Ionospheric fluctuations structure during strong geomagnetic storm by incoherent scatter radar and GPS data Yu.V. CHERNIAK(1), I.I. SHAGIMURATOV(1), A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESWW 5 Some ionospheric effects on ground based radar Y. Béniguel, J.-P. Adam.
Advertisements

7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
Using a DPS as a Coherent Scatter HF Radar Lindsay Magnus Lee-Anne McKinnell Hermanus Magnetic Observatory Hermanus, South Africa.
Storm-time total electron content and its response to penetration electric fields over South America P. M. de Siqueira, E. R. de Paula, M. T. A. H. Muella,
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
The North East CIDR Array (NECA): A Chain of Ionospheric Tomography Receivers for Studying the Equatorward Edge of the Auroral Oval and the Mid-latitude.
Which describes a variation of wave frequency ω(t) in a geometric-optic approximation [4]. Here n(ω) is the refractive index of the medium, is the vector.
Space Weather Workshop, Boulder, CO, April 2013 No. 1 Ionospheric plasma irregularities at high latitudes as observed by CHAMP Hermann Lühr and.
Specular reflectorquasi-specular reflector quasi-Lambert reflector Lambert reflector Limiting Forms of Reflection and Scatter from a Surface.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
Ionospheric Electric Field Variations during Geomagnetic Storms Simulated using CMIT W. Wang 1, A. D. Richmond 1, J. Lei 1, A. G. Burns 1, M. Wiltberger.
22 July, 2009 Total Solar Eclipse: Effect on D-region Ionosphere Dynamics as Studied from AWESOME VLF Observations Rajesh Singh B. Veenadhari, A.K. Maurya.
Radar Remote Sensing Laboratory University of Washington Melissa Meyer, Andrew Morabito, Zac Berkowitz, John Sahr University of Washington Electrical Engineering.
How can we get a vertical profile of the atmosphere?
Doppler Radar From Josh Wurman Radar Meteorology M. D. Eastin.
Profilers. Wind profilers are phased array radars that measure the wind as a function of height above a fixed location. Characteristics: Wavelength: 33.
V. M. Sorokin, V.M. Chmyrev, A. K. Yaschenko and M. Hayakawa Strong DC electric field formation in the ionosphere over typhoon and earthquake regions V.
1 UNCLASSIFIED – FOUO – Not for Public Release Operational Space Environment Network Display (OpSEND) & the Scintillation Network Decision Aid Dr. Keith.
The Ionosphere Irregularities Modeling on the base of ROTI Mapping Measurements and Database In order to analyze TEC fluctuation activity there were considered.
The TIDDBIT HF Doppler Radar G. Crowley and F. Rodrigues
Antenna 1 Antenna 2 Antenna 3 Transmitter Control EISCAT-3D and active ionospheric experiments Michael Rietveld EISCAT Scientific Association TromsøNorway.
Effects of ionospheric small- scale structures on GNSS G. WAUTELET Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Ionospheric Radio Systems & Techniques (IRST)
Incoherent Scattering
Magnetospheric ULF wave activity monitoring based on the ULF-index OLGA KOZYREVA and N. Kleimenova Institute of the Earth Physics, RAS.
Remote Radio Sounding Science For JIMO J. L. Green, B. W. Reinisch, P. Song, S. F. Fung, R. F. Benson, W. W. L. Taylor, J. F. Cooper, L. Garcia, D. Gallagher,
Chapter 7 Propagation The Ionosphere
Sub-ionospheric Point hmhm Ionosphere Earth Surface Ionospheric Piercing Point High Resolution GPS-TEC Gradients in the Northern Hemisphere Ionospheric.
STAMMS Conference Meeting, Orleans, France May 2003 R. L. Mutel, D. A. Gurnett, I. Christopher, M. Schlax University of Iowa Spatial and Temporal Properties.
Effect of Geomagetic Activity on Cosmic Ray Muon Rate Mendon High School Regents Physics Honors Period 9 Class A group of Honors physics students plotted.
Large-Amplitude Electric Fields Associated with Bursty Bulk Flow Braking in the Earth’s Plasma Sheet R. E. Ergun et al., JGR (2014) Speaker: Zhao Duo.
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
The investigations of the solar wind with the large decametric radio telescopes of Ukraine Falkovych I.S. 1, Konovalenko A.A 1, Kalinichenko N.N. 1, Olyak.
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*, J. Spits*,
Adaphed from Rappaport’s Chapter 5
Spatial Effects of Multiple Scattering of HF Signals in the Ionosphere: Theory and Experiment N. Zabotin 1,2, J.W. Wright 2, A. Gasiewski 1, G. Zhbankov.
