Progress with MUON reconstruction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALICE TOF FESTIVAL Offline tools and GRID scenario for the ALICE TOF detector A. De Caro (University of Salerno and INFN) CERN – Bdg.29, October 20 th.
Advertisements

5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
26 Jan, MEG Software Status Framework for MEG MC, Unification of LargePrototype/beam test, Schedule and DC reconstruction MEG Software Group.
ALICE Upgrade for Run3: Computing HL-LHC Trigger, Online and Offline Computing Working Group Topical Workshop Sep 5 th 2014.
David N. Brown Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Representing the BaBar Collaboration The BaBar Mini  BaBar  BaBar’s Data Formats  Design of the Mini 
Trigger Requirements first thoughts from Alessandro Di Mattia, Giovanni Siragusa, Sergio Grancagnolo, Andrea Ventura, Michela Biglietti, Diana Scannicchio.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
AMB HW LOW LEVEL SIMULATION VS HW OUTPUT G. Volpi, INFN Pisa.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
ALICE Offline Week, CERN, Andrea Dainese 1 Primary vertex with TPC-only tracks Andrea Dainese INFN Legnaro Motivation: TPC stand-alone analyses.
C. Oppedisano, 9 October 2007, ALICE Offline Week 1 RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM CALIBRATION OBJECT ESD STRUCTURE ONGOING TASKS.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
A. BHASIN ALICE offline Software Week 13th June 2002 Dimuon High Lelvel Trigger (DHLT) ● Goals ● FM Algorithm ● Proposal for a new Algorithm.
HLT/AliRoot integration C.Cheshkov, P.Hristov 2/06/2005 ALICE Offline Week.
Status of global tracking and plans for Run2 (for TPC related tasks see Marian’s presentation) 1 R.Shahoyan, 19/03/14.
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
ATLAS Trigger Development
HLT Kalman Filter Implementation of a Kalman Filter in the ALICE High Level Trigger. Thomas Vik, UiO.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
1 Offline Week, October 28 th 2009 PWG3-Muon: Analysis Status From ESD to AOD:  inclusion of MC branch in the AOD  standard AOD creation for PDC09 files.
Javier Castillo 1 Muon Embedding Status & Open Issues PWG3 - CERN - 15/02/2011.
Predrag Buncic CERN ALICE Status Report LHCC Referee Meeting 01/12/2015.
Notes in preparation by the Torino group Sara BolognesiDT Cosmic Meeting 01/11/2007  MTCC note:  calibration section  DQM section  Internal note about.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
CWG7 (reconstruction) R.Shahoyan, 12/06/ Case of single row Rolling Shutter  N rows of sensor read out sequentially, single row is read in time.
Tuning of trigger simulation parameters (Bossi, Moulson, Palutan, Sciascia) Calorimeter trigger thresholds calibration using prompt photons from K S 
Software Week - 8/12/98G. Poulard - CERN EP/ATC1 Status of Software for Physics TDR Atlas Software Week 8 December 1998 G. Poulard.
Muon Persistency Persistent Analysis Objects Muon Persistency Norbert Neumeister µ-PRS meeting February 10, 2004.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
1 Reconstruction tasks R.Shahoyan, 25/06/ Including TRD into track fit (JIRA PWGPP-1))  JIRA PWGPP-2: Code is in the release, need to switch setting.
Main parameters of Russian Tier2 for ATLAS (RuTier-2 model) Russia-CERN JWGC meeting A.Minaenko IHEP (Protvino)
Overview of EMU Software Rick Wilkinson. Slice Test DAQ We succeeded in using Slice Test DAQ code to take test beam data, combining chamber and trigger.
 offline code: changes/updates, open items, readiness  1 st data taking plans and readiness.
AliRoot survey: Reconstruction P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
GLAST LAT ProjectNovember 18, 2004 I&T Two Tower IRR 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Integration and Test Two Tower Integration Readiness Review SVAC Elliott.
CALIBRATION: PREPARATION FOR RUN2 ALICE Offline Week, 25 June 2014 C. Zampolli.
Gianluca Lamanna TDAQ WG meeting. CHOD crossing point two slabs The CHOD offline time resolution can be obtained online exploiting hit position.
January 2009 offline detector review - 2 nd go 1 ● Offline – Geometry – Material budget – Simulation – Raw data – OCDB parameters – Reconstruction ● Calibration.
Gianluigi, 10 Sep 2012 Paris, September 10 th 2012 Status of the Pattern Recognition Code Gianluigi Boca GSI & Pavia University 1.
Christoph Blume Offline Week, July, 2008
Tracking performances & b-tagging commissioning
Developments of the PWG3 muon analysis code
ALICE analysis preservation
Preparation for CERN test beam
DCH missing turn analysis
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
AliRoot status and PDC’04
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
ALICE Offline Week, CERN
EMCal Offline Code Status: Introduction and tasks
HLT & Calibration.
ALICE Computing Upgrade Predrag Buncic
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Silicon Tracking with GENFIT
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Muon Trigger Software Status
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Agenda SICb Session Status of SICb software migration F.Ranjard
BES III Software: Short-term Plan ( )
Presentation transcript:

Progress with MUON reconstruction Outline: Reconstruction procedure in short CPU performances Impact of recent changes in framework 09 October 2007 ALICE-Offline week - Philippe Pillot

Local reconstruction Raw  Digits Digits  Clusters format conversion digit calibration (pedestals, gains) fill TreeD Digits  Clusters clustering prepare clustering pre-clustering (form clusters of digits) clustering (cluster fitting / splitting by using MLEM) fill TreeR

Muon tracking Clusters  Tracks muon track reconstruction (using Kalman filter) trigger track reconstruction muon / trigger tracks matching + trigger hit map compute trigger chamber efficiency (disconnectable) fill TreeT fill ESD (+ extrapolate to ITS vertex)

Simulations 1000 p-p events: 100 Pb-Pb events: platform: p-p bench Pythia minimum bias + upsilon in the spectrometer acceptance 100 Pb-Pb events: Pb-Pb bench standard Hijing generator impact parameter range: [8.6, 11.2] (semi-central) platform: MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz Intel core 2 duo

Local reconstruction (1) AliReconstruction::Run(): ··························· 266.69 / 300.97 CPU seconds 1000 p-p 100 Pb-Pb Raw  Digits:················································· 51.68 / 15.80 s format conversion:······································ 19.98 / 4.23 s digit calibration create calibrator: ····································· 8.11 / 8.10 s once per run! calibrate: ················································· 5.39 / 1.24 s fill TreeD: ····················································· 4.86 / 1.17 s others (loaders…): ···································· 13.35 / 1.06 s  Improvements: Small optimizations… under way reduce the time to create calibrator dispatch the creation of the status map among events

Local reconstruction (2) AliReconstruction::Run(): ··························· 266.69 / 300.97 CPU seconds 1000 p-p 100 Pb-Pb Digits  Clusters: ······································ 165.48 / 271.68 s clustering: prepare clustering ·································· 16.17 / 4.40 s pre-clustering ········································ 43.04 / 25.68 s clustering ·············································· 65.32 / 236.94 s fill TreeR: ······················································ 1.44 / 0.69 s others (loaders…): ···································· 39.51 / 3.97 s  Improvements: Separation pre-clustering / clustering… done Pre-clustering: optimized in the past year (pre-clustering+clustering time / 3 in p-p) still some options to test… Clustering: try to optimize the algorithm… big task!! use simple fit with Mathieson function in p-p ??… To be tested Perform combined clustering / tracking… starting soon

Muon tracking 1000 p-p 100 Pb-Pb AliReconstruction::Run(): ··························· 266.69 / 300.97 CPU seconds 1000 p-p 100 Pb-Pb Clusters  Tracks: ······································· 23.54 / 9.20 muon track reconstruction: ························· 5.48 / 5.28 trigger track reconstruction: ······················· 0.00 / 0.01 tracks matching + trigger hit map: ············ 3.76 / 2.30 trigger chamber efficiency: ························ 1.66 / 0.65 fill ESD: ························································· 0.19 / 0.01 others (loaders): ·········································· 12.45 / 0.95  Improvements: Optimized in the past year… done Muon track rec. time / 2 in p-p & / 16 in Pb-Pb With the option MakeTrackCandidatesFast: rec. time / 50 in Pb-Pb

Impact of recent changes in framework MUONTracks (TreeT) no longer saved on disk: lost track parameters at each chamber lost informations about clusters attached to the track How will we recover important informations? extrapolation from track parameters at first chamber stored in the ESD add an array of clusters’ ID into the ESD (~ 10 UInt_t in average) need modifications in the definition of clusters… done need modifications in the implementation of the tracking…

Summary Improvements in the recontruction time are mainly foreseen around the clustering (combined clustering / tracking) Note: we also optimized the size on disk (digits / 3 & clusters / 4) Need to add an array of clusters’ ID into the ESD to recover the informations lost with the suppression of the TreeT