P. Forck, P. Kowina, M. Schwickert, R. Singh

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Orbit Feedback NSLS-II stability workshop Visitor committee April 20, 2007.
Advertisements

Digital RF Stabilization System Based on MicroTCA Technology - Libera LLRF Robert Černe May 2010, RT10, Lisboa
Data Acquisition Risanuri Hidayat.
Author - Title (Footer)1 LINEAR LATTICE ERRORS AT THE ESRF: MODELING AND CORRECTION A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, T. Perron.
Beam position monitors LCABD Plenary meeting Bristol, 24th March 2009 A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, G. Boorman, S. Molloy, N. Joshi JAI at Royal Holloway.
Why prefer CMOS over CCD? CMOS detector is radiation resistant Fast switching cycle Low power dissipation Light weight with high device density Issues:
Low Emittance Program David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education CesrTA.
Impedance measurements at SLS E. Koukovini-Platia CERN, EPFL TIARA mid-term meeting, Madrid, 13 th June 2012 Many thanks to M. Dehler, N. Milas, A. Streun.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Stability Workshop April , 2007 NSLS-II Electrical Systems G. Ganetis NSLS-II Electrical Systems NSLS-II.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Characterization of Fast Orbit Feedback System Om Singh, APS, ANL NSLS-2 Beam Stability Workshop BNL, April 18-20, 2007.
DLS Digital Controller Tony Dobbing Head of Power Supplies Group.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Peter Spiller, DIRAC Kick-off meeting Peter Spiller Design Study Group DIRAC kick-off meeting SIS100.
Project Management Mark Palmer Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
NUCLOTRON CONTROL SYSTEM (NCS) V.Andreev, E.Frolov, A.Kirichenko, A.Kovalenko, B.Vasilishin, V.Volkov Laboratory of High Energies, JINR, Dubna.
The ATF Damping Ring BPM Upgrade Nathan Eddy, Eliana Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab for the ATF Damping Ring BPM Team.
Fast feedback, studies and possible collaborations Alessandro Drago INFN-LNF ILCDR07 Damping Rings R&D Meeting 5-7 March 2007.
EU Design Study Kickoff Meeting GSI U. Raich CERN AB/BDI Digital Signal Analysis for BPMs The Project –Measure beam trajectories and orbits in.
1 H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration Low Emittance Beam Generation in ATF H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration BPM electronics improvement emittance tuning.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
Software Defined Radio PhD Program on Electrical Engineering Sampling Theory and Quantization José Vieira.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
U. Raich CERN Accelerator School on Digital Signal Processing Sigtuna Digital Signal processing in Beam Diagnostics Lecture 1 Ulrich Raich CERN.
Electron beams in order to sense nm-size mechanical vibrations? CERN: Marek Gasior: BBQ electronics (Andrea Boccardi: VME electronics) Juergen Pfingstner:
Tools in CTF3 Simona Bettoni for the CTF3 operation team.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
Beam Instrumentation of CEPC Yue Junhui (岳军会) for the BI Group Accelerator Center, IHEP HF2014.
Status of the single-bunch feedback system for the SPS/LHC M. Pivi C. Rivetta, J. Cesaratto, J. Fox, O. Turgut, S. Uemuda, W. Hofle, U. Wehrle, K. Li,
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
Rahul Singh Betatron Tune Measurements 1 Beam Physics for FAIR Workshop May, 2012 Odenwald, Germany R. Singh 1,2, O. Chorniy 1, P. Forck 1, P. Kowina.
Beam Diagnostics for the FAIR Proton LINAC RFQ Workshop at GSI
Microprocessors Data Converters Analog to Digital Converters (ADC)
A monitoring system for the beam-based feedbacks in the LHC
Glen White, SLAC Jan th ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK
Beam diagnostics from GSI
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Status of the ASTRID2 facility
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source
Vertical emittance measurement and modeling Correction methods
Beam based measurements
Space charge studies at the SPS
The ELENA BPM System. Status and Plans.
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Results of the LHC Prototype Chromaticity Measurement
Linear and Nonlinear Lattice Correction Via Betatron Phase
M. Mehler1), H. Klingbeil1), B. Zipfel2)
SC Overview 2013 White & Rouge The Codes in Comparison The Noise Issue
Tune measurements at SIS-18
Latency measurements on the ALBA Electron units
Limits on damping times
Chapter 6 Discrete-Time System
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Optics Measurements in the PSB
Undulator Cavity BPM System Status
Simulation of Multiturn Injection into SIS-18
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Feedbacks & Stabilization Getting them going
SKAMP Square Kilometre Array Molonglo Prototype
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

Closed Orbit Feedback and Tune Measurement: Status of realization at SIS18 P. Forck, P. Kowina, M. Schwickert, R. Singh for the GSI Beam Diagnostics Group and DELTA (TU-Dortmund) 5th FAIR Machine Advisory Committee Meeting May 9th/10th 2011

Overview Outline Status of Closed Orbit Feedback for SIS18 performed in collaboration with DELTA (TU-Dortmund) & COSY (FZ-Jülich) Status of Tune Measurement System at SIS18 The BPM signals are digitized by the I-Tech LIBERA Digitalization Units SIS18 serves as a test installation for FAIR: Validation the general design consideration Preparation of final realization for FAIR Gain of operational experiences 09.05.2011

