SERENATE Geographical issues

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Operational Programme I – Cohesion Policy Event part-financed by the European Union European Regional Development Fund Evaluation Plan for Maltas.
Advertisements

Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
Slide 1 ASPIRE STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP Brussels Thursday 13 September Michael Nowlan Consultant THE.
TERENA General Assembly meeting, Poznań 9-10 June 2005 Workshop on FP7 Brussels, 11 April Theme: “Research Networking: Where do we go next?”. Attendees:
South Africa’s S&T partnership with the European Union From FP4 to Horizon 2020 Daan du Toit Senior S&T Representative to the EU.
N.Vakalis, MEP, ITRE “Greek experiences in using Structural funds for regional development” Conference "Research and Innovation - an Opportunity for Convergence.
SERENATE findings on geographic issues SERENATE findings on geographic issues Marko Bonač ARNES
FEAST The TERENA Compendium of NRENs & Data Collection from African NRENs & NRENs in Construction Ubuntunet Connect 2008 Lilongwe, Malawi Tuesday 11 November.
22 Feb 2007EU-Russia Co-operation1 Dr. Stephan Pascall Advisor to the Director Directorate G: Components and Systems DG Information Society and Media European.
An Approach to Case Analysis
Raising EU R&D Intensity Evidences from the Report for the European Commission by an Independent Research Group Ana Paiva Inês Costa Science and Technology.
Adam Tyson, European Commission DG HE, Dublin, 22 April 2013
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism Research within Priority.
A litigious incumbent and a cautious regulator and other reasons why R&E networking is expensive in some countries Marko Bonač ARNES, Slovenia
SERENATE Marko Bonač ARNES, Slovenia
VET/HRD research and development initiatives in ROMANIA Magdalena BALICA, Liliana VOICU ECER, University College Dublin 07 –10 September 2005.
Innovation Development in Europe Dr. Miroslav Janecek R&D Council.
Key Barriers for the ICT Research Sector in Serbia, and Recommendations for Future EU- Serbia Collaboration Miodrag Ivkovic, ISS Milorad Bjeletic, BOS.
User views from outside of Western Europe MarkoBonac, Arnes, Slovenia.
Assessing the Capacity of Statistical Systems Development Data Group.
STRUCTURAL FUNDS MANAGEMENT IN GREECE: The experience of the Management Organisation Unit of the CSF Presented by: Dex. Agourides Director General M.O.U.
Valentino Cavalli TNC2005, Poznan, 6-9 June (GN2) NA4 Support for Research and Education Networking in Less Advanced Countries Valentino Cavalli.
Valentino Cavalli Workshop, Bad Nauheim, June Report of discussion breakout Group 3 Valentino Cavalli TERENA.
Dairying in Asia: Strategic opportunities, challenges and the response Vinod Ahuja Livestock Policy Officer Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN.
Center for Tele-Information Evolution of the Infrastructure Market SERENATE final workshop Bad Nauheim 15/16 June 2003 Knud Erik Skouby CTI/ DTU.
WP8 – Innovation Support Kelly Vavasi General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT) 1 st Innovation Dialogue Forum Becici, 8-9 November 2010.
1 GN2 Foresight Study: Economic Issues Developments in regulation in Europe Claire Milne tel: +44.
John DYER African Research & Education Networking 26 September 2005, Geneva. 1 Setting up an NREN European Experiences John DYER Chief Technical Officer.
SERENATE update. SERENATE basics  Strategic study into the evolution of research & education networking in Europe over the next 5-10 years. Looking into.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.
Progress of the SERENATE studies Karel Vietsch TERENA Secretary General SERENATE Project Manager GÉANT Policy Committee meeting Schiphol, 28 November 2002.
Workshop IVETTE institutional Policy recommendations University of Barcelona Division V- Science Education November, 2000.
Valentino Cavalli SEEREN Inauguration, Thessaloniki, 09/01/ Digital Divide and Policy Issues for NRENs in South East Europe Valentino Cavalli TERENA.
What’s the idea? David Williams CERN, also President TERENA SERENATE Workshop.
The SERENATE project Strategic studies into the Future of Research and Education Networking in Europe Karel Vietsch TERENA Secretary General SERENATE Project.
The Digital Divide inside European Research and Education David Williams Second Round Table on Developing Country Access to Scientific Knowledge ICTP,
Sustainability model for NRENs Goal: establishing/upgrading the R&E network + international connectivity Supposed background: single NREN covering the.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
G É ANT2 Development Support Activity and the Republic of Moldova 1st RENAM User Conference Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 14-May-2007 Valentino Cavalli.
Sectoral Operational Programme “INCREASE OF ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS” October 2005 MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND TRADE.
Update on the TERENA Compendium, 2003 A talk about comparing apples with oranges in the NREN world TNC/CUC 2003, Session 7b4 Bert van Pinxteren, TERENA.
David Williams, CERN Reporting on SERENATE Final Workshop Bad Nauheim, 16 June 2003 For SCIC, concentrating on Digital Divide inside Europe Outcomes and.
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
SERENATE Study into European Research & Education Networking As Targeted by eEurope Karel Vietsch TERENA CEO Internet2 International Task Force meeting.
EU context (networks & initiatives) and expectations EU context (networks & initiatives) and expectations Michel Viaud and/or Ingrid Weiss EPIA, Brussels,
Investment into smart growth! How we can help!. “…the EU and its Member States should adopt a strategic and integrated approach to innovation whereby.
12. Identifying measures to remove barriers 20 min Chapter 6 Ivan Nygaard.
Making the future happen Some remarks from the perspective of the Reykjavik-Group Chair full report:
Sharing solutions for better regional policies European Union | European Regional Development Fund Erika Fulgenzi Policy Officer | Interreg Europe JS
Accelerating progress towards the Green Economy
INSPIRE and the role of Spatial Data Interest Communities (SDIC)
Strategy for research networking in Europe – conclusions and follow-up
ESPON project Identification of Spatially Relevant Aspects of the Information Society TPG TPG: Department of Social Geography and Regional Development,
INVESTING IN SYRIAN HUMANITARIAN ACTION (ISHA)
The GEANT Perspectives
INVESTING IN SYRIAN HUMANITARIAN ACTION (ISHA)
Innovation.bg 2007 The Bulgarian Innovation System in the EU
Module 8 : Implementing Port Reform
Davor Kozmus, MHEST Steering Platform Meeting 29. October 2009, Zagreb
Barriers and enabling tools for renewable heating and cooling
European Investment Bank Group
Macroeconomic Impact of Air Pollution Reduction
European Commission – DG CONNECT
RSPG 34th Plenary Meeting
EC Strategy, Globalization, and SMEs
Nada Al Dosary Edited By: Maysoon AlDuwais
Dairying in Asia: Strategic opportunities, challenges and the response
Chapter 10: Location effects, economic geography and regional policy
Incentives for electricity infrastructure – ERGEG view
Report on the funding situation of EAPN National Networks
Presentation transcript:

SERENATE Geographical issues Marko Bonac bonac@arnes.si

SERENATE - The objectives Strategic study into the evolution of research & education networking in Europe over the next 5 – 10 years. Looking into the technical, organizational and financial aspects, the market conditions and the regulatory environment. It will provide inputs to the policy-making of the EC, national governments and funding bodies, research institutions and research & education networks.

Part of the final study is: Report identifying issues related to the geographic coverage of European research and education networking

Description of report in the project proposal There is a strategic goal of providing “equal opportunities” for researchers from all European countries. The review will be made of the present status, including the availability and costs of both services and infrastructures, and an assessment provided of scenarios for improving the situation that are likely to be realistic. Recommendations may address the issue of appropriate cost-sharing models.

What has (will be) done The description of NRENs in EU Accession States (+Portugal and Greece) has been prepared for the “Report on the expected development of the regulatory situation in Europe relevant for the SERENATE project”. TERENA will send in a week or two the Compendium Questionnaire 2003 (deadline for completion 28 February 2003)

What is missing ? We are far away from providing “equal opportunities” for researchers from all countries in the European Research Area: Where are the problems ? How to close the gap ?

General view Lack of awareness of politicians and decision makers of the importance of Science and Technology for the general evolution of the economy and society. Relatively low R&D investment in Candidate countries in comparison to the EU average (0,6 % to 1,93 % GDP). What is the awareness of the importance of R&E networks ? Relatively high budgets of NRENs compared to the GDP of their countries.

Where are the most severe problems in the hierarchy Computer/laboratory equipment Local network Access network Metropolitan network National backbone International connectivity

What are the problems ? Lack of funds Shortage of appropriate infrastructure in the country High prices of the telecommunication infrastructure Not enough competition in this sector. Not enough demand. Regulatory problems. Shortage of managerial competence and skills Shortage of technical competence and skills

How large is the gap ? Comparing research networking elements in more and less developed European countries: International capacity: 1:1000 National links: 1:5000 The gap is bigger than ever before. BUT not for all candidate countries ! It is possible to close the gap!

How to continue with the report ? Suggestion: Complement the description of NRENs which has been prepared for the “Report on the expected development of the regulatory situation in Europe relevant for the SERENATE project”. Answer the TERENA Compendium Questionnaire Answer questions in an additional questionnaire (where are the problems, how to overcome them) We are here to find the right questions. The report should be written from these data (by a small group?)