Keeping LHC cold during LS periods Preliminary proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of Cryogenics at point 4 following the power cut L. Tavian 20 August 2011.
Advertisements

Cryogenic system in P4: Possible options S. Claudet & U. Wagner LHC Workshop, “Chamonix XlV” January 2005 (Mostly for RF & beam scrubbing)
Going towards LHC Run2 CRYOGENICS 5 th Evian Workshop 2-4 June 2014 SESSION 4 - Systems 2 - Status and commissioning plans (HW perspective) Krzysztof Brodzinski.
Improved anchoring of SSS with vacuum barrier to avoid displacement Ofelia Capatina (speaker), Katy Foraz (coordinates all the activities), Antonio Foreste,
L. Tavian, TE/CRG, Page 2 12 th September 2013 Accelerator Consolidation Workshop L. Tavian, TE-CRG.
1 Powering Tests and Safety Electrical Safety Hugues Thiesen Power Converter Group.
LHC HARDWARE COMMISSIONING REVIEW May 2005 CRYOGENIC VACUUM SYSTEM Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC.
A. Perin, CERN, TE-CRG, 26 May Review of the cryogenic by-pass for the LHC DS collimators 26 May 2011 Modifications to the DFBs, DSLC and cryogenic.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, A. HERTY, A. MARIN, M. ACAR PERMANENT MONITORING OF THE LHC LOW BETA TRIPLETS: LATEST RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES.
QRL Leak Tests the story so far………. Paul Cruikshank on behalf of TE-VSC colleagues & AL4030 Consortium (S133) 1 Paul Cruikshank TE/VSC - QRL Leak Tests.
Laurent Tavian Thanks to contribution and helpful discussions with M. Jimenez, V. Parma, F. Bertinelli, J.Ph. Tock, R. van weelderen, S. Claudet, A. Perin,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
SC - 04Feb'13Cryo Heaters Review Cryogenic Heaters Review Operation use and wishes S. Claudet - A. Suraci LHC Cryogenic Operation.
LHC HARDWARE COMMISSIONING SAFETY TRAINING DAY S. Claudet (AT-ACR-OP) With great help from G. Lindell (Safety commission) CRYOGENICS.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
CV activities on LHC complex during the long shutdown Serge Deleval Thanks to M. Nonis, Y. Body, G. Peon, S. Moccia, M. Obrecht Chamonix 2011.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
HC review - 12 May 2005Luigi SERIO - AT/ACR/OP1 SECTOR COOL DOWN AND CRYOGENIC COMMISSIONING L. Serio.
A. Siemko and N. Catalan Lasheras Insulation vacuum and beam vacuum overpressure release – V. Parma Bus bar joints stability and protection – A. Verweij.
Workshop Chamonix XIV Shortcuts during installation and commissioning: risk and benefit H. Gruehagen, G. Riddone on behalf of the AT/ACR group 18 January.
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
Cryogenics in SPS & LHC (2 K / 4.5 K) LHC-CC11, 14 November 2011 L. Tavian, CERN, TE-CRG With the contribution of N. Delruelle, G. Ferlin & B. Vullierme.
7/23/ J.Coupard. 1) Cryogenic risks 2) Cryogenic phases from RT/floating to nominal and additional safety rules A. Sectors warmed-up to RT or considered.
For more info:
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Long shutdown 1 LHC Machine Status Report K. Foraz June 12 th, 2013.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
Luigi Serio CRYOGENICS PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION L. Serio, on behalf of the LHC Cryogenics Operation and Cryogenics Performance Panel.
Cryogenics for crab cavities – SPS/LHC 2 nd HiLumi LHC meeting – Frascati (Italy) 15 November 2012 K. Brodzinski and L. Tavian on behalf of cryogenic team.
[R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In Charge of LHC] HWC Workshop ( ) Consolidation and major changes that have impact on the powering circuits.
SM18 cryogenics infrastructure upgrade L. Serio TE-CRG.
Review of Sector th of February Tunnel Access During Powering Tests Hugues Thiesen, AB-PO.
Can we change a magnet without warming-up a full arc ? Serge Claudet, With help from P. Cruikshank & J-P. Tock (Chamonix Jan’10)
TE-CRG Activities D. Delikaris, TE-CRG.
Duy Phan, EN-STI-RBS. Description of the hazards  An Oxygen Deficiency Hazard (ODH) exists when the concentration of O2 ≤ 19.5 % (by volume)  Cold burns.
5-year operation experience with the 1.8 K refrigeration units of the LHC cryogenic system G. Ferlin, CERN Technology department Presented at CEC 2015.
LHC schedule status K. Foraz EN-MEF 12/04/2013LSC - K. Foraz1.
LHC Cryogenics, equipment & interventions around P3/P7 S. Claudet, “volunteer” for TE_CRG 16 Oct’14.
Workshop on cryogenic & vacuum sectorisation of the SPL Vacuum Sectorisation Paul Cruikshank, CERN Technology Department (TE) Vacuum Surfaces & Coatings.
28 th January LHC Performance Workshop Session 8: (E)YETS and Long Shutdown 2 Strategy and Preparation. HL-LHC.
L. Tavian, TE/CRG, LSC Page 2 February 21 th, 2014 LS1 Committee (LSC) L. Tavian TE-CRG.
H. Hayano(KEK), B. Petersen(DESY), T. Peterson(FNAL),
TE-CRG Activities A. Perin, on behalf on the Cryogenics Group.
LHC Performance Workshop LS1 Session Cryogenic system: strategy to achieve nominal performance and reliable operation J. Bremer, K. Brodzinski, J. Casas,
CONSOLIDATION day in view of HL-LHC Cryogenic aspects
PSB Lock Out Test, Follow-Up AP. Bernardes-/EN-STI, K
BA6 – crab cavity activities in EYETS
HEL – Safety aspects Christelle Gaignant
AD consolidation activities in LS2
Update of cryogenic activities
LHC Performance Workshop (Chamonix 2016)
The LHC - Status Is COLD Is almost fully commissioned
CRYOGENICS – strategy, unavailability root causes and limitations
Update on HW commissioning
Preparation of the activities for the LHC Long Shutdown 2
LHC-TS3 Coordination meeting #3
Coordination of Hardware Commissioning
Consequences of warming-up a sector above 80 K
Hollow e- lens, Cryogenic aspects
Activities of the ME section during LS2 ( )
Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC
Overview & baseline of LS2 and roadmap for CRG
Agenda Contents Different types of documents
Cryogenic cavern in Asian site
Mathew C. Wright January 26, 2009
Typical NC in Warm Modules Following X-ray campaign
Guidelines defined early Dec 2012
Summary post TCC#54_02Aug’18
Other arguments to train two sectors to 7 TeV
HL-LHC New MS optimisation WP9, Preliminary cost estimates
Presentation transcript:

