N. Ligterink, R. Cuelenaere

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WLTP-06-31e WLTP correction algorithms progress report from TUG (chassis dynamometer corrections) and TNO (coast down corrections) preliminary results.
Advertisements

WLTP-EU DB short trip analyis 1 by H. Steven Overview of the WLTP-EU database short trip analysis.
Further modifications on the gearshift calculation tool
1 Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Application of the development approach described in WLTP-DHC on ACEA’s EU database By H. Steven
WLTP-DHC Validation Phase I Results and Recommendations by India
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Comparison of different European databases with respect to road category and time periods (on peak, off peak, weekend)
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
1 Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data delivered by vehicle manufacturers By Heinz Steven
1 Proposals of WLTC versions for low powered vehicles Heinz Steven WLTP.
In pairs can you CAREFULLY go through the exam. Can you then write in your book the title 5 Things I have learnt from the exam and then list 5 things you.
NEDC/WLTP correlation process Meeting of TCMV on 17 November 2015
Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service JRC Science Hub: ec.europa.eu/jrc 38th UNECE IWG PMP MEETING Non- exhaust particle.
RDE testing: how to define NTE emission limits?
Questions on cycle representativeness (French position) EU – WLTP 17 th of September 2013.
WLTP correction algorithms progress report from TUG (chassis) and TNO (road load) preliminary results TU Graz:Stefan Hausberger David Leitner TNO: Norbert.
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
Random Cycle Generator
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
Evaluation of PEMS tests Veh 01 & Veh 02 with the CLEAR Method
Fuel consumption measurement in LDVs WLTP 2nd act Working Group
Regulation series WLTP-24-03e_Appendix 4
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
HDV CO2 verification test (“SiCo”)
Status Januar Verification of test normality
Development of the Japan’s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure
Questions on cycle representativeness
28th of November 2013, Brussels
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
driving behaviour determination for Dutch national emission factors
Input on wind tunnel criteria discussions
BRAKE PARTICLE EMISSIONS
RDE Regulation Random Cycle, Cycle Generation
Pems route and parameters
absolutely essential first level
WLTP-21-04e Revision 1 Amendment proposals for annex 2 of GTR #15 from the cycle gearshift issues task force Heinz Steven
Current status of WLTP-DHC
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-229
JAMA position on RDE Boundary Condition
main topics Robust law is essential
Input ACEA Boundary Conditions.
Dutch driving behavior analyses | Norbert Ligterink
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update and summary of previous presentations by H. Steven
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven
Overview of in-use driving behaviour data from different regions
Emissions testing in the laboratory and on the road: Preliminary results for one Euro 6 diesel vehicle Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre.
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
WLTP-25-07e Gearshift Issues Heinz Steven
Revision of the Work Plan
Safety Distance to the front
16th of November 2013, Brussels
Safety Assessment of Automated Vehicles
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
WLTP Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven
Emissions testing with PEMS versus random laboratory driving cycles
Boundary conditions - Status
RDE-LDV working group 13 April 2012 Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act March 15th, 2017
Informal document GRPE-77-30
RDE-LDV working group 20 November 2012, Brussels, EU Pierre Bonnel
WLTP-26-03e - Revision 1 Final amendments for annex 2 and status report about the programming code development subgroup Heinz Steven
Working Group “Real-Driving Emissions of Light-Duty Vehicles” Work Progress – December
Comparison of key parameters of EU WLTP database and WLTC version 5
RDE Commission Meeting Nov 20th.
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
Presentation transcript:

N. Ligterink, R. Cuelenaere RCG, 8 September 2014 N. Ligterink, R. Cuelenaere

Random Cycle Generator chronology RCG, 8 September 2014 Random Cycle Generator chronology alpha version specifications from the Commission alpha version distributed feedback: minor problems with cycle generation and signal quality further development derived from RDE-PEMS development: fixed selection from the available options in the alpha version cycle requirements: alignment with RDE trip requirements shift from “time-based” to “distance-based” Validation: drivability representativeness Add-ons…. current status follow-ups

RCG components distance distribution urban/rural/ motorway RCG, 8 September 2014 RCG components distance distribution urban/rural/ motorway vehicle information WLTP database probabilities of driving behaviour random cycle generator constraints and boundary conditions cycle validation driving cycles check testing (outside project scope) method validation

Methodology Based on data from WLTP database (European driving) RCG, 8 September 2014 Methodology Based on data from WLTP database (European driving) Markov chain approach: probabilities of changing acceleration and velocity band stochastic approach two time scales: seconds (for acceleration) minutes (for average velocity) Restrictions from vehicle and test limitations (i.e. maximal power) Each cycle to cover urban, rural, and motorway driving: derived from the RDE-PEMS trip requirements transitions between the ten velocity bands:

Markov matrix current state region of high probability start braking RCG, 8 September 2014 current state when decelerating remain decelerating input region of high probability start braking deceleration driving at a constant velocity low probability next state P selection start accelerating when accelerating remain accelerating acceleration low probability Markov matrix deceleration acceleration typical periods (2-10 seconds) of accelerations in a real-world driving

Random cycles? Different speed profiles (visual) Statistical analyses RCG, 8 September 2014 Random cycles? Different speed profiles (visual) Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses of generated cycles average velocity over cycle RCG, 8 September 2014 average velocity over cycle velocity distribution in road types urban rural motorway distance between stops Statistical analyses of generated cycles

Open issues RDE-PEMS trip requirements are not cycle requirements: RCG, 8 September 2014 Open issues RDE-PEMS trip requirements are not cycle requirements: >120 minutes is too long on a chassis dynamometer short times, with equal distance, gives a very short motorway part gear shift strategies: free choice/OEM/GSI Heinz Steven tool (WLTP) fixed velocities (NEDC) fixed velocities in power-to-mass classes (CADC) delayed gear shifts during acceleration (TNO-approach) driver assistance: difficult to “follow a line” on the screen: driving simulation?

Maximum cycle duration? Change distance per road type? RCG, 8 September 2014 Reflections? Maximum cycle duration? Change distance per road type?

Open issues Preferences? RCG, 8 September 2014 Open issues RDE-PEMS trip requirements are not cycle requirements: >120 minutes is too long on a chassis dynamometer short times, with equal distance, gives a very short motorway part gear shift strategies: free choice/OEM/GSI Heinz Steven tool (WLTP) fixed velocities (NEDC) fixed velocities in power-to-mass classes (CADC) delayed gear shifts during acceleration (TNO-approach) driver assistance: difficult to “follow a line” on the screen: driving simulation? Preferences?

Next phases Beta-version and draft report asap RCG, 8 September 2014 Next phases Beta-version and draft report asap Concept for Validation: TUG end ‘14 Legal text early ‘15 Validation tests (outside scope project) early ‘15

RCG, 8 September 2014 Back up slide

Alpha-version - Input to the random cycle generator RCG, 8 September 2014 Alpha-version - Input to the random cycle generator examples: Prated = 82 kW M = 1412 kg F0 = 153 N F1 = 0.54 N/[km/h] F2 = 0.056 N/[km/h]2 physical vehicle limitations based on type-approval data: test mass rated power road-load values chassis dynamometer restrictions (optional) avoiding tyre slip, by limiting maximal deceleration cycle limitations: (optional) total duration (# seconds) percentages, and order, of urban/rural/motorway(/ex) amin > - 2 m/s2 Ncycle = 1800 sec urban  rural  motorway urban = 27% [distance] rural = 31% [distance]