Performance management and engagement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CREATING A CULTURE THAT ENGAGES AND RETAINS MILLENNIALS Like us and check in on facebook at DaleCarnegieNY Tweet during the workshop at #DaleCarnegie.
Advertisements

Hackman & Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model Core DimensionsPsychological StatesOutcomes Skill Variety Task Identity Task Signif. Autonomy Feedback Meaningfulness.
MOTIVATION. A Talk With The Director of A Research Institute What has been the hardest job for you as a director? How to convince people that by cooperating.
PM 4035 The Psychology of Work Lecture 3 Week 3 Studying Individuals at work Motivation.
HRM 601 Organizational Behavior Session 6 Motivational Applications.
Knowledge Objectives Identify need-based theories and explain their practical management applications. Describe expectancy theory and management implications.
‘Encouraging the Heart’. A key role of leadership is energizing employees and keeping them engaged Leaders accomplish this by being credible, fostering.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
DEFINITIONS OF MOTIVATION:
Chapter 16 Motivating Employees.
Organizational culture and Knowledge management B.V.L.Narayana Sr Professor (T M ) RSC/BRC.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 6-1 Chapter Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Imran Ghaznavi Course Code: MGT557 COMSATS Strategic Human Resource Management.
Job design & job satisfaction
Chapter 16 Motivating Employees.
Assessment GroupDepth of analysis and clarity of issues (4) Contextuality Practicability, Novelty of recommendtns (4) Quality of Presentation (Consistancy.
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Unit 3: Management Challenges
Path-Goal Theory Chapter 7.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology Organizational Development and Theory Copyright Paul E. Spector, All rights reserved, March 15, 2005.
Prepared by Cheryl Dowell, Algonquin College, and Greg Cole, Saint Mary’s University.
Motivation. Sources Learning unit 2 in handbooks Pages 335 ~347 in Textbook My notes & our wiki.
Leadership Chapter 7 – Path-Goal Theory.  Path-Goal Theory Perspective  Conditions of Leadership Motivation  Leader Behaviors & Subordinate Characteristics.
EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION MGMT 371: CHAPTER 6. EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION  Job Performance Model  Need Theories  Motivational Job Design  Intrinsic Motivation.
Motivation is made up of internal and external factors that stimulate desire and energy in people to be continually interested in and committed to a job,
1. Development Planning and Administration MPA – 403 Lecture 15 FACILITATOR Prof. Dr. Mohammad Majid Mahmood Bagram.
The Engagement Factor Part II: Engagement in Independent Agencies J. LEE WHITTINGTON, PhD University of Dallas; Satish & Yasmin Gupta College of Business.
iPPQ Team Report for Practitioners
Learning Objectives:  Define Motivation and explain features of motivated behaviour  Understand significance of Motivation at work  Appreciate major.
Healthcare Organization Employee Experience Michael Mabanglo, PhD, LCSW February 16, 2016.
LECTURE 4 WORKING WITH OTHERS. Definition Working with others : is the ability to effectively interact, cooperate, collaborate and manage conflicts with.
LEADERSHIP AND RE- ENGAGEMENT Professor Patrick Flood ESRC Seminar, Lancaster University.
Motivation A key to company success. Two cases what would you do (in teams) Case 1: Bread factory. Physical labor. Hot. Paying employees minimum wage.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
COMPENSATION.
Chapter 6: Path-Goal Theory.  Path–Goal Theory Perspective  Conditions of Leadership Motivation  Leader Behaviors & Follower Characteristics  Task.
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Amity Business School Amity School of Business BBAGEN, SEMESTER II ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR (BBAHR-10201) MODULE 3 Ms. Kushi Sharma.
Values, Attitudes & Job Satisfaction
The High Cost of Low Morale
EMPLOYEE RETENTION, ENGAGEMENT, & CAREERS
Job design & job satisfaction
10 Managing Employee Retention, Engagement, and Careers
MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
ENGAGEMENT This resource is part of a range offered free to academics and/or students using Armstrong’s Essential Human Resource Management Practice as.
Performance management and talent management
Hackman & Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model
Pay for Performance: The Evidence
Using Survey Results to Assess Employee Engagement
Chapter 6: Path-Goal Theory
Leadership Advanced: Engaging others
CIPD Intermediate Certificate and Diploma in Human Resource Management
Path-Goal Theory Lecture 7 Md. Mahbubul Alam, PhD Associate Professor
CIPD Intermediate Certificate and Diploma in Human Resource Management
Front line Managers and HR
Motivation Chapter Four.
Hackman & Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model
PSYCHOLOGY (8th Edition, in Modules) David Myers
Understanding Your Personal Motivation for Physical Activity
CIPD Intermediate Certificate and Diploma in Human Resource Management
Leadership Chapter 7 – Path-Goal Theory Northouse, 4th edition.
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Job design & job satisfaction
Performance Management -Uttam Acharya
Building an Inclusive Work Environment MICHELE PALUDI, Ph. D
Presentation transcript:

Performance management and engagement It was suggested by Mone and London (2010) that: ‘Performance management, effectively applied, will help you to create and sustain high levels of engagement, which leads to higher levels of performance’. Gruman and Saks (2011) observed that: ‘Modern developments often make it difficult for supervisors to “manage” subordinates’ performance. In such an environment it may be more effective for supervisors to focus less on managing performance than on managing the context in which performance occurs, and on fostering the development of employee engagement as a driver of enhanced performance’. Risher (2012) referred to the solid evidence provided by the Gallup Organization’s research that ‘effective performance management contributes to higher levels of engagement – and better performance’. Gruman, J A and Saks, A M (2011) Performance management and employee engagement, Human Resource Management Review, 21 (2), pp 123–36 Mone, E M and London, M (2010) Employee Engagement Through Performance Management: A practical guide for managers, Routledge, New York Risher, H (2012) Employers need to focus on improving performance management, Compensation & Benefits Review, 44 (4), p 188–90

Engagement defined Engagement happens when people are committed to their work and the organization and are motivated to achieve high levels of performance. It has two interrelated aspects: job engagement which takes place when employees exercise discretionary effort because they find their jobs interesting, challenging and rewarding; organizational engagement when employees identify with the values and purpose of their organization and believe that it is a great place in which to work and to continue to work. Other definitions have been produced by: Kahn, 1990 who regarded it as a psychological state experienced by employees in relation to their work, together with associated behaviours. Maslach et al (2001) who referred to engagement as: ‘A positive, fulfilling, work-related state of mind that is characterized by vigour, dedication, and absorption.’ Macey et al (2009) who produced the following working definition: ‘Engagement is an individual’s purpose and focused energy, evident to others in the display of personal initiative, adaptability, effort and persistence directed towards organizational goals.’ Kahn, W A (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4), pp 692–724 Macey, W H and Schneider, B (2008) The meaning of employee engagement, Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, pp 3–30 Maslach, C, Schaufeli, W B and Leiter, M P (2001) Job Burnout, Annual Review of Psychology, 52, pp 397–422  

The IES model of engagement Commitment is the relative strength of the individual's identification with, and involvement in an organization. Organizational citizenship behaviour as defined by Organ (1988) is employee behaviour that goes above and beyond the call of duty, that is discretionary and not explicitly recognized by the employing organization’s formal reward system, and that contributes to organizational effectiveness. Motivation is the force that energizes, directs and sustains behaviour. It can be intrinsic, ie behaviour is affected by factors which may arise from the work itself and are self‑generated, or extrinsic which occurs when things are done to or for people to motivate them. The motivation element in engagement is intrinsic. As Macey et al (2009) observed: ‘When the work itself is meaningful it is also said to have intrinsic motivation. This means that it is not the pay or recognition that yields positive feelings of engagement but the work itself’. They also commented that engaged employees ‘feel that their jobs are an important part of what they are’. Source: Armstrong et al, 2010

Drivers of engagement job autonomy; support and coaching; feedback; opportunities to learn and develop; task variety; responsibility. It was stated by Macey et al (2009) that the most important enabler of engagement is the work environment and the jobs people do. They noted that: ‘Engagement requires a work environment that does not just demand more but promotes information sharing, provides learning opportunities and fosters a balance in people’s lives, thereby creating the bases for sustained energy and personal initiative.’ They also commented that ‘When people have the opportunity to do work in a way that: (a) effectively uses their skills; (b) fits their values and (c) provides them the freedom to exercise choice, they will be fully motivated to engage in their work. They observed that: ‘Engaged employees feel that their jobs are an important part of who they are’ and that ‘the feeling of engagement cannot occur without a specific purpose or objective’. Macey, W H, Schneider, B, Barbera, K M and Young, S A (2009) Employee Engagement, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden MA

How performance management enhances engagement Clarify organizational goals and values. Help to develop more rewarding roles. Encourage managers to focus on people. Enable people to have a clear sense of purpose. Convince people that they are doing well in a job worth doing. Provide employees with learning opportunities. Help to develop a positive psychological contract. Performance management helps to achieve the conditions for engagement specified by Macey et al (2009), namely that ‘Engaged employees feel that their jobs are an important part of who they are’ and that ‘the feeling of engagement cannot occur without a specific purpose or objective’. Mone and London (2010) commented that performance management enhances engagement by giving greater meaning to the work that employees do. They explained that engagement can be driven by setting performance goals and establishing development plans that support the career success of employees. Macey, W H, Schneider, B, Barbera, K M and Young, S A (2009) Employee Engagement, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden MA Mone, E M and London, M (2010) Employee Engagement Through Performance Management: A practical guide for managers, Routledge, New York