Keeping LHC cold during LS periods Preliminary proposal TE-CRG-OP_GF 2017/05/09 TE-CRG-OP_GF

Nominal configuration during LS agenda Definitions Nominal configuration during LS Adapted configuration to fit with request “Keep LHC cold during LS” Summaries table Conclusion 2017/05/09 TE-CRG-OP_GF

Cold sector conditions means: Definitions Cold sector conditions means: At least one Cryoplant running, 80 K level Pressure in Vertical transfer line, QUI and QRL up to 18 bars. Temperature of circulating helium 80 < T < 90 [K] Temperature of cold mass 85 < T < 100 [K] for ARC excepted extremities Q7 Temperature of LSS + extremities Q7 : 90 < T < 105 [K] Temperature of DFB : Natural warmup Maximum temperature of sectors components during switch of cryoplants or major issue From Q7+1 Left to Q7+1 Right; 120 K within 7 to 10 days Q7 & standalone magnet 120 K within less than 3 days 2017/05/09 TE-CRG-OP_GF

Nominal configuration during LS Cryoplants, lines, QUI, Sector are warmed up to 300 K then depressurized than consigned for LS duration (Cryo lock-out). Under this configuration, all interventions on sector (magnet exchange, diode repair…) are free (cryogenic temperature & pressure point of view). During this LS period, the mandatory major overhauling (each 5 years) of all warm compressors and associated motors is realized. For LHC cryoplants, the duration of unavailability for major overhauling purpose is from 10 to 12 months. 2017/05/09 TE-CRG-OP_GF

