The Status of the LHC machine

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rüdiger Schmidt - Wuppertal Januar Der LHC Beschleuniger Rüdiger Schmidt - CERN Universität Wuppertal Januar 2004 Herausforderungen LHC Beschleunigerphysik.
Advertisements

Heat load due to e-cloud in the HL-LHC triplets G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo 19th HiLumi WP2 Task Leader Meeting - 18 October 2013 Many thanks to: H.Bartosik,
K. Potter RADWG & RADMON Workshop 1 Dec WELCOME TO THE 4th RADWG & RADMON WORKSHOP 1 December 2004.
A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
(n)QPS LHC status LHC: past, present and future Mike Lamont for the LHC team
LHCC 3rd June 2015 Mike Lamont for the LHC team
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
SPS scrubbing experience: electron cloud observables L. Mether on behalf of the LIU-SPS e-cloud team LIU SPS scrubbing review, September 8, 2015.
CONTENT: Beam characteristics and parameters Filling schemes Operational settings OP procedure and COLL setting Planning Shift breakdown To define the.
LHC Status - SUSY Bonn 1 Drawing by Sergio Cittolin Status of the LHC 6 months of beam operation in 2010 J. Wenninger CERN.
Partikeldagarna, Göteborg 21 September 2007 LHC: Status and Plans Lyn Evans.
Luminosity expectations for the first years of CLIC operation CTC MJ.
LHC progress Report LHCC Wednesday 23 rd March 2011.
The Large Hadron Collider Contents: 1. The machine II. The beam III. The interaction regions IV. First LHC beam [R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In.
Rüdiger Schmidt1 The LHC collider project I Rüdiger Schmidt - CERN SUSSP Sumer School St.Andrews Challenges LHC accelerator physics LHC technology Operation.
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
Prepared by M. Jimenez AT Dept / Vacuum Group, ECloud’04 Future Needs and Future Directions Maximizing the LHC Performances J.M. Jimenez …when Nature persists.
J.M. Jowett, S. Maury, PANIC05 HI Satellite meeting, 23/11/ LHC as a Heavy-Ion Collider An update John M. Jowett, Stephan Maury I-LHC Project CERN.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
FCC-FHI 28/1/14 Requirements from Collider Draft parameters just available in EDMS:
LHC Machine Operational Status and Plans LHCC, 22nd September 2010 Steve Myers (On behalf of the LHC team and international collaborators)
E. Todesco, Milano Bicocca January-February 2016 Unit 2 Magnets for circular accelerators: the interaction regions Ezio Todesco European Organization for.
LHC Status Report 1 Jan Uythoven For the LHC Team LPCC
Fabio Follin Delphine Jacquet For the LHC operation team
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
LHC commissioning experience at 6.5 TeV
Beam Instability in High Energy Hadron Accelerators and its Challenge for SPPC Liu Yu Dong.
The CERN Physics Programme
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
contribution to the round table discussion
S. Roesler (on behalf of DGS-RP)
Wednesday :06 Dump fill 3533: interlock BPMS in IP6
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
LHC schedule.
LHC Machine Status report
Machine Coordinators: G. Arduini, J. Wenninger
MD2036: UFO dynamics studies and UFO fast detection
Electron cloud & vacuum pressure observations: 2011 proton run
Powering the LHC Magnets
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Status of the beta-beam study
Beam-beam Effects in Hadron Colliders
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
Status of the BLHC ….work in progress! Mike Lamont CERN/AB 18/01/2008
LHC status Benoit Salvant (Beams department, Accelerator and Beam Physics group) for the LHC complex teams With many thanks for their inputs to J. Boyd,
MD25 ns - 14/12/2012 G. Arduini, H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
Status of the LHC December 2009
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
Wednesday /Thursday 09-11:00 Verification of the LSS6 interlocked BPMs: took longer to fill due to some problems with RF cavities in the PS. In the mean.
Summary of Week 16 G. Arduini, J. Wenninger
CSP Meeting CERN CERN Accelerators in th November 2010
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
6 months of beam operation in 2010
LHC Collimation Requirements
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
Summary of week 19 Machine Coordinators: G. Arduini, M. Lamont Main aim: Luminosity production.
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
Another Immortal Fill….
LS 1 start date 12th June Schedule Extension 2012 run Extension of 2012 run approved by the DG on 3rd July 2012.
LHC Machine Advisory Committee, CERN 12th June 2008
Presentation transcript:

The Status of the LHC machine L. Ponce CERN /Beams Department Operation group

Outline Introduction LHC energy in 2010/2011 LHC performances High intensity issues Outlook LHC status – Moriond 2011 14.03.2011

