Same geometry, but different size of the rim

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEM Chambers at BNL The detector from CERN, can be configured with up to 4 GEMs The detector for pad readout and drift studies, 2 GEM maximum.
Advertisements

INFN Trieste, October 2008 Summary of measurements on: CsI coated ThGEM triple CERN.
Standard GEM Charging Up Simulation: First test of the approach Matteo Alfonsi, Gabriele Croci, Serge Duarte Pinto, Leszek Ropelewski, Rob Veenhof, Marco.
1 First observations on CsI -coated ThGEM in Trieste presented by Gabriele Giacomini phone meeting 06/08/2008.
Micro MEsh GASeous Detectors (MicroMegas)
D. Peterson, “ILC Detector Work”, Cornell Group Meeting, 4-October ILC Detector Work This project is supported by the US National Science Foundation.
Tests of a 10cm by 10cm triple GEM detector
Gain measurements of Triple Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) detector with zigzag readout strips V. BHOPATKAR, E. ESPOSITO, E. HANSEN, J. TWIGGER M. HOHLMANN.
The work of GEM foil at CIAE
Chamber parameters that we can modify and that affect the rising time Number of ionisation clusters produced in the drift gap: Poisson Distribution Probability.
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO CERN, 23/04/ Contribution from Trieste UPDATE ON TRIESTE LAB. ACTIVITY The set-up to measure currents THGEM prototypes from ELTOS.
1 First observations on CsI -coated ThGEM in Trieste presented by Gabriele Giacomini phone meeting 06/08/2008.
TIDE TESTS AT GDD LAB M. Casiraghi and F. Vasi. New detector configuration Low pressure chamber anode.
CERN Rui de OliveiraTS-DEM Rui de Oliveira TS-DEM Large size detectors CERN TS-DEM-PMT Capabilities.
15/07/2010Rui De Oliveira1 Update on large size GEM manufacturing Rui de Oliveira.
Prototypes For Particle Detectors Employing Gas Electron Multiplier
Geant4 Simulation of Neutrons interaction with GEM-foil and gas Gabriele Croci, Matteo Alfonsi, Serge Duarte Pinto, Leszek Ropelewski, Marco Villa (CERN)
DEVELOPMENT OF A THGEM-BASED PHOTON DETECTOR FOR CHERENKOV IMAGING APPLICATIONS Silvia Dalla Torre INFN - Trieste On behalf of an Alessandria-CERN-Freiburg-Liberec-Prague-Torino-TriesteCollaboration.
5 th RD51 meeting (WG1) 25 May 2009 Atsuhiko Ochi ( Kobe University )
Lab tests of Thick GEMs (THGEM) Lab tests of Thick GEMs (THGEM) S. Dalla Torre, Elena Rocco, L. Ropelewski, F. Tessarotto May – August 2007.
GEM basic test and R&D plan Takuya Yamamoto ( Saga Univ. )
Taku Gunji Center for Nuclear Study The University of Tokyo
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO CERN, 20/03/ GDD Meeting - Contribution from Trieste FIRST LOOK AT THGEM IN TRIESTE LAB. The set-up to measure currents THGEM.
Large THGEMs, uniformity and gain largely based on the paper for MPGD13 and some recently obtained results S. Levorato THGEM meeting CERN 13 Nov
1 GEM R&D Activity in USTC Yi Zhou University of Science & Technology of China.
CERN, LIU-SPS ZS Review, 20/02/ Brief review on electron cloud simulations for the SPS electrostatic septum (ZS) G. Rumolo and G. Iadarola in LIU-SPS.
Gas Quality Checks Maria Luisa Porto Oriented by: Burkhard Schmidt 23/02/2009.
Standard GEM Charging Up Simulation Gabriele Croci, Matteo Alfonsi, Serge Duarte Pinto, Leszek Ropelewski, Rob Veenhof, Marco Villa (CERN), Elena Rocco.
Triple GEM Beam Test within PHENIX DC Upgrades Meeting 4/14/04 B. Azmoun PHENIX Brookhaven National Lab.
RD51 Group Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics 14 February, 2014
Construction and Characterization of a GEM G.Bencivenni, LNF-INFN The lesson is divided in two main parts: 1 - construction of a GEM detector (Marco Pistilli)
Report on very preliminary measurements of 10x10cm 2 Triple-GEM detectors with New Single Mask technique Overview Hole geometry Experimental setup Transparency.
Proton Test Beam Experimental Program Overall objective: Study response of modified monochrome DC Plasma Display Panels to low energy proton beam. Energy.
Recent progress in large THGEM production On behalf of Trieste group and Rui de Oliveira (CERN) S. Levorato RD51 mini week1.
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO GDD meeting, CERN, 01/10/2008 Trieste THGEM news New THGEM test in the COMPASS hall New THGEM test in the COMPASS hall Preparation.
Results on a Large Area triple-GEM Detector at LNF 5 th RD51 Collaboration Meeting Freiburg, 25 May 2010 D. Domenici - LNF.
Single GEM Measurement Matteo Alfonsi,Gabriele Croci and Bat-El Pinchasik June 25 th 2008 GDD Meeting 1.
Update on THGEM project for RICH application Elena Rocco University of Eastern Piedmont & INFN Torino On behalf of an Alessandria-CERN-Freiburg-Liberec-
Gas Electron Multiplier
GEM-MSTPC for direct measurements of astrophysical reaction rates H. Ishiyama 1, K. Yamaguchi 2, Y. Mizoi 3, Y.X. Watanabe 1, T. Hashimoto 4, M.H. Tanaka.
Systematic studies for microbulk detectors E. Ferrer Ribas, A. Giganon, Y. Giomataris, FJ Iguaz, T. Papaevangelou (Saclay) A. Gris, R. de Oliveira (CERN)
A High Eta Forward Muon Trigger & Tracking detector for CMS A High Eta Forward Muon Trigger & Tracking detector for CMS Archana Sharma For CMS High Eta.
R&D activities on a double phase pure Argon THGEM-TPC A. Badertscher, A. Curioni, L. Knecht, D. Lussi, A. Marchionni, G. Natterer, P. Otiougova, F. Resnati,
THGEM short results collection
Large THGEM sampling elements for DHCAL status report
Larger Pixels, New Insights
(On Behalf of CMS Muon Group)
Activity of CERN and LNF Groups on Large Area GEM Detectors
Dept. of Physics and Space Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology
IBF studies of triple and quadruple GEM for the ALICE TPC upgrade
Quality Control Chamber Production
Single GEM Measurement
Hybrid MPGD based photon detector, R&D update.
Updates on the Micromegas + GEM prototype
On behalf of the GEMs for CMS Collaboration
THGEM: Introduction to discussion on UV-detector parameters for RICH
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Part 2: Comparison of measurements and simulations for OBLA-500keV
Conceptual design of TOF and beam test results
THGEM report – january, 22nd 2009
Development of a THGEM-based photon detector for RICH applications
Development of Gas Electron Multiplier Detectors for Muon Tomography
First observations on CsI-coated ThGEM in Trieste - ADDENDUM -
MWPC’s, GEM’s or Micromegas for AD transfer and experimental lines
Development of a THGEM-based photon detector for RICH applications
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
(On Behalf of CMS Muon Group)
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
A DLC μRWELL with 2-D Readout
Presentation transcript:

Same geometry, but different size of the rim RUI: SAME WEIZMANN GEOMETRY WEIZMANN With rim PARAMETERS: Diameter = 0.3 mm Pitch= 0.7 mm Thickness = 0.4 mm Gas: Ar/CO2 – 70/30 Without rim RUI: WITHOUT POLISHING RUI:CHEMICALLY POLISHED THGEM: same geometry

Before and after the chemical polishing REMARKS: different aspects of the rim after the two different treatments! THGEM: same geometry

THGEM: Electro-chemical polished PARAMETERS: Diameter = 0.3 mm Pitch= 0.7 mm Thickness = 0.4 mm Rim = 0 mm Gas: Ar/CO2 – 70/30 GEOMETRICAL CONFIGURATION THGEM DRIFT ANODE Thickness 6.5 mm 5mm A picture taken by the microscope: it’s to remark the rim after the electro-chemical polishing. For a best quantification of the rim it’s convenient to cut and to observe the cross-section avoiding the optics effects present in the current picture. THGEM electro-chemical polished

Current measurement setup Back view of the picoamperometer Glass box – N2 is flushing input HV source Triaxial cable floating REMARKS: it’s not visible, but there’s an internal connection (“meter-connection”) in the black “HV input” activated by selection on the picoamperometer before starting the measurement Grounded to CERN ground

Current measurement (behaviour) ∆V= 1KV applied to the electrodes THGEM electro-chemical polished

Current measurement (total data) First 2 values ~ 2nA During the initial 30 seconds there are some fluctuations maybe due to the stabilization of the voltage on the instrument and/or some external causes which perturbed the measurement (very sensitive to the movements around the setup) THGEM electro-chemical polished

Induction scan & its energy resolution Working conditions: Edrift=2 KV/cm ∆V=1.475 KV THGEM electro-chemical polished

Drift scan & its energy resolution Working conditions: Einduction=3 KV/cm ∆V=1.475 KV THGEM electro-chemical polished