Adapted configuration to fit with request “Keep LHC cold during LS” for 2 adjacent sectors Requested configuration for one point (2 adjacent sectors!) At least one Cryoplant, lines, QUI, Sectors remains around 80 K level Pressure in Vertical transfer line, QUI and QRL could be up to 18 bars Under this configuration, all interventions on cold part of the 2 sectors are forbidden. The mandatory major overhauling of all warm compressors and associated motors must be shared in phases of 2*6 months during this LS period. Note: with this configuration, no maintenance of common Cryo parts such as Vertical transfer lines, QUI, QRL… is possible. From safety point of view, only minor interventions on tunnel, above cold QRL, cold magnet & DFB should be possible after risk assessment. Major handling or massive proximity intervention will not be possible in the vicinity of cold parts! All utilities such CV, EL, network, controls, Vac… must be operational 2017/05/09 TE-CRG-OP_GF

“Keep LHC cold during LS” for 2 adjacent sectors Circulating Helium, 80K, up to 18 bars Phase 2 ~ 6 months Phase 1 ~ 6 months 1.8K unit 1.8K unit 2017/05/09 TE-CRG-OP_GF

Requested configuration to fit with “Keep LHC cold during LS” for 1 sector and intervention on the adjacent sector Requested configuration for one point (1 sector!) At least one Cryoplant, lines, QUI, Sectors remains around 80 K level Pressure in Vertical transfer line, QUI and QRL could be up to 18 bars To intervene on the adjacent warm sector, a decoupling of adjacent sector must be foreseen but is not possible without hardware heavy modifications during a preceding LS. The mandatory major overhauling of all warm compressors and associated motors must be shared in phases of 2*6 months during this LS period. Note: with this configuration, no maintenance of common Cryo parts such as Vertical transfer lines, QUI, QRL… is possible. From safety point of view, only minor interventions on tunnel, above cold QRL, cold magnet & DFB should be possible after risk assessment. Major handling or massive proximity intervention will not be possible in the vicinity of cold parts! All utilities such CV, EL, network, controls, Vac… must be operational 2017/05/09 TE-CRG-OP_GF

“Keep LHC cold during LS” for 1 sector Phase 1 ~ 6 months Already proposed, Chamonix, not approved Controlled airlock air and moisture condensation/icing not controlled Helium, 80K, up to 18 bars Atmosphere One valve to be added, see Chamonix 2010

“Keep LHC cold during LS” for 1 single sector Phase 2 ~ 6 months Atmosphere Helium, 80K, up to 18 bars air and moisture condensation/icing not controlled Controlled airlock by adding valves

OK, nominal configuration Nominal status (300K) 2 adjacent sectors remains cold 1 sector remain cold Option OK, nominal configuration Possible with no job foreseen on sectors Not possible with the present configuration Related risk na No major handling/intervention in the vicinity of the cold parts of the 2 sectors Cryo-lockout not possible Air/moisture trap on cold part of QUI Risk mitigation No access in the 2 adjacent sectors Heavy intervention in QUI to create airlock (sas) on the concerned sector. Creating airlock (sas) must be done during LS to allow this option during the following LS. Cryo maintenance Ok Refrigeration maintenance must be shared in 2*6 months No maintenance for common items Never presented, must be carefully studied 2017/05/09 TE-CRG-OP_GF

Conclusions “Keep LHC cold during LS” is not trivial. In all case the Cryo maintenance will be negatively impacted with possible effect on availability. In the hypothesis of keeping 2 adjacent sectors cold and according to the present risk assessment, major intervention on magnets will be forbidden. In the hypothesis of keeping cold one sector during LSx , QUI must be modified during the previous LS(x-1) by adding 5 valves per sector. The associated cost should be around 300 kCHF/sector (cost to be confirmed). CRG recommendation is to warmup all sectors during LS in order to allow all interventions in tunnel, caverns and to allow a complete maintenance of cryo equipment's, a guarantee of better availability over the long term. 2017/05/09 TE-CRG-OP_GF