T2 Jet Reconstruction Studies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ON THE HIGH ORDER MULTIPLICITY MOMENTS K. Fiałkowski, R. Wit Jagellonian University.
Advertisements

Lauri A. Wendland: Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle flow algorithm at CMS, cHarged08, Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle.
Charged Particle Jet measurements with the ALICE Experiment in pp collisions at the LHC Sidharth Kumar Prasad Wayne State University, USA for the ALICE.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Simulation of Z->jets in CMS Outline –Introduction –Technique –Results –Conclusion.
DØ Run II jet algorithms E. Busato (LPNHE, Paris) TeV4LHC Workshop 12/1/2004 Outline:  Introduction  The Ideal Jet Algorithm  DØ Run II Cone Jet Algorithm.
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Jet finding Algorithms at Tevatron B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction The Ideal Jet Algorithm Cone Jet Algorithms:
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
My work PAST WORKS: 1) (Madrid) Data Analysis in L3, LEP: - Measurement of the Mass, Width and Cross Section of the W boson production at LEP, Study.
Alán Dávila for the STAR Collaboration WWND February, 8, 2011.
1 Introduction to Dijet Resonance Search Exercise John Paul Chou, Eva Halkiadakis, Robert Harris, Kalanand Mishra and Jason St. John CMS Data Analysis.
Top-partner mass reconstruction by using jets Michihisa Takeuchi ( KEK,YITP ) In collaboration with Mihoko M. Nojiri (KEK), Naotoshi Okamura (KEK)
Summary of PHOS Internal Notes (part I) Rafael Diaz Valdes 10/25/20151.
Studies of the jet fragmentation in p+p collisions in STAR Elena Bruna Yale University STAR Collaboration meeting, June
W + /W - and l + /l - A Means to investigate PDFs T. Schörner-Sadenius, G. Steinbrück Hamburg University HERA-LHC Workshop, CERN, October 2004.
Tagging Hadronic Tops at High Pt Brock Tweedie Johns Hopkins University 16 Sept 08 D.E. Kaplan, K. Rehermann, M. Schwartz, B.T. arXiv: (to appear.
Optimization of parameters for jet finding algorithm for p+p collisions at E cm =200 GeV T. G. Dedovich & M.V. Tokarev JINR, Dubna  Motivations.
The D  Run II Cone jet algorithm: problems and suggested changes B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) Outline:  Introduction  Algorithm description  Present and.
PFA Template Concept Performance Mip Track and Interaction Point ID Cluster Pointing Algorithm Single Particle Tests of PFA Algorithms S. Magill ANL.
OPTIMAL JET FINDER Ernest Jankowski University of Alberta in collaboration with D. Grigoriev F. Tkachov.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 13/09/2012.
PFAs – A Critical Look Where Does (my) SiD PFA go Wrong? S. R. Magill ANL ALCPG 10/04/07.
Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.
A Comparison Between Different Jet Algorithms for top mass Reconstruction Chris Tevlin University of Manchester (Supervisor - Mike Seymour) Atlas UK top.
Itamar Roth, Ehud Duchovni Group meeting 19/01/15 1.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Soft QCD WG Meeting 29/04/2013.
24/08/2009 LOMONOSOV09, MSU, Moscow 1 Study of jet transverse structure with CMS experiment at 10 TeV Natalia Ilina (ITEP, Moscow) for the CMS collaboration.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Status of the TOTEM Experiment and Latest Results
David Berge – CAT Physics Meeting – 9 May Summary Hadronic Calibration Workshop 3 day workshop 14 to 16 March 2008 in Tucson, Arizona
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
1 Jets in PHENIX Jiangyong Jia, Columbia Univerisity How to measure jet properties using two particle correlation method (In PHENIX)? Discuss formula for.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Collaboration Meeting, Oct. 21st Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in.
Jet reconstruction with Deterministic Annealing Davide Perrino Dipartimento di Fisica – INFN di Bari Terzo Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di Alice – 13/11/2007.
QCD at the Tevatron M. Martínez IFAE-Barcelona Results from CDF & D0 Collaborations.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 23/07/2012.
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 2003 Fall Meeting of the Division of Nuclear Physics (2003/10/31) 1 KANETA, Masashi for the PHENIX Collaboration RIKEN-BNL Research.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Mirko Berretti - Giuseppe Latino (University of Siena & INFN-Pisa) Track and Jet reconstruction in T2 “Forward Physics at LHC with TOTEM” Penn State University.
20/05/09EMCal meeting The Seedless Infrared Safe Cone algorithm (SISCone) Swensy Jangal, M. Estienne.
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
(members of the group) Underlying CMS F.Ambroglini, D.Acosta, P.Bartalini, A.De Roeck, L.Fanò, R. Field, K.Kotov, E.Izaguirre, A.Vilela.
Jet Energy Scale and Calibration Framework
Jet Studies 1. Changes in seed finding for cone jets reconstruction
Bernard Andrieu (LPNHE,Paris)
Implications of First LHC Data: Underlying Event Measurements
Jet reconstruction in ALICE using the EMCal
Ángel Sierra, Pablo Fierro, Irais Bautista and Antonio Ortiz
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Decomposing p+p Events at √s = 200 GeV with STAR
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Igor Volobouev Texas Tech University
Inclusive Jet Cross Section Measurement at CDF
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Investigation on QCD group
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Jet Measurements with the EMCal of ALICE
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Inclusive Jet Production at the Tevatron
Rick Field - Florida/CDF
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

