Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC HARDWARE COMMISSIONING REVIEW May 2005 CRYOGENIC VACUUM SYSTEM Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC.
Advertisements

LTC Extended days, 03 March’08 J.M. Jimenez, AT Vacuum Group LHC Vacuum commissioning J.M. Jimenez On behalf of AT-VAC.
LHC HARDWARE COMMISSIONING SAFETY TRAINING DAY S. Claudet (AT-ACR-OP) With great help from G. Lindell (Safety commission) CRYOGENICS.
LHC Machine Status Report Roberto Saban LHCC June 4 th 2014.
IEFC Workshop 2011 David Mcfarlane Superintendent for SPS EN/MEF/ABA 1.
The cryogenic systems of the ATLAS and CMS detectors Johan Bremer on behalf of TE/CRG 06/06/2013AFF.
Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel to define length of restricted working areas  Actual situation  Evolution  How to continue  Set-up of the spilling.
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
A. Siemko and N. Catalan Lasheras Insulation vacuum and beam vacuum overpressure release – V. Parma Bus bar joints stability and protection – A. Verweij.
Thomas Otto (TE DSO), Safety Officer in Charge of LS1. 37th LSC, Thomas Otto, Safety Officer in charge of LS11.
LHC 8:30 meetingEBH 1  Cryogenics recovery in point 8  Meanwhile a couple of accesses:  MKI investigation on noise in IP2  Insulation Vacuum.
RSSO refresher meeting J. Pedersen M. Tavlet, T. Otto.
Thomas Otto, Safety Officer, TE Dept. Evacuation at Point 5 Summary of Facts 11th LSC, Thomas Otto, TE Safety Officer3 13:26One ODH alarm.
7/23/ J.Coupard. 1) Cryogenic risks 2) Cryogenic phases from RT/floating to nominal and additional safety rules A. Sectors warmed-up to RT or considered.
For more info:
LS2 Safety Thomas Otto, LS2 Safety Coordinator.
Hardware Commissioning  Preparation Documentation MTF Programme  Status The Review The commissioning activity in Resources  Outlook The new.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
19/11/2015 PSB and PS&TT2 Facilities YETS L. Kobzeva.
Last but not least : LS2 General Safety 1 Thomas Otto, LS2 Safety Coordinator for LHC Ana-Paula Bernardes, LS2 Safety Coordinator for Injectors.
Quality assurance - documentation and diagnostics during interventions Corrective maintenance seen from the Technical Infrastructure operation Peter Sollander,
Safety in LS1 Thomas Otto, TE DSO.
LHC progress Tuesday 28 th April 2015 Coordination: Mike Lamont, Wolfgang Hofle.
Safety of premises P. K. Frandsen SM 18 LHC Magnet test review 21 JUN 2005.
TE-CRG Activities D. Delikaris, TE-CRG.
5-year operation experience with the 1.8 K refrigeration units of the LHC cryogenic system G. Ferlin, CERN Technology department Presented at CEC 2015.
Safety - Lessons learnt from the design, commissioning and operation of the HIE-ISOLDE cryomodules Safety overview ESS 8 June 2016 AP.Bernardes/EN on behalf.
Logo area MQXF Review: Safety Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer With contributions by -Paolo Ferrcin and Ezio Todesco, TE-MSC -Francesca Viggiano,
Workshop on cryogenic & vacuum sectorisation of the SPL Vacuum Sectorisation Paul Cruikshank, CERN Technology Department (TE) Vacuum Surfaces & Coatings.
1 How Many Protons can we afford to loose in the PS ? Thomas Otto SC-RP.
NIKHEF Annual Meeting, December 18, The LHC Project Status report to the NIKHEF annual meeting Jos Engelen Based on last week’s reports to CERN.
Electrial Safety LS2 days November 2016 AP
LS2 Safety Preparation Thomas Otto, LS2 Safety Support Officer for LHC
Cryogenic safety organisation at CERN
LHC intervention scheduling with the Work Acceptance Tool
ALICE 5 o’clock meeting Wk 51.
Safety in the Neutrino Platform Hall
TS2 preparatory meeting
SPS Crab Cavity Test Stand: Safety review summary
HL-LHC IT STRING and Series test of SC link
PSB Lock Out Test, Follow-Up AP. Bernardes-/EN-STI, K
FCC Safety Strategy for the Conceptual Design Report
Installation of an Instrument on a CERN machine
Safety considerations for SM-18 control room
EYETS LHC 2016/2017 Works EN/EL/CF
Safety in Construction and Upgrade Phases
HEL – Safety aspects Christelle Gaignant
SHORT LHC-TS Coordination meeting #1
Safety for the FCC Conceptual Design Report
Helium spill in LHC tunnel
The LHC - Status Is COLD Is almost fully commissioned
M. Alcaide Leon, Paolo Fessia
LHC-TS3 Coordination meeting #3
Consequences of warming-up a sector above 80 K
Safety rules for works supervisors
Keeping LHC cold during LS periods Preliminary proposal
Consolidation and Upgrade of the LHC Experimental Vacuum Systems
Renovation of the 45-year old PS magnets
HL Consolidation Day Analysis of needs from BE-ICS
EP Experiments safety validation process Safety Permits
Thomas Otto, TE Department, CERN
HL-LHC Safety Assessment Process
K. Foraz on behalf of OSS members
Monday 11/07: Recovery Plenty of accesses.
The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory is a U. S
Power cut 18kV cable for EMD404/E9 is heating
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
MERIT Review Meeting Cryogenics BNL, NY Dec. 12, 2005 Friedrich Haug
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
J. Fleiter, S. C. Hopkins, A. Ballarino
Presentation transcript:

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC Thomas Otto, Departmental Safety Officer, Technology Department, CERN Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Helium spill risk in LHC Pressure Tests not performed Temperature between 300 K and 80 K Spill rate 1 kg s-1 Powering Phase 2 (full magnetic field) Powering Phase 1 (standby, hardware tests) Spill rate 320 g s-1 Residual risk during Technical Stops and Shut-Downs A spill of 100 g s-1 may occur, if sensitive cryogenic equipment is damaged Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Helium Spill WG Recommendation Once T < 80 K, access to LHC tunnel only at stable temperature and with zero current in the main magnets Remaining risk of He spill is human error on sensitive instrumentation and DFBs Helium pressure gauge Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Memo of the Complex Manager Since Autumn 2014: Activities in the vicinity of cryogenic equipment need to be authorised by the Complex Manager when T < 80 K For recurrent activities (piquet, “best effort”), Work Frame authorisations can be given Two “He-spill” Safety Officers are preparing the risk assessments DFBA Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC LHC Tunnel QRL Zone Transport Zone Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC Exempted Activities BE Dept. BE-BI BPM electronics Servicing front-end crates, electronics cards, fibres or cables of the LHC BPM system DGS Unit DGS-RP Survey Assessment of radiological risks at the worksite from the transport zone of the tunnel. DGS-SEE Inspections Safety inspections, tests of Level-3 alarms and accident analysis. EN Dept EN-HE Transport Transport of equipment and spares in the LHC tunnel and to the RRs and REs. Transport of the Tomograph. EN-MEF Geometry and Alignment Geometric measurements of the position of accelerator equipment, alignment of equipment in long straight sections. EN-MEF Small Works All interventions of the Small Works team in the SI section which have been screened by the Safety Coordinators and which are not in the vicinity of sensitive cryogenic instrumentation. GS Dept. GS-ASE Alarms Test and maintenance of Fire Detection and Evacuation Systems, Flammable Gas and ODH Detection Systems, Red Telephones, CERN Safety Alarm Monitoring (CSAM)) TE Dept. TE-ABT Injection Activities on Injection systems TE-ABT LBDS Activities on LHC Beam Dump System in P6 TE-ABT MKQ Activities on MKQ magnets in P4 TE-EPC Piquet Interventions on the 60 A supplies, placed under the magnets and accessible from the transport zone and on equipment in the RRs Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Sensitive Locations for He-spill Direct Current Feedbox (DFB) He pressure gauge Vac instrumentation ports Multivalve port Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC Methods of Control 1 Definition of Go / No-Go areas D2Q4R5, (entre R57 et UJ57) DCUM 13501 Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC Methods of Control 2 Detailed access instructions, avoiding sensitive equipment Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC Methods of Control 3 Information of personnel Helium Spill hazards are identified during the risk assessment with the works supervisors Works supervisor informs and instructs in turn personnel under his responsibility Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC Methods of Control 4 Emptying sensitive equipment from lHe Direct Current Feedboxes RF cavities … Inner Triplet Magnets (see later) Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC Identify activities in LHC tunnel Activities in transport zone alone are exempted Activities around DFBs and on QRL-side of cryostat / beam line require authorisation Risk Analysis by HE-spill SO and requestor, based on documented procedures RA checked by Hierarchy RA submitted to Complex Manager Approval by electronic signature Procedure Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Work Frame Authorisations Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC Inner Triplet Area only one direction of escape Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC Inner Triplet Area Result of the Helium-spill WG : Access to the triplet areas at a temperature T < 80 K is forbidden In well-justified cases, exceptions from the rule can be granted by the Complex Manager, with compensatory measures Under which conditions are exceptions possible ? Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

“Well justified cases” Activities to take place in the cold IT areas must be related to, in order of importance Personal Safety (e.g. the BE-OP patrol) Equipment Safety (e.g. BLMs monitoring the triplet quadrupoles) By default, interventions should be scheduled for the next TS, where the triplets can be emptied Accelerator availability Attaining nominal performance Performance enhancement Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Inner Triplet Area Access Types Short access The duration of the access is short (t < 10 min) AND the workers remain in the transport zone AND no work close to the cryostats (“Hands in pocket”) No compensatory measures, authorisation by CM Long access The access takes longer than 10 min OR the activity involves manipulations other than in the transport zone (remote possibility to damage the cryostats / instrumentation) Compensatory measures and authorisation by CM Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Compensatory measures For a long access to the IT Areas, the insulation vacuum of the triplets can be monitored with a pressure gauge attached to a visual/audible alarm. This is limited to max. ½ day interventions and subject to VSC manpower availability Another compensatory measure is to empty the triplet from liquid Helium (takes 2 times 7 hours). Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC Summary 1 Helium Spill WG identified human error as largest risk factor for He spill once the LHC cryostats are cold and at stable T < 80 K Activities in sensitive areas are restricted (Work Frame) Authorisations are given by the Complex Manager after Risk Analysis of work procedures Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC Summary 2 Access to IT areas remains forbidden. Well-justified exceptions in the interest of Safety and safe operation are possible Authorisation involves Risk assessment Compensatory measures, where required The consent of the hierarchy The signature of the Complex Manager This procedure guaranties Safety and maintains operational flexibility. Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC

Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC Thomas Otto, TE DSO Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC