University of Arkansas Information Technology Services

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: An Evaluators Perspective Carol L. Colbeck Director & Associate Professor Center for the Study of Higher Education The Pennsylvania.
Advertisements

ECAR Students and IT Study, 2012 Eden Dahlstrom, EDUCAUSE.
The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2012 Data Figures and Graphs.
Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.
Fostering STEM Diversity OPAS Vision for the Year All Oregonians have the opportunity to choose and successfully pursue engineering or applied science.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
The Impact of Immersion in a Local Research Problem on Technology Skills and Use CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY PREPARING TOMORROW’S TEACHERS TO USE TECHNOLOGY.
Origins SERVQUAL IS SERVQUAL LibQual+. Theoretical Model Define services from the end user point of view Understand that end user expectations are shifting.
ECAR NATIONAL STUDY OF UNDERGRADUATES AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2011 Eden Dahlstrom | December 15, 2011 ECAR Senior Research Analyst.
Julia Bauder, Grinnell College & Jenny Emanuel, University of Illinois Be Where our Faculty Are: Emerging Technology Use and Faculty Information Seeking.
An Interpretation of the 2013 EDUCAUSE Student Use of Technology Study Andrew C. Lawlor, PhD Faculty of the Future Conference Bucks County Community College.
SLIDE 1 Innovations Conference March SLIDE 2 The National Lone Star Report Aligning Technology with Student Success.
EDUCAUSE Live! – The Annual ECAR Student and IT Study December 18, 2012 Eden Dahlstrom, EDUCAUSE.
Aurali Dade, PhD Division of Research, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Barriers and Opportunities for Communicating Sustainability on Campus.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Enhancing your Teaching and Developing New Leadership: Impact of the On the Cutting Edge Professional Development Program Ellen Iverson, Cathy Manduca,
IT ISSUES & TRENDS, 2015 Faculty Technology Day Wednesday, August 19, 2025.
MBA in Insurance. Are you ready for the next step in your career?
ECAR Student Technology Study. Report Authors Eden EDUCAUSE Director of Research Charles Dziuban, University of Central Florida.
Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies.
1) INTRODUCTION 2) METHODOLOGY 3) FINDINGS 4) DISCUSSION 5) CONCLUSION.
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
Using ASSIST to Complete the Indiana School Improvement Plan March 1, 2016.
SUNY TAACCCT Grant PLA Advisory Board Agenda Review of Charge WordPress Site Policy – Philosophical differences on PLA – What makes a good: Policy?
WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY College of Education and Human Services Integrating Technology Into Foundations and Methods Courses.
Teaching and learning online: Perceptions of UAF Rural Campus Instructors Victor and Natalia Zinger UAF.
Get into flexible learning flexiblelearning.net.au AUSTRALIAN FLEXIBLE LEARNING FRAMEWORK.
FELICIAN UNIVERSITY Creating a Learning Community Using Knowledge Management and Social Media Dr. John Zanetich, Associate Professor Felician University.
Information Seeking Behavior and Information Literacy Among Business Majors Casey Long Business Liaison Librarian University Library Georgia State University,
STRATEGIES FOR BUILDING POSITIVE STUDENT-INSTRUCTOR INTERACTIONS IN LARGE CLASSES OSCAR J. SOLIS AND WINDI D. TURNER PRESENTED BY AMY STONGER APRIL 21,
Is Anybody Actually Using This? Gaining Insight to Technology Ownership and Use for Planning and Purchasing Elizabeth German, Web Services Coordinator.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Quality Online Preparation: Qualities of Faculty, Courses, and Preparation Programs By Dr. Erin O’Brien Valencia College League of Innovation Conference,
Student and Faculty Technology Experiences: Research and Benchmarking
Advisor: Dr. Richard Fanjoy
How To Build An Assessment And Impact Model Dr. Suzan Harkness
Effects Of Internet On The Study Habits Of Students
Judy Borreson Caruso Shannon D. Smith 11/6/2009
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN AND SOCIAL CIENCES APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH CAREER    “THE INFLUENCE OF TEACHER’S ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS INTO TECHNOLOGY-RELATED.
ELI 2012 Annual Meeting February 15, 2012 Austin, Texas
21st Century Faculty and Students: Educational Technology Surveys 2009
Bringing Active Learning to Scale at Bronx Community College (BCC) of the City University of New York (CUNY) Dr. Nancy Ritze August 3, 2016.
Streamlining Distance Education
Implementing Advisor Development Across the University
Closing the Experience Gap March 30, 2017
(includes online “demo” video)
Improving Student Engagement Through Audience Response Systems
Professor Rebecca Strachan Sanaa Aljabali
The Σtat = R2ight! The Faculty/Student & IT Quiz Show
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: Assessment and Evaluation
Perceptions of Technology
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Creating a Bicycle Friendly University
Social Change Implications
Brian Voss, Chief Information Officer April 5, 2006
Essential Components.
Study Questions To what extent do English language learners have opportunity to learn the subject content specified in state academic standards and.
Want to do a Parent Survey in your district?
Management and Evaluation Programs for Faculty
Education Feedback Survey
Working Together WORKSHOP 4
The Heart of Student Success
PREPARED BY: NABIRA BT MANSOR NUR SOLEHAH BT HANAFIAH
Technology in education: A friend or foe ?
Bulloch Information Session
DREAM Developing Reading Education with Arts Methods
Strategic Planning in Dynamic Times
Cynthia Curry, Director National AEM Center
Tracer Study: Impact Assessment of four CHIETA programmes (Project in progress)
Presentation transcript:

University of Arkansas Information Technology Services 2013 ECAR Results University of Arkansas Information Technology Services

ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology ECAR has surveyed undergraduate students annually since 2004 about technology in higher education. In 2013, ECAR collaborated with more than 250 higher education institutions to collect responses from more than 112,000 undergraduate students about their technology experiences and expectations. The findings are distilled into four broad themes to help educators and higher education institutions better understand how students experience technology on their respective campuses and the ways in which new, better, or more technology can impact students’ relationship with information technology. The University of Arkansas has participated in the ECAR since 2010. In 2013 we sent the survey to 5000 students with 11.9% (595) of those students responding. Statistical methods and comprehensive reports and resources are available at the end of the report.

ECAR 2013 Key Findings Students recognize the value of technology but still need guidance when it comes to better using it for academics. Students are ready to use their mobile devices more for academics, and they look to institutions and instructors for opportunities and encouragement to do so. Students value their privacy, and using technology to connect with them has its limits.

ECAR Recommends Students expect their instructors—not others—to train them to effectively use the technology required for coursework (e.g., use of the CMS, hardware, and software—including specialty software and common productivity software). Instructors need support, encouragement, and possibly incentives to do so. Create (or update) a strategy for incorporating mobile device use into the classroom. Address the IT infrastructure barriers (such as a lack of convenient charging outlets and/or charging stations and insufficient network access) that keep students from using their devices effectively while on campus. Approach learner analytics purposefully and thoughtfully by adhering to information privacy principles. Collect data for a stated and transparent purpose in order to build students’ confidence in learner analytics activities.

ECAR Recommends Continue efforts to improve students’ “end user” experiences with institutionally provided technology resources such as the CMS and institutional websites; these student-facing services are used by nearly all students and are an opportunity for an institution to make a strong positive impression about the priority it places on technology Work proactively with academic leaders in seeking opportunities to provide students with opportunities to experience institutionally supported resources such as freely available course content, e-books, simulations and educational games, and e-portfolios Consider the options at your university for meeting students’ expectations for uniform experiences with the CMS from course to course and from professor to professor

*Statistical method notes at end of report.

University of Arkansas ECAR Demographics 2013

University of Arkansas ECAR Demographics 2013

Student Laptop Ownership and Use 2013

Student Tablet Ownership and Use 2013

Student Desktop Ownership and Use 2013

Student Smartphone Ownership and Use 2013

Student e-Reader Ownership and Use 2013

Student Mobile Support Experience 2013

Student Mobile Support Experience 2013

Instructors and Technology Experience 2013

Students and Technology Training 2013 86% of students feel it’s important to be better skilled at using technologies

Instructors’ Use of Technology 2013

Importance of Technology Resources 2013

Extent of Use of Technology Resources 2013

Student Opinions of More/Less Use of Technology Resources 2013

Student Technology Attitudes 2013

Student Technology Attitudes 2013

Student Technology Attitudes 2013

Student Technology Attitudes 2013

What types of new, better, or “cutting-edge” technologies would benefit your university experience?

What one thing can your INSTRUCTORS do with technology to better facilitate your academic success?

What one thing can your INSTITUTION do with technology to better facilitate your academic success?

ECAR Statistical Methods and Resources The quantitative findings in the comprehensive ECAR report were developed using a representative sample of students from 220 U.S.-based higher education college and university sites. A stratified random sample of approximately 10,000 ( from the 112,585 overall respondents) respondents was drawn from the overall response pool to proportionately match a profile of current U.S. undergraduates.   Due to a smaller sample size, this report for the University of Arkansas and other DR institutions was not evaluated with stratified sampling. As a result, the relationship between the comprehensive report results and our specific results is not analogous. Resources ECAR 2013 Comprehensive Report ECAR 2013 Survey Instrument ECAR 2013 Results Webinar