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
On the Role of Electric Field Changes when Calculating Thunderstorm Currents Yu.V. Shlugaev, V.V. Klimenko, E.A. Mareev Institute of Applied Physics RAS,
THE REACTION OF MID-LATITUDE IONOSPHERE ON STRONG IONOSPHERIC STORMS ON THE BASE OF THE EAST- SIBERIAN GROUND-BASED RADIO INSTRUMENT NETWORK DATA B.G.
Mapping high-latitude TEC fluctuations using GNSS I.I. SHAGIMURATOV (1), A. KRANKOWSKI (2), R. SIERADZKI (2), I.E. ZAKHARENKOVA (1,2), Yu.V. CHERNIAK (1),
CEDAR 2008 Workshop Observations at the Plasmaspheric Boundary Layer with the Mid-latitude SuperDARN radars Mike Ruohoniemi, Ray Greenwald, and Jo Baker.
Comparison of the electron density profiles measured with the Incoherent Scatter Radar, Digisonde DPS-4 and Chirp-Ionosonde Ratovsky K.G., Shpynev* B.G.,
Ionospheric HF radars Pasha Ponomarenko. Outline Conventional radars vs ionospheric radars Collective scatter processes Aspect angle effects HF propagation.
HAARP-induced Ionospheric Ducts Gennady Milikh, University of Maryland in collaboration with: Dennis Papadopoulos, Chia-Lee Chang, BAE systems Evgeny Mishin,
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
0 7th ESWW, Bruges, Ionospheric Scintillations Propagation Model Y. Béniguel, J-P Adam IEEA, Courbevoie, France.
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant, G. Wautelet, S. Lejeune, H. Brenot, J. Spits, S. Stankov.
Mike Ruohoniemi 2012VT SuperDARN Remote Sensing of the Ionosphere and Earth’s Surface with HF Radar J. Michael Ruohoniemi and Joseph Baker.
Effects of January 2010 stratospheric sudden warming in the low-latitude ionosphere L. Goncharenko, A. Coster, W. Rideout, MIT Haystack Observatory, USA.
Interminimum Changes in Global Total Electron Content and Neutral Mass Density John Emmert, Sarah McDonald Space Science Division, Naval Research Lab Anthony.
VT SuperDARN Group Joseph Baker Ground-Based Observations of the Plasmapause Boundary Layer (PBL) Region with.
Shadowing.
Interplanetary scintillation of strong sources during the descending phase near the minimum of 23 solar activity cycle Chashei I1., Glubokova1,2 S., Glyantsev1,2.
Space weather phenomena in the ionosphere and their effect on GNSS
Status of GNSS ionospheric Study in Korea
An advantage of magnetic index h to show high local disturbances in ionosphere during quiet day conditions Beata Dziak-Jankowska1, Iwona Stanisławska1,
Ionospheric Science and Space Weather
HF radio sounding the horizontally inhomogeneous ionosphere
Ionosphere, Magnetosphere and Thermosphere Anthea Coster
Mid-latitude Electron Density Variations Under Magnetospheric Substorm Conditions As Determined From Istanbul Dynasonde Observations Aysegul Ceren MORAL,
CEDAR 2013 Workshop International space weather and climate observations along the 120E/60W meridional circle and its surrounding areas Space weather observations.
Astrid Maute, Art Richmond, Ben Foster
R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*,
Oerstedt+Champ+Swarm → Empirical models →New parameters/knowledge
Charles Lin1, Jia-Ting Lin1, Loren Chang2, Yang-Yi Sun2
Series of high-frequency slowly drifting structure mapping the magnetic field reconnection M. Karlicky, A&A, 2004, 417,325.
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
The Ionosphere Equatorial Anomaly.
