A HURDLE IN THE EGG FREEZING RACE: COMPARISON OF DONOR AND AUTOLOGOUS OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION OUTCOMES NYU Langone Fertility Center Sarah Druckenmiller,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Is Frozen Embryo Transfer better than Fresh?
Advertisements

The Latest and Greatest on Egg Freezing
The outcome of oocyte freezing as compared with embryo freezing Filippo Maria Ubaldi M.D. M.Sc. CLINICA VALLE GIULIA, Rome 3° Congress of Society of Reproductive.
Discontinuation of rLH two days before hCG may increase the number of oocytes retrieved in IVF Jessica B Spencer 1*, Aimee S Browne 1, Susannah D Copland.
Selective Single Embryo Transfers: A Preliminary Study L. Keith Smith, Ellen H. Roots and M. Janelle Odom Dorsett The Centre for Reproductive Medicine,
Veronica Bianchi declares no conflict of interest.
Outcome of Surgical Sperm Retrieval (SSR) followed by ICSI in men with obstructive azoospermia University of Aberdeen Assisted reproductive unit D.Giannaris,
The Effect of Bromocriptine-Rebound Method on Ongoing Pregnancy and Live Birth after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
THE DELICATE ART OF EGG FREEZING AN UPDATE OF SUCCESSES AND CHALLENGES.
Aline de Cássia Azevedo (a,b) ; Fernanda Coimbra Miyasato (b) ; Litsuko S. Fujihara (b), Maria Cecília R.M. Albuquerque (b), Ticiana V. Oliveira (b), Luiz.
Results 13 papers Heterogeneity of morphokinetic and conditions (culture media, mode of fertilization, day of ET)
Aneuploidy does not Correlate with Cell Number on Day 3 Leigh WHITMAN 1, Jeremy OSBORN 2, Jacquelyn IRVING 1, Keith HARRISON 1 1 Queensland Fertility Group,
ESET is increasing Women aged
DAY 6 BLASTOCYST TRANSFERS INCREASE THE PREGNANCY, IMPLANTATION AND LIVE BIRTH RATES COMPARED TO DAY 5 BLASTOCYST TRANSFERS IN HUMAN IVF-ET L.K. Smith,
Vikram Talaulikar, Melanie Davies & Gerard S Conway
How to get your abstract accepted Maureen Wood Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Aberdeen.
Too slow? we don’t think so. Outcomes relative to embryo development
Freeze All The Paradigm Shift
Fertilization and Implantation Week One of Human Development
The bank of embryo and the process of embryo Cryopreservation
Table 2. RCTs analyzed illustrating SET superiority over DET
Purposeful rotation of outer guide catheter just prior to embryo transfer: Does it enhance the pregnancy rate in women undergoing assisted reproduction.
VTF-All /PGS Effect : LBR / cycle / 1st ET
Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive procedures of embryos derived from affected and unaffected ovaries among women with small unilateral endometriomas.
Presenter: Mr T Partridge MBBS, MRCS
HOW MANY DOES IT TAKE? ACHIEVEMENT OF EUPLOID BLASTOCYST (BL) AS THE PRIMARY PREDICTOR OF LIVE BIRTH (LB) IN OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION (OC) Shannon DeVore.
Supplemental Table 2. Reproductive outcomes
Put on ice twice: a problem
Krinos M. Trokoudes, M. D. , Constantinos Pavlides, M. Sc
Introduction Ovarian reserve is injured following surgical excision of ovarian endometriomas Garcia-Velasco JA, Somigliana E., Hum Reprod, 2009 Bilateral.
Intermacs Web-Based Reporting: Outcome Analytics Overview and Instructions for Downloading Reports Intermacs Data Coordinating Center.
T. Rana, L. Szabo, A. Asderakis, E. Ablorsu
Can we further reduce multiple pregnancies in Belgium?
A GnRH agonist and exogenous hormone stimulation protocol has a higher live-birth rate than a natural endogenous hormone protocol for frozen-thawed blastocyst-stage.
Nicole Noyes, Jaime M. Knopman, Katherine Melzer, M
Fertility Center A HURDLE IN THE EGG FREEZING RACE: COMPARISON OF DONOR AND AUTOLOGOUS OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION (OC) OUTCOMES Sarah Druckenmiller, Patty.
Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day.