LHC layout and parameters 8 arcs (sectors), ~3 km each 8 long straight sections (700 m each) beams cross in 4 points 2-in-1 magnet design with separate vacuum chambers → p-p collisions RF - β* = 0.55 m (beam size =17 μm) - Crossing angle = 285 μrad - L = 1034 cm-2 s-1 Nominal LHC parameters Beam energy (TeV) 7.0 No. of particles per bunch 1.15x1011 No. of bunches per beam 2808 Stored beam energy (MJ) 362 Transverse emittance (μm) 3.75 Bunch length (cm) 7.6

LHC challenges The LHC surpasses existing accelerators/colliders in 2 aspects : The energy of the beam of 7 TeV that is achieved within the size constraints of the existing 26.7 km LEP tunnel. LHC dipole field 8.3 T HERA/Tevatron ~ 4 T The luminosity of the collider that will reach unprecedented values for a hadron machine: LHC pp 1034 cm-2 s-1 Tevatron pp 3x1032 cm-2 s-1 SppS pp 6x1030 cm-2 s-1 Very high field magnets and very high beam intensities: Operating the LHC is a great challenge. There is a significant risk to the equipment and experiments. A factor 2 in field A factor 4 in size LHC status – Moriond 2011 A factor 30 in luminosity 14.03.2011

Stored energy The present beam intensity will slice open a vacuum chamber even at injection Increase with respect to existing accelerators : A factor 2 in magnetic field A factor 7 in beam energy A factor 200 in stored beam energy 80 kg TNT LHC status – Moriond 2011 14.03.2011

Outline Introduction LHC energy in 2010/2011 LHC performances High intensity issues Outlook LHC status – Moriond 2011 14.03.2011

LHC target energy: the way down When Why All main magnets commissioned for 7TeV operation before installation Detraining found when hardware commissioning sectors in 2008 5 TeV poses no problem Difficult to exceed 6 TeV Machine wide investigations following S34 incident showed problem with joints Commissioning of new Quench Protection System (nQPS) 7 TeV 2002-2007 Design 12 kA 5 TeV Summer 2008 Detraining 9 kA LHC status – Moriond 2011 Late 2008 3.5 TeV Joints Spring 2009 6 kA 1.18 TeV Nov. 2009 nQPS 2 kA 14.03.2011 450 GeV 7

LHC target energy: the way up When What Train magnets 6.5 TeV is in reach 7 TeV will take time Repair joints Complete pressure relief system Commission nQPS system 7 TeV 2015 ? Training 6 TeV 2014 Stabilizers LHC status – Moriond 2011 2011 3.5 TeV nQPS 2010 1.18 TeV 2009 14.03.2011 450 GeV 8

(Probability) Maximum Safe Energy Probability per Year of burning an interconnect Going to 4TeV, 50s implies a significant increase in the risk of burning an interconnect LHC Status – Moriond 2011 Remaining choice 14.03.2011 Presented in Chamonix 2011 by A. Verweij

Outline Introduction LHC energy in 2010/2011 LHC performances High intensity issues Outlook LHC status – Moriond 2011 14.03.2011

Luminosity : collider figure-of-merit The event rate N for a physics process with cross-section s is proprotional to the collider Luminosity L: “Thus, to achieve high luminosity, all one has to do is make (lots of) high population bunches of low emittance to collide at high frequency at locations where the beam optics provides as low values of the amplitude functions as possible.” PDG 2005, chapter 25 LHC status – Moriond 2011 High beam “brillance” N/e (particles per phase space volume)  Injector chain performance ! To maximize L: Many bunches (k) Many protons per bunch (N) Small beam sizes s*x,y= (b *e)1/2 b * : beam envelope (optics) e : beam emittance, the phase space volume occupied by the beam (constant along the ring) Small envelope  Strong focusing ! Optics property Beam property 14.03.2011 11

Peak luminosity performance Peak luminosity > 21032 cm-2s-1 (368 bunches/beam, 348 colliding bunches) LHC status – Moriond 2011 14.03.2011 Integrated proton luminosity 2010 ~48 pb-1 12

Associated LHC parameters 2010 Nominal Limited by Energy 3.5 TeV 7 TeV Hardware N (p/bunch) 1.11011 1.151011 kb (no. bunches) 368 (348 coll/IP) 2808 Machine protection e (mm rad) 2.5-5 3.75 b* (m) 3.5 (3.5) 0.55 (10) Aperture, tolerances Stored energy (MJ) 28 360 L (cm-2s-1) 21032 1034 LHC status – Moriond 2011 Squeezing at the IP (b*) is limited by aperture and tolerances. Beams are larger at 3.5 TeV ~ 1/g. sx = sy = ~45-60 mm - nominal value is 15 mm at 7 TeV. 14.03.2011 13

Outline Introduction LHC energy in 2010/2011 LHC performances High intensity issues Outlook LHC status – Moriond 2011 14.03.2011

SEUs QPS crate SEU count (RADMON) during off momentum loss map LHC status – Moriond 2011 Thijs Wijnands Not a problem at the moment but being monitored carefully 14.03.2011

Unidentified Flying Objects - UFOs As the beam intensity was increased unexpected fast beam loss events were observed in the super-conducting regions of the ring: Fast loss over ~0.5-2 ms, leading to a dump of the beam. Most events occurred during ‘rock’ stable periods. Losses in regions of very large aperture. The hypothesis quickly emerged that it is not the beam that moves to the aperture, but rather the opposite ! ‘Dust’ particles ‘falling’ into the beam, estimated size ~100 mm thick Carbon-equivalent object. We do not understand the mechanism that triggers such events. It is clearly induced by (presence of) beam – electromagnetic fields at the surface of the vacuum chamber. Sparking ??? Good news: signal amplitude seems to not depend on beam intensity Strategy for 2011: increase the BLM thresholds LHC status – Moriond 2011 14.03.2011 16

Intensity and vacuum (150 ns) Vacuum pressure increases were observed around the 4 experiments from the moment LHC switched to 150 ns train operation Intensity 2·1013 p+ LHC status – Moriond 2011 3·10-7 mbar Pressure 10-7 mbar 14.03.2011 17

Vacuum effects It was not possible to operate the LHC with bunch spacing of 50 ns for experiments data taking because the vacuum pressure increases were already too large at injection. Pressures easily exceeded 4x10-7 mbar (normal is 10-9 or less) leading to closure of the vacuum valves. Signs of cleaning by beam, with strong dependence on bunch intensity and bunch spacing. Consistent with the signature of electron clouds. e- cloud drive pressure rise, beam unstabilities and possibly overload the cryogenic system by the heat deposited on the chamber walls ! LHC status – Moriond 2011  The cloud can ‘cure itself’: the impact of the electrons cleans the surface (Carbon migration), reduces the electron emission probability and eventually the cloud disappears – ‘beam scrubbing’ Inject as much beam as you can (run at the limit of the vacuum / beam stability), operate for some time and Iterate until conditions are acceptable / good ( several days) – experience from the SPS. 14.03.2011 18

Outline Introduction LHC energy in 2010/2011 LHC performances High intensity issues Outlook LHC status – Moriond 2011 14.03.2011

Present LHC proton parameters End 2010 Nominal N (p/bunch) 1.21011 1.151011 kb (no. bunches) 368 2808 e (mm rad) 2.4-4 3.75 b* (m) 3.5 0.55 s* (mm) 45-60 16 L (cm-2s-1) 21032 1034 LHC status – Moriond 2011 Improvements for 2011: Reduction of b* to 1.5 m (measured aperture larger than design). Increase of N to 1.41011 or higher if possible. Increasing number of bunches using 50 ns or 75 ns spacing. Must overcome e-clouds effects. 14.03.2011 20

Days for Luminosity operation Item Days Total proton operation 264 5 MDs (4 days) - 20 6 TS (4+1 days) - 30 Special requests - 10 Commissioning - 20 to -30 Intensity ramp up - 30 to -40 Scrubbing run Total High intensity 124 to 144 (135 days for integrated L) LHC status – Moriond 2011 Assume 135 days at peak luminosity Stable period shrinks quickly if there are many exotic requests ! 14.03.2011

Estimated peak and integrated luminosity Baseline for 2011 is 2e32 Peak and 1fb-1 (integrated) But following 2010, we are confident we will do better value for b* = 1.5m in IP1/ 5 days HubnerFactor Fills with kb Nb e11 e mm L Hz/cm2 Stored energy MJ L Int fb-1 160 0.3 150 ns 368 1.2 2.5 ~5.2e32 ~30 ~1.9 135 0.2 75 ns 936 2 1.8 ~1.3e33 ~1.6e33 ~1.8e33 ~75 ~2.7 ~3.3 ~3.7 125 0.15 50 ns 1404 ~2e33 ~110 ~2.8 LHC status – Moriond 2011 14.03.2011 Possible integrated Luminosity of 2-3 fb-1

Conclusions Beam energy will stay at 3.5 TeV for 2011 run For 2012 run, can be revisited based on 2011 run experience Estimated no. of days at high luminosity ~135 days (for a total time of 260 days !) – 50% !! In order not to waste time we must have a good plan and not let ourselves be diverted from the target of stable high intensity running. Luminosity of 1033 cm-2s-1 could be reached with 75 ns beams. Integrated L ~1-3 fb-1. Optimum parameters to be selected carefully taken into account all parameters – for example injection efficiency may favor low e over high bunch charge. Efficiency, efficiency, efficiency. Not given yet… (UFOs, e-cloud, SEU)…but on the good way LHC status – Moriond 2011 14.03.2011

LHC status – Moriond 2011 14.03.2011