HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1167r2 Sept 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) TGax Functional Requirement Discussion Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Advertisements

Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Doc.: IEEE /0107 Jan 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) HEW Evaluation Metrics Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0026r1 January 2014 Yong Liu, et al.Slide 1 Thoughts on HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
September 2013 doc.: IEEE 11-13/1105r0 Submission Meng Yang (CATR) Discussion on Access Mechanism for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1054 Sept 2013 SubmissionYonggang Fang, ZTETX HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Dense apartment building use case for HEW
Month Year doc: IEEE /xxxxr0
March 2017 doc.: IEEE /0410r0 March 2017
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
Energy Efficiency in HEW
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Considerations on HEW Evaluation Methodology
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2017
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Requirements Discussion
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Considerations on AP Coordination
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
Considerations on AP Coordination
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
Simulation Analysis of ED Threshold Levels
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
HEW Study Group Documentation
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Synchronization Requirements
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Dense apartment building use case for HEW
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Efficient Frequency Spectrum Utilization
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD
UL MU Random Access Analysis
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
Reducing Channel Access Delay
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Discussion on IMT-2020 mMTC and URLLC
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Current Status of submission about EUHT
HEW Beamforming Enhancements
March 2018 doc.: IEEE /1699r7 March 2018
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Reducing Channel Access Delay
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Multi-Link Architecture and Requirement Discussion
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
EHT Multi-AP Feature Discussion
Multi-Link Architecture and Requirement Discussion
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date: September, 2019
Presentation transcript:

HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions Month Year doc: IEEE 802.11-13/xxxxr0 HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions Date: 2013-9-16 Authors: Name Affiliation Address Email Yonggang Fang ZTETX San Diego, USA yfang@ztetx.com Bo Sun ZTE Xi An, China sun.bo1@zte.com.cn Zhendong Luo CATR Beijing, China luozhendong@ritt.cn Meng Yang yangmeng@ritt.cn Yonggang Fang, ZTETX

Introduction HEW SG IEEE 802 LMSC approved formation of 802.11 Study Group to investigate High-efficiency WLAN (HEW) in March meeting of 2013. The goal of HEW SG is to improve 802.11 PHY and MAC layers performance in frequency bands of 2.4 and 5 GHz with a focus on: spectrum efficiency and area throughput improvement real world performance improvement in indoor and outdoor deployments in the presence of interfering sources, dense heterogeneous networks in moderate to heavy user loaded APs

Introduction HEW SG (continued) In previous meetings, presentations submitted to HEW for considerations include Use cases and traffic models Efficiency issues in the existing WLAN Channel models and evaluation methodology Suggested improvements This contribution suggests evaluation metrics to formalize a way to measure the performance of existing WLAN and future HEW. Slide 3

HEW Evaluation Targets HEW needs to consider measurements and improvements on efficiency of isolated BSS, which is more focusing on evaluation of technology in the ideal scenario. efficiency on overlapping BSS, which is used to evaluate the system level performance in the real world, including overloaded scenario . user experience, which is to evaluate user acceptance level of communication network. Current 11 HEW CDF Tput Slide 4

HEW Evaluation Scenarios HEW evaluation could be performed in following scenarios Outdoor deployment scenario It is OBSS in medium or high density such as in Train/Metro stations Measurements should consider the area throughput with stations in low mobility. Indoor/Outdoor deployments scenario It is OBSS in the dense urban apartments, stadiums, airports and enterprise environments Measurements should consider the area throughput with stations in nomadic It should consider: planned deployment, and unplanned deployment. Aspects Considerations Outdoor high density (both AP and STA) Outdoor model, OBSS interference, low mobility, Indoor high density (both AP and STA) Indoor model, OBSS interference, nomadic, Slide 5

HEW Evaluation Methodology System Configurations For multi-layer network configuration Frequency reuse factor = 1 and = 3 at 5 GHz Band. Antenna configuration Baseline: 2 antenna at AP, 1 antenna at STA; (0 – 6dBi). Advanced: 4 antenna at AP; 2 at STA; (0 – 6dBi). SU and MU configurations Evaluate the point to point situation. Slide 6

HEW Evaluation Methodology Traffic Models Full buffer models (for simplicity) Non-full buffer models (for real world) – TR36.814 IP based traffic Half-duplex transmission: different split of uplink and downlink traffic loads Full-duplex transmission: simultaneous uplink and downlink transmission Mixed traffic model Comprise a large packets (web, video, etc) and small packets (ACKs) Maximum number of served stations Light load: traffic should be finite buffer (burst) and a single connection is not overloading the system. Heavy load: Overloaded: Slide 7

HEW Evaluation Metrics – Link Level Receiver Performance Measurements RF Receiver Sensitivity and Dynamic Range Minimum received power measured at the station antenna connector at which the frame error rate (FER) does not exceed a specified value (dBm / BW) The receiver dynamic range is the input power range at the station antenna connector over which the FER does not exceed a specific value (dB) Adjacent Channel Selectivity A measurement of the ability to receive a signal on the assigned frequency channel in the presence of another signal that is offset from the center frequency of the assigned channel. Self-Interference Suppression A measurement of the ability to receive a signal on the assigned frequency channel in presence of signal that is transmitted from its transmitter on the same frequency channel (full-duplexer) Slide 8

HEW Evaluation Metrics – Link Level Transmitter Performance Measurements Frequency Accuracy Link Adaption Select proper MCS based on RF condition including evaluating condition of low SNR and congestion. Radiated Spurious Emissions Measure spurious emissions generated or amplified in a receiver and radiated by the antenna, housing and all power, control, and audio leads connected to the receiver. Slide 9

HEW Evaluation Metrics – Link Level MAC Efficiency Measurements PHY Throughput : payload transmitted at PHY layer / the time to transmit the payload MAC Throughput : payload transmitted at MAC layer / the time to transmit the payload MAC Efficiency = MAC throughput / PHY throughput MAC efficiency should be measured with bi-direction in full-buffer and different loading in Point to point, Point to multi-points Note: the idle time is not included. Slide 10

HEW Evaluation Metrics – System Level Spectrum Efficiency Measurements Spectrum efficiency is measured in bps/Hz. Medium Utilization It is to measure utilization (occupancy ratio) of the medium. Transmission time / (transmission + idle time) The spectrum efficiency should also consider to maximize the utilization of all available spectrum, including balancing loads among different frequency channels. Freq. Time 802.11a 802.11n 40 MHz 802.11ac 80 MHz HEW Capable STA or, 160 MHz Ch.1 Ch.2 Ch.3 Ch.4 Ch.5 Ch.6 Ch.7 Ch.8 Slide 11

HEW Evaluation Metrics – System Level Throughput Measurements Single user throughput It needs to measure 5 percentile and 95 percentile user throughput in the center of cell and at the edge of cell. Network Capacity This measurement is to evaluate the system level capacity measured with 95 percentile together with 5 percentile for robustness in the network. BW (Hz) x BSS Spectrum Efficiency (bps/Hz/BSS) x # of BSS Slide 12

HEW Evaluation Metrics – System Level Robustness Measurements The robustness of connection is to evaluate the wireless connection reliability and strategy in different scenario. Strategy for association could be always connected or connected with minimum rate, or blocked when the admitted data rate is not met. Maximum supported active transmission stations (at minimum data rate or average data rate according to different profiles) Successful transmission ratio (or re-trial rate) for different access category and profiles Slide 13

HEW Evaluation Metrics – System Level Availability (or Outage) This measurement is more focusing on the system level communication performance in OBSS. Even the radio link signal is good, the communication link may not be available due to high congestion, overloading or interference from neighbor BSS. Percentage of the transmit packet without response in total transmissions. Slide 14

HEW Evaluation Metrics – System Level User Experience Measurements Network selection and association latency (ms) Measure the delay of initial network acquisition and association Association Successful Ratio Data transmission latency (ms) MAC latency STA initiated transmission AP imitated polling transmission Network latency (ms) QoS latency (ms) Voice and video streaming latency BE latency Slide 15

HEW Evaluation Metrics – System Level Network Performance Measurements Handoff latency (ms) This measurement is to measure the user performance of service interrupt during the handoff when re-association from one AP to another (re-selecting network) Active handoff from one AP to another (seamless handoff) Handoff to other frequency channel in re-association or active handoff Handoff Successful Ratio Service continuity with minimum QoS guarantee or Without service continuity Slide 16

References 11-13-0657-06-0hew-hew-sg-usage-models-and-requirements-liaison-with-wfa 11-13-0722-01-0hew-hew-evaluation-methodology 11-13-0764-01-0hew-full-duplex-technology-for-hew 11-13-0765-02-0hew-co-time-co-frequency-full-duplex-for-802-11-wlan 11-13-0804-00-0hew-impact-of-network-configuration-on-quality-of-experience-in-wlan-networks 11-13-0805-02-0hew-on-definition-of-dense-networks-and-performance-metric 11-13-0847-01-0hew-evaluation-criteria-and-simulation-scenarios 11-13-0854-01-0hew-consideration-on-efficiency-enhancement 11-13-0869-00-0hew-simulation-scenarios-and-metrics-for-hew Slide 17