Asbestos NESHAP Inspection and Safety Procedures Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FHM TRAINING TOOLS This training presentation is part of FHMs commitment to creating and keeping safe workplaces. Be sure to check out all the training.
Advertisements

Asbestos Regulations DEQs Role To Administer and Enforce the Asbestos NESHAP Regulations ( 40 C.F.R. §§ ) Other asbestos regulations, such.
Revised Environmental Site Assessment Guidelines & Asbestos Inspection Guidelines for Bridges.
Bureau of Air Pollution Federal NESHAP Program. Director –John Kim Bureau ChiefLaurel Kroack Division of Air Pollution ControlJim Ross Field Operations.
Background Presenters Work done in preparation for WHS changes
REGULATORY OVERVIEW.
Slide 6- 1 CERCLA Chapter 6 Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act “CERCLA”
WHAT IS HIPAA? The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) provides certain protections for any of your health information.
1 Asbestos NESHAP Inspection and Safety Procedures Course Chapter 5 Enforcement Strategy Version
Environmental Issues and Concerns Louisiana Dept. of Environmental Quality Debris Management.
Notices of Violation, Orders to Cease Operation and Consent Orders.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
1 OSHA FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA) OF 1970 George Mason University College of Nursing and Health Science Regulatory Requirements.
Inspections 101. The OSHA Mission… To assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women, by authorizing enforcement of the standards.
Department of Health and Human Services Health Hazards Control Unit Jeff Dellinger Industrial Hygiene Consultant September 13, 2005.
11. As part of its mission to protect human health and the environment, EPA works with various partners, including schools, to share information, resources.
2015 NCMA EPA Enforcement Policies and How They Affect Your Facility Michael Pjetraj, P.E. DAQ Stationary Source Compliance Branch Supervisor.
Laschone P. Garrison State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health.
Miner’s Rights Rights & Responsibilities Under the Mine Safety & Health Act of 1977 Miners Rights Michigan Mine Safety & Health Training Program.
October Module 1: Regulations - The RRP Rule Addresses activities that disturb lead-based paint in target housing and child-occupied facilities.
Subchapter III: Company Certification Requirements.
1 Asbestos NESHAP Inspection and Safety Procedures Course Chapter 1 Background Information Version
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Jodi G. Miller, CHMM, CPM May 9, 2007 New Orleans/Gulf Coast Challenges and Outcomes.
Our Vision - Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments
■ This Training Module is designed to educate Management on FMCSA Compliance Review (CR).
October Module 2: Regulations U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Established accredited training and certification programs for workers,
Environmental Compliance Assistance Workshop for Colleges and Universities September 13-14, 2005 Chapel Hill, NC.
Asbestos. © Business & Legal Reports, Inc What Is Asbestos? Group of natural minerals Still mined in some countries Long, thin, and strong fibrous.
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT.  History of the Act ◦ The primary purpose of TSCA is to regulate chemical substances and mixtures  It does so by regulating.
MINIMUM CRITERIA Project Manager Marianne Lindström, Bulgaria SYKE, Expert Services, Environmental Management Division.
Asbestos Renovations and Demolitions in South Carolina Lynn Barnes, Manager Asbestos Section SC Dept. of Health & Env. Control Phone: (803)
1 Enforcement Options and Case Studies Lisa Brown Assistant Counsel for Enforcement Cal/EPA CUPA/UST Conference February 8, 2006 February 8, 2006.
Regulating Asbestos in Louisiana by Jodi G. Miller, CHMM, CPM Louisiana Solid Waste Conference March 28, 2008.
Asbestos NESHAP Inspection and Safety Procedures Workshop Section Seventeen Legal Perspectives October 2008.
Miner’s Rights Rights & Responsibilities Under the Mine Safety & Health Act of 1977 Miners Rights Michigan Mine Safety & Health Training Program Rubin.
OSHA – What to Expect When You’re Inspected (Following Federal Guidelines)
Corporate Asbestos Review Anthony Peltier 11/2012.
Miner’s Rights Rights & Responsibilities Under the Mine Safety & Health Act of 1977 Miners Rights.
Conservation Development and Planning Department Code Compliance Flow Chart for County Code (Zoning & Land Use) Violations COMPLAINT RESEARCH AND PRIORITIZE.
Miners Rights Rights & Responsibilities Under the Mine Safety & Health Act of 1977 NC DOL Mine & Quarry Bureau Mine Safety & Health Training Revised 2010.
Bob Princic Division of Environmental Response & Revitalization Environmental Supervisor April 7, 2016.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
Your name You and the Law Understanding Your Obligations Under the OHSA 1.
INTRODUCTION TO OSHA Lesson
OSHA Inspections.
DIVISION OF MOTORIST SERVICES BUREAU OF DEALER SERVICES
Supervisory Responsibility
Understanding the OSHA Inspection Process
§ – Waste Disposal § (a) – Visible Emissions
Administrative Enforcement Process
Asbestos NESHAP Inspection and Safety Procedures Course
Public Employer Workplace Violence Prevention Program
Regulatory Enforcement & Citizen Suits in the New Administration
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Asbestos NESHAP Inspection and Safety Procedures Course
Laws Relating to Accreditation, the use of NGABs, and Enforcement
Liability Under CERCLA
City Council Meeting August 27, 2018
Bureau of Air Pollution Federal NESHAP Program
Waste Management Activities
Miners Rights Rights & Responsibilities Under the Mine Safety & Health Act of 1977 Introduce topic. Hand out Miner’s Rights Booklets. Mine Safety & Health.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Connections Abuse Prevention Plan 2018.
What we’ll cover: How EPA enforces the Clean Air Act, including permits Roles for tribal governments in enforcing NSR permits.
Asbestos: Identification and Training
Cupa violation Review BAESG Meeting May 20, 2019 Matthew Burge
Annual Enforcement Report Overview
Revised MassDEP Asbestos Regulation
Preliminary Interview
Shipping and Receiving Hazardous Materials
Presentation transcript:

Asbestos NESHAP Inspection and Safety Procedures Workshop Chapter Seventeen Legal Perspectives This Section describes: the authority for inspections; evidence needed to pursue an enfo rcement action; and various enforcement options. The material in this section was obtained from EPA's national strategy document and from EPA attorneys. Further legal questions should be addressed to Regional Counsels or to counsels for the State or local enforcement agency. 2014

Topics Authority for Inspections Evidence Required Enforcement Options Other Potential Violations Consent Decrees These are the topics that will be addressed in this Section.

Authority for Inspections Clean Air Act Section 114 Permitted Activities Sampling Photography Visual observations If denied access, may apply for a warrant Inspector may NOT order work to stop Statutory authority for inspection is under Section 114 of the Clean Air Act. Allowed activities during inspection include: Sampling; Photography; and Vsual observations. The inspector need not be a certified visible emissions observer to judge whether there is an emission. If the Inspector is denied access to the site, an application for a warrant me be pursued (which is covered on the next slide). An inspector discovering obvious violations of the asbestos NESHAP during an inspection is not empowered by EPA to order a work stoppage to curtail asbestos emissions. This order must be made, when necessary, at the level of a Division Director. Other orders may be feasible under the power of local health agencies.

To obtain a warrant: Will vary by jurisdiction Show inspection was scheduled: under “neutral” format OR for probable cause Provide: name of owner street address of facility If denied access to a facility, an inspector may apply for a warrant to perform the inspection. In order to obtain a warrant, the agency should show either that the inspection is scheduled under a "neutral" inspection format, or that there is probable cause to suspect violations at the subject source. The agency must obtain the exact street address of the site and name of the owner in order to have a warrant issued.

Evidence Required Owner or operator Facility or installation Demolition or renovation Asbestos/Friable asbestos material Jurisdictional amount Defendant acted knowingly (criminal) Defendant failed or caused others not to comply with work practice standards This slide lists the evidence required to establish that a violation of the asbestos NESHAP. The following slides will present detail concerning the list of evidence outlined in this slide.

Owner or Operator Person who owns, leases, operates, controls or supervises the: facility being demolished or renovated demolition or renovation operation or both active waste disposal site that receives ACWM conversion operations There may be numerous owners and operators within a facility; this can be complicated In 40 CFR Part 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Subpart A General Provisions, Section 61.02 (Definitions), an "owner or operator" is "any person who owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises a stationary source". A "stationary source" is "any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit any air pollutant which has been designated as hazardous by the Administrator." In Subpart M -National Emission Standard for Asbestos, Section 61.154 (Standard for active waste disposal sites) notes that "each owner or operator of an active waste disposal site that receives asbestos-containing waste material" from mills, demolition or renovation operations, or conversion operations must comply with the waste disposal provisions of the asbestos NESHAP. In Subpart M -Asbestos, Section 61.141 -Definitions, an "owner or operator" is redefined specific to demolition or renovation activities. An "owner or operator of a demolition or renovation activity" is "any person who owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises the facility being demolished or renovated or any person who owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises the demolition or renovation operation, or both.“ Evidence needed: Find out as much as possible regarding the companies and individuals that are involved in the demolition or renovation. Get the names of the owner, any lessees, the demolition or renovation contractor, the asbestos abatement subcontractor, if any, and the workers at the site.

Facility and/or Installation Note type of building or buildings Note number of dwelling units >1 bldg? discuss purpose/scope of demo/reno A "facility" is any institutional, commercial, public, industrial, or residential structure, installation, or building (including any structure, installation, or building containing condominiums or individual dwelling units operated as a residential cooperative, but excluding residential buildings having four or fewer dwelling units); any ship; and any active or inactive waste disposal site. For purposes of this definition, any building, structure, or installation that contains a loft used as a dwelling is not considered a residential structure, installation, or building. Any structure, installation, or building that was previously subject to this subpart is not excluded, regardless of its current use or function. An "installation" is any building or structure or any group of buildings or structures at a single demolition or renovation site that are under the control of the same owner or operator (or owner or operator under common control). Evidence needed: Note what type of building or buildings are being renovated or demolished. If it is an apartment building, note the number of dwelling units it contains. If more than one building is involved, speak with the owner, contractor and/or subcontractor to determine the overall purpose or scope of the demolition or renovation. It may be important to be able to group the buildings together in one project in order to meet the jurisdictional amount of asbestos if less than the regulated amount is involved in some of the buildings.

Demolition or Renovation Determine onsite activities "Demolition" is defined as the wrecking or taking out of any load-supporting structural member of a facility together with any related handling operations or the intentional burning of any facility. "Renovation" is defined as altering a facility or one or more facility components in any way, including the stripping or removal of RACM from a facility component. Evidence needed: Determine what activities are taking place at the site.

Activity Involved Asbestos Take samples Analyze at EPA approved laboratory "Asbestos" is the asbestiform varieties of serpentine (chrysotile), riebeckite (crocidolite), cummingtonite-grunerite, anthophyllite, and actinolite-tremolite. Evidence needed: Take representative bulk samples of all suspect materials and analyze these samples at an EPA-approved laboratory.

Activity Involved Friable Asbestos Material Test material Document wet/dry differences "Friable asbestos material (FAM)" is any material containing more than 1 percent asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix A, Subpart F, 40 CFR Part 763, Section l, Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. If the asbestos content is less than 10 percent as determined by a method other than point counting by PLM, verify the asbestos content by point counting using PLM. Evidence needed: Carefully document the condition of the material observed. Is it dry? Does it crumble easily with hand pressure?

Activity Involved Jurisdictional amount 260/160/35 Measure amount removed/disturbed Document method Interview employees Blueprints In order for the requirements of the asbestos NESHAP to apply, there must be a demolition or renovation involving at least 260 linear feet of friable asbestos material on pipes, at least 160 square feet of friable asbestos materials on other facility components, or at least 35 cubic feet of friable asbestos off facility components where area or length could not be previously measured. Evidence needed: Determine how much asbestos was removed. If the asbestos has already been removed, ask workers where it was removed from and measure the pipes or square footage. If such measurements are not possible, estimate the volume of asbestos materials removed. Facility blueprints, where available, may be helpful in estimating quantities.

Defendant Acted Knowingly (Criminal) History? Training? Ignored inspection results and did dry removal? To establish a criminal violation of the asbestos NESHAP, the government must prove that the defendant had knowledge of his or her actions. Evidence needed: What is the defendant's history with the asbestos NESHAP? Has the owner/operator had training in the requirements of the asbestos NESHAP? Have violations occurred in the past? Did the owner/operator ignore inspection findings and proceed with a dry removal?

Criminal Investigation A picture of a criminal investigation Employees being questioned Files being accumulated and reviewed

Failure to Comply with Work Practice Standards Notification Wet removal Lowering of ACM Maintenance of wet condition The defendant failed or caused another person or employee to fail to comply with any of the work practice standards. Important components of the work practice standards include: proper notification, adequately wetting the ACM during removal, carefully lowering ACM, keeping materials wet pending disposal preparation, providing worker training, properly preparing materials for transportation and disposal, disposing of ACWM properly. Evidence needed: notification - Determine if a proper notification was submitted. b. wet removal - Is material being wetted consistent with EPA guidelines? Is there a water source at the site? Ask workers what practices were followed during removal operations. Is dust visible in the air? c. lowering of ACM - Ask workers to describe how material was removed from areas high above the ground. Check condition of removed materials (Is it broken up from being dropped?). d. maintenance of wet condition - Are materials awaiting deposition properly wetted?