T2 Jet Reconstruction Studies Results for a possible Jet Algorithm SW Working Group Meeting (TOTEM Collaboration Meeting) CERN, 4/12/2007 Mirko Berretti - Giuseppe Latino

We want to study the possibility of developing a Jet algorithm by using only charged particles reconstructed with T2 To do this, we have to exchange the (usual) PT information with the particle density information in the h-f plane First step: the algorithm has been developed/tested by using Pythia DiJets Events where both partons are required to fall in T2 region (5.3 < h < 6.5). 2

include the neighbouring We have developed a cone algorithm with some improvement, based on MidPoint algorithm Build eta –phi grid Fill the cells with the number of particles inside them Construction of ordered list (in particle number) of seed avoiding to include the neighbouring cells of the major seeds multiplicity and shape cuts Final Jet List From the seeds start the search of stable cones (1st Jet list) 2nd Jet List Merging - Splitting Mid Point 3

Mid - Point For every pair of jets with distance < 2R , assign a new seed in the midpoint. This method could reduce “infrared sensitivity” of our algorithm due to missing p0s in the core of particle jet and “collinear sensitivity” due to the choice on grid size/position. Infrared sensitivity With Mid-Point we could merge two different jets when soft radiation is present between them Collinear sensitivity Algorithm start from central most populared cell and it will probably find 3 Jet or only 1 Jet (if the Jet are too close in the preclustering). Without Mid-Point, algorithm starts from the right-most cell and it will find only 2 Jets.With Mid Point it will find 3 jet o 1 jet 4

To use a reasonable grid size and search radius we have looked at the distribution of charged particles around the outgoing parton 5

We need some jet “quality” cuts Multiplicity (minimum number of particles forming a jet) >= 2 Shape # charged particles inside cone 0.4 Jet charged shape: # charged particles inside cone 0.7 > 0,5 6

Summary of current Jet Algorithm Parameters (to be optimized according to specific analysis needs) Cone search-radius 0.7 Grid Size 0.5 Percentage of particles shared between two jets for merging-splitting: 50 % of the less populated jet If the number of particles shared are less than half multiplicity of the less populated jets, the two jets are split otherwise are merged. Jet Charged Multiplicity cut : 2 Jet Shape request: > 50% of charged particles inside 0.4 cone 7

Cuts Effect Event Jet Number No Shape – No Multiplicity cuts No Jet Shape cut Jet Shape and Multiplicity cuts 8

Cuts Effect DJet Event Reconstruction No Shape – No Multiplicity cuts No Shape Multiplicity cut Shape and Multiplicity cuts 9

Benefits of Splitting and Merging Procedure Event Jet Number No Mid point No Split-Merging No Mid Point Split-Merging Mid Point and 10

Benefits of Splitting and Merging Procedure Event DJet Reconstruction No Mid point No Split-Merging No Mid Point Split-Merging Mid Point and 11

Benefits of Split and Merging Procedure Resolution in the reconstruction of leading Jet center No Mid Point No Split and Merging Only Split and Merging Mid Point and Split and Merging 12

Other features Find the best cell size Check the algorithm stability shifting the grid Angular resolution (all cuts activated) 13

DJets vs Single Diffractive events Selection of particles in the T2 Region Single Diffraction in T2 DJets Events in T2 14

DJets vs Single Diffractive events Selection of particles in the T2 Region Single Diffraction in T2 DJets Events in T2 Cell= 0.4 x 0.4 ; R =0.8 15

WORKING PLAN FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF SOME ALGORITHM FEATURES WITH IMPROVED MC STATISTICS START TO WORK ON THE SIMULATION OF TRAKS IN T2 DETECTOR OTHER ALGORITHM OPTIMIZATIONS WILL BE MADE DEPENDING ON THE RESULTS OF THE PARTICLES TRACKING. COMPARISON OF OUR ALGORITHM WITH A KT- LIKE JET-ALGORITM. Acknowledgment: Fabrizio Jan Hubert 16