Áine O Connor National Parks and Wildlife Service Ireland

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critique of the DPSIR framework
Advertisements

The Carbon Navigator How can we maximise the adoption of “green” measures?
Case study: Tommelen bomb craters (Hasselt) WWII High density ponds (ca 110 ponds;12 ha), similar age, same soil (light sandy loam) (Part of WP1:
Draft River Basin Management Plan Workshop Freshwater Pearl Mussel December 2008.
Wet Woodlands and the Water Framework Directive Ben Bunting, South West River Basin Programme Manager.
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
Draft Conceptual Model for LOSL Integrated Ecological Response Model Limno-Tech, Inc. 501 Avis Drive Ann Arbor, MI
Future Research NeedsWorld Heritage and Climate Change World Heritage and Climate Change - Future Research Needs Bastian Bomhard World Heritage Officer.
ADMINISTRATION OF LAKE RESTORATION AND WATER RESOURCES IN FINLAND 1.Lakepromo seminar Kuopio Division Manager Markku Maunula The Finnish.
Aquatic Ecosystems Composed By: Mrs. Perlowski & Mr. Bronico.
Physical Properties Discharge rate, temperature and other physical attributes of the stream.
European Marine Sites Update Ruth Crundwell. Natural England Advisers to the government on the environment, providing practical scientific advice on how.
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2007 Water Services National Training Group 11 th Annual Conference 6 th September 2007.
Management of Commonwealth environmental water in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia David Papps, Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder Environmental.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Knowledge and research needs for wetlands and lakes IWRM presentation 18 November 2008 Johan Schutten Senior Wetland Ecologist SEPA.
Development of a process for setting Conservation Objectives Dr Rebecca Jeffrey Science and Biodiversity Section National Parks and Wildlife Service Ireland.
Presented by Sandra Poikane EC Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Biological indicators of lakes and rivers and the Intercalibration.
Sub-basin Management Plans for the Freshwater Pearl Mussel Dr E. Sides, J Ryan, Dr A O’Connor, Dr Colin Byrne Department of Environment, Heritage and Local.
River Basin Management Plan Steps, Status and Objectives.
Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland1 Classification and monitoring of the surface waters of Finland National.
Nitrogen loading from forested catchments Marie Korppoo VEMALA catchment meeting, 25/09/2012 Marie Korppoo, Markus Huttunen 12/02/2015 Open DATA: Nutrient.
What is the MPA network?. Marine Nature Conservation Strategy Vision: Clean, healthy, safe, productive and biologically diverse marine and coastal environment.
The second River Basin Management Plans and implementation of fish barriers measures Jenny Davies RBMP coordinator June 2017.
Environmental Services Training Group
Freshwater Attributes
Corina Carpentier AquaLife Workshop, Kiel, Germany 2nd June 2010
Research & Development Division Central Fisheries Board
EMODnet Chemistry 3 Kick-off Meeting May 2017
Regime Shifts and Leading Indicators
Aquatic Ecosystem Overview:
Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment
CIS Work Programme WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Scottish Natural Heritage
Environmental Services Training Group
Intercalibration Results 2006
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
Prioritised Action Frameworks for financing Natura 2000
The Habitats Directive and the Water Framework Directive
GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS IN THE PROPOSED MARINE STRATEGY DIRECTIVE
Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Aquatic Ecosystem and Biodiversity Report Card Assess and rate the ecological condition of creeks and rivers across Adelaide.
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
WFD and Hydromorphology - 4/5 June 2007, Berlin, Germany -
GUIDANCE DOCUMENT - SCOPING 1st meeting of the Sub-Group
EU Water Framework Directive
Securing the future of the freshwater pearl mussel in Great Britain
Reporting Synergies: MSFD & BHD Miraine Rizzo, Matthew Grima Connell & Luke Tabone Biodiversity & Water Unit Environment & Resources Authority - Malta.
Pond Dipping You can determine the Water Quality Index by observing and counting the different species of benthic macro-invertebrates. Benthic: the ecological.
Freshwater and Marine at DOC
DG Environment, Nature Protection Unit (D3)
Meeting of Water Directors WFD Common Implementation Strategy
The normal balance of ingredients
Some thoughts on the PAF in an Irish context
Opportunities for financing Natura 2000 in the next MFF
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
Overview of Article 6 procedures under the Habitats Directive
Harmonisation Ecostat 2014
EU Water Framework Directive
Meeting of the WFD Strategic Co-ordination Group 11 March 2009
Management of farmland in Natura 2000 Ideas for a first outline
Conservation Guidance Concept Form
Progress on the elaboration of CIS guidance document on E-Flows
ESTABLISHING CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR NATURA 2000 SITES
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
Validation and alternative approaches
Uli Claussen Co-lead ECOSTAT
Floodplains: important ecosystems and mitigators of flood risks
Presentation transcript:

Áine O Connor National Parks and Wildlife Service Ireland Integration of conservation objectives into WFD objectives in Ireland: hard water lakes and the freshwater pearl mussel base poor – but the catchments of each do contain other habitats and species of biodiversity importance marl lakes with charophyte (Habitat 3140) Margaritifera margaritifera (Species 1029) Áine O Connor National Parks and Wildlife Service Ireland

Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government WFD National Parks and Wildlife Service

WFD in Ireland 1st cycle 2nd cycle 8 RBDs and RBMPs Plans written by consultants Co-ordinated by national groups 2nd cycle 2 year delay 1 RBD and plan Written by Irish EPA

Nature Directives in Ireland 165 SPAs 430 SACs 45 of 58 Annex I habitats are water-dependent 22 of 25 Annex II species

Nature Directives in Ireland Current priority work for NPWS Monitoring and reporting Completion of formal designation Site-specific Conservation Objectives (SSCO)

Site-specific Conservation Objectives (SSCO) Objective – parameter – attribute – target Article 17 parameters Range Area/Population Structure and Functioning Maintain/restore

Hard water lakes Hard oligo-mesotrophic waters with benthic vegetation of Chara spp. (habitat code 3140) 18 SACs in Ireland

Margaritifera margaritifera

Margaritifera margaritifera conservation objectives Parameter Attribute 1 1 Range 1.1 Distribution 2 Population 2.1 Population size   2.2 Population structure:  3 Habitat for the species 3.1 Suitable habitat: 3.2 Water quality 3.3 Substratum quality 3.4 Hydrological regime 3.5 Host fish 3.6 Fringing habitat Natural ecosystem functioning

WFD Metrics & EQRs/objectives/standards Parameter Attribute 1  2 Population 2.2 Population structure: 2.2.1 recruitment   2.2.2 adult mortality 3 Habitat for the species 3.1 Suitable habitat: 3.1.1 extent 3.1.2 condition 3.2 Water quality: 3.2.1 macroinvertebrates 3.2.2 phytobenthos (diatoms) 3.3 Substratum quality: 3.3.1 filamentous algae (macroalgae) 3.3.2 macrophytes (rooted higher plants) 3.3.3 sediment 3.3.4oxygen availability WFD Metrics & EQRs/objectives/standards

Margaritifera margaritifera and WFD High status objective WFD status Legal requirement to downgrade to ‘less than good ecological status’

Margaritifera margaritifera conservation condition and WFD macroinvertebrate metric Good status High status

Margaritifera margaritifera conservation measures WFD draft SBMPs 1st cycle (2009-15)

Margaritifera margaritifera conservation measures KerryLIFE (c. 50 farmers with farm plans, measures in conifer plantations) RDP scheme Focus on 8 priority populations

Margaritifera margaritifera – natural ecosystem functioning

Margaritifera margaritifera – natural ecosystem functioning

Conclusions WFD focus on status /risk (rather than objectives) status has very narrow/specific meaning Unclear benefits from achieving ‘good’ or ‘high’ status

Conclusions Integrated implementation needs: At site level, clear, co-ordinated objectives based on natural ecosystem function At regional/national level, strategic priorities and practical time frames.

The Margaritifera experts Acknowledgements The Margaritifera experts

Vegetation Hard water lakes dominated by charophytes distinctive zonation

Vegetation Hard water lakes dominated by charophytes distinctive zonation Krustenstein

Groundwater a key driver Hard water lakes Vegetation dominated by charophytes distinctive zonation Krustenstein Low cover of vascular plants Groundwater a key driver

Hard water lake conservation objectives Parameter Attribute 1 1 Area 1.1 Habitat area 2 Range 2.1 Habitat distribution 3 Structure and functions 3.1 Vegetation composition:   3.2 Vegetation distribution: 3.3 Hydrological regime: 3.4 Lake substratum quality 3.5 Water quality: 3.6 Acidification status 3.7 Water colour 3.8 Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) 3.9 Turbidity 3.10 Fringing habitat Natural ecosystem functioning

Hard water lake conservation objectives Parameter Attribute 1 1 Area 1.1 Habitat area 2 Range 2.1 Habitat distribution 3 Structure and functions 3.1 Vegetation composition:   3.2 Vegetation distribution: 3.3 Hydrological regime: 3.4 Lake substratum quality 3.5 Water quality: 3.6 Acidification status 3.7 Water colour 3.8 Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) 3.9 Turbidity 3.10 Fringing habitat WFD Metrics & EQRs/objectives/standards

Hard water lake conservation objectives and WFD 2nd cycle Parameter Attribute 1 Attribute 2  3 Structure and functions 3.5 Water quality: 3.5.1 transparency   3.5.2 nutrients 3.5.3 phytoplankton biomass 3.5.4 phytoplankton composition 3.5.6 attached algal biomass 3.5.7 macrophyte status 3.6 Acidification status

The Chara (and Crust) Crew Acknowledgements The Chara (and Crust) Crew