions and concepts which help coordinate descriptions of our material: https://id.kb.se/ Examples of building blocks in id.kb.se are subject headings, which are linked to id.loc.gov when there is an equivalent in Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) OLLE: id.kb.se id.kb.se (inspired by id.loc.gov) is a service under development which will make available the foundation stones used by the Swedish National Library to publish structured, linked data. Here we will have mutual definitions and concepts which help coordinate descriptions of our material: https://id.kb.se/ Examples of building blocks in id.kb.se are subject headings, which are linked to id.loc.gov when there is an equivalent in Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) 5

Example expressed as data Selma Lagerlöf <https://libris-qa.kb.se/qn247n18248vs58#it> a :Person ; :familyName "Lagerlöf" ; :givenName "Selma" ; KATARINA: This is an example from new Libris expressed as data The Swedish author Selma Lagerlöf expressed in RDF: An ID for a description of the type Person, who has Family name och Given name 6

/------------/ 7 KATARINA: …and a representation of how it looks in the new interface (In order to fit the picture into the slide, alternative name forms are omitted ) 7

What is ? A national union catalogue Between 400 and 500 participating libraries (128 public libraries) Nearly 11 million bibliographic records 32,5 million holding records Ca 321 000 authority records (persons, corporate bodies, subject headings, genre/form terms) The manual cataloguing builds on imported records (from other libraries, CIP records) OLLE: What is Libris? - A national union catalogue - Between 400 and 500 participating libraries (128 public libraries) - Nearly 11 million bibliographic records - 32,5 million holding records - Ca 321 000 authority records (persons, corporate bodies, subject headings, genre/form terms) The manual cataloguing builds on imported records (from other libraries, CIP records = Cataloguing In Progress) 8

What is ? Decentralised cataloguing Cataloguing over extended time (changes of policy) Import of external data, automated conversion Some cases of incorrect data: Records with incorrrect format Unauthorised record content (too many/repeated fields/subfields) Incomplete record content (too few fields/subfields, internal inconsistency) Unauthorised fields Unauthorised subfields Unauthorised field values (codes) Incorrect field content Incorrect field use KATARINA: The cataloguing in Libris is decentralised Cataloguing has been done over extended time (with many changes of policy) We import external data and conversion is automated. Import from different sources complicates an even overall level and quality. Some cases of incorrect data: Records with incorrrect format Unauthorised record content (too many/repeated fields/subfields) Incomplete record content (too few fields/subfields, internal inconsistency) Unauthorised fields Unauthorised subfields Unauthorised field values (codes) Incorrect field content Incorrect field use 9

From Voyager to the new Libris Analysis and move of metadata OLLE: Format and metadata: what is really happening when we move from one system to another? The Division Metadata and Systems Support within the National Library is responsible för coordination of metadata and decides the level of the metadata delivered from the National Library. Built on a presentation by Miriam Björkhem 10

KATARINA: A schematic picture of the move from the old system to the new This is Voyager, our current system, with data in MARC21. This data is converted to JSON-LD in our new system. From Libris we will export JSON-LD but also convert JSON-LD to MARC21 for the local library systems that still needs MARC. [Apologise for the text in the picture being in Swedish – explain the terms!] So the metadata conversion is made in two steps – it is not a process of re-conversion 11

Metadata in the new Libris BIBFRAME 2.0 in the new Libris Data model with hierarchical levels: higher degree of re-use, less redundancy Higher degree of bibliographic control: authorisation, identifiers, global changes, check-up on incoming data, version check-up, etc. Flexible output: well structured metadata in different formats ”Plan B” allows interim storage in MARC to support conversion OLLE: BIBFRAME in the new Libris Data model with hierarchical levels: higher degree of re-use, less redundancy Higher degree of bibliographic control: Authorisation, identifiers, global changes, check-up on incoming data, version check-up, etc. Flexible output: well structured metadata in different formats ”Plan B” allows interim storage in MARC to support conversion – for fields, subfields or other information that are not supported by the new format that we need to be able to export in MARC. Metadata quality is not the same as high degree level Metadata quality is not the same as high degree level 12

A few starting points Correct MARC content: we must be totally certain about what we deliver (fields, subfields, codes). MARC content from Libris should not crash local systems Correct MARC usage: we cannot in the long run take responsibility for incorrect usage MARC data from Libris should not save local system solutions Field frequency and history has been guiding, but not deciding, in the conversion work Our focus is BIBFRAME, not MARC21 MARC is the format we are leaving. We will not develop MARC, but will not let it deteriorate either KATARINA: A few starting points Correct MARC content: we must be totally certain about what we deliver (fields, subfields, codes). MARC content from Libris should not crash local systems Correct MARC use: we cannot in the long run take responsibility for incorrect usage. MARC data from Libris should not save local system solutions. Field frequency and history has been guiding, but not deciding in the conversion work. Our focus is BIBFRAME, not MARC21 MARC is the format we are leaving. We will not develop MARC, but will not let it deteriorate either 13

Less is more 14 <100% <100% +++ 100% 0 till >100% OLLE: Selection: ”Less is more” No data are destroyed or deleted, but not all data are used 14

KATARINA: Old place – move – pack and bring the best to the new place Make a complete data download and keep in a safe place Unpack things in the new place Complement, order, fix Make possible export of handsome, well structured metadata in the next step 15

Thanks for your attention! Questions? rda@kb.se 16