Failure to Comply with Work Practice Standards, cont’d Worker training Preparation for transport and disposal Proper disposal e. worker training - Is the supervisor's NESHAP training certification posted? For MAP sites, are the workers' initial and current training certificates on site? For AHERA sites, does the management plan contain information re: training of school asbestos workers? f. preparation for transportation and disposal - Note the condition of ACM in bags or other containers. Is the material adequately wet? Are the containers properly labeled? g. proper disposal - What waste disposal sites are being used? Are waste shipment records available for previous shipments? Are the WSRs being retained for two years? Do the WSRs contain the appropriate information? 15 15

Enforcement Options Civil judicial Civil administrative Criminal The three major actions EPA may pursue against violators of the asbestos NESHAP are: civil judicial enforcement, civil administrative enforcement, and criminal enforcement. These should be briefly discussed, as follows: Civil Judicial Enforcement EPA may bring a civil judicial action to enforce the asbestos NESHAP, under 42 U.S.C. Section 7413(b)(2), whenever any person violates section 112. These lawsuits may ask the court to order the defendant to come into compliance with all CAA requirements and to assess a civil penalty of no more than $32,500 per day for each violation. These enforcement actions are brought by EPA, but represented by the Department of Justice in federal district court. Civil Administrative Enforcement Authority EPA may also enforce the asbestos NESHAP through an administrative action under 42 U.S.C. Section 7413(d)(1)(B) so long as the civil penalty sought does not exceed $200,000 and the first date of alleged violation occurred no more than 12 months prior to filing the administrative complaint. These cases are brought by EPA attorneys and are decided by administrative law judges assigned to the EPA. Criminal Enforcement Authority Criminal violations of the asbestos NESHAP are charged under 42 U.S.C. Section 7413(c)(1), which provides that knowingly violating any requirement or prohibition of section 112, the air toxics program, is a felony punishable by fine or imprisonment of up to 5 years, or both.

Other Potential Violations CERCLA Knowing Endangerment Sources subject to the asbestos NESHAP may violate not only Section 112 of the CAA, but other regulations as well.

CERCLA Must report release to National Response Center Reportable quantity = 1 lb. pure asbestos Not one pound of ACM Fines and/or imprisonment up to 3 years CERCLA Release of a Reportable Quantity Under 42 U.S.C. Section 9603(a), the person in charge of a facility is required to report the release (other than a federally permitted release) of a reportable quantity of a hazardous substance as soon as he or she has knowledge of it to the EPA's National Response Center. Asbestos is considered a hazardous substance and the reportable quantity is one pound. A violation of this provision is a crime punishable by fines or imprisonment of up to three years, or both.

Knowing Endangerment Knowingly release hazardous air pollutant Most serious crime under CAA Fines and/or imprisonment up to 15 years Knowing Endangerment 42 U.S.C. Section 7413(c)(5) makes it a crime to knowingly release into the ambient air any hazardous air pollutant, including asbestos, and thereby knowingly place another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury. This is the most serious crime under the CAA and is punishable by fine or imprisonment of up to 15 years, or both.

Consent Decrees Designed to enhance future compliance with regulation May replace fines Various provisions During settlement proceedings, consent decrees, rather than fines, may be issued against a violator in order to enhance future compliance with the regulation. For example, depending on the types of violations seen, consent degrees may require defendants to: Conduct representative sampling of suspect ACM to be disturbed and have samples analyzed at a NVLAP laboratory. Develop an asbestos control program which details procedures the defendant will follow to comply with the asbestos NESHAP. Develop and implement an asbestos training program and implement it within a certain time frame. Train a corporate asbestos program manager who will be responsible for company compliance with the regulation. Supply some of the following information with future notifications: - date of previous notification; - if previous notification was made by telephone, name of Agency contact who received the call; - name of on-site supervisor; - facility contact and telephone number; - survey inspector name and address, date of training, and training provider identification; - specific information regarding the types of RACM to be disturbed; - working hours at abatement site; - definitive description of abatement techniques (wetting, waste handling, etc.) to be employed; - name of waste disposal facility contact; and - reason for an ordered demolition.

The End! Questions?