Factors affecting the success of human blastocyst development and pregnancy following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer 1  Gayle M Jones, Ph.D.,
Baby budgeting: oocyte cryopreservation in women delaying reproduction can reduce cost per live birth  Kate Devine, M.D., Sunni L. Mumford, Ph.D., Kara.
Factors associated with birth outcomes from cryopreserved blastocysts: experience from 4,597 autologous transfers of 7,597 cryopreserved blastocysts 
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Dramatic declines in implantation and pregnancy rates in patients who undergo repeated cycles of in vitro fertilization with blastocyst transfer after.
Effect of prolonged gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patients with endometriosis 
Oocyte cryopreservation outcomes including pre-cryopreservation and post-thaw meiotic spindle evaluation following slow cooling and vitrification of human.
There is significant unexplained inter-cycle variation in ovarian performance during IVF treatment Thanos Papathanasiou, Nausheen Mawal, Phil Snell. Bourn.
Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention  Dmitry M. Kissin, M.D.,
Mid-luteal serum progesterone concentrations govern implantation rates for cryopreserved embryo transfers conducted under hormone replacement  John L.
Alexis Adler, Hsaio-Ling Lee, David H
Follicle recruitment determines IVF productivity rate via the number of embryos frozen and subsequent transfers  James D. Stanger, John L. Yovich  Reproductive.
A. Pujol, MJ. Zamora, A. Obradors, D. Garcia,
Progress we can be proud of: U. S
Effect of repeated cryopreservation on human embryo developmental potential  Xiaoying Zheng, Yuan Chen, Jie Yan, Yuqi Wu, Xinjie Zhuang, Shengli Lin, Jinliang.
What are patients doing with their mosaic embryos
Should embryos developing to blastocysts on day 7 be cryopreserved and transferred: an analysis of pregnancy and implantation rates  George Kovalevsky,
Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis  Aylin Pelin Cil, M.D., Heejung Bang, Ph.D.,
Pregnancy outcomes from more than 1,800 in vitro fertilization cycles with the use of 24- chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism–based preimplantation.
Current approach to fertility preservation by embryo cryopreservation
Live babies born per oocyte retrieved in a subpopulation of oocyte donors with repetitive reproductive success  J. Ryan Martin, M.D., Jason G. Bromer,
Dizygotic twin delivery following in vitro fertilization and transfer of thawed blastocysts cryopreserved at day 6 and 7  E.Scott Sills, M.D., Cindy L.
Bruce S Shapiro, M. D. , Kevin S Richter, Ph. D. , Dee C Harris, M. T
Qiong Zhang, M.D., Xiaoyue M. Guo, B.A., Yanping Li, M.D. 
Sherman J. Silber, M.D. Director Infertility Center of St. Louis
Fertility Center HOW MANY DOES IT TAKE? ACHIEVEMENT OF EUPLOID BLASTOCYST (BL) AS THE PRIMARY PREDICTOR OF LIVE BIRTH (LB) IN OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION.
Experience with a patient-friendly, mandatory, single-blastocyst transfer policy: the power of one  John M. Csokmay, M.D., Micah J. Hill, D.O., Rebecca.
Nicole Noyes, M. D. , Brittany Starr Hampton, M. D. , Alan Berkeley, M
Krinos M. Trokoudes, M. D. , Constantinos Pavlides, M. Sc
Multiple fertility preservation approach in cancer patients: IVF and embryo freezing using donor or husband sperm combined with oocyte cryopreservation.
Fertility Center Put on ice twice: a problem? Comparison of trophectoderm biopsy (Tebx) with preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) in cycles usiNg previously.
Success Rates Following laboratory advances over the years, including using time-lapse monitoring for all cycles, Galway Fertility Clinic has increased.
Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles  John L. Frattarelli,
Presentation transcript:

A HURDLE IN THE EGG FREEZING RACE: COMPARISON OF DONOR AND AUTOLOGOUS OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION OUTCOMES NYU Langone Fertility Center Sarah Druckenmiller, Patty Ann Labella, Shannon DeVore, James Grifo, Brooke Hodes-Wertz, Nicole Noyes OBJECTIVE Oocyte cryopreservation is now a mainstream fertility preservation option, and many women are asking about the chance of live birth with this new technology. Unfortunately, minimal data is available as most women who have undergone oocyte cryopreservation have not yet returned for thaw. Further, much of our knowledge is based on donor oocyte cryopreservation, which may be superior to autologous oocyte cryopreservation. Thus, our aim was to compare donor and autologous oocyte cryopreservation thaw outcomes. TABLE. Outcomes of oocyte cryopreservation cycles. FIGURE. Outcomes of oocyte cryopreservation cycles. To resize boxes, click twice on the bottom box and drag the bottom of the box up or down. Group Donor oocyte cryopreservation (n = 119 pts, 131 thaws, 158 transfers) All autologous oocyte cryopreservation <43y (n= 123 pts, 137 thaws, 92 transfers) Autologous oocyte cryopreservation <35y at cryo (n= 23 pts, 24 thaws, 16 transfers) P Values Median age (IQR) 26 (24-29)a 38 (36-39) 33 (30-34)b a-b .0001 No. MII oocytes thawed (median / cycle, IQR) 1138 (8, 6-10)c 1698 (11, 8-16)d 381 (13, 11-21)e c-d .0001 c-e .0001 No. MII oocytes survived 1001/1138 (88%)f 1330/1698 (78%)g 300/381 (79%)h f-g .0001 f-h .0001 No. 2-PN fertilization 759/1138 (67%)i 901/1698 (53%)j 230/381 (60%)k i-j .0001 i-k .03 No. of morulae + blastocysts 91+373 = 464 149+246 = 395 43+83 = 126   Morula + blastocyst formation rate 464/759 (61%)l 395/901 (44%)m 126/230 (55%)n l-m .0001 l-n .09 Blastocyst formation rate 373/759 (49%)o 246/901 (27%)p 83/230 (36%)q o-p .0001 o-q .0005 Total no. embryos transferred 215 (1, 1-2) 182 41 (2, 2-3) Implantation rate 102/215 (47%)r 54/182 (30%)s 13/41 (32%)t r-s .0003 r-t .09 Ongoing / live birth rate for all transfers 84/158 (53%)u 38/92 (41%)v 9/16 (56%)w u-v .09 u-w 1 No. thaw cycles with no transfer (%) 9/131 (7%)x 47/137 (34%)y 8/24 (33%)z x-y .0001 x-z .001 Percent (%) RESULTS See Table. Oocyte cryopreservation cycles included 131 donor thaws (119 recipients, median donor age 26, range 21-31) and 137 autologous thaws (123 pts, median age 38, range 25-42), including the subgroup of 24 autologous <35y thaws (23 patients, median age 33, range 25-34). As expected, donors were younger than autologous patients (p<.0001) and fewer MII oocytes per cycle were thawed in donor cycles (median 8) than in all autologous cycles (median 11; p<.0001) or autologous <35y cycles (median 13; p<.0001). Oocyte survival, 2-PN fertilization and blastocyst formation rates were higher in donor than all autologous (p<.0001) and autologous <35y (p<0.03) cycles, and more all-autologous and autologous <35y cycles had no suitable blastocysts for transfer compared to donor cycles (34% and 33% vs. 7%; p<.01). However, in cycles with blastocysts for transfer, live birth rates were not different between donor and autologous <35y cycles (p=1); albeit, in autologous <35y patients, an additional blastocyst was transferred on average per cycle. Multiple birth rates in the donor, all autologous, and autologous <35y groups were 5/84 (6%), 7/38 (18%), and 2/9 (22%), respectively. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study MATERIALS & METHODS We reviewed all donor and autologous oocyte cryopreservation thaw cycles from October 2004 - January 2017 at a large university-based fertility center. Exclusion criteria included use of PGD/PGS, day-3 embryo transfers, and age at retrieval >43y. Data was mined for: number of retrieved / thawed / surviving oocytes, 2-pronuclear (2PN) fertilization, embryo development, implantation and ongoing pregnancy / live birth rates. Fischer’s exact and Mood’s median tests were used for statistics. CONCLUSIONS As women increasingly rely on autologous oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation, it is critical to provide realistic expectations about outcomes. Developmental parameters for autologous oocyte cryopreservation were inferior to donor oocyte cryopreservation, resulting in production of fewer blastocysts and a higher proportion of patients with no embryos for transfer. However, in those achieving embryo transfer, live-birth outcomes in autologous <35y vs. donor groups appear comparable, although with an additional blastocyst being transferred on average per cycle in the autologous <35y group. Thus, donor thaw data is not an appropriate counselling tool for women pursuing autologous oocyte cryopreservation; only autologous thaw data should be used.