MACE Trial Rationale, Study Design, and Current Status

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FFR vs Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation
Advertisements

Randomized Comparison of FFR-guided and Angiography-guided Provisional Stenting for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI trial Shao-Liang.
M.Unverdorben; TCT Problem The treatment of stenoses of small coronary arteries (SVD) and of restenoses after stent deployment (ISR) still show.
As presented by Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD, FACC Principal Investigator Thoraxcentre - Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands PISCES Paclitaxel.
A Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-­ Eluting Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: One-Year Angiographic and.
FRONTIER Registry The Guidant MULTI-LINK FRONTIER ™ Coronary Stent System for the Treatment of Pts with Native De Novo or Restenotic Bifurcation Coronary.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating a Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon in Patients TReated with Endothelial Progenitor Cell CapTuring Stents for De Novo.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
Early and Late Stent Thrombosis Rates in 5,054 Real-World Patients from XIENCE V USA With and Without Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Interruptions James Hermiller,
RAVEL 4 YEAR FOLLOW-UP - Cordis Cardiology / Cardialysis – Euro-PCR – Sousa – 24 May 2005 RAVEL A RAndomised, double-blind study with the Sirolimus-eluting.
Philippe Généreux, MD for the Tryton Bifurcation Trial Investigators Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York City.
Two-Year Outcomes in Real-World Patients Treated With a Thin-Strut, Platinum-Chromium, Everolimus-Eluting Stent in the PROMUS Element Plus US Post-Approval.
Martin B. Leon, MD Key Messages Tryton Pivotal: Randomized Trial and
David J. Cohen, M.D., M.Sc. Director of Cardiovascular Research
Novel Trial Design Focus - Left Main and “All Comers” DES Studies: All-Comers Studies. Interventional View Jeffrey J. Popma, MD Director, Innovations in.
David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators
Disrupt CAD Study Design
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
What is the Optimal Rate of DES Use?
Adnan K. Chhatriwalla, MD Saint-Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
*Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
Lutonix® Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon to Treat Obstructive Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries Preliminary Six-Month Results from.
How to Perform a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
New Generation Resolute Integrity Drug-Eluting Stent Superior to Benchmark Xience Drug-Eluting Stent: Primary Endpoint Results from the PROPEL Study –
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Final Five-Year Follow-up of the SYNTAX Trial: Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Patients With Three-Vessel Disease and/or Left Main Disease Patrick.
Novel atherectomy devices for the coronary calcified lesions
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
David J. Cohen, M.D., M.Sc. Director of Cardiovascular Research
Updates From SURTAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients
Harmonized Assessment by Randomized Multicenter Study of OrbusNEich’s COMBO StEnt Japan-USA HARMONEE: Primary Report of A Randomized Trial of a Bioabsorbable.
ABSORB Japan: 3-year Clinical and Angiographic Results of a Randomized trial Evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Metallic Drug-eluting.
The Tryton Bifurcation Trial:
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
David J. Cohen, M.D., M.Sc. Director of Cardiovascular Research
TAXUS IV Trial Slow-rate release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with bare stent in patients with single de novo coronary lesions Presented.
SYNTAX at 2 Years: This Interventionalist’s Perspective
DES Should be Used as the Default Stent in ACS!
The XIENCE V EXCEED Study
Instent Restenosis and Occlusion: Time for Surgical Revision?
How (Much) Should We Pay for TAVI?
FINAL FIVE-YEAR CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF THE NOBORI2 TRIAL
Two-Year Extended Follow-up in Patients Receiving a Zotarolimus-eluting Stent in the E-Five Registry Martin T. Rothman, Ian T. Meredith, Keyur Parikh,
TAXUS II and IV: two-year follow-up
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Stephan Windecker
How and why this study may change my practice ?
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds: 2-year Outcomes of the EVERBIO.
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Large-Scale Registry Examining Safety and Effectiveness of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Western.
Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents: 70 restenotic cases from a cohort of.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
TAXUS – Myonecrosis and sidebranch patency concerns are short-term issues with no long-term consequences, and the benefits are undeniable Jeffrey J. Popma,
Translation Pathway for Coronary Stent Development- Clinical Endpoints
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Updated 3-Year Meta-Analysis of the TAXUS Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy Demonstrated in 3,445 Randomized Patients Time allocation for this talk.
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Ahmed A. Khattab, MD For the German Cypher Registry Investigators
Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team
TYPHOON Trial Trial to Assess the Use of the Cypher Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Balloon Angioplasty (TYPHOON) Trial Presented at.
Presentation transcript:

