Impact of Solar and Sulfate Geoengineering on Surface Ozone

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Can Cirrus Cloud Thinning Cool Climate Without Severe Climate Side Effects? CEC14 Berlin Lawrence Jackson, Julia Crook & Piers Forster.
Advertisements

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA
Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA
The other Harvard 3-D model: CACTUS Chemistry, Aerosols, Climate: Tropospheric Unified Simulation Objective: to improve understanding of the interaction.
Water Vapor and Cloud Feedbacks Dennis L. Hartmann in collaboration with Mark Zelinka Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington PCC Summer.
Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA
Observed Reductions of Surface Solar Radiation at Sites in the United States and Worldwide from 1961 to 1990 Beate Liepert Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.
REFERENCES Maria Val Martin 1 C. L. Heald 1, J.-F. Lamarque 2, S. Tilmes 2 and L. Emmons 2 1 Colorado State University 2 NCAR.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Evolution of Stratospheric.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Evolution of Stratospheric.
Effect of Stratospheric Water Vapor Change on Ozone Layer and Climate Wenshou Tian Martyn P. Chipperfield 1 Collage of the Atmospheric Science Lanzhou.
Influence of the sun variability and other natural and anthropogenic forcings on the climate with a global climate chemistry model Martin Schraner Polyproject.
Update on paleochemistry simulations Jean-François Lamarque and J.T. Kiehl Earth and Sun Systems Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Konrad Cunningham, Joel Arberman, Nadine Bell, Susan Harder, Drew Schindell, Gavin Schmidt The Effects of Climate and Emission Changes on Surface Sulfate.
Sensitivity of Methane Lifetime to Sulfate Geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) Giovanni Pitari V. Aquila,
Introduction With global warming becoming more of a concern to society, as well as entire ecosystems, it is important to address proposed methods to alleviate.
Links between ozone and climate J. A. Pyle Centre for Atmospheric Science, Dept of Chemistry University of Cambridge Co-chair, SAP 7th ORM, Geneva, 19.
Use of CCSM3 and CAM3 Historical Runs: Estimation of Natural and Anthropogenic Climate Variability and Sensitivity Bruce T. Anderson, Boston University.
Radiation Group 3: Manabe and Wetherald (1975) and Trenberth and Fasullo (2009) – What is the energy balance of the climate system? How is it altered by.
2. Climate: “average” weather conditions, but the average doesn’t stay steady. I.e. Ice ages, El Niño, etc. 1. Weather: state of the atmosphere at a given.
Integrated projections of U.S. air quality benefits from avoided climate change Fernando Garcia Menendez Rebecca K. Saari, Erwan Monier, Noelle E. Selin.
ETH On-going and planned projects with ECHAM Martin Wild, Doris Folini, Adeline Bichet, Maria Hakuba, Christoph Schär IACETH.
Fanglin Yang Work Done at Climate Research Group
Volcanic Climate Impacts and ENSO Interaction Georgiy Stenchikov Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ Thomas Delworth.
. s Yuqiang Zhang 1, J. Jason West 1, Meridith M. Fry 1, Raquel A. Silva 1, Steven J. Smith 2, Vaishali Naik 4, Zachariah Adelman 1, Susan C. Anenberg.
Strengthening of Brewer- Dobson circulation since 1979 seen from observed lower- stratospheric temperatures Qiang Fu Department of Atmospheric Sciences.
Human fingerprints on our changing climate Neil Leary Changing Planet Study Group June 28 – July 1, 2011 Cooling the Liberal Arts Curriculum A NASA-GCCE.
Climateprediction.net SRM Experiment 1 We used the climateprediction.net (cpdn) version of the Hadley Centre Coupled Model, version 3 ( HadCM3) to investigate.
Recent Trend of Stratospheric Water Vapor and Its Impacts Steve Rieck, Ning Shen, Gill-Ran Jeong EAS 6410 Team Project Apr
Maria Val Martin (CSU) and Colette L. Heald (MIT) J-F Lamarque, S. Tilmes and L. Emmons (NCAR) Thanks to the National Park Service for funding Effects.
ESTIMATION OF SOLAR RADIATIVE IMPACT DUE TO BIOMASS BURNING OVER THE AFRICAN CONTINENT Y. Govaerts (1), G. Myhre (2), J. M. Haywood (3), T. K. Berntsen.
The G4-Specified Stratospheric Aerosol Experiment Alan Robock 1, Lili Xia 1 and Simone Tilmes.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 14: Methane and CO Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Illinois,
Climatic implications of changes in O 3 Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies How well.
The G4-Specified Stratospheric Aerosol Experiment Alan Robock 1, Lili Xia 1, and Simone Tilmes.
Coordinated climate change experiments to be assessed as part of the IPCC AR5 Gerald A. Meehl National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado.
Atmospheric Circulation Response to Future Arctic Sea Ice Loss Clara Deser, Michael Alexander and Robert Tomas.
Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA
Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA
Mayurakshi Dutta Department of Atmospheric Sciences March 20, 2003
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
15th Annual CMAS Conference
Climate change and meteorological drivers of widespread flooding in the UK EA/Defra/NRW Research and Development (R&D) project board meeting, London, March.
Chemistry-climate interactions in CCSM
A Fully Coupled GCM Study of a "Geoengineered World"
Data Assimilation and Carbon Cycle Working Groups
CCSM Working Group Meeting, February 2008
Sensitivity of precipitation extremes to ENSO variability
Ryan Kramer and Brian Soden University of Miami/RSMAS
Heat extremes in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)
Mingwei Li Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences
Climate Dynamics 11:670:461 Alan Robock
Global Changes in the Atmosphere
How ozone affects global precipitation
Chemistry, Aerosols, and Climate: Tropospheric Unified Simulation (CACTUS) Objective: to improve understanding of interactions between atmospheric chemistry,
Climate Modeling General Circulation Models
Climate Dynamics 11:670:461 Alan Robock
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
Climate Dynamics 11:670:461 Alan Robock
Shiliang Wu1 Loretta J. Mickley1, Daniel J
Global atmospheric changes and future impacts on regional air quality
Geoengineering: Direct Environmental Consequences
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Climate Change and Agriculture
The Human Influence on Climate: How much is known, What’s in store for us? Loretta Mickley Harvard University CO2 concentrations, Mauna Loa.
David Stevenson University of Edinburgh
Volcanic Climate Impacts and ENSO Interaction
Climatic implications of changes in O3
Presentation transcript:

Impact of Solar and Sulfate Geoengineering on Surface Ozone CEC17 Impact of Solar and Sulfate Geoengineering on Surface Ozone Lili Xia1, Peer J. Nowack2, Simone Tilmes3 and Alan Robock1 1Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA 2Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College, London, UK 3Atmospheric Chemistry Observations and Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA Xia, L., Nowack, P. J., Tilmes, S., and Robock, A. (2017), Impacts of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering on tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1-15, doi:10.5194/acp-17-1-2017.

G4 specified stratospheric aerosols Simulating two SRM scenarios: Sulfate injection and solar irradiance reduction Full tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry version of CESM CAM4-Chem (Community Atmospheric Model version 4 - Chemistry) Fully coupled to ocean, land and ice models 1 degree resolution in latitude and longitude Three ensemble members of RCP6.0 (2004-2089) Three ensemble members of G4SSA (2020-2089) Three ensemble members of G4SSA-S (2020-2089) G4 specified stratospheric aerosols Solar irradiance reduction with the same forcing as in G4SSA at the top of the atmosphere Tilmes, S., et al. (2015), A new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment designed for climate and chemistry models, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 43-49, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-43-2015.

G4SSA Forcing: Steady-state prescribed aerosol distribution, based on an 8 Tg SO2 year-1 emission scenario using the ECHAM5-HAM model, combined with RCP6.0 Tilmes, S., et al. (2015), A new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment designed for climate and chemistry models, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 43-49, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-43-2015. Niemeier, U., et al. (2013), Solar irradiance reduction via climate engineering: Impact of different techniques on the energy balance and the hydrological cycle, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 11,905–11,917, doi:10.1002/2013JD020445.

Total insolation reduction at top of atmosphere is ~1% G4SSA-S Forcing: Keep the net solar radiation at top of atmosphere (TOA) the same as in G4SSA, which is 2.5 W/m2 less than RCP6.0. Net Solar Flux (TOA) Insolation (TOA) Total insolation reduction at top of atmosphere is ~1%

Global Averaged Surface Temperature and Ozone Compared with RCP6.0, global (land/ocean) averaged annual surface temperature reductions of G4SSA and G4SSA-S are very similar. G4SSA shows less surface O3 when compared with RCP6.0 as a global average, while G4SSA-S shows an opposite change – surface O3 concentration increases relative to RCP6.0.

Surface Ozone Concentration Difference (ppb) (average of three ensembles, average of 2030-2069) O3 (ppb) G4SSA minus RCP6.0 O3 (ppb) G4SSA minus G4SSA-S O3 (ppb) G4SSA-S minus RCP6.0 Changes in regional surface ozone concentrations are controlled by ozone exchange from the stratosphere, chemical changes in the troposphere (production and loss rates), and deposition rates.

Tropospheric O3 Flux = O3 from Net Chemistry + O3 from STE Net Chemistry = Chemistry Production – Chemistry Loss Compared with RCP6.0, tropospheric O3 decreases in G4SSA and increases in G4SSA-S, which is consistent with the changes on surface ozone. Both G4SSA and G4SSA-S show increase of net chemistry and reduction of ozone from the stratosphere related to RCP6.0. Changes in G4SSA are stronger than changes in G4SSA-S.

Tropospheric O3 Net Chemistry = O3 Chemical Production – O3 Chemical Loss G4SSA has stronger increase of ozone net chemical change than G4SSA-S; Reduction of ozone chemical loss in both G4SSA and G4SSA-S is due to less water vapor in the troposphere; Less reduction of ozone chemical production in G4SSA related to G4SSA-S is caused by more ultraviolet radiation in the troposphere under G4SSA.

Stratospheric ozone depletion under G4SSA O3 (ppb) G4SSA minus RCP6.0 O3 (ppb) G4SSA-S minus RCP6.0 Annual zonal mean O3 concentration change (ppb) (average of 2030-2069, average of three ensembles)

Ozone from the Stratosphere Troposphere Exchange (STE) Global Average STE Average of 20°N – 20°S Ozone from the Stratosphere Troposphere Exchange (STE) Strong reduction of O3 – STE in G4SSA is mainly due to stratospheric ozone depletion; Mild reduction of O3 – STE in G4SSA-S is due to the slow down of the Brewer-Dobson Circulation, which is supported by the Age of Air. Age of Air (at 10 mb) calculation is based on a point on a zonal mean map (1°N, 139 mb)

Conclusions Surface ozone concentration is a balance between ozone transported from the stratosphere and net chemical change in the troposphere. With stratospheric sulfate injection, stratospheric ozone depletion is the main cause of surface ozone reduction. When we decrease insolation, the increase of tropospheric ozone net chemistry is the major cause of increased surface ozone concentration. Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering may reduce surface ozone pollution, but decisions about implementation must weigh all possible benefits and risks. For example, the negative impacts of stratospheric ozone depletion would far outweigh any improvements in tropospheric air quality.