Strange behaviour for the energy resolution Working conditions: Einduction=3 KV/cm ∆V=1.475 KV THGEM electro-chemical polished

Scan voltage and rate capability Einduction=3.5 KV/cm; Edrift=1.5 KV/cm ∆V=1.475 KV Source collimated 1.Voltage Scan 2.Rate capability THGEM electro-chemical polished

THGEM electro-chemical polished Gain estimation ∆V=1.475 KV, G~1550 ∆V=1.45 KV, G~950 ∆V=1.425 KV, G~590 ∆V=1.4 KV, G~360 ∆V=1.375 KV, G~220 Einduction=3.5 KV/cm; Edrift=1.5 KV/cm Source collimated THGEM electro-chemical polished

THGEM electro-chemical polished Time measurement An example of the spectrum acquired pedestal Pulse test Some problems with the fit (black spikes) Possible explanation: variation of the temperature THGEM electro-chemical polished

THGEM: kapton multilayers & chromium (103Å thick) NO ELECRICAL CONNECTION  NO CHARACTERIZATION PARAMETERS: Diameter = 0.5 mm Pitch= 0.8 mm Thickness = 0.6 mm Rim = 0 mm Gas: Ar/CO2 – 70/30 Zoom THGEM: kapton substrate chromium layer

THGEM: kapton multilayers & copper (5 μm thick) PARAMETERS: Diameter = 0.5 mm Pitch= 0.8 mm Thickness = 0.6 mm Rim = 0 mm Gas: Ar/CO2 – 70/30 GEOMETRICAL CONFIGURATION THGEM DRIFT ANODE Thickness 6.5 mm 5mm THGEM: kapton substrate 5μm Cu

THGEM: kapton substrate 5μm Cu Current measurement Jumps due to the changing of the range ∆V= 1KV applied to the electrodes THGEM: kapton substrate 5μm Cu

Comparison of 2 spectrum with different source collimation Einduction=3.5 KV/cm; Edrift~1.5 KV/cm ∆V=1.71 KV THGEM: kapton substrate 5μm Cu

THGEM: fibre glass with asymmetric rims side A side B PARAMETERS: Diameter = 0.3 mm Pitch= 0.7 mm Thickness = 0.4 mm RimsideA = 0.1 mm RimsideB = 0.03 mm Gas: Ar/CO2 – 70/30 GEOMETRICAL CONFIGURATION Some garbage THGEM DRIFT ANODE Thickness 6.5 mm 5mm THGEM asymmetric rims

Current measured Voltage on Voltage off and cables disconnected from the instrument Voltage off Voltage off THGEM asymmetric rims

The charging-up movie: reading from the bottom electrode Einduction=4 KV/cm; Edrift~1 KV/cm; ∆V=1.18 KV; Collimated X-Ray source (~ 1 mm of diameter); The smallest rim (30μm) is on the top of the THGEM Local effect next step THGEM submitted to the cleaning procedure done by Rui THGEM asymmetric rims

THGEM: fibre glass without rim PARAMETERS: Diameter = 0.3 mm Pitch= 0.7 mm Thickness = 0.4 mm Rim = 0 mm Gas: Ar/CO2 – 70/30 GEOMETRICAL CONFIGURATION THGEM DRIFT ANODE Thickness 6.5 mm 5mm THGEM without rim

Gain estimation of this THGEM for ∆V=1.35KV is ~300 Rate capability Averaging the current plateau and plotting vs the X-Ray current Gain estimation of this THGEM for ∆V=1.35KV is ~300 THGEM without rim

Induction scan, its energy resolution & comparison with the behaviour of THGEM electro-chem. pol. Edrift~1.5 KV/cm ∆V=1.35 KV Rate= 1.6 KHz Collimated source Gas flux: 5l/h Working conditions Same working conditions except for the gas flow into the chamber of the THGEM electro-chem. polished was higher (8l/h) and the drift field value THGEM without rim

Drift scan, its energy resolution & comparison with the behaviour of THGEM electro-chem. pol. Einduction~3 KV/cm ∆V=1.35 KV Rate= 1.7 KHz Collimated source Gas flux: 5l/h Working conditions Same working conditions except for the gas flow into the chamber of the THGEM electro-chem. polished was higher (8l/h) THGEM without rim

Consistence between pulse height spectra and current measurement always from the anode THGEM without rim

Position scan before and after time stability measurement An example of the spectrum Collimated source 0.2 KHz Same working conditions: Einduction~3.5 KV/cm Edrift~1.5 KV/cm ∆VSTD=1.35 KV ∆VELECTRO=1.45 KV Rate= 0.84 KHz Collimated source THGEM without rim