RANDOM AND COHERENT SOURCES
Evaluation of IRI-2012 by comparison with JASON-1 TEC and incoherent scatter radar observations during the solar minimum period Eun-Young Ji,
General Licensing Class
Presentation transcript:

Ionospheric fluctuations structure during strong geomagnetic storm by incoherent scatter radar and GPS data Yu.V. CHERNIAK(1), I.I. SHAGIMURATOV(1), A. KRANKOWSKI(2), I.E. ZAKHARENKOVA(1,2) (1) West Department of Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowaves Propagation, Kaliningrad, Russia (2) Geodynamics Research Laboratory, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland (GRL / UWM) The ionosphere plasma characteristics are responding on variations of solar and magnetic activity. The research of an ionosphere structure and dynamics is important as for understanding physics of processes, proceed in it, and for radiophysical problems solution. In the last years the interest of technical community studying of the ionospheric irregularities has been essentially increased. Small-scale irregularities produce the amplitude and phase scintillation which can degrade the transionospheric signals and can influence on the performance of different space communication radio systems (Forte B,2004). Large scale ionospheric irregularities produce phase fluctuations of radio wave propagation through the ionosphere.The presented GPS and radar observations were carried during a main phase of geogeomagnetic storm with index Kp= 8 for 9 - 10 November 2004 events.The incoherent scatter radar located near Kharkiv, Ukraine (geographic coordinates: 49.6°N, 36.3°E, geomagneticcoordinates: 45.7°N, 117.8°E) was used to observe the processes in the ionosphere. At distances more than 1000 km the Doppler velocity reached 500 m/s. During 20 h 10 min-20 h 30 min in a distances interval of 650 - 850 km the velocity with opposite direction and maximum value 270 m/s was observed. At daytime anomalous received signal power amplification on slant ranges 350 - 1100 km was registered during ~ 20 min from 10 h 00 min to 11 h 20 min. The maximum magnitude at 11 h 10 min of UT in a range slant distances 400 - 450 and 650-730 km (fig. 10) was observed. It is interesting fact, that on altitude-frequency characteristics that obtained by ionosonde in same point of observation, at 11:15 UT on November 10, 2004, during observation of signals coherent backscatters, diffuse reflections, that more typifying for high-latitude ionosphere (fig. 11) were registered. The signal diffusion a could be stipulated by scattering of radiowaves on intense small-scale irregularities, oriented along a geomagnetic fields. Fig. 1. Zenith Cassegrain 100 m parabolic antenna The radar (Fig.1-2) is operated with 100-m zenith parabolic antenna at 158 MHz with peak transmitted power of ~2.0 MW. The doublefrequency measuring channel mode with compound sounding signal was employed. That provided ~ 20-km resolution in range ~100–400 km and ~ 100-km in range ~200–1100 km. The signal integration over 1.5–15-min intervals when the input signal-noise ratios are of 10–0.2 permits the ionosphere parameters to be determined with accuracy of about 3–10%. Fig. 10. Distribution of a signal power, obtained during geomagnetic storm November 9, 2004. Fig. 11. Ionogramm These irregularities are generated near to the southern boundary aurora of the ovals during strong geomagnetic storm and have large space scale (from hundred to thousand of kilometres). It is important, that these day time events (coherent backscatters and diffuse trace on ionogramm) is occurred at minimum value Dst = -289 nTl. Temporary variations of Dst index, obtained from World Data Centre (fig. 12, 13) and electron density in maximum F2 layer, measured on Kharkiv incoherent scatter radar are presented on fig 14, 15. It is seen, that the coherent backscatter was observed during a sharp decreasing of Dst index from approximately -40 up to -130 nTl for May 2003 and from approximately -120 up to 240 nTl for 9 November and from -160 up to -290 nTl 10 November 2004. During both event electron density in maximum F2 is inc The signal/noise ratio, that was registered at distances 1100 km and further on the degree more, than for usual IS signal. Fig. 2. Elements of Kharkiv IS radar systems Fig. 3. Ionosonde In first time the phenomenon - high-power backscatter signal “coherent backscatter ” was observed during geogeomagnetic storm 29-30 may 2003. A usually observable spectrum of a dispersing medium (see fig. 3) has two identical on magnitude of a symmetrical extremum appropriate iono-acoustic waves. Since 23h. 22 min. UT on distances 900 – 1300 km, where before the signal/noise ratio did not exceed 0.03-0.05, has appeared a more high-power, unstable signal with a narrow-band spectrum (fig. 4). Fig. 12 Dst index 29-31 May 2003 Fig. 13 Dst index 8-10 November 2004 Fig. 3 Typical incoherent signal spectrum. Fig. 4. Incoherent signal with coherent backscatter spectrums. From 23h 35 min to 0h 05 a min. stable quasi-coherent a signal was observed. This signal on the correlation, spectral and temporary characteristics are different both from incoherent scatter signal, and from signals reflected from space vehicles. At that the maximum value of an imaginary component correlation function of a signal was increased at 5-10 and more time. That indicated to a large phase velocity of process. On fig 5. the estimations of thermal fluctuations electronic densities spectrum obtained during strong geomagnetic storm May 30, 2003 are presented. The maximum intensity the signal had in a range of distances 990 - 1150 km. In an interval 23:52 min - 23:54 min the signal strength has dropped on 8 - 10 db (Fig. 6). The data's, are adduced on fig. 6, correspond to integration time 2 min. They were obtained by summation of the by 1 min duration measured sessions. From the analysis of spectra (fig. 2, 3, 5a) it is visible, that further 800 km the signal consists of two component - incoherent and quasi-coherent. The quasi-coherent component is frequency shifted. The Doppler velocity, is calculated by a correlation method equal to 250 -500 m/s, depend from distance. On night time was observed increasing of electronic temperature up to 2500 К. Usually at this time temperature of ions is equal to temperature of electrons. During strong geomagnetic storm on November 8-12, 2004 in night time 9.11.2004 and day time 10.11.2004 anomal signals - coherent backscatter were observed. In night time this signal from 19 h 52 min to 20 h 00 min, from 20 hours 18 min for 20 hours 26 min, from 22 hours 25 min for 22 hours 50 min UT in an interval of distances 1000 - 1190 km (Fig. 8, 9) was registered. At this distances before incoherent scatter signal was not fixed because of the signal/noise ratio less than 0.5%. The appeared well differentiable quasicoherent signal with narrow-band spectrum shifted in positive frequencies area. The estimations of thermal fluctuations electronic densities spectrum obtained on this period are presented on fig. 7. Fig. 14 Electron density on F2 max 29-31 May 2003 Fig. 15 Electron density on F2 max 8-10 November 2004 Under such space weather the displacement to equator of a main ionospheric trough is possible, the southern boundary auroral oval can extend up to geogeomagnetic latitude 40 - 50. The expanding of high latitude ionosphere structures to geographical mid latitudes is confirmed by satelites observations (Fig. 16 ) and TEC maps (Fig. 17 ). Fig. 14 Auroral oval position 09.11.2004, 21:35UT Fig. 15 TEC map 09.11.2004 TEC maps was constructed on data from ftp://cddisa.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/gps/products/ ionex/. Results of satelites observations - from http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/pmap/ progect site. During storm the horizontal gradients were essentially increased in TEC distribution. Strong disturbance leads to the change of sign of TEC gradients against to regularly gradients which observed in quiet ionospheric conditions. Maximal latitudinal gradients took place near equator and polar walls of main ionospheric trough. The effect is caused by dynamics of the auroral oval and midlatitudinal ionospheric trough. Dramatic modification of the ionosphere during geomagnetic storm was observed in location of the ionospheric trough which in quite condition was detected at middle latitudes near of 55° N. Analysis of occurrence of TEC fluctuations on GNSS network stations shows that auroral oval is lowered to 50°N (Fig. 16). The series of large scale fluctuations as enhancement of TEC are clearly shown on temporal patterns (Fig. 17) Fig. 5. The altitude structure of a signal/noise ratio, of electronic density thermal fluctuations spectra, drift velocity, were measured 30 May 2003. Fig. 6. Distribution of a signal power of return scattering, was registered during geomagnetic storm 30 May 2003 Fig. 16. location of the ionospheric trough by GPS TEC measuriments during stormtime (red line) and quite condition (blue) Fig. 17. The spatial and temporal distribution of the enhancement of TEC during storm 09 November 2004 Fig. 7 Spectrum signal altitude dependences The TEC fluctuations are caused by the presence of medium and small-scale irregularities in the ionosphere. To estimate the phase fluctuations the dual-frequency phase measurements with 30 sec interval have usually been used. TEC data at a rate of change of 1 min (ROT) were used to estimate phase fluctuations. As well as auroral oval the spatial and temporal occurrence of the irregularities can be visually presented in coordinates: Geomagnetic local time and Corrected geomagnetic latitude. On Fig. 18 are shown the pictures of location of TEC fluctuations derived from GPS measurements for Poltava station (49.3N, 34.3E) of permanent GHSS network during disturbed (November 9-10, 2004) days for considered events. The intensity of fluctuations is indicated with different symbols. Between these intervals the same signal with a level on 10 - 15 db less was observed. About from 20 h 25 min for 20 h 50 min the signal strength varied on 15 - 20 db. During same period the signal on lower distances was observed also overall (superposition of an incoherent and coherent component) the signal above than 500 km with a maximum approximately on 700 - 800 km. Variations of the ionosphere spatial configuration during magnetic storm was observed by different radiophysical facilities There was observed a increasing of the total electron content at times close to the time of registration of the backscatter signal by ISR. During storms the intensity of irregularities essentially increases and the auroral oval expands to the equator. The maximal activity of TEC fluctuations took place when observed during a sharp decreasing of Dst index from approximately -140 up to -250 nTl. The analysis of TEC fluctuations derived using GPS shown that this technique can permanently provide effective information on the oval irregularities of the storm-time ionosphere. These all ionospheric effects can lead to degradation during storms in the GNSS performance and its accuracy and reliability. Fig. 8. The altitude structure of a signal/noise ratio,electronic density thermal fluctuations spectra, drift velocity were measured November 9, 2004. Fig. 9. Distribution of a signal power of return scattering, was registered during geomagnetic storm November 9, 2004. Fig.18. The variations of TEC, ROT derived from GPS measurements on Poltava station