Digital BPM Readout: Digitalization and Evaluation System Description: Digitalization of BPM signals at LIBERA with 14 bit and 125 MS/s ADC Individual bunch position evaluation with FPGA (presently Virtex-II Pro) Monitoring: data transfer to PC for either further down conversion for CO or bunch by bunch evaluation e.g. tune Planned Closed Orbit Feedback (COFB): Digital Down Conversion on LIBERA, Real-time transfer to concentrator via Diamond Com. Controller (DCC) Advantage: Single bunch position for flexible further processing For FAIR: Comparable successor system Scalable software realized at SIS18 Integration & Δ/ delivers bunch position I-Tech LIBERA Hadron 09.05.2011

Closed Orbit Feedback at SIS18: Hardware for BPM Data System Description COFB: Position data reduction on LIBERA 10 kHz input to ‘BPM Extender’ Input of time-dependent (triplett  duplett) Orbit Response Matrix from Control System SVD Algorithm for correction calculation Digital output to corrector power converter with  1kHz (to be tested) Beam DCC over SFP Corrector Hardware: Design & test by TU-Dortmund 09.05.2011

designed by GSI EET Group Closed Orbit Feedback at SIS18: Hardware for Power Converter Multi Function Unit designed by GSI EET Group System Description PS control: Multi Function Unit (MFU) as standard for all PS at FAIR (10 kHz digital bandwidth, 32 bit DAC) Input from BPM-Extender via USB  Quasi real-time communication for corrector value, bandwidth > 1 kHz Installation of MFU-control for SIS18 correctors required (foreseen end 2011) First tests for communication performed SIS18: 12 BPMs and 12 hor. & vert. correctors SIS100: 84 BPMs and 84 hor. & vert. correctors 09.05.2011

Closed Orbit Feedback at SIS18: Status General: System design according to Synchrotron Light Source standards Implementation at DELTA (TU-Dortmund): summer 2011 Readout of 54 BPMs and control of 20 hor. & vert. correctors Reaction bandwidth: 0.3 to 1 kHz (projected) About 1 year delay due to severe illness of PhD student at TU-Dortmund ! Implementation at SIS18: Foreseen in 2012 12 BPMs and 12 hor.& vert. correctors, projected reaction bandwidth 1 kHz Ongoing: Input of time-dependent Orbit Response Matrix via Control System Ongoing: Digital interface to power converter controller MFU Design for SIS100: 84 BPMs will be installed and 84 correctors  data treatment can be scaled Constant lattice  time-independent Orbit Response Matrix Hierarchical scheme for CO stabilization: 1. Magnetic field control by reference dipole  correction of e.g. hysteresis 2. Feed-forward using position data for creation of new set-values  correction of reproducible errors 3. Real-time feedback  residual, non-reproducible errors on 10 ms time scale 09.05.2011

Tune Determination at SIS18: Hardware The beam is excited to betatron oscillation → the beam position is measured each revolution (’turn-by-turn’) → Fourier Transformation gives the non-integer tune q. Advantage of digital processing: Digital bunch identification for turn-by-turn evaluation Varying revolution frequency: Matched ‘filter’ due to individual bunch integration  Precise determination of bunch position required for low excitation 09.05.2011

Maximum Position Variation Tune Determination at SIS18: Online Display of Results Tune versus time horizontal vertical Working Diagram Tune at fixed time Maximum Position Variation Qy  0.02 Qx  0.015 2 mm 5 mm Online display for tune measurement: Time resolution for plot: 4096 turns  20 – 4.5 ms Features: Minor emittance growth but good signal-to-noise Online display Ready for users DAQ in FESA GUI according FAIR spec. Ongoing: Improvement of algorithm Tune variation due to triplett  duplett lattice Beam parameter: Ar18+ acc. 11  300 MeV/u within 0.7 s 09.05.2011

Tune Determination at SIS18: Exploration of Working Range Condition for ‘Working Range’: Sufficient signal strength & minor emittance growth Orbit and tune for 3.5 W exciter power (50mW/Hz) Turns x 1000 Vertical Beam parameter: 6·109 Ar18+, 11  300 MeV/u within 0.4 s, Measurement parameter: Vertical excitation only, 516 turn FFT 09.05.2011

Tune Determination at SIS18: Exploration of Working Range Condition for ‘Working Range’: Sufficient signal strength & minor emittance growth Result: Measurement without significant emitance growth Transverse profile by an Ionization Profile Monitor Beam parameter: 6·109 Ar18+, 11  300 MeV/u within 0.4 s, Measurement parameter: Vertical excitation only, 516 turn FFT 09.05.2011

Conclusion Tune measurement system for SIS18: ‘Oversampling’ of bunches with 125 MSa/s > 20 · frf One position value per bunch by integration  cuf-off low-frequency noise Calculation of FFT  flexible time resolution e.g. 512 turns  1 ms Resolution Δq << 0.01 i.e. better than specified (spectrum broadening by tune spread contribution, to be investigated) Working range determined, no significant transverse emittance growth or beam loss Tests of ‘BBQ’ analog system: at SIS18 low-frequency noise is an issue Tune measurement: Demonstrated for SIS18, system design suited for SIS100 Tune feedback: Detailed consideration not started (CO stabilization as precaution) Possible solutions: Hardware comparable to COFB or ‘PLL tune tracking’ Closed Orbit Feedback: Anticipated bandwidth: 1 kHz Electronics realization comparable to Synchrotron Light Sources Collaboration with TU-Dortmund  demonstration expected late 2011 FAIR: Comparable systems will be installed. 09.05.2011