London Funders: Theory of change

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
28 th November 2005 JISC VRE Consultation Workshop What is happening, what are the likely outcomes, what is the likely impact, what does it all mean? John.
Advertisements

The success of the community is at least as important as the success of the projects. The evaluators are there to help us understand what we are doing.
MADELEINE GABRIEL & JULIE DAS 9 FEBRUARY PURPOSE OF THIS SESSION Introductions Purpose of our input today Our role – we are evaluating the programme,
Supported self-evaluation in assessing the impact of HE Libraries Sharon Markless, King’s College London and David Streatfield, Information Management.
Evaluation of Wellbeing 2 Quick update for grant holders Nicki Smith / Sarah Jenkins Ecorys UK #wellbeing.
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
BALANCING EFFICIENCY AND EQUITY A NEW INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMME ADDRESSING THE ROLE OF VALUES IN HEALTH CARE Department of Primary Care and Public.
Transformation and research trends: dictated by preference Prof Ina Fourie Department of Information Science, University of Pretoria.
Evaluating Learning Using Vignettes Gillian MacIntyre Pam Green Lister Glasgow School of Social Work.
More than Knowing At Mercy College Karin Gilbert & Michelle Cotter.
3ie Grantees Communication for Policy Influence Clinic Negombo 16 th – 18 th July 2012.
Brendan Halloran Transparency and Accountability Initiative Beyond Theories of Change: Working Politically for Transparency.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Supporting voluntary and community action supporting voluntary and community action Measuring Outcomes How do we understand the changes we are making …
Introduction to Evaluation. Objectives Introduce the five categories of evaluation that can be used to plan and assess ACSM activities. Demonstrate how.
Strengthening NGO Effectiveness Presenting the BOND Effectiveness Programme London, 16 July 2009.
Alliance 4 Useful Evidence Webinar, 1 September 2015.
Introducing Pegasus: An ethnographic study of the ‘use’ of Grid technologies by the UK particle physics community Will Venters Department of Information.
M&E of policy influence some guidance thoughts…. Elements of a monitoring frame.. Policy objective and theory of change Indicators Data collection tools.
Delivering growth, improvement, & influence for our members EMITA going forward Donald van der Merwe Intevexis Sunday, 15 November 2015.
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
Dr Alison Carter – global leader in coaching programme evaluation Dr Penny Tamkin – experienced in organisation based research providing insight into whole.
HNC/D Administration and IT Integration of Units/Topics Dawn Hayes.
Shared measurement and the Inspiring Impact programme London Funders Research and Evaluation Project Group September 2012 Eibhlín Ní Ógáin, Analyst, NPC.
R Keys to Collective Impact. Isolated Impact  Most funders are faced with the task of choosing a few grantees  Which organizations make the greatest.
EPSO Building and Developing a Community of Practice Build Knowledge Develop Expertise Solve Problems Dr David Stewart 24 May 2011.
Jane Holdsworth 20 January The terminology of outcomes and impact How to evidence outcomes and impact Methods for collecting evidence Sources of.
Being The Best We Can A self-evaluation & improvement process for libraries Key results for Victoria’s public library services.
Understanding methods in a ‘system of usability practice’ Dominic Furniss PhD Supervisors: Ann Blandford & Paul Curzon.
Transforming Practice Program Project Report. UWS Academic Careers & Development The Context: The UWS Academic Career project takes a holistic approach.
STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS— : Focusing on Growth & Impact 2016 NNCG Annual Meeting Washington DC.
Building Capacity and Culture within a Research & Evaluation Team anzea July 2007 Research & Evaluation Team Research Division.
Conditions for learning Aiming for excellence in self-evaluation.
WP6 – Monitoring and Evaluation 17th November 2014 Rome.
Governance effectiveness... A model for development Les Walton Northern Education Trust.
A Framework for Understanding Civic Tech and Data Ecosystems Katya Abazajian NNIP Cleveland September 14, 2016.
Horses for courses – are researchers just not that enterprising Presented by Eunice Lawton, Researcher Development Manager Anita J Kenny, Quality and Operations.
Improving patient experience across London Cancer
Title of presentation Copyright IDS and MeTA 2010
Knowledge Transfer Partnership Project Nottingham Trent University and Nottinghamshire County Council Dr Adam Barnard Rachel Clark Catherine Goodall 19/4/16.
Signs Of Safety Building a Multi Agency Network
Being a small charity trustee
Who’s here? Why are we here? What will happen?
Poster 1. Leadership Development Programme : Leading Cultures of Research and Innovation in Clinical Teams Background The NHS Constitution is explicit.
LEARNING REPORT 2016 Disasters and Emergencies Preparedness Programme
Scaling your Organisation through Partnerships
Assessing the Impact of Governors
Lines of Inquiry in our PPA
Developing & Refining a Theory of Action
Statistical Capacity development 4.0
Collective impact Emma Cooper, M&E Unit
Collecting High-Quality Data
Lac la croix first nation
Learning partnerships
Development of a Stoke-on-Trent & Staffordshire Industrial Strategy (SSIS) Executive Board
Family and Community Services
Reframing Equalities to respond to Health Inequalities in GM
Results of the previous workshop 2016 and outlook on the workshop 2018
Using Wikis to Facilitate Teaching & Learning
Regulated Health Professions Network Evaluation Framework
Learning that deepens knowledge and understanding
Community Charters and Cultural Heritage
Community engagement and co-design
Leadership of and for learning
Who Are Champions, What Are Their Impacts and How Do We Know
«Վերջնարդյունքների վրա հիմնված դասընթացի մշակում և կառավարում»
Kath Bridger 4 June 2014 BSV Associates Ltd
lessons from npc’s homelessness research
Seminar on the Evaluation of AUT STEM Programme
Wednesday 13 September UKCF Conference Cardiff
Presentation transcript:

London Funders: Theory of change David Warner & Katie Boswell – Presentation to Research & Evaluation Network (January 2017)

Agenda for today Introduction The journey so far Background Creating the Theory of Change Key lessons What next? Sharing and using the ToC How would you like to use the ToC? Wrap-up and next steps

The journey so far

Background London Funders wanted to improve its understanding of how its work contributes to its goal: ‘the needs of Londoners are met’ London Funders’ unique contribution to that goal focuses on creating ‘an effective ecosystem for funders working in London’ Assumes that if funders operate within an effective ecosystem, then a positive social impact on Londoners will follow London Funders approached NPC to help develop a theory of change for its work Based on a shared understanding of what an effective ecosystem for funders looks like Refined and tested over time—intended to be a live document

Creating the theory of change Sept ‘15 Oct ‘15 Nov ‘15 Dec ‘15 Define an effective ecosystem Develop a theory of change Design a measurement framework Desk research Interviews Brainstorm with London Funders Workshop with Board members Draft theory of change Prioritise outcomes and indicators Levels of evidence Tools and sources

Key lessons Ecosystem approach emphasises the importance of nurturing relationships and spaces for change We should switch from being architects and engineers to being ‘ecosystem gardeners’ (Duncan Green, How change happens) Culture and values matter Need to understand points of leverage in the system and how to influence change This is an ongoing task as the ecosystem and needs of Londoners are constantly evolving No funder is an island LF members are embedded in the wider funder ecosystem Impact cannot be understood in isolation Collective responsibility to own and shape the ecosystem

What next?

Sharing & using the theory of change

Discussion How should London Funders develop the Theory of Change? More interactive? More real-time information? More case studies? How would you like to use the London Funders Theory of Change? Does it resonate with your organisation’s Theory of Change? Is it a useful tool for discussions with your colleagues / Board? Where would you place your organisation in terms of: Knowledge? Collaboration? Voice?

Wrap-up and next steps