MACE Trial Rationale, Study Design, and Current Status David J. Cohen, MD, MSc Director of Cardiovascular Research Saint-Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute Missouri Endowed Professor of Medicine University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine DJC-CRT 2015

Disclosures Grant Support/Drugs Grant Support/Devices Daiichi-Sankyo - Eli Lilly Astra-Zeneca - Merck Grant Support/Devices Edwards Lifesciences - Abbott Vascular Medtronic - Boston Scientific CSI, Inc. - Covidien Consulting/Advisory Boards Medtronic - Astra-Zeneca Eli Lilly DJC: 2/15

Challenges in Treating Calcified Coronary Lesions Prone to dissection with POBA and other standard PTCA techniques Inability to dilate Incomplete stent expansion increased stent thrombosis and restenosis Inhibition of drug delivery/absorption

Impact of Severe Calcification on DES Outcomes Cardialysis Study Pooled data from 7 DES trials (6296 pts) Presence of severe coronary calcification determined by angiographic core lab Severe calcification present in 20% of pts associated with worse outcomes across full spectrum of endpoints P<0.01 for all comparisons Bourantas C, et al. EuroPCR 2014

Rationale for the MACE Study Previously, no device was specifically FDA approved for treatment of coronary calcification Recently, the Diamondback 360 catheter was approved for the indication of “facilitating stent delivery in patients with CAD… due to severely calcified coronary lesions” Nonetheless, there remain numerous gaps in knowledge about the treatment of CAD in this challenging patient population

MACE Study Multicenter Prospective Study to Evaluate Outcomes of Moderate to Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

MACE Study: Organization Study Sponsor: Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Principal Investigator Samin K. Sharma, MD Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York Angiographic Core Laboratory Jeffrey J. Popma, MD Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston Economic Core Laboratory Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City MO

MACE Study: Objectives To determine the impact of both moderate and severe coronary calcification on the outcomes of PCI using contemporary devices and pharmacotherapy To evaluate the impact of coronary calcification on the short- and long-term costs of PCI To serve as a virtual “control group” to better understand the benefits of orbital atherectomy in patients with severe coronary calcification

MACE Study: Design Enroll up to 500 subjects 2002 subjects with: Moderate calcification 1001 subjects with: None/mild calcification Severe calcification All patients biomarker negative at entry ensures accurate assessment of periprocedural MI Real-world design Treatment using any FDA approved device(s) per operator discretion 3 year follow-up for all patients for both clinical and economic outcomes

Assessment of Calcification  Ca++ Severity Angiographic Appearance* IVUS/OCT None/Mild Absence of readily apparent radiopacities at the site of stenosis ≤ 180° of calcium at one (1) cross section Moderate Presence of radiopacities only during cardiac cycle before contrast injection 181° to 269° of calcium at 1 cross section Severe Presence of radiopacities noted without cardiac motion Involves both sides of the arterial wall in at least one location Total length of calcium at least 15mm and extend partially into the target lesion, or ≥ 270° of calcium at 1 cross section. * Assessed by core laboratory

Study Endpoints Primary Endpoint 30-day MACE: composite of cardiac death, MI (CKMB >3x ULN), or TVR Secondary Endpoints MACE at 1 year TLR Procedural and device success Cardiovascular Related Costs: In-hospital (billing data), 1-year, 3-years

Study Update (as of 1/19/15) 34 activated sites 293 subjects enrolled First 50 Patients 34 activated sites 293 subjects enrolled Calcification None/Mild 93 pts Moderate 100 pts Severe 98 pts Characteristic Mean Value Male 64% Age (yrs) 67 yrs Diabetes 40% Prior CABG 6% Target Vessel LAD/LM LCx/Ramus 32% RCA 28%

Summary (1) MACE is the first study that will prospectively assess short and long-term PCI outcomes according to the extent of coronary calcification as assessed by a centralized core laboratory Patients from MACE will also serve as a “virtual control group” for the ORBIT II trial in order to better understand the benefits of orbital atherectomy in contemporary practice for patients undergoing PCI for treatment of calcified coronary lesions

Summary (2) Detailed health economic data will be collected to better understand the cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for managing calcified coronary lesions Preliminary results for 30 day outcomes